Sacred magnificence: civic intervention and the arca of San Domenico in Bologna

In 1469, the commission of an ambitious new addition to the arca of San Domenico passed from its traditional custodians, the Dominicans, to the civic government, making it a focus of Bolognese civic munificence. While the earlier thirteenth-century sarcophagus by Nicola Pisano and assistants has rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renaissance studies 1999-12, Vol.13 (4), p.412-429
1. Verfasser: Klebanoff, Randi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 429
container_issue 4
container_start_page 412
container_title Renaissance studies
container_volume 13
creator Klebanoff, Randi
description In 1469, the commission of an ambitious new addition to the arca of San Domenico passed from its traditional custodians, the Dominicans, to the civic government, making it a focus of Bolognese civic munificence. While the earlier thirteenth-century sarcophagus by Nicola Pisano and assistants has received considerable scholarly attention, the complex and remarkably inventive fifteenth-century monument by Niccolò dell'Arca is still little-known, despite contributions by the young Michelangelo. Incorporating the earlier sarcophagus as a sign of sacred self-referentiality, the fifteenth-century arca outgrew its original intentions as it outgrew its original dimensions; it was transformed from a funerary and commemorative reliquary/tomb into an honorific civic monument. The tomb of San Domenico had exceptional diplomatic and strategic value that exceeded local boundaries. Its embellishment and 'marking' as a civic focus legitimized and promoted the city as it sought to assert its sacred significance and political autonomy. In this study, formal analysis, archival research, and contextual explorations are employed to situate the arca as a nexus of the dynamic self-imaging of Renaissance Bologna. It contributes to the rich discussions of the mechanisms of art and architectural patronage as cultural statecraft, discussions traditionally defined by the models of Renaissance Florence, Siena, Venice, and Rome. By re-evaluating an artistic project of unique significance, this study also suggests alternative visions to the still predominantly Tuscan orientation of artistic development, and expands understanding of the interweaving of civic, religious, and cultural patronage in fifteenth-century Bolognese history.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1477-4658.00314
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036569416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24412717</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24412717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c193t-68e96a8e11cdd191faeafc12de3fabaf0e4bc09b1d9c11b18312f577dda7cf693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnT0LAi5dtM5vsR7xp_YRCD9Xzks1OaspuUpNtwX_v1ooH5zIwPO_L8BByCWwCw0xBFEUi8qycMMZBHJHR3-WYjFiaywRS4KfkLMY1YywTkI3IYql0wIZ2auWssRqdxluq7c5qal2PYYeut95R5RrafyBVQSvqDV0qRx98h85qP5D03rd-5dQ5OTGqjXjxu8fk_enxbfaSzBfPr7O7eaJB8j7JS5S5KhFANw1IMAqV0ZA2yI2qlWEoas1kDY3UADWUHFKTFUXTqEKbXPIxuTn0boL_3GLsq85GjW2rHPptrIDxPMulgHxAr_-ha78NbviugiJjJRdyoMdkeqB08DEGNNUm2E6Fr6Gq2guu9jqrvc7qR_CQuDok1rH34Q9PhYC0gIJ_A_AQdqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750834910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sacred magnificence: civic intervention and the arca of San Domenico in Bologna</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Klebanoff, Randi</creator><creatorcontrib>Klebanoff, Randi</creatorcontrib><description>In 1469, the commission of an ambitious new addition to the arca of San Domenico passed from its traditional custodians, the Dominicans, to the civic government, making it a focus of Bolognese civic munificence. While the earlier thirteenth-century sarcophagus by Nicola Pisano and assistants has received considerable scholarly attention, the complex and remarkably inventive fifteenth-century monument by Niccolò dell'Arca is still little-known, despite contributions by the young Michelangelo. Incorporating the earlier sarcophagus as a sign of sacred self-referentiality, the fifteenth-century arca outgrew its original intentions as it outgrew its original dimensions; it was transformed from a funerary and commemorative reliquary/tomb into an honorific civic monument. The tomb of San Domenico had exceptional diplomatic and strategic value that exceeded local boundaries. Its embellishment and 'marking' as a civic focus legitimized and promoted the city as it sought to assert its sacred significance and political autonomy. In this study, formal analysis, archival research, and contextual explorations are employed to situate the arca as a nexus of the dynamic self-imaging of Renaissance Bologna. It contributes to the rich discussions of the mechanisms of art and architectural patronage as cultural statecraft, discussions traditionally defined by the models of Renaissance Florence, Siena, Venice, and Rome. By re-evaluating an artistic project of unique significance, this study also suggests alternative visions to the still predominantly Tuscan orientation of artistic development, and expands understanding of the interweaving of civic, religious, and cultural patronage in fifteenth-century Bolognese history.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-1213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1477-4658.00314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</publisher><subject>Churches ; Cities ; Civics ; Dominican Order ; Holy relics ; Iconography ; Popes ; Renaissance art ; Sarcophagi</subject><ispartof>Renaissance studies, 1999-12, Vol.13 (4), p.412-429</ispartof><rights>1999 The Society for Resissance Studies and Oxford University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24412717$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24412717$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27867,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klebanoff, Randi</creatorcontrib><title>Sacred magnificence: civic intervention and the arca of San Domenico in Bologna</title><title>Renaissance studies</title><description>In 1469, the commission of an ambitious new addition to the arca of San Domenico passed from its traditional custodians, the Dominicans, to the civic government, making it a focus of Bolognese civic munificence. While the earlier thirteenth-century sarcophagus by Nicola Pisano and assistants has received considerable scholarly attention, the complex and remarkably inventive fifteenth-century monument by Niccolò dell'Arca is still little-known, despite contributions by the young Michelangelo. Incorporating the earlier sarcophagus as a sign of sacred self-referentiality, the fifteenth-century arca outgrew its original intentions as it outgrew its original dimensions; it was transformed from a funerary and commemorative reliquary/tomb into an honorific civic monument. The tomb of San Domenico had exceptional diplomatic and strategic value that exceeded local boundaries. Its embellishment and 'marking' as a civic focus legitimized and promoted the city as it sought to assert its sacred significance and political autonomy. In this study, formal analysis, archival research, and contextual explorations are employed to situate the arca as a nexus of the dynamic self-imaging of Renaissance Bologna. It contributes to the rich discussions of the mechanisms of art and architectural patronage as cultural statecraft, discussions traditionally defined by the models of Renaissance Florence, Siena, Venice, and Rome. By re-evaluating an artistic project of unique significance, this study also suggests alternative visions to the still predominantly Tuscan orientation of artistic development, and expands understanding of the interweaving of civic, religious, and cultural patronage in fifteenth-century Bolognese history.</description><subject>Churches</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Civics</subject><subject>Dominican Order</subject><subject>Holy relics</subject><subject>Iconography</subject><subject>Popes</subject><subject>Renaissance art</subject><subject>Sarcophagi</subject><issn>0269-1213</issn><issn>1477-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnT0LAi5dtM5vsR7xp_YRCD9Xzks1OaspuUpNtwX_v1ooH5zIwPO_L8BByCWwCw0xBFEUi8qycMMZBHJHR3-WYjFiaywRS4KfkLMY1YywTkI3IYql0wIZ2auWssRqdxluq7c5qal2PYYeut95R5RrafyBVQSvqDV0qRx98h85qP5D03rd-5dQ5OTGqjXjxu8fk_enxbfaSzBfPr7O7eaJB8j7JS5S5KhFANw1IMAqV0ZA2yI2qlWEoas1kDY3UADWUHFKTFUXTqEKbXPIxuTn0boL_3GLsq85GjW2rHPptrIDxPMulgHxAr_-ha78NbviugiJjJRdyoMdkeqB08DEGNNUm2E6Fr6Gq2guu9jqrvc7qR_CQuDok1rH34Q9PhYC0gIJ_A_AQdqY</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Klebanoff, Randi</creator><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Sacred magnificence: civic intervention and the arca of San Domenico in Bologna</title><author>Klebanoff, Randi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c193t-68e96a8e11cdd191faeafc12de3fabaf0e4bc09b1d9c11b18312f577dda7cf693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Churches</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Civics</topic><topic>Dominican Order</topic><topic>Holy relics</topic><topic>Iconography</topic><topic>Popes</topic><topic>Renaissance art</topic><topic>Sarcophagi</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klebanoff, Randi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Renaissance studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klebanoff, Randi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sacred magnificence: civic intervention and the arca of San Domenico in Bologna</atitle><jtitle>Renaissance studies</jtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>412</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>412-429</pages><issn>0269-1213</issn><eissn>1477-4658</eissn><abstract>In 1469, the commission of an ambitious new addition to the arca of San Domenico passed from its traditional custodians, the Dominicans, to the civic government, making it a focus of Bolognese civic munificence. While the earlier thirteenth-century sarcophagus by Nicola Pisano and assistants has received considerable scholarly attention, the complex and remarkably inventive fifteenth-century monument by Niccolò dell'Arca is still little-known, despite contributions by the young Michelangelo. Incorporating the earlier sarcophagus as a sign of sacred self-referentiality, the fifteenth-century arca outgrew its original intentions as it outgrew its original dimensions; it was transformed from a funerary and commemorative reliquary/tomb into an honorific civic monument. The tomb of San Domenico had exceptional diplomatic and strategic value that exceeded local boundaries. Its embellishment and 'marking' as a civic focus legitimized and promoted the city as it sought to assert its sacred significance and political autonomy. In this study, formal analysis, archival research, and contextual explorations are employed to situate the arca as a nexus of the dynamic self-imaging of Renaissance Bologna. It contributes to the rich discussions of the mechanisms of art and architectural patronage as cultural statecraft, discussions traditionally defined by the models of Renaissance Florence, Siena, Venice, and Rome. By re-evaluating an artistic project of unique significance, this study also suggests alternative visions to the still predominantly Tuscan orientation of artistic development, and expands understanding of the interweaving of civic, religious, and cultural patronage in fifteenth-century Bolognese history.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</pub><doi>10.1111/1477-4658.00314</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-1213
ispartof Renaissance studies, 1999-12, Vol.13 (4), p.412-429
issn 0269-1213
1477-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036569416
source Periodicals Index Online; Wiley Online Library Journals; JSTOR
subjects Churches
Cities
Civics
Dominican Order
Holy relics
Iconography
Popes
Renaissance art
Sarcophagi
title Sacred magnificence: civic intervention and the arca of San Domenico in Bologna
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T15%3A22%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sacred%20magnificence:%20civic%20intervention%20and%20the%20arca%20of%20San%20Domenico%20in%20Bologna&rft.jtitle=Renaissance%20studies&rft.au=Klebanoff,%20Randi&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=412&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=412-429&rft.issn=0269-1213&rft.eissn=1477-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1477-4658.00314&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24412717%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750834910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24412717&rfr_iscdi=true