Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy
In this study, we analyze a case of governance in natural resource management. Building on the limited body of literature on termination and using methods of problem orientation and social process mapping, we examine a stakeholder engagement process designed to address conflicts in grizzly bear mana...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Policy sciences 2012-09, Vol.45 (3), p.265-291 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 291 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 265 |
| container_title | Policy sciences |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Richie, Lauren Oppenheimer, J. Daniel Clark, Susan G. |
| description | In this study, we analyze a case of governance in natural resource management. Building on the limited body of literature on termination and using methods of problem orientation and social process mapping, we examine a stakeholder engagement process designed to address conflicts in grizzly bear management in Banff National Park, Alberta. Terminated in 2009 after several years of collaboration, this stakeholder engagement process explicitly used the policy sciences framework to cultivate dialogue, improve participants' decision-making skills, and make consensus-based recommendations for grizzly bear management. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of undertaking social process mapping and problem orientation in order to understand a natural resource policy problem. We include recommendations to foster a social process that allows for clarification and advancement of the common interest in stakeholder groups, insights into how social process can contribute to policy termination, and reflections on the practical, collaborative use of the policy sciences to solve problems of governance. This analysis complements other articles on this case that examine stakeholder perspectives, initial outcomes, and decision process, collectively providing a thorough policy analysis. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11077-012-9160-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036878091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41683148</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41683148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ba9ec428040830c95b23a3f46dda84fc87a6b934cbb883534671abf9282b0ffe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LwzAchoMoOKd_gAch4MVL9ZePNak3GX7BwIN6LkmWls4umUk7WP96MyoigqdAeN43bx6EzglcEwBxEwkBITIgNCtIDtlwgCZkJlgGsiCHaALAaEZzKY7RSYwrAMgFFRP08epNo1q8Cd7YGHHjcB2aYWh3WFsV8Fo5Vdu1dd0tbhPgXcSVD9j4tlXaB9U1W4trv7XBKWcsVm6Jner6kEqDjb4P6XLj28bsTtFRpdpoz77PKXp_uH-bP2WLl8fn-d0iMxx4l2lVWMOpBA6SgSlmmjLFKp4vl0ryykihcl0wbrSWks0YzwVRuiqopBqqyrIpuhp706c-exu7ct1EY9NgZ30fSwIsiZBQkIRe_kFXabFL6_YUCCqFoIkiI2WCjzHYqtyEZq3CLkHlXn856i-T_nKvvxxSho6ZmFhX2_C7-f_QxRhaxc6Hn1c4ySUjXLIvhYqThA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030728772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Richie, Lauren ; Oppenheimer, J. Daniel ; Clark, Susan G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richie, Lauren ; Oppenheimer, J. Daniel ; Clark, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we analyze a case of governance in natural resource management. Building on the limited body of literature on termination and using methods of problem orientation and social process mapping, we examine a stakeholder engagement process designed to address conflicts in grizzly bear management in Banff National Park, Alberta. Terminated in 2009 after several years of collaboration, this stakeholder engagement process explicitly used the policy sciences framework to cultivate dialogue, improve participants' decision-making skills, and make consensus-based recommendations for grizzly bear management. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of undertaking social process mapping and problem orientation in order to understand a natural resource policy problem. We include recommendations to foster a social process that allows for clarification and advancement of the common interest in stakeholder groups, insights into how social process can contribute to policy termination, and reflections on the practical, collaborative use of the policy sciences to solve problems of governance. This analysis complements other articles on this case that examine stakeholder perspectives, initial outcomes, and decision process, collectively providing a thorough policy analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-2687</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11077-012-9160-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSCBZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: Springer</publisher><subject>Alberta ; Analysis ; Banff National Park ; Bears ; Canada ; Collaboration ; Conservation policy ; Decision making ; Economic Policy ; Environmental policy ; Governance ; Grizzly bear ; Grizzly bears ; National parks ; Natural resource management ; Natural resources ; Natural resources conservation ; Policy analysis ; Policy studies ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Problem solving ; Prototypes ; Public Administration ; Public policy ; Recommendations ; Resource management ; Stakeholder ; Studies ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; Wildlife policy</subject><ispartof>Policy sciences, 2012-09, Vol.45 (3), p.265-291</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ba9ec428040830c95b23a3f46dda84fc87a6b934cbb883534671abf9282b0ffe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ba9ec428040830c95b23a3f46dda84fc87a6b934cbb883534671abf9282b0ffe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41683148$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41683148$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,12845,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richie, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, J. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><title>Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy</title><title>Policy sciences</title><addtitle>Policy Sci</addtitle><description>In this study, we analyze a case of governance in natural resource management. Building on the limited body of literature on termination and using methods of problem orientation and social process mapping, we examine a stakeholder engagement process designed to address conflicts in grizzly bear management in Banff National Park, Alberta. Terminated in 2009 after several years of collaboration, this stakeholder engagement process explicitly used the policy sciences framework to cultivate dialogue, improve participants' decision-making skills, and make consensus-based recommendations for grizzly bear management. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of undertaking social process mapping and problem orientation in order to understand a natural resource policy problem. We include recommendations to foster a social process that allows for clarification and advancement of the common interest in stakeholder groups, insights into how social process can contribute to policy termination, and reflections on the practical, collaborative use of the policy sciences to solve problems of governance. This analysis complements other articles on this case that examine stakeholder perspectives, initial outcomes, and decision process, collectively providing a thorough policy analysis.</description><subject>Alberta</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Banff National Park</subject><subject>Bears</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Conservation policy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic Policy</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Grizzly bear</subject><subject>Grizzly bears</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Natural resource management</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Natural resources conservation</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy studies</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Prototypes</subject><subject>Public Administration</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife policy</subject><issn>0032-2687</issn><issn>1573-0891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LwzAchoMoOKd_gAch4MVL9ZePNak3GX7BwIN6LkmWls4umUk7WP96MyoigqdAeN43bx6EzglcEwBxEwkBITIgNCtIDtlwgCZkJlgGsiCHaALAaEZzKY7RSYwrAMgFFRP08epNo1q8Cd7YGHHjcB2aYWh3WFsV8Fo5Vdu1dd0tbhPgXcSVD9j4tlXaB9U1W4trv7XBKWcsVm6Jner6kEqDjb4P6XLj28bsTtFRpdpoz77PKXp_uH-bP2WLl8fn-d0iMxx4l2lVWMOpBA6SgSlmmjLFKp4vl0ryykihcl0wbrSWks0YzwVRuiqopBqqyrIpuhp706c-exu7ct1EY9NgZ30fSwIsiZBQkIRe_kFXabFL6_YUCCqFoIkiI2WCjzHYqtyEZq3CLkHlXn856i-T_nKvvxxSho6ZmFhX2_C7-f_QxRhaxc6Hn1c4ySUjXLIvhYqThA</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Richie, Lauren</creator><creator>Oppenheimer, J. Daniel</creator><creator>Clark, Susan G.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy</title><author>Richie, Lauren ; Oppenheimer, J. Daniel ; Clark, Susan G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-ba9ec428040830c95b23a3f46dda84fc87a6b934cbb883534671abf9282b0ffe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alberta</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Banff National Park</topic><topic>Bears</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Conservation policy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic Policy</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Grizzly bear</topic><topic>Grizzly bears</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Natural resource management</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Natural resources conservation</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy studies</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Prototypes</topic><topic>Public Administration</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richie, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oppenheimer, J. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Susan G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Policy sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richie, Lauren</au><au>Oppenheimer, J. Daniel</au><au>Clark, Susan G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy</atitle><jtitle>Policy sciences</jtitle><stitle>Policy Sci</stitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>265-291</pages><issn>0032-2687</issn><eissn>1573-0891</eissn><coden>PLSCBZ</coden><abstract>In this study, we analyze a case of governance in natural resource management. Building on the limited body of literature on termination and using methods of problem orientation and social process mapping, we examine a stakeholder engagement process designed to address conflicts in grizzly bear management in Banff National Park, Alberta. Terminated in 2009 after several years of collaboration, this stakeholder engagement process explicitly used the policy sciences framework to cultivate dialogue, improve participants' decision-making skills, and make consensus-based recommendations for grizzly bear management. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of undertaking social process mapping and problem orientation in order to understand a natural resource policy problem. We include recommendations to foster a social process that allows for clarification and advancement of the common interest in stakeholder groups, insights into how social process can contribute to policy termination, and reflections on the practical, collaborative use of the policy sciences to solve problems of governance. This analysis complements other articles on this case that examine stakeholder perspectives, initial outcomes, and decision process, collectively providing a thorough policy analysis.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11077-012-9160-z</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-2687 |
| ispartof | Policy sciences, 2012-09, Vol.45 (3), p.265-291 |
| issn | 0032-2687 1573-0891 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036878091 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Alberta Analysis Banff National Park Bears Canada Collaboration Conservation policy Decision making Economic Policy Environmental policy Governance Grizzly bear Grizzly bears National parks Natural resource management Natural resources Natural resources conservation Policy analysis Policy studies Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Problem solving Prototypes Public Administration Public policy Recommendations Resource management Stakeholder Studies Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife management Wildlife policy |
| title | Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A07%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20process%20in%20grizzly%20bear%20management:%20lessons%20for%20collaborative%20governance%20and%20natural%20resource%20policy&rft.jtitle=Policy%20sciences&rft.au=Richie,%20Lauren&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=265-291&rft.issn=0032-2687&rft.eissn=1573-0891&rft.coden=PLSCBZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11077-012-9160-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41683148%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030728772&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41683148&rfr_iscdi=true |