Techno, Frankenstein and copyright
This essay argues that the widespread but not widely recognised adaptation of Frankenstein in contemporary dance music problematises the ‘technological’ constitution of modern copyright law as an instrument wielded by corporations to exert increasing control over cultural production. The argument fi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Popular music 2007-05, Vol.26 (2), p.259-280 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Popular music |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | McCUTCHEON, MARK A. |
description | This essay argues that the widespread but not widely recognised adaptation of Frankenstein in contemporary dance music problematises the ‘technological’ constitution of modern copyright law as an instrument wielded by corporations to exert increasing control over cultural production. The argument first surveys recent accounts of intellectual property law’s responses to sound recording technologies, then historicises the modern discourse of technology, which subtends such responses, as a fetish of industrial capitalism conditioned by Frankenstein. The increasing ubiquity of cinematic Frankenstein adaptations in the latter two decades of the twentieth century outlines the popular cultural milieu in which Detroit techno developed its futuristic aesthetic, and which provided subsequent dance music producers with samples that contributed to techno’s popularisation. These cultural and economic contexts intersect in an exemplary case study: the copyright infringement dispute in 1999 and 2000 between Detroit’s Underground Resistance (UR) techno label and the transnational majors Sony and BMG. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0261143007001225 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035903289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0261143007001225</cupid><jstor_id>4500317</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4500317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f231ea79ee575be88668d74a87fb67bea3d37939a28c0eec8f2b13b22fd13093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwA5AYqk4MBO7sOLZHVFFAQmKgzJHjXNqU1il2OvTfk6gVQiCmG9573zs9xi4RbhFQ3b0BzxBTAaAAkHN5xAaYqjQBMPKYDXo56fVTdhbjEgAkSj1g4xm5hW9uRtNg_Qf52FLtR9aXI9dsdqGeL9pzdlLZVaSLwx2y9-nDbPKUvLw-Pk_uXxInFLRJWnGBZJUhkkoWpHWW6VKlVquqyFRBVpRCGWEs1w6InK54gaLgvCpRgBFDdr3nbkLzuaXY5us6OlqtrKdmG3MEIQ0Irnvr-Jd12WyD777L0UjsWrjqTLg3udDEGKjKN6Fe27DrSHk_Wv5ntC5ztc8sY9uE70AqAQT2SHFA2nUR6nJOP4r_hX4BT3Z0vQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195179327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techno, Frankenstein and copyright</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</creatorcontrib><description>This essay argues that the widespread but not widely recognised adaptation of Frankenstein in contemporary dance music problematises the ‘technological’ constitution of modern copyright law as an instrument wielded by corporations to exert increasing control over cultural production. The argument first surveys recent accounts of intellectual property law’s responses to sound recording technologies, then historicises the modern discourse of technology, which subtends such responses, as a fetish of industrial capitalism conditioned by Frankenstein. The increasing ubiquity of cinematic Frankenstein adaptations in the latter two decades of the twentieth century outlines the popular cultural milieu in which Detroit techno developed its futuristic aesthetic, and which provided subsequent dance music producers with samples that contributed to techno’s popularisation. These cultural and economic contexts intersect in an exemplary case study: the copyright infringement dispute in 1999 and 2000 between Detroit’s Underground Resistance (UR) techno label and the transnational majors Sony and BMG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-1430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0261143007001225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Copyright ; Copyright laws ; Culture ; Dance music ; Intellectual property ; Mailing lists ; Music ; Music industry ; Musical rhythm ; Popular music ; Product labeling ; Techno ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Popular music, 2007-05, Vol.26 (2), p.259-280</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press, Publishing Division May 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f231ea79ee575be88668d74a87fb67bea3d37939a28c0eec8f2b13b22fd13093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4500317$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0261143007001225/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</creatorcontrib><title>Techno, Frankenstein and copyright</title><title>Popular music</title><addtitle>Pop. Mus</addtitle><description>This essay argues that the widespread but not widely recognised adaptation of Frankenstein in contemporary dance music problematises the ‘technological’ constitution of modern copyright law as an instrument wielded by corporations to exert increasing control over cultural production. The argument first surveys recent accounts of intellectual property law’s responses to sound recording technologies, then historicises the modern discourse of technology, which subtends such responses, as a fetish of industrial capitalism conditioned by Frankenstein. The increasing ubiquity of cinematic Frankenstein adaptations in the latter two decades of the twentieth century outlines the popular cultural milieu in which Detroit techno developed its futuristic aesthetic, and which provided subsequent dance music producers with samples that contributed to techno’s popularisation. These cultural and economic contexts intersect in an exemplary case study: the copyright infringement dispute in 1999 and 2000 between Detroit’s Underground Resistance (UR) techno label and the transnational majors Sony and BMG.</description><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Copyright laws</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Dance music</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Mailing lists</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music industry</subject><subject>Musical rhythm</subject><subject>Popular music</subject><subject>Product labeling</subject><subject>Techno</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0261-1430</issn><issn>1474-0095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>A3D</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DJMCT</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EEqXwA5AYqk4MBO7sOLZHVFFAQmKgzJHjXNqU1il2OvTfk6gVQiCmG9573zs9xi4RbhFQ3b0BzxBTAaAAkHN5xAaYqjQBMPKYDXo56fVTdhbjEgAkSj1g4xm5hW9uRtNg_Qf52FLtR9aXI9dsdqGeL9pzdlLZVaSLwx2y9-nDbPKUvLw-Pk_uXxInFLRJWnGBZJUhkkoWpHWW6VKlVquqyFRBVpRCGWEs1w6InK54gaLgvCpRgBFDdr3nbkLzuaXY5us6OlqtrKdmG3MEIQ0Irnvr-Jd12WyD777L0UjsWrjqTLg3udDEGKjKN6Fe27DrSHk_Wv5ntC5ztc8sY9uE70AqAQT2SHFA2nUR6nJOP4r_hX4BT3Z0vQ</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>A3D</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DJMCT</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PEJEM</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Techno, Frankenstein and copyright</title><author>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-4f231ea79ee575be88668d74a87fb67bea3d37939a28c0eec8f2b13b22fd13093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Copyright laws</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Dance music</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Mailing lists</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music industry</topic><topic>Musical rhythm</topic><topic>Popular music</topic><topic>Product labeling</topic><topic>Techno</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Music Periodicals Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Music & Performing Arts Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Visual Arts & Design</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><jtitle>Popular music</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCUTCHEON, MARK A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techno, Frankenstein and copyright</atitle><jtitle>Popular music</jtitle><addtitle>Pop. Mus</addtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>259-280</pages><issn>0261-1430</issn><eissn>1474-0095</eissn><abstract>This essay argues that the widespread but not widely recognised adaptation of Frankenstein in contemporary dance music problematises the ‘technological’ constitution of modern copyright law as an instrument wielded by corporations to exert increasing control over cultural production. The argument first surveys recent accounts of intellectual property law’s responses to sound recording technologies, then historicises the modern discourse of technology, which subtends such responses, as a fetish of industrial capitalism conditioned by Frankenstein. The increasing ubiquity of cinematic Frankenstein adaptations in the latter two decades of the twentieth century outlines the popular cultural milieu in which Detroit techno developed its futuristic aesthetic, and which provided subsequent dance music producers with samples that contributed to techno’s popularisation. These cultural and economic contexts intersect in an exemplary case study: the copyright infringement dispute in 1999 and 2000 between Detroit’s Underground Resistance (UR) techno label and the transnational majors Sony and BMG.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0261143007001225</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-1430 |
ispartof | Popular music, 2007-05, Vol.26 (2), p.259-280 |
issn | 0261-1430 1474-0095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035903289 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Copyright Copyright laws Culture Dance music Intellectual property Mailing lists Music Music industry Musical rhythm Popular music Product labeling Techno Technology |
title | Techno, Frankenstein and copyright |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T06%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techno,%20Frankenstein%20and%20copyright&rft.jtitle=Popular%20music&rft.au=McCUTCHEON,%20MARK%20A.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=259-280&rft.issn=0261-1430&rft.eissn=1474-0095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0261143007001225&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4500317%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195179327&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0261143007001225&rft_jstor_id=4500317&rfr_iscdi=true |