Cucumber mosaic virus infection of kava ( Piper methysticum ) and implications for cultural control of kava dieback disease
Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was found by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) to be not fully systemic in naturally infected kava ( Piper methysticum ) plants in Fiji. Twenty-six of 48 samples (54%) from various tissues of three recently infected plants were CMV-positive compared...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australasian plant pathology 2005-01, Vol.34 (3), p.377-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 377 |
container_title | Australasian plant pathology |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Davis, R. I. Lomavatu-Fong, M. F. McMichael, L. A. Ruabete, T. K. Kumar, S. Turaganivalu, U. |
description | Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was found by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) to be not fully systemic in naturally infected kava ( Piper methysticum ) plants in Fiji. Twenty-six of 48 samples (54%) from various tissues of three recently infected plants were CMV-positive compared with 7/51 samples (14%) from three long-term infections (plants affected by dieback for more than 1 year). The virus was also found to have a limited ability to move into newly formed stems. CMV was detected in only 2/23 samples taken from re-growth stems arising from known CMV infected/dieback affected plants. Mechanical inoculation experiments conducted in Fiji indicate that the known kava intercrop plants banana ( Musa spp.), pineapple ( Ananas comosus ), peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) and the common weed Mikania micrantha are potential hosts for a dieback-causing strain of CMV. It was not possible to transmit the virus mechanically to the common kava intercrop plants taro ( Colocasia esculenta ), Xanthosoma sp., sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ), yam ( Dioscorea alata ), papaya ( Carica papaya ) or the weed Momordica charantia . Implications of the results of this research on a possible integrated disease management strategy are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1071/AP05050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_csiro</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034830237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21047553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a490ebb7940dd60d56c5d0be9619cf4dc4cb7890504fe93cb4fda0240bfe101d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_AgCq4P_AoBwcehOmnSR46y-ALBPei5pHlgdtumJqkgfnmz7uLBg8xhDvObgeGP0AmBKwIVub5ZQJFqB80IY3VWAs130QxqUmSUcLKPDkJYAhBWUpihr_kkp77VHvcuCCvxh_VTwHYwWkbrBuwMXokPgS_wwo5rpuPbZ4g2beFLLAaFbT92Voq1Dtg4j-XUxcmLDks3RO-63xvK6lbIVepBi6CP0J4RXdDH236IXu9uX-YP2dPz_eP85imTlOUxE4yDbtuKM1CqBFWUslDQal4SLg1Tksm2qnn6mRnNqWyZUQJyBq3RBIiih-hsc3f07n3SITa9DVJ3nRi0m0KTE2BVUdAEL_6FBCirKeS0SvT0D126yQ_pjaRIUULOc57U-UZJ70Lw2jSjt73wnwk167SabVpJ4q0M1rtfJsafcfMWe_oN-8aScQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1015602929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cucumber mosaic virus infection of kava ( Piper methysticum ) and implications for cultural control of kava dieback disease</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Davis, R. I. ; Lomavatu-Fong, M. F. ; McMichael, L. A. ; Ruabete, T. K. ; Kumar, S. ; Turaganivalu, U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. I. ; Lomavatu-Fong, M. F. ; McMichael, L. A. ; Ruabete, T. K. ; Kumar, S. ; Turaganivalu, U.</creatorcontrib><description>Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was found by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) to be not fully systemic in naturally infected kava ( Piper methysticum ) plants in Fiji. Twenty-six of 48 samples (54%) from various tissues of three recently infected plants were CMV-positive compared with 7/51 samples (14%) from three long-term infections (plants affected by dieback for more than 1 year). The virus was also found to have a limited ability to move into newly formed stems. CMV was detected in only 2/23 samples taken from re-growth stems arising from known CMV infected/dieback affected plants. Mechanical inoculation experiments conducted in Fiji indicate that the known kava intercrop plants banana ( Musa spp.), pineapple ( Ananas comosus ), peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) and the common weed Mikania micrantha are potential hosts for a dieback-causing strain of CMV. It was not possible to transmit the virus mechanically to the common kava intercrop plants taro ( Colocasia esculenta ), Xanthosoma sp., sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ), yam ( Dioscorea alata ), papaya ( Carica papaya ) or the weed Momordica charantia . Implications of the results of this research on a possible integrated disease management strategy are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-6032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AP05050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Ananas comosus ; Arachis hypogaea ; Carica papaya ; Colocasia esculenta ; Cucumber mosaic virus ; Cultural control ; Cytomegalovirus ; Dieback ; Dioscorea alata ; Infection ; Inoculation ; Ipomoea batatas ; Mikania micrantha ; Momordica charantia ; Musa ; Nuts ; Piper methysticum ; Plant viruses ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Reverse transcription ; Solanum tuberosum ; Stems ; Weeds ; Xanthosoma</subject><ispartof>Australasian plant pathology, 2005-01, Vol.34 (3), p.377-384</ispartof><rights>Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a490ebb7940dd60d56c5d0be9619cf4dc4cb7890504fe93cb4fda0240bfe101d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a490ebb7940dd60d56c5d0be9619cf4dc4cb7890504fe93cb4fda0240bfe101d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomavatu-Fong, M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruabete, T. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turaganivalu, U.</creatorcontrib><title>Cucumber mosaic virus infection of kava ( Piper methysticum ) and implications for cultural control of kava dieback disease</title><title>Australasian plant pathology</title><description>Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was found by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) to be not fully systemic in naturally infected kava ( Piper methysticum ) plants in Fiji. Twenty-six of 48 samples (54%) from various tissues of three recently infected plants were CMV-positive compared with 7/51 samples (14%) from three long-term infections (plants affected by dieback for more than 1 year). The virus was also found to have a limited ability to move into newly formed stems. CMV was detected in only 2/23 samples taken from re-growth stems arising from known CMV infected/dieback affected plants. Mechanical inoculation experiments conducted in Fiji indicate that the known kava intercrop plants banana ( Musa spp.), pineapple ( Ananas comosus ), peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) and the common weed Mikania micrantha are potential hosts for a dieback-causing strain of CMV. It was not possible to transmit the virus mechanically to the common kava intercrop plants taro ( Colocasia esculenta ), Xanthosoma sp., sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ), yam ( Dioscorea alata ), papaya ( Carica papaya ) or the weed Momordica charantia . Implications of the results of this research on a possible integrated disease management strategy are discussed.</description><subject>Ananas comosus</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Carica papaya</subject><subject>Colocasia esculenta</subject><subject>Cucumber mosaic virus</subject><subject>Cultural control</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus</subject><subject>Dieback</subject><subject>Dioscorea alata</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Ipomoea batatas</subject><subject>Mikania micrantha</subject><subject>Momordica charantia</subject><subject>Musa</subject><subject>Nuts</subject><subject>Piper methysticum</subject><subject>Plant viruses</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Reverse transcription</subject><subject>Solanum tuberosum</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><subject>Xanthosoma</subject><issn>0815-3191</issn><issn>1448-6032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtLxDAQB_AgCq4P_AoBwcehOmnSR46y-ALBPei5pHlgdtumJqkgfnmz7uLBg8xhDvObgeGP0AmBKwIVub5ZQJFqB80IY3VWAs130QxqUmSUcLKPDkJYAhBWUpihr_kkp77VHvcuCCvxh_VTwHYwWkbrBuwMXokPgS_wwo5rpuPbZ4g2beFLLAaFbT92Voq1Dtg4j-XUxcmLDks3RO-63xvK6lbIVepBi6CP0J4RXdDH236IXu9uX-YP2dPz_eP85imTlOUxE4yDbtuKM1CqBFWUslDQal4SLg1Tksm2qnn6mRnNqWyZUQJyBq3RBIiih-hsc3f07n3SITa9DVJ3nRi0m0KTE2BVUdAEL_6FBCirKeS0SvT0D126yQ_pjaRIUULOc57U-UZJ70Lw2jSjt73wnwk167SabVpJ4q0M1rtfJsafcfMWe_oN-8aScQ</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Davis, R. I.</creator><creator>Lomavatu-Fong, M. F.</creator><creator>McMichael, L. A.</creator><creator>Ruabete, T. K.</creator><creator>Kumar, S.</creator><creator>Turaganivalu, U.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Cucumber mosaic virus infection of kava ( Piper methysticum ) and implications for cultural control of kava dieback disease</title><author>Davis, R. I. ; Lomavatu-Fong, M. F. ; McMichael, L. A. ; Ruabete, T. K. ; Kumar, S. ; Turaganivalu, U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-a490ebb7940dd60d56c5d0be9619cf4dc4cb7890504fe93cb4fda0240bfe101d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Ananas comosus</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Carica papaya</topic><topic>Colocasia esculenta</topic><topic>Cucumber mosaic virus</topic><topic>Cultural control</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus</topic><topic>Dieback</topic><topic>Dioscorea alata</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Ipomoea batatas</topic><topic>Mikania micrantha</topic><topic>Momordica charantia</topic><topic>Musa</topic><topic>Nuts</topic><topic>Piper methysticum</topic><topic>Plant viruses</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Reverse transcription</topic><topic>Solanum tuberosum</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><topic>Xanthosoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, R. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomavatu-Fong, M. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, L. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruabete, T. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turaganivalu, U.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Australasian plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, R. I.</au><au>Lomavatu-Fong, M. F.</au><au>McMichael, L. A.</au><au>Ruabete, T. K.</au><au>Kumar, S.</au><au>Turaganivalu, U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cucumber mosaic virus infection of kava ( Piper methysticum ) and implications for cultural control of kava dieback disease</atitle><jtitle>Australasian plant pathology</jtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>377</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>377-384</pages><issn>0815-3191</issn><eissn>1448-6032</eissn><abstract>Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was found by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) to be not fully systemic in naturally infected kava ( Piper methysticum ) plants in Fiji. Twenty-six of 48 samples (54%) from various tissues of three recently infected plants were CMV-positive compared with 7/51 samples (14%) from three long-term infections (plants affected by dieback for more than 1 year). The virus was also found to have a limited ability to move into newly formed stems. CMV was detected in only 2/23 samples taken from re-growth stems arising from known CMV infected/dieback affected plants. Mechanical inoculation experiments conducted in Fiji indicate that the known kava intercrop plants banana ( Musa spp.), pineapple ( Ananas comosus ), peanut ( Arachis hypogaea ) and the common weed Mikania micrantha are potential hosts for a dieback-causing strain of CMV. It was not possible to transmit the virus mechanically to the common kava intercrop plants taro ( Colocasia esculenta ), Xanthosoma sp., sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ), yam ( Dioscorea alata ), papaya ( Carica papaya ) or the weed Momordica charantia . Implications of the results of this research on a possible integrated disease management strategy are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1071/AP05050</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0815-3191 |
ispartof | Australasian plant pathology, 2005-01, Vol.34 (3), p.377-384 |
issn | 0815-3191 1448-6032 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034830237 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Ananas comosus Arachis hypogaea Carica papaya Colocasia esculenta Cucumber mosaic virus Cultural control Cytomegalovirus Dieback Dioscorea alata Infection Inoculation Ipomoea batatas Mikania micrantha Momordica charantia Musa Nuts Piper methysticum Plant viruses Polymerase chain reaction Reverse transcription Solanum tuberosum Stems Weeds Xanthosoma |
title | Cucumber mosaic virus infection of kava ( Piper methysticum ) and implications for cultural control of kava dieback disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T16%3A27%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_csiro&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cucumber%20mosaic%20virus%20infection%20of%20kava%20(%20Piper%20methysticum%20)%20and%20implications%20for%20cultural%20control%20of%20kava%20dieback%20disease&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Davis,%20R.%20I.&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=377&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=377-384&rft.issn=0815-3191&rft.eissn=1448-6032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AP05050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_csiro%3E21047553%3C/proquest_csiro%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1015602929&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |