The Stamford Council of April 1327

This assembly of prelates and barons has been largely overlooked. The agenda comprised two principal items: the urgent necessity to raise money for military action against the Scots, who were later to make a laughing stock of the English at Stanhope Park, even endangering the life of the young Edwar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The English historical review 2007-02, Vol.CXXII (495), p.141-148
1. Verfasser: Haines, Roy Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue 495
container_start_page 141
container_title The English historical review
container_volume CXXII
creator Haines, Roy Martin
description This assembly of prelates and barons has been largely overlooked. The agenda comprised two principal items: the urgent necessity to raise money for military action against the Scots, who were later to make a laughing stock of the English at Stanhope Park, even endangering the life of the young Edward III, who is said to have wept from shame and exasperation and, secondly, the question of the queen's marital status. The successful invasion of Queen Isabella with a group of exiles, supported by a contingent of Hainaulters, had left unresolved problems. The incarcerated Edward of Caernarvon remained a potential focus of rebellion. His deposition had been partly engineered by two lawyer-bishops, Adam Orleton and John Stratford, but churchmen remained in a quandary as to how the queen could justify the failure to uphold her matrimonial vows. Allegedly her husband was likely to inflict serious injury upon her, but it was notorious that she enjoyed an intimate relationship with Mortimer, husband of Joan de Joinville. Archbishop Reynolds, who had played a vacillating role in the deposition, was now concerned to quell ‘slanderous rumours’ by claiming that the magnates had dissuaded the queen from approaching her husband. He called for prayers and granted a forty-days' indulgence, encouraging the comprovincial bishops to do likewise, while the bishop of London, as dean of the province, was instructed to threaten excommunication of those slandering the queen. Although external peace came in 1328 with the unpopular Scottish treaty, the internal situation deteriorated into a conflict between Mortimer and Henry of Lancaster.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehr/cel376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035874616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20108208</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/ehr/cel376</oup_id><sourcerecordid>20108208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-2115e97c569c29427d67a00eb19d7ea28cd9151099f48b4c7d885241f1a76e513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsX78JSEERYm8l3jqWoqxQUrFC8hG02S1vbpia7oP-9KSsePHiagfdj5r2H0DngG8CaDt0iDK1bUykOUA-YlDnjlB2iHsZAc0WEOEYnMa4wxpQr3EOD6cJlL025qX2osrFvt3a5znydjXYhLUCJPEVHdbmO7uxn9tHr3e10XOSTp_uH8WiSWwrQ5ASAOy0tF9oSzYishCwxdnPQlXQlUbbSwJNLXTM1Z1ZWSnHCoIZSCseB9tFVd3cX_EfrYmM2y5jCrMut8200sLcsmQCR0MEfdOXbsE3uDAHGmU5fEnTdQTb4GIOrTYq0KcNXumT2bZnUlunaSvBlB_t29z930XGr2PjwSxIMWBGskp53-jI27vNXL8O7EZJKborZm8FFMVPPkphH-g0m6H5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214549099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Stamford Council of April 1327</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Haines, Roy Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Haines, Roy Martin</creatorcontrib><description>This assembly of prelates and barons has been largely overlooked. The agenda comprised two principal items: the urgent necessity to raise money for military action against the Scots, who were later to make a laughing stock of the English at Stanhope Park, even endangering the life of the young Edward III, who is said to have wept from shame and exasperation and, secondly, the question of the queen's marital status. The successful invasion of Queen Isabella with a group of exiles, supported by a contingent of Hainaulters, had left unresolved problems. The incarcerated Edward of Caernarvon remained a potential focus of rebellion. His deposition had been partly engineered by two lawyer-bishops, Adam Orleton and John Stratford, but churchmen remained in a quandary as to how the queen could justify the failure to uphold her matrimonial vows. Allegedly her husband was likely to inflict serious injury upon her, but it was notorious that she enjoyed an intimate relationship with Mortimer, husband of Joan de Joinville. Archbishop Reynolds, who had played a vacillating role in the deposition, was now concerned to quell ‘slanderous rumours’ by claiming that the magnates had dissuaded the queen from approaching her husband. He called for prayers and granted a forty-days' indulgence, encouraging the comprovincial bishops to do likewise, while the bishop of London, as dean of the province, was instructed to threaten excommunication of those slandering the queen. Although external peace came in 1328 with the unpopular Scottish treaty, the internal situation deteriorated into a conflict between Mortimer and Henry of Lancaster.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-8266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ehr/cel376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Archbishops ; Clergy ; Councils ; Edward III, King of England (1312-77) ; European history ; Kings ; Military policy ; Nobility ; Notes and Documents ; Parliaments ; Prayer ; Queens ; Royalty</subject><ispartof>The English historical review, 2007-02, Vol.CXXII (495), p.141-148</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author [2007]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. 2007</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-2115e97c569c29427d67a00eb19d7ea28cd9151099f48b4c7d885241f1a76e513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20108208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20108208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1578,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haines, Roy Martin</creatorcontrib><title>The Stamford Council of April 1327</title><title>The English historical review</title><description>This assembly of prelates and barons has been largely overlooked. The agenda comprised two principal items: the urgent necessity to raise money for military action against the Scots, who were later to make a laughing stock of the English at Stanhope Park, even endangering the life of the young Edward III, who is said to have wept from shame and exasperation and, secondly, the question of the queen's marital status. The successful invasion of Queen Isabella with a group of exiles, supported by a contingent of Hainaulters, had left unresolved problems. The incarcerated Edward of Caernarvon remained a potential focus of rebellion. His deposition had been partly engineered by two lawyer-bishops, Adam Orleton and John Stratford, but churchmen remained in a quandary as to how the queen could justify the failure to uphold her matrimonial vows. Allegedly her husband was likely to inflict serious injury upon her, but it was notorious that she enjoyed an intimate relationship with Mortimer, husband of Joan de Joinville. Archbishop Reynolds, who had played a vacillating role in the deposition, was now concerned to quell ‘slanderous rumours’ by claiming that the magnates had dissuaded the queen from approaching her husband. He called for prayers and granted a forty-days' indulgence, encouraging the comprovincial bishops to do likewise, while the bishop of London, as dean of the province, was instructed to threaten excommunication of those slandering the queen. Although external peace came in 1328 with the unpopular Scottish treaty, the internal situation deteriorated into a conflict between Mortimer and Henry of Lancaster.</description><subject>Archbishops</subject><subject>Clergy</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Edward III, King of England (1312-77)</subject><subject>European history</subject><subject>Kings</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Nobility</subject><subject>Notes and Documents</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Prayer</subject><subject>Queens</subject><subject>Royalty</subject><issn>0013-8266</issn><issn>1477-4534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsX78JSEERYm8l3jqWoqxQUrFC8hG02S1vbpia7oP-9KSsePHiagfdj5r2H0DngG8CaDt0iDK1bUykOUA-YlDnjlB2iHsZAc0WEOEYnMa4wxpQr3EOD6cJlL025qX2osrFvt3a5znydjXYhLUCJPEVHdbmO7uxn9tHr3e10XOSTp_uH8WiSWwrQ5ASAOy0tF9oSzYishCwxdnPQlXQlUbbSwJNLXTM1Z1ZWSnHCoIZSCseB9tFVd3cX_EfrYmM2y5jCrMut8200sLcsmQCR0MEfdOXbsE3uDAHGmU5fEnTdQTb4GIOrTYq0KcNXumT2bZnUlunaSvBlB_t29z930XGr2PjwSxIMWBGskp53-jI27vNXL8O7EZJKborZm8FFMVPPkphH-g0m6H5g</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Haines, Roy Martin</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>The Stamford Council of April 1327</title><author>Haines, Roy Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-2115e97c569c29427d67a00eb19d7ea28cd9151099f48b4c7d885241f1a76e513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Archbishops</topic><topic>Clergy</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Edward III, King of England (1312-77)</topic><topic>European history</topic><topic>Kings</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Nobility</topic><topic>Notes and Documents</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Prayer</topic><topic>Queens</topic><topic>Royalty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haines, Roy Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The English historical review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haines, Roy Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Stamford Council of April 1327</atitle><jtitle>The English historical review</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>CXXII</volume><issue>495</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>141-148</pages><issn>0013-8266</issn><eissn>1477-4534</eissn><abstract>This assembly of prelates and barons has been largely overlooked. The agenda comprised two principal items: the urgent necessity to raise money for military action against the Scots, who were later to make a laughing stock of the English at Stanhope Park, even endangering the life of the young Edward III, who is said to have wept from shame and exasperation and, secondly, the question of the queen's marital status. The successful invasion of Queen Isabella with a group of exiles, supported by a contingent of Hainaulters, had left unresolved problems. The incarcerated Edward of Caernarvon remained a potential focus of rebellion. His deposition had been partly engineered by two lawyer-bishops, Adam Orleton and John Stratford, but churchmen remained in a quandary as to how the queen could justify the failure to uphold her matrimonial vows. Allegedly her husband was likely to inflict serious injury upon her, but it was notorious that she enjoyed an intimate relationship with Mortimer, husband of Joan de Joinville. Archbishop Reynolds, who had played a vacillating role in the deposition, was now concerned to quell ‘slanderous rumours’ by claiming that the magnates had dissuaded the queen from approaching her husband. He called for prayers and granted a forty-days' indulgence, encouraging the comprovincial bishops to do likewise, while the bishop of London, as dean of the province, was instructed to threaten excommunication of those slandering the queen. Although external peace came in 1328 with the unpopular Scottish treaty, the internal situation deteriorated into a conflict between Mortimer and Henry of Lancaster.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ehr/cel376</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-8266
ispartof The English historical review, 2007-02, Vol.CXXII (495), p.141-148
issn 0013-8266
1477-4534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035874616
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Archbishops
Clergy
Councils
Edward III, King of England (1312-77)
European history
Kings
Military policy
Nobility
Notes and Documents
Parliaments
Prayer
Queens
Royalty
title The Stamford Council of April 1327
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A45%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Stamford%20Council%20of%20April%201327&rft.jtitle=The%20English%20historical%20review&rft.au=Haines,%20Roy%20Martin&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=CXXII&rft.issue=495&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=141-148&rft.issn=0013-8266&rft.eissn=1477-4534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ehr/cel376&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20108208%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214549099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20108208&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ehr/cel376&rfr_iscdi=true