Signs for labour-value in printed pictures after the photomechanical revolution: mainstream changes and extreme cases around 1960
Until the early years of the 20C, it mattered to consumers, including consumers of journals, how printed pictures had been made. Their production history, including the amount of skilled labour that had gone into their making, affected how consumers regarded them. This understanding of the value of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oxford art journal 2005-01, Vol.28 (3), p.371-390 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Oxford art journal |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Gretton, Tom |
description | Until the early years of the 20C, it mattered to consumers, including consumers of journals, how printed pictures had been made. Their production history, including the amount of skilled labour that had gone into their making, affected how consumers regarded them. This understanding of the value of a printed picture was being eclipsed by the end of the 19C as a competing paradigm, based on the transvaluation of origination and the devaluation of mediation, emerged. The article discusses the changing ways that labour was understood to add value to printed pictures at a critical moment of this paradigm shift. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035748440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1035748440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_10357484403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVy0FPAjEQBeAeMAGF_zBHL5t0pSzilWi8650MZZYtaTvrTEu8-s9lE_-Ap5d8772ZWdjWPTXdxtm5uVe9WGu73bZbmJ-PcM4KPQtEPHKV5oqxEoQMo4Rc6ARj8KUKKWBfSKAMBOPAhRP5AXPwGEHoyrGWwPkFEoasRQgTTP15OuYT0PfNEoFHnUS43rDddXZp7nqMSqu_fDCPb6-f-_dmFP6qpOWQgnqKETNx1UNr15ute3bOrv8x_QWsOVTW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035748440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Signs for labour-value in printed pictures after the photomechanical revolution: mainstream changes and extreme cases around 1960</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Gretton, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>Until the early years of the 20C, it mattered to consumers, including consumers of journals, how printed pictures had been made. Their production history, including the amount of skilled labour that had gone into their making, affected how consumers regarded them. This understanding of the value of a printed picture was being eclipsed by the end of the 19C as a competing paradigm, based on the transvaluation of origination and the devaluation of mediation, emerged. The article discusses the changing ways that labour was understood to add value to printed pictures at a critical moment of this paradigm shift.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-6540</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Oxford art journal, 2005-01, Vol.28 (3), p.371-390</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Signs for labour-value in printed pictures after the photomechanical revolution: mainstream changes and extreme cases around 1960</title><title>Oxford art journal</title><description>Until the early years of the 20C, it mattered to consumers, including consumers of journals, how printed pictures had been made. Their production history, including the amount of skilled labour that had gone into their making, affected how consumers regarded them. This understanding of the value of a printed picture was being eclipsed by the end of the 19C as a competing paradigm, based on the transvaluation of origination and the devaluation of mediation, emerged. The article discusses the changing ways that labour was understood to add value to printed pictures at a critical moment of this paradigm shift.</description><issn>0142-6540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVy0FPAjEQBeAeMAGF_zBHL5t0pSzilWi8650MZZYtaTvrTEu8-s9lE_-Ap5d8772ZWdjWPTXdxtm5uVe9WGu73bZbmJ-PcM4KPQtEPHKV5oqxEoQMo4Rc6ARj8KUKKWBfSKAMBOPAhRP5AXPwGEHoyrGWwPkFEoasRQgTTP15OuYT0PfNEoFHnUS43rDddXZp7nqMSqu_fDCPb6-f-_dmFP6qpOWQgnqKETNx1UNr15ute3bOrv8x_QWsOVTW</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Gretton, Tom</creator><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Signs for labour-value in printed pictures after the photomechanical revolution: mainstream changes and extreme cases around 1960</title><author>Gretton, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_10357484403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gretton, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Oxford art journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gretton, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Signs for labour-value in printed pictures after the photomechanical revolution: mainstream changes and extreme cases around 1960</atitle><jtitle>Oxford art journal</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>371-390</pages><issn>0142-6540</issn><abstract>Until the early years of the 20C, it mattered to consumers, including consumers of journals, how printed pictures had been made. Their production history, including the amount of skilled labour that had gone into their making, affected how consumers regarded them. This understanding of the value of a printed picture was being eclipsed by the end of the 19C as a competing paradigm, based on the transvaluation of origination and the devaluation of mediation, emerged. The article discusses the changing ways that labour was understood to add value to printed pictures at a critical moment of this paradigm shift.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-6540 |
ispartof | Oxford art journal, 2005-01, Vol.28 (3), p.371-390 |
issn | 0142-6540 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035748440 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | Signs for labour-value in printed pictures after the photomechanical revolution: mainstream changes and extreme cases around 1960 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A42%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Signs%20for%20labour-value%20in%20printed%20pictures%20after%20the%20photomechanical%20revolution:%20mainstream%20changes%20and%20extreme%20cases%20around%201960&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20art%20journal&rft.au=Gretton,%20Tom&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=371-390&rft.issn=0142-6540&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1035748440%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035748440&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |