From Narmouthis (Medinet Madi) to Kellis (Ismant El-Kharab): Manichaean Documents from Roman Egypt
In 1968, Peter Brown read at the Society's Annual General Meeting a paper entitled ‘The Diffusion of Manichaeism in the Roman Empire’. Delivered at a time when little research was being carried out by British scholars either on Manichaeism or on the cultural and religious relationship between t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of Roman studies 1996-11, Vol.86, p.146-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | The Journal of Roman studies |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Gardner, I. M. F. Lieu, S. N. C. |
description | In 1968, Peter Brown read at the Society's Annual General Meeting a paper entitled ‘The Diffusion of Manichaeism in the Roman Empire’. Delivered at a time when little research was being carried out by British scholars either on Manichaeism or on the cultural and religious relationship between the Roman and the Sassanian Empires, it was for many a complete revelation. With consummate skill and vast erudition Brown placed the history of the diffusion of the sect against a background of vigorous and dynamic interchange between the Roman and the Persian Empires. He also mounted a successful challenge on a number of popularly held views on the history of the religion in the Roman Empire. Manichaeism was not to be seen as part of the mirage orientale which fascinated the intellectuals of the High Empire. It was not an Iranian religion which appealed through its foreigness or quaintness. Rather, it was a highly organized and aggressively missionary religion founded by a prophet from South Babylonia who styled himself an ‘Apostle of Jesus Christ’. Brown reminded the audience that ‘the history of Manichaeism is to a large extent a history of the Syriac-speaking belt, that stretched along the Fertile Crescent without interruption from Antioch to Ctesiphon’. Its manner of diffusion bore little or no resemblance to that of Mithraism. It did not rely on a particular profession, as Mithraism did on the army, for its spread throughout the Empire. Instead it developed in the common Syriac culture astride the Romano-Persian frontier which was becoming increasingly Christianized consequent to the regular deportation of whole communities from cities of the Roman East like Antioch to Mesopotamia and adjacent Iran. Manichaeism which originally flourished in this Semitic milieu was not in the strict sense an Iranian religion in the way that Zoroastrianism was at the root of the culture and religion of pre-Islamic Iran. The Judaeo-Christian roots of the religion enabled it to be proclaimed as a new and decisive Christian revelation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/300427 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036492760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_300427</cupid><jstor_id>300427</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>300427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2200-44736d49bb45c4a69035196d83faa7ed9a2bb8d9e419a5f475e9b34117721d433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtv1DAQRi0EEkspv8ESCLUPAV_jmDcou6XatlzE7c2aOE7X2yRebEei_75ZbdVCpT7Nwxyd-eZD6AUlbxgn6i0nRDD1CM2okryQrPr9GM0IUbIQXFZP0bOU1oRQUUo5Q_Uihh6fQ-zDmFc-4YMz1_jBZXwGjT_EOeCl67rt4iT1MGQ874rlCiLUh-8mZvB2BQ4G_DHYsXdDTrjdGr-FCcbzi6tNfo6etNAlt38z99CPxfz70afi9PPxydH708IyRkghhOJlI3RdC2kFlJpwSXXZVLwFUK7RwOq6arQTVINshZJO11xQqhSjjeB8Dx3svJsY_owuZdP7ZKfwMLgwJkMJL4VmqiQT-vIeug5jHKZ0hipNpRaKboWvd5SNIaXoWrOJvod4NanMtmqzq3oCX93oIFno2giD9emWZpXSuirvrq5TDvFhWbGjfMru7y0F8dKUiitpyuOvhp3_-rn8sKDmy93bFvo6-ubC_fPM_-prvu6gcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791594713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Narmouthis (Medinet Madi) to Kellis (Ismant El-Kharab): Manichaean Documents from Roman Egypt</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gardner, I. M. F. ; Lieu, S. N. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gardner, I. M. F. ; Lieu, S. N. C.</creatorcontrib><description>In 1968, Peter Brown read at the Society's Annual General Meeting a paper entitled ‘The Diffusion of Manichaeism in the Roman Empire’. Delivered at a time when little research was being carried out by British scholars either on Manichaeism or on the cultural and religious relationship between the Roman and the Sassanian Empires, it was for many a complete revelation. With consummate skill and vast erudition Brown placed the history of the diffusion of the sect against a background of vigorous and dynamic interchange between the Roman and the Persian Empires. He also mounted a successful challenge on a number of popularly held views on the history of the religion in the Roman Empire. Manichaeism was not to be seen as part of the mirage orientale which fascinated the intellectuals of the High Empire. It was not an Iranian religion which appealed through its foreigness or quaintness. Rather, it was a highly organized and aggressively missionary religion founded by a prophet from South Babylonia who styled himself an ‘Apostle of Jesus Christ’. Brown reminded the audience that ‘the history of Manichaeism is to a large extent a history of the Syriac-speaking belt, that stretched along the Fertile Crescent without interruption from Antioch to Ctesiphon’. Its manner of diffusion bore little or no resemblance to that of Mithraism. It did not rely on a particular profession, as Mithraism did on the army, for its spread throughout the Empire. Instead it developed in the common Syriac culture astride the Romano-Persian frontier which was becoming increasingly Christianized consequent to the regular deportation of whole communities from cities of the Roman East like Antioch to Mesopotamia and adjacent Iran. Manichaeism which originally flourished in this Semitic milieu was not in the strict sense an Iranian religion in the way that Zoroastrianism was at the root of the culture and religion of pre-Islamic Iran. The Judaeo-Christian roots of the religion enabled it to be proclaimed as a new and decisive Christian revelation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0075-4358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-528X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/300427</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ancient civilizations of the near east ; Art and archaeology ; Baptists ; Buddhism ; Christianity ; Egypt ; Facsimiles ; Gnostic Christianity ; Manichaeism ; Papyrus ; Psalms ; Roman and Byzantine Egypt ; Zoroastrianism</subject><ispartof>The Journal of Roman studies, 1996-11, Vol.86, p.146-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright © I. M. F. Gardner and S. N. C. Lieu 1996. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies</rights><rights>Copyright 1996 The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2200-44736d49bb45c4a69035196d83faa7ed9a2bb8d9e419a5f475e9b34117721d433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/300427$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0075435800057476/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,55628,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2879986$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gardner, I. M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieu, S. N. C.</creatorcontrib><title>From Narmouthis (Medinet Madi) to Kellis (Ismant El-Kharab): Manichaean Documents from Roman Egypt</title><title>The Journal of Roman studies</title><addtitle>J. Rom. Stud</addtitle><description>In 1968, Peter Brown read at the Society's Annual General Meeting a paper entitled ‘The Diffusion of Manichaeism in the Roman Empire’. Delivered at a time when little research was being carried out by British scholars either on Manichaeism or on the cultural and religious relationship between the Roman and the Sassanian Empires, it was for many a complete revelation. With consummate skill and vast erudition Brown placed the history of the diffusion of the sect against a background of vigorous and dynamic interchange between the Roman and the Persian Empires. He also mounted a successful challenge on a number of popularly held views on the history of the religion in the Roman Empire. Manichaeism was not to be seen as part of the mirage orientale which fascinated the intellectuals of the High Empire. It was not an Iranian religion which appealed through its foreigness or quaintness. Rather, it was a highly organized and aggressively missionary religion founded by a prophet from South Babylonia who styled himself an ‘Apostle of Jesus Christ’. Brown reminded the audience that ‘the history of Manichaeism is to a large extent a history of the Syriac-speaking belt, that stretched along the Fertile Crescent without interruption from Antioch to Ctesiphon’. Its manner of diffusion bore little or no resemblance to that of Mithraism. It did not rely on a particular profession, as Mithraism did on the army, for its spread throughout the Empire. Instead it developed in the common Syriac culture astride the Romano-Persian frontier which was becoming increasingly Christianized consequent to the regular deportation of whole communities from cities of the Roman East like Antioch to Mesopotamia and adjacent Iran. Manichaeism which originally flourished in this Semitic milieu was not in the strict sense an Iranian religion in the way that Zoroastrianism was at the root of the culture and religion of pre-Islamic Iran. The Judaeo-Christian roots of the religion enabled it to be proclaimed as a new and decisive Christian revelation.</description><subject>Ancient civilizations of the near east</subject><subject>Art and archaeology</subject><subject>Baptists</subject><subject>Buddhism</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Egypt</subject><subject>Facsimiles</subject><subject>Gnostic Christianity</subject><subject>Manichaeism</subject><subject>Papyrus</subject><subject>Psalms</subject><subject>Roman and Byzantine Egypt</subject><subject>Zoroastrianism</subject><issn>0075-4358</issn><issn>1753-528X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtv1DAQRi0EEkspv8ESCLUPAV_jmDcou6XatlzE7c2aOE7X2yRebEei_75ZbdVCpT7Nwxyd-eZD6AUlbxgn6i0nRDD1CM2okryQrPr9GM0IUbIQXFZP0bOU1oRQUUo5Q_Uihh6fQ-zDmFc-4YMz1_jBZXwGjT_EOeCl67rt4iT1MGQ874rlCiLUh-8mZvB2BQ4G_DHYsXdDTrjdGr-FCcbzi6tNfo6etNAlt38z99CPxfz70afi9PPxydH708IyRkghhOJlI3RdC2kFlJpwSXXZVLwFUK7RwOq6arQTVINshZJO11xQqhSjjeB8Dx3svJsY_owuZdP7ZKfwMLgwJkMJL4VmqiQT-vIeug5jHKZ0hipNpRaKboWvd5SNIaXoWrOJvod4NanMtmqzq3oCX93oIFno2giD9emWZpXSuirvrq5TDvFhWbGjfMru7y0F8dKUiitpyuOvhp3_-rn8sKDmy93bFvo6-ubC_fPM_-prvu6gcA</recordid><startdate>199611</startdate><enddate>199611</enddate><creator>Gardner, I. M. F.</creator><creator>Lieu, S. N. C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>FBAQO</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199611</creationdate><title>From Narmouthis (Medinet Madi) to Kellis (Ismant El-Kharab): Manichaean Documents from Roman Egypt</title><author>Gardner, I. M. F. ; Lieu, S. N. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2200-44736d49bb45c4a69035196d83faa7ed9a2bb8d9e419a5f475e9b34117721d433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Ancient civilizations of the near east</topic><topic>Art and archaeology</topic><topic>Baptists</topic><topic>Buddhism</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Egypt</topic><topic>Facsimiles</topic><topic>Gnostic Christianity</topic><topic>Manichaeism</topic><topic>Papyrus</topic><topic>Psalms</topic><topic>Roman and Byzantine Egypt</topic><topic>Zoroastrianism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gardner, I. M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieu, S. N. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 02</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The Journal of Roman studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gardner, I. M. F.</au><au>Lieu, S. N. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Narmouthis (Medinet Madi) to Kellis (Ismant El-Kharab): Manichaean Documents from Roman Egypt</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of Roman studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. Rom. Stud</addtitle><date>1996-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>146</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>146-169</pages><issn>0075-4358</issn><eissn>1753-528X</eissn><abstract>In 1968, Peter Brown read at the Society's Annual General Meeting a paper entitled ‘The Diffusion of Manichaeism in the Roman Empire’. Delivered at a time when little research was being carried out by British scholars either on Manichaeism or on the cultural and religious relationship between the Roman and the Sassanian Empires, it was for many a complete revelation. With consummate skill and vast erudition Brown placed the history of the diffusion of the sect against a background of vigorous and dynamic interchange between the Roman and the Persian Empires. He also mounted a successful challenge on a number of popularly held views on the history of the religion in the Roman Empire. Manichaeism was not to be seen as part of the mirage orientale which fascinated the intellectuals of the High Empire. It was not an Iranian religion which appealed through its foreigness or quaintness. Rather, it was a highly organized and aggressively missionary religion founded by a prophet from South Babylonia who styled himself an ‘Apostle of Jesus Christ’. Brown reminded the audience that ‘the history of Manichaeism is to a large extent a history of the Syriac-speaking belt, that stretched along the Fertile Crescent without interruption from Antioch to Ctesiphon’. Its manner of diffusion bore little or no resemblance to that of Mithraism. It did not rely on a particular profession, as Mithraism did on the army, for its spread throughout the Empire. Instead it developed in the common Syriac culture astride the Romano-Persian frontier which was becoming increasingly Christianized consequent to the regular deportation of whole communities from cities of the Roman East like Antioch to Mesopotamia and adjacent Iran. Manichaeism which originally flourished in this Semitic milieu was not in the strict sense an Iranian religion in the way that Zoroastrianism was at the root of the culture and religion of pre-Islamic Iran. The Judaeo-Christian roots of the religion enabled it to be proclaimed as a new and decisive Christian revelation.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/300427</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0075-4358 |
ispartof | The Journal of Roman studies, 1996-11, Vol.86, p.146-169 |
issn | 0075-4358 1753-528X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036492760 |
source | Cambridge Journals; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Ancient civilizations of the near east Art and archaeology Baptists Buddhism Christianity Egypt Facsimiles Gnostic Christianity Manichaeism Papyrus Psalms Roman and Byzantine Egypt Zoroastrianism |
title | From Narmouthis (Medinet Madi) to Kellis (Ismant El-Kharab): Manichaean Documents from Roman Egypt |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Narmouthis%20(Medinet%20Madi)%20to%20Kellis%20(Ismant%20El-Kharab):%20Manichaean%20Documents%20from%20Roman%20Egypt&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20Roman%20studies&rft.au=Gardner,%20I.%20M.%20F.&rft.date=1996-11&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=146-169&rft.issn=0075-4358&rft.eissn=1753-528X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/300427&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E300427%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791594713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_2307_300427&rft_jstor_id=300427&rfr_iscdi=true |