RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM

Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern theology 2008-07, Vol.24 (3), p.487-497
1. Verfasser: OCHS, PETER
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 3
container_start_page 487
container_title Modern theology
container_volume 24
creator OCHS, PETER
description Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035899834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1503412601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3921-7491a213585c6b0f75ea7a9e3727441734feb5ba3643c322abe0399c28f171063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1PgzAchhujiXP6P6AnL2C_aKmJh7nARsLAbFOPTSElAdmHdIvbf28Rs4Mne_m16fu8-eUBwEHQQ_Y81B6iLHAhxL6HIQw8CClH3uEMDE4f52AAMWMuR5xfgitjaggR4gIOwO08XLxk6SJ8dOZhlITjZWxfTpY6z3E6mseL2TW4KFVj9M3vHILXKFyOp26STeLxKHELIjByORVIYUT8wC9YDkvua8WV0IRjTinihJY693NFGCUFwVjlGhIhChyUiCPIyBDc973bdvO512YnV5UpdNOotd7sjUTQdgsREGqjd3-i9Wbfru12EiPBGEcBtqGgDxXtxphWl3LbVivVHm2T7NTJWnaGZGdIdurkjzp5sOhTj35VjT7-m5OzbDm1N8u7PV-ZnT6ceNV-SMYJ9-V7OpGcJv5bEkUyJd_fC3zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219667182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>OCHS, PETER</creator><creatorcontrib>OCHS, PETER</creatorcontrib><description>Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-7177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0025</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Philosophers ; Sacred texts ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Modern theology, 2008-07, Vol.24 (3), p.487-497</ispartof><rights>2008 The Author. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jul 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3921-7491a213585c6b0f75ea7a9e3727441734feb5ba3643c322abe0399c28f171063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0025.2008.00471.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1468-0025.2008.00471.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>OCHS, PETER</creatorcontrib><title>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</title><title>Modern theology</title><description>Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.</description><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Sacred texts</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0266-7177</issn><issn>1468-0025</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1PgzAchhujiXP6P6AnL2C_aKmJh7nARsLAbFOPTSElAdmHdIvbf28Rs4Mne_m16fu8-eUBwEHQQ_Y81B6iLHAhxL6HIQw8CClH3uEMDE4f52AAMWMuR5xfgitjaggR4gIOwO08XLxk6SJ8dOZhlITjZWxfTpY6z3E6mseL2TW4KFVj9M3vHILXKFyOp26STeLxKHELIjByORVIYUT8wC9YDkvua8WV0IRjTinihJY693NFGCUFwVjlGhIhChyUiCPIyBDc973bdvO512YnV5UpdNOotd7sjUTQdgsREGqjd3-i9Wbfru12EiPBGEcBtqGgDxXtxphWl3LbVivVHm2T7NTJWnaGZGdIdurkjzp5sOhTj35VjT7-m5OzbDm1N8u7PV-ZnT6ceNV-SMYJ9-V7OpGcJv5bEkUyJd_fC3zQ</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>OCHS, PETER</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</title><author>OCHS, PETER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3921-7491a213585c6b0f75ea7a9e3727441734feb5ba3643c322abe0399c28f171063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Sacred texts</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OCHS, PETER</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Modern theology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OCHS, PETER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM</atitle><jtitle>Modern theology</jtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>487-497</pages><issn>0266-7177</issn><eissn>1468-0025</eissn><abstract>Immanuel Kant asked, What are the transcendental conditions for knowing the world and for knowing how we ought to behave in it? For Scriptural Reasoners, this question is answered through fellowships of scriptural study in which practices of shared reading and interpretation give rise to practices of reasoning, speculatively, about what ultimately guides and authorizes our action in the world. These practices lead, in one direction, to Textual Reasoning: fellowships of study that define and test such speculations from within the context of specific traditions of belief and action. In another direction, these practices lead to recommendations about academic study: for example, about how well or poorly various disciplines comprehend the conditions for understanding scriptural religion.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-7177
ispartof Modern theology, 2008-07, Vol.24 (3), p.487-497
issn 0266-7177
1468-0025
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035899834
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cognition & reasoning
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Philosophers
Sacred texts
Theology
title RESPONSE: REFLECTIONS ON BINARISM
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A41%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RESPONSE:%20REFLECTIONS%20ON%20BINARISM&rft.jtitle=Modern%20theology&rft.au=OCHS,%20PETER&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=487-497&rft.issn=0266-7177&rft.eissn=1468-0025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2008.00471.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1503412601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219667182&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true