RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM
Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern theology 2008-07, Vol.24 (3), p.487-497 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Modern theology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | OCHS, PETER |
description | Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035899834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1503412601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3921-7491a213585c6b0f75ea7a9e3727441734feb5ba3643c322abe0399c28f171063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1PgzAchhujiXP6P6AnL2C_aKmJh7nARsLAbFOPTSElAdmHdIvbf28Rs4Mne_m16fu8-eUBwEHQQ_Y81B6iLHAhxL6HIQw8CClH3uEMDE4f52AAMWMuR5xfgitjaggR4gIOwO08XLxk6SJ8dOZhlITjZWxfTpY6z3E6mseL2TW4KFVj9M3vHILXKFyOp26STeLxKHELIjByORVIYUT8wC9YDkvua8WV0IRjTinihJY693NFGCUFwVjlGhIhChyUiCPIyBDc973bdvO512YnV5UpdNOotd7sjUTQdgsREGqjd3-i9Wbfru12EiPBGEcBtqGgDxXtxphWl3LbVivVHm2T7NTJWnaGZGdIdurkjzp5sOhTj35VjT7-m5OzbDm1N8u7PV-ZnT6ceNV-SMYJ9-V7OpGcJv5bEkUyJd_fC3zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219667182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>OCHS, PETER</creator><creatorcontrib>OCHS, PETER</creatorcontrib><description>Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-7177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0025</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; Exegesis & hermeneutics ; Philosophers ; Sacred texts ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Modern theology, 2008-07, Vol.24 (3), p.487-497</ispartof><rights>2008 The Author. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3921-7491a213585c6b0f75ea7a9e3727441734feb5ba3643c322abe0399c28f171063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0025.2008.00471.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0025.2008.00471.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>OCHS, PETER</creatorcontrib><title>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</title><title>Modern theology</title><description>Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Exegesis & hermeneutics</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Sacred texts</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0266-7177</issn><issn>1468-0025</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1PgzAchhujiXP6P6AnL2C_aKmJh7nARsLAbFOPTSElAdmHdIvbf28Rs4Mne_m16fu8-eUBwEHQQ_Y81B6iLHAhxL6HIQw8CClH3uEMDE4f52AAMWMuR5xfgitjaggR4gIOwO08XLxk6SJ8dOZhlITjZWxfTpY6z3E6mseL2TW4KFVj9M3vHILXKFyOp26STeLxKHELIjByORVIYUT8wC9YDkvua8WV0IRjTinihJY693NFGCUFwVjlGhIhChyUiCPIyBDc973bdvO512YnV5UpdNOotd7sjUTQdgsREGqjd3-i9Wbfru12EiPBGEcBtqGgDxXtxphWl3LbVivVHm2T7NTJWnaGZGdIdurkjzp5sOhTj35VjT7-m5OzbDm1N8u7PV-ZnT6ceNV-SMYJ9-V7OpGcJv5bEkUyJd_fC3zQ</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>OCHS, PETER</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</title><author>OCHS, PETER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3921-7491a213585c6b0f75ea7a9e3727441734feb5ba3643c322abe0399c28f171063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Exegesis & hermeneutics</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Sacred texts</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OCHS, PETER</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Modern theology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OCHS, PETER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</atitle><jtitle>Modern theology</jtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>487-497</pages><issn>0266-7177</issn><eissn>1468-0025</eissn><abstract>Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-7177 |
ispartof | Modern theology, 2008-07, Vol.24 (3), p.487-497 |
issn | 0266-7177 1468-0025 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035899834 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Cognition & reasoning Exegesis & hermeneutics Philosophers Sacred texts Theology |
title | RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RESPONSE:%20REFLECTIONS%20ON%20BINARISM&rft.jtitle=Modern%20theology&rft.au=OCHS,%20PETER&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=487-497&rft.issn=0266-7177&rft.eissn=1468-0025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1503412601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219667182&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |