Water potential and gas exchange did not reflect performance of Pinus radiata D. Don in an agroforestry system under conditions of soil-water deficit in a temperate environment
In order to understand how radiata pines respond to declining supply of soil-water in agroforestry systems, we monitored water potential in xylem (ψx), osmotic potential (π) and relative water content (q) for fascicles at pre-dawn and at mid-day for 3-year-old trees that were raised from either seed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2005-08, Vol.275 (1-2), p.195-206 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 206 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 195 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 275 |
creator | Yunusa, I.A.M Thomson, S.E Pollock, K.P Youwei, L Mead, D.J |
description | In order to understand how radiata pines respond to declining supply of soil-water in agroforestry systems, we monitored water potential in xylem (ψx), osmotic potential (π) and relative water content (q) for fascicles at pre-dawn and at mid-day for 3-year-old trees that were raised from either seedlings (Seedling) or from tissue culture (TC3 and TC4), and grown either alone (Control) or over lucerne (Medicago sativa) pasture (Lucerne). Water relations at dawn were mostly similar for all the pines, except late in the season when π was lower, bulk turgor pressure (P), deduced as the difference between ψx and π, was higher, for TC3 than for the other two pines. At mid-day, Seedling often had higher ψx and π, but because of its poor osmotic adjustment (OA) had lower P, than either TC3 or TC4. The cell walls were more elastic in Seedling with modulus of elasticity (e) of 6.5 MPa compared with 8.1 MPa for both TC3 and TC4, while loss of turgor was estimated to occur at ψx of -1.45 MPa for Seedling, - 1.38 MPa for TC3 and -1.35 MPa for TC4. All trees irrespective of their origin had higher ψx, P, CO₂ assimilation (A), and stomatal conductance (gs), but lower π, in Control than in Lucerne in which the soil profile was consistently drier. The trends in ψx, π, q and A did not reflect the known differences in dry weight of trees, P was in the order TC3 > TC4 > Seedling, consistent with previously reported tree weights. Both TC3 and TC4 had higher P, due to their larger OA, than Seedling, although the latter had higher A. Thus ψx and A that are routinely measured may not always adequately explain differences in growth amongst pines; it is advisable that π be determined to allow deductions of P be made when using water relations to analyse plant growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-005-1481-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034829499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42951732</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>42951732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-849a0ff7268b98f5af2bc581be87e2c25b459a5cb4126b98a52c71b6f86cb5253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhATggRpy4uHicOE6OqC20UiWQoIKb5Tj24lViL7YD7FvxiDgN4sDJsueb_x_PX1XPkZ4jpeJNQkTaEEo5waZDIh5UO-SiJpzW7cNqR2nNCBX918fVk5QOdL1ju6t-f1HZRDiGbHx2agLlR9irBOaX_qb83sDoRvAhQzR2MjrD0UQb4qy8NhAsfHR-SRDV6FRWcHkOl8GD80UH1D6GgpqU4wnSKWUzw-LHYqeDH112wadVIgU3kZ_3c4zGOu3yvQAUvpiVdzD-h4vBz2XGp9Ujq6Zknv09z6q7d1efL67J7Yf3Nxdvb4muOWbSNb2i1grWdkPfWa4sGzTvcDCdMEwzPjS8V1wPDbK2EIozLXBobdfqgTNen1WvN91jDN-X8gc5u6TNNClvwpIk0rrpWN_0fUFf_YcewhJ9mU4KjowibVcIN0jHkFJZpjxGN6t4KkpyjVBuEcoSoVwjlKL0vNh6DimH-K-hYT1HUbNSf7nVrQqybNslefep-NWrJSLr6z_snaRi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751201069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water potential and gas exchange did not reflect performance of Pinus radiata D. Don in an agroforestry system under conditions of soil-water deficit in a temperate environment</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yunusa, I.A.M ; Thomson, S.E ; Pollock, K.P ; Youwei, L ; Mead, D.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Yunusa, I.A.M ; Thomson, S.E ; Pollock, K.P ; Youwei, L ; Mead, D.J</creatorcontrib><description>In order to understand how radiata pines respond to declining supply of soil-water in agroforestry systems, we monitored water potential in xylem (ψx), osmotic potential (π) and relative water content (q) for fascicles at pre-dawn and at mid-day for 3-year-old trees that were raised from either seedlings (Seedling) or from tissue culture (TC3 and TC4), and grown either alone (Control) or over lucerne (Medicago sativa) pasture (Lucerne). Water relations at dawn were mostly similar for all the pines, except late in the season when π was lower, bulk turgor pressure (P), deduced as the difference between ψx and π, was higher, for TC3 than for the other two pines. At mid-day, Seedling often had higher ψx and π, but because of its poor osmotic adjustment (OA) had lower P, than either TC3 or TC4. The cell walls were more elastic in Seedling with modulus of elasticity (e) of 6.5 MPa compared with 8.1 MPa for both TC3 and TC4, while loss of turgor was estimated to occur at ψx of -1.45 MPa for Seedling, - 1.38 MPa for TC3 and -1.35 MPa for TC4. All trees irrespective of their origin had higher ψx, P, CO₂ assimilation (A), and stomatal conductance (gs), but lower π, in Control than in Lucerne in which the soil profile was consistently drier. The trends in ψx, π, q and A did not reflect the known differences in dry weight of trees, P was in the order TC3 > TC4 > Seedling, consistent with previously reported tree weights. Both TC3 and TC4 had higher P, due to their larger OA, than Seedling, although the latter had higher A. Thus ψx and A that are routinely measured may not always adequately explain differences in growth amongst pines; it is advisable that π be determined to allow deductions of P be made when using water relations to analyse plant growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-1481-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>agroecosystems ; Agroforestry ; Agroforestry systems ; Alfalfa ; assimilation (physiology) ; Carbon dioxide ; Cell walls ; climate change ; Conductance ; Flowers & plants ; forest ecosystems ; forest trees ; Gas exchange ; groundwater ; Growing seasons ; Medicago sativa ; Moisture content ; Osmotic potential ; osmotic pressure ; Pasture ; Pastures ; physiological response ; Pine trees ; Pinus radiata ; Plant growth ; plant response ; plant stress ; Plant water relations ; Plants ; Seedlings ; Soil profiles ; Soil water ; Soil water deficit ; soil-plant interactions ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance ; Temperate environments ; temperate zones ; Tissue culture ; Trees ; Turgor ; Turgor pressure ; Water content ; Water deficit ; Water potential ; Water relations ; water stress ; Xylem</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2005-08, Vol.275 (1-2), p.195-206</ispartof><rights>2005 Springer</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-849a0ff7268b98f5af2bc581be87e2c25b459a5cb4126b98a52c71b6f86cb5253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-849a0ff7268b98f5af2bc581be87e2c25b459a5cb4126b98a52c71b6f86cb5253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42951732$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42951732$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yunusa, I.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, K.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youwei, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, D.J</creatorcontrib><title>Water potential and gas exchange did not reflect performance of Pinus radiata D. Don in an agroforestry system under conditions of soil-water deficit in a temperate environment</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>In order to understand how radiata pines respond to declining supply of soil-water in agroforestry systems, we monitored water potential in xylem (ψx), osmotic potential (π) and relative water content (q) for fascicles at pre-dawn and at mid-day for 3-year-old trees that were raised from either seedlings (Seedling) or from tissue culture (TC3 and TC4), and grown either alone (Control) or over lucerne (Medicago sativa) pasture (Lucerne). Water relations at dawn were mostly similar for all the pines, except late in the season when π was lower, bulk turgor pressure (P), deduced as the difference between ψx and π, was higher, for TC3 than for the other two pines. At mid-day, Seedling often had higher ψx and π, but because of its poor osmotic adjustment (OA) had lower P, than either TC3 or TC4. The cell walls were more elastic in Seedling with modulus of elasticity (e) of 6.5 MPa compared with 8.1 MPa for both TC3 and TC4, while loss of turgor was estimated to occur at ψx of -1.45 MPa for Seedling, - 1.38 MPa for TC3 and -1.35 MPa for TC4. All trees irrespective of their origin had higher ψx, P, CO₂ assimilation (A), and stomatal conductance (gs), but lower π, in Control than in Lucerne in which the soil profile was consistently drier. The trends in ψx, π, q and A did not reflect the known differences in dry weight of trees, P was in the order TC3 > TC4 > Seedling, consistent with previously reported tree weights. Both TC3 and TC4 had higher P, due to their larger OA, than Seedling, although the latter had higher A. Thus ψx and A that are routinely measured may not always adequately explain differences in growth amongst pines; it is advisable that π be determined to allow deductions of P be made when using water relations to analyse plant growth.</description><subject>agroecosystems</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Agroforestry systems</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>assimilation (physiology)</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>forest ecosystems</subject><subject>forest trees</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><subject>groundwater</subject><subject>Growing seasons</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Osmotic potential</subject><subject>osmotic pressure</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pastures</subject><subject>physiological response</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus radiata</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>plant response</subject><subject>plant stress</subject><subject>Plant water relations</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Soil profiles</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Soil water deficit</subject><subject>soil-plant interactions</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Temperate environments</subject><subject>temperate zones</subject><subject>Tissue culture</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Turgor</subject><subject>Turgor pressure</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water deficit</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><subject>Water relations</subject><subject>water stress</subject><subject>Xylem</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFu1DAQhiMEEkvhATggRpy4uHicOE6OqC20UiWQoIKb5Tj24lViL7YD7FvxiDgN4sDJsueb_x_PX1XPkZ4jpeJNQkTaEEo5waZDIh5UO-SiJpzW7cNqR2nNCBX918fVk5QOdL1ju6t-f1HZRDiGbHx2agLlR9irBOaX_qb83sDoRvAhQzR2MjrD0UQb4qy8NhAsfHR-SRDV6FRWcHkOl8GD80UH1D6GgpqU4wnSKWUzw-LHYqeDH112wadVIgU3kZ_3c4zGOu3yvQAUvpiVdzD-h4vBz2XGp9Ujq6Zknv09z6q7d1efL67J7Yf3Nxdvb4muOWbSNb2i1grWdkPfWa4sGzTvcDCdMEwzPjS8V1wPDbK2EIozLXBobdfqgTNen1WvN91jDN-X8gc5u6TNNClvwpIk0rrpWN_0fUFf_YcewhJ9mU4KjowibVcIN0jHkFJZpjxGN6t4KkpyjVBuEcoSoVwjlKL0vNh6DimH-K-hYT1HUbNSf7nVrQqybNslefep-NWrJSLr6z_snaRi</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Yunusa, I.A.M</creator><creator>Thomson, S.E</creator><creator>Pollock, K.P</creator><creator>Youwei, L</creator><creator>Mead, D.J</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Water potential and gas exchange did not reflect performance of Pinus radiata D. Don in an agroforestry system under conditions of soil-water deficit in a temperate environment</title><author>Yunusa, I.A.M ; Thomson, S.E ; Pollock, K.P ; Youwei, L ; Mead, D.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-849a0ff7268b98f5af2bc581be87e2c25b459a5cb4126b98a52c71b6f86cb5253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>agroecosystems</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Agroforestry systems</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>assimilation (physiology)</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>forest ecosystems</topic><topic>forest trees</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><topic>groundwater</topic><topic>Growing seasons</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Osmotic potential</topic><topic>osmotic pressure</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pastures</topic><topic>physiological response</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus radiata</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>plant response</topic><topic>plant stress</topic><topic>Plant water relations</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Soil profiles</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Soil water deficit</topic><topic>soil-plant interactions</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Temperate environments</topic><topic>temperate zones</topic><topic>Tissue culture</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Turgor</topic><topic>Turgor pressure</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water deficit</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><topic>Water relations</topic><topic>water stress</topic><topic>Xylem</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yunusa, I.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, S.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollock, K.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youwei, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mead, D.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yunusa, I.A.M</au><au>Thomson, S.E</au><au>Pollock, K.P</au><au>Youwei, L</au><au>Mead, D.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water potential and gas exchange did not reflect performance of Pinus radiata D. Don in an agroforestry system under conditions of soil-water deficit in a temperate environment</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>275</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>195-206</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>In order to understand how radiata pines respond to declining supply of soil-water in agroforestry systems, we monitored water potential in xylem (ψx), osmotic potential (π) and relative water content (q) for fascicles at pre-dawn and at mid-day for 3-year-old trees that were raised from either seedlings (Seedling) or from tissue culture (TC3 and TC4), and grown either alone (Control) or over lucerne (Medicago sativa) pasture (Lucerne). Water relations at dawn were mostly similar for all the pines, except late in the season when π was lower, bulk turgor pressure (P), deduced as the difference between ψx and π, was higher, for TC3 than for the other two pines. At mid-day, Seedling often had higher ψx and π, but because of its poor osmotic adjustment (OA) had lower P, than either TC3 or TC4. The cell walls were more elastic in Seedling with modulus of elasticity (e) of 6.5 MPa compared with 8.1 MPa for both TC3 and TC4, while loss of turgor was estimated to occur at ψx of -1.45 MPa for Seedling, - 1.38 MPa for TC3 and -1.35 MPa for TC4. All trees irrespective of their origin had higher ψx, P, CO₂ assimilation (A), and stomatal conductance (gs), but lower π, in Control than in Lucerne in which the soil profile was consistently drier. The trends in ψx, π, q and A did not reflect the known differences in dry weight of trees, P was in the order TC3 > TC4 > Seedling, consistent with previously reported tree weights. Both TC3 and TC4 had higher P, due to their larger OA, than Seedling, although the latter had higher A. Thus ψx and A that are routinely measured may not always adequately explain differences in growth amongst pines; it is advisable that π be determined to allow deductions of P be made when using water relations to analyse plant growth.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-005-1481-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2005-08, Vol.275 (1-2), p.195-206 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034829499 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | agroecosystems Agroforestry Agroforestry systems Alfalfa assimilation (physiology) Carbon dioxide Cell walls climate change Conductance Flowers & plants forest ecosystems forest trees Gas exchange groundwater Growing seasons Medicago sativa Moisture content Osmotic potential osmotic pressure Pasture Pastures physiological response Pine trees Pinus radiata Plant growth plant response plant stress Plant water relations Plants Seedlings Soil profiles Soil water Soil water deficit soil-plant interactions Stomata Stomatal conductance Temperate environments temperate zones Tissue culture Trees Turgor Turgor pressure Water content Water deficit Water potential Water relations water stress Xylem |
title | Water potential and gas exchange did not reflect performance of Pinus radiata D. Don in an agroforestry system under conditions of soil-water deficit in a temperate environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A29%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20potential%20and%20gas%20exchange%20did%20not%20reflect%20performance%20of%20Pinus%20radiata%20D.%20Don%20in%20an%20agroforestry%20system%20under%20conditions%20of%20soil-water%20deficit%20in%20a%20temperate%20environment&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Yunusa,%20I.A.M&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=275&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=195-206&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-005-1481-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42951732%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751201069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42951732&rfr_iscdi=true |