Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography

To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2012-09, Vol.264 (3), p.812-822
Hauptverfasser: Omoumi, Patrick, Bafort, Anne-Catherine, Dubuc, Jean-Emile, Malghem, Jacques, Vande Berg, Bruno C, Lecouvet, Frédéric E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 822
container_issue 3
container_start_page 812
container_title Radiology
container_volume 264
creator Omoumi, Patrick
Bafort, Anne-Catherine
Dubuc, Jean-Emile
Malghem, Jacques
Vande Berg, Bruno C
Lecouvet, Frédéric E
description To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%-97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%-79% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 85%-90% for the subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%-93% for the supraspinatus, 88%-100% and 81%-83% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 90%-100% for the subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744-0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641-0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ > 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration. Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.12112062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035106894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1035106894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-8f9fa329defea0a6aeefb5c0c57051894f27cd2883ac45364e6d1b78400f58c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM9LwzAUgIMobk7P3iRHL515SdOm3mTMHzARZJ7LW5q4StvMJBX239uxTfD04L3vfYePkGtgU4BU3XmsatdMgQNwlvETMgbJ8wQEyFMyZkyIRKVQjMhFCF-MQSpVfk5GnBdQsBTGpJv_YNNjrF1HnaXeRYzOU91bS6PpqmEdDfpwT7VrN-jrsAfbvol1ZaLRO3y2pOjj2rtPj5v1lmJXUZjKZElf3_9dLsmZxSaYq8OckI_H-XL2nCzenl5mD4tE8yKPibKFRcGLyliDDDM0xq6kZlrmTIIqUstzXXGlBOpUiiw1WQWrXKWMWam0FBNyu_duvPvuTYhlWwdtmgY74_pQAhMSWDaYBvRuj2rvQvDGlhtft-i3A1TuIpf7yOUx8vBxc5D3q9ZUf_yxqvgFQCJ6IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035106894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Omoumi, Patrick ; Bafort, Anne-Catherine ; Dubuc, Jean-Emile ; Malghem, Jacques ; Vande Berg, Bruno C ; Lecouvet, Frédéric E</creator><creatorcontrib>Omoumi, Patrick ; Bafort, Anne-Catherine ; Dubuc, Jean-Emile ; Malghem, Jacques ; Vande Berg, Bruno C ; Lecouvet, Frédéric E</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%-97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%-79% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 85%-90% for the subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%-93% for the supraspinatus, 88%-100% and 81%-83% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 90%-100% for the subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744-0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641-0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ &gt; 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration. Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22919041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Arthrography - methods ; Arthroscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Rotator Cuff Injuries ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tendon Injuries - diagnosis ; Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2012-09, Vol.264 (3), p.812-822</ispartof><rights>RSNA, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-8f9fa329defea0a6aeefb5c0c57051894f27cd2883ac45364e6d1b78400f58c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-8f9fa329defea0a6aeefb5c0c57051894f27cd2883ac45364e6d1b78400f58c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22919041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omoumi, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bafort, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubuc, Jean-Emile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malghem, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vande Berg, Bruno C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecouvet, Frédéric E</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%-97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%-79% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 85%-90% for the subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%-93% for the supraspinatus, 88%-100% and 81%-83% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 90%-100% for the subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744-0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641-0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ &gt; 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration. Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthrography - methods</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff Injuries</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM9LwzAUgIMobk7P3iRHL515SdOm3mTMHzARZJ7LW5q4StvMJBX239uxTfD04L3vfYePkGtgU4BU3XmsatdMgQNwlvETMgbJ8wQEyFMyZkyIRKVQjMhFCF-MQSpVfk5GnBdQsBTGpJv_YNNjrF1HnaXeRYzOU91bS6PpqmEdDfpwT7VrN-jrsAfbvol1ZaLRO3y2pOjj2rtPj5v1lmJXUZjKZElf3_9dLsmZxSaYq8OckI_H-XL2nCzenl5mD4tE8yKPibKFRcGLyliDDDM0xq6kZlrmTIIqUstzXXGlBOpUiiw1WQWrXKWMWam0FBNyu_duvPvuTYhlWwdtmgY74_pQAhMSWDaYBvRuj2rvQvDGlhtft-i3A1TuIpf7yOUx8vBxc5D3q9ZUf_yxqvgFQCJ6IQ</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Omoumi, Patrick</creator><creator>Bafort, Anne-Catherine</creator><creator>Dubuc, Jean-Emile</creator><creator>Malghem, Jacques</creator><creator>Vande Berg, Bruno C</creator><creator>Lecouvet, Frédéric E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography</title><author>Omoumi, Patrick ; Bafort, Anne-Catherine ; Dubuc, Jean-Emile ; Malghem, Jacques ; Vande Berg, Bruno C ; Lecouvet, Frédéric E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-8f9fa329defea0a6aeefb5c0c57051894f27cd2883ac45364e6d1b78400f58c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthrography - methods</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff Injuries</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omoumi, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bafort, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubuc, Jean-Emile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malghem, Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vande Berg, Bruno C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecouvet, Frédéric E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omoumi, Patrick</au><au>Bafort, Anne-Catherine</au><au>Dubuc, Jean-Emile</au><au>Malghem, Jacques</au><au>Vande Berg, Bruno C</au><au>Lecouvet, Frédéric E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>264</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>812</spage><epage>822</epage><pages>812-822</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%-97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%-79% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 85%-90% for the subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%-93% for the supraspinatus, 88%-100% and 81%-83% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 90%-100% for the subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744-0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641-0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ &gt; 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration. Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22919041</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.12112062</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2012-09, Vol.264 (3), p.812-822
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1035106894
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Arthrography - methods
Arthroscopy
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tendon Injuries - diagnosis
Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T00%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20rotator%20cuff%20tendon%20tears:%20comparison%20of%20multidetector%20CT%20arthrography%20and%201.5-T%20MR%20arthrography&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Omoumi,%20Patrick&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=264&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=812&rft.epage=822&rft.pages=812-822&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.12112062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1035106894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035106894&rft_id=info:pmid/22919041&rfr_iscdi=true