Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components

The use of carbon fibre reinforced plastics is steadily increasing in the aerospace industry as rising fuel costs and concerns over the environment push airframe manufacturers to improve aircraft efficiency. The high costs associated with manufacturing carbon fibre reinforced components in autoclave...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2012-07, Vol.29-30, p.91-102
Hauptverfasser: Witik, Robert A., Gaille, Fabrice, Teuscher, Rémy, Ringwald, Heike, Michaud, Véronique, Månson, Jan-Anders E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue
container_start_page 91
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 29-30
creator Witik, Robert A.
Gaille, Fabrice
Teuscher, Rémy
Ringwald, Heike
Michaud, Véronique
Månson, Jan-Anders E.
description The use of carbon fibre reinforced plastics is steadily increasing in the aerospace industry as rising fuel costs and concerns over the environment push airframe manufacturers to improve aircraft efficiency. The high costs associated with manufacturing carbon fibre reinforced components in autoclaves have prompted interest in alternative out-of-autoclave processing methods. In this study a combined cost modelling and life-cycle assessment approach is applied to selected out-of-autoclave production scenarios. Out-of-autoclave specific “prepregs” and resin infused fabrics are cured in thermal and microwave ovens of comparable volume and assessed against a benchmark autoclave scenario. Results showed that materials, in particular carbon fibres, contributed most significantly to component cost and environmental impacts. Resin infusion processes were effective at reducing costs, as reinforcement fabrics and resin were less expensive. Due to the small contribution of energy to total cost, reductions in energy use did not lead to significant savings, although they did improve the environmental performance of the manufacturing process. Out-of-autoclave specific prepregs did not perform as well due to their higher costs, longer associated cycle times and the need for lengthy de-bulking operations. Microwave oven curing offered little in terms of cost reduction and environmental improvement as investment costs were comparable to those of an autoclave, and energy consumption was relatively high compared with traditional thermal oven use. Opportunities for improvement exist if investment costs can be reduced and additional work carried out to promote more efficient transfer of energy. Improvement of the carbon fibre production process would be the most effective approach for reducing impacts and costs from carbon fibre components.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034822944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652612001047</els_id><sourcerecordid>1034822944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e4c7a3070d6d7ca41f15125a102713b7a9a0768c20547baa63892ec7c5f23e673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtqwzAQFKWFpo9PKOjYi1NJli37VEpIH1DopT2LzXpNFWwplZRA_742yb0wsOwyM7s7jN1JsZRC1g_b5RYH2sWwVEKqpZjRnLGFbExbSNPU52wh2qot6krVl-wqpa0Q0gijF8ytMfgwOuTgO07-4GLwI_kMA4eUKKW54aHnMGSKHrI7EJ92dXvMLng-Uv4OXeJ9iBzDuAvJZeLgIkbo83HkJ4t0wy56GBLdnuo1-3pef65ei_ePl7fV03uBWre5II0GSmFEV3cGQcteVlJVIIUystwYaEGYukElKm02AHXZtIrQYNWrkmpTXrP7o-905M-eUrajS0jDAJ7CPlkpSt0o1Wo9UasjFWNIKVJvd9GNEH8nkp2jtVt7itbO0Voxo5l0j0cdTX8cHEWb0JFH6lwkzLYL7h-HP8m-h3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034822944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Witik, Robert A. ; Gaille, Fabrice ; Teuscher, Rémy ; Ringwald, Heike ; Michaud, Véronique ; Månson, Jan-Anders E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Witik, Robert A. ; Gaille, Fabrice ; Teuscher, Rémy ; Ringwald, Heike ; Michaud, Véronique ; Månson, Jan-Anders E.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of carbon fibre reinforced plastics is steadily increasing in the aerospace industry as rising fuel costs and concerns over the environment push airframe manufacturers to improve aircraft efficiency. The high costs associated with manufacturing carbon fibre reinforced components in autoclaves have prompted interest in alternative out-of-autoclave processing methods. In this study a combined cost modelling and life-cycle assessment approach is applied to selected out-of-autoclave production scenarios. Out-of-autoclave specific “prepregs” and resin infused fabrics are cured in thermal and microwave ovens of comparable volume and assessed against a benchmark autoclave scenario. Results showed that materials, in particular carbon fibres, contributed most significantly to component cost and environmental impacts. Resin infusion processes were effective at reducing costs, as reinforcement fabrics and resin were less expensive. Due to the small contribution of energy to total cost, reductions in energy use did not lead to significant savings, although they did improve the environmental performance of the manufacturing process. Out-of-autoclave specific prepregs did not perform as well due to their higher costs, longer associated cycle times and the need for lengthy de-bulking operations. Microwave oven curing offered little in terms of cost reduction and environmental improvement as investment costs were comparable to those of an autoclave, and energy consumption was relatively high compared with traditional thermal oven use. Opportunities for improvement exist if investment costs can be reduced and additional work carried out to promote more efficient transfer of energy. Improvement of the carbon fibre production process would be the most effective approach for reducing impacts and costs from carbon fibre components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aeronautics ; Composites ; Cost modelling ; Life-cycle assessment</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2012-07, Vol.29-30, p.91-102</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e4c7a3070d6d7ca41f15125a102713b7a9a0768c20547baa63892ec7c5f23e673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e4c7a3070d6d7ca41f15125a102713b7a9a0768c20547baa63892ec7c5f23e673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652612001047$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Witik, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaille, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teuscher, Rémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringwald, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Månson, Jan-Anders E.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>The use of carbon fibre reinforced plastics is steadily increasing in the aerospace industry as rising fuel costs and concerns over the environment push airframe manufacturers to improve aircraft efficiency. The high costs associated with manufacturing carbon fibre reinforced components in autoclaves have prompted interest in alternative out-of-autoclave processing methods. In this study a combined cost modelling and life-cycle assessment approach is applied to selected out-of-autoclave production scenarios. Out-of-autoclave specific “prepregs” and resin infused fabrics are cured in thermal and microwave ovens of comparable volume and assessed against a benchmark autoclave scenario. Results showed that materials, in particular carbon fibres, contributed most significantly to component cost and environmental impacts. Resin infusion processes were effective at reducing costs, as reinforcement fabrics and resin were less expensive. Due to the small contribution of energy to total cost, reductions in energy use did not lead to significant savings, although they did improve the environmental performance of the manufacturing process. Out-of-autoclave specific prepregs did not perform as well due to their higher costs, longer associated cycle times and the need for lengthy de-bulking operations. Microwave oven curing offered little in terms of cost reduction and environmental improvement as investment costs were comparable to those of an autoclave, and energy consumption was relatively high compared with traditional thermal oven use. Opportunities for improvement exist if investment costs can be reduced and additional work carried out to promote more efficient transfer of energy. Improvement of the carbon fibre production process would be the most effective approach for reducing impacts and costs from carbon fibre components.</description><subject>Aeronautics</subject><subject>Composites</subject><subject>Cost modelling</subject><subject>Life-cycle assessment</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtqwzAQFKWFpo9PKOjYi1NJli37VEpIH1DopT2LzXpNFWwplZRA_742yb0wsOwyM7s7jN1JsZRC1g_b5RYH2sWwVEKqpZjRnLGFbExbSNPU52wh2qot6krVl-wqpa0Q0gijF8ytMfgwOuTgO07-4GLwI_kMA4eUKKW54aHnMGSKHrI7EJ92dXvMLng-Uv4OXeJ9iBzDuAvJZeLgIkbo83HkJ4t0wy56GBLdnuo1-3pef65ei_ePl7fV03uBWre5II0GSmFEV3cGQcteVlJVIIUystwYaEGYukElKm02AHXZtIrQYNWrkmpTXrP7o-905M-eUrajS0jDAJ7CPlkpSt0o1Wo9UasjFWNIKVJvd9GNEH8nkp2jtVt7itbO0Voxo5l0j0cdTX8cHEWb0JFH6lwkzLYL7h-HP8m-h3E</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Witik, Robert A.</creator><creator>Gaille, Fabrice</creator><creator>Teuscher, Rémy</creator><creator>Ringwald, Heike</creator><creator>Michaud, Véronique</creator><creator>Månson, Jan-Anders E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components</title><author>Witik, Robert A. ; Gaille, Fabrice ; Teuscher, Rémy ; Ringwald, Heike ; Michaud, Véronique ; Månson, Jan-Anders E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e4c7a3070d6d7ca41f15125a102713b7a9a0768c20547baa63892ec7c5f23e673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aeronautics</topic><topic>Composites</topic><topic>Cost modelling</topic><topic>Life-cycle assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Witik, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaille, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teuscher, Rémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringwald, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michaud, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Månson, Jan-Anders E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Witik, Robert A.</au><au>Gaille, Fabrice</au><au>Teuscher, Rémy</au><au>Ringwald, Heike</au><au>Michaud, Véronique</au><au>Månson, Jan-Anders E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29-30</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>91-102</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>The use of carbon fibre reinforced plastics is steadily increasing in the aerospace industry as rising fuel costs and concerns over the environment push airframe manufacturers to improve aircraft efficiency. The high costs associated with manufacturing carbon fibre reinforced components in autoclaves have prompted interest in alternative out-of-autoclave processing methods. In this study a combined cost modelling and life-cycle assessment approach is applied to selected out-of-autoclave production scenarios. Out-of-autoclave specific “prepregs” and resin infused fabrics are cured in thermal and microwave ovens of comparable volume and assessed against a benchmark autoclave scenario. Results showed that materials, in particular carbon fibres, contributed most significantly to component cost and environmental impacts. Resin infusion processes were effective at reducing costs, as reinforcement fabrics and resin were less expensive. Due to the small contribution of energy to total cost, reductions in energy use did not lead to significant savings, although they did improve the environmental performance of the manufacturing process. Out-of-autoclave specific prepregs did not perform as well due to their higher costs, longer associated cycle times and the need for lengthy de-bulking operations. Microwave oven curing offered little in terms of cost reduction and environmental improvement as investment costs were comparable to those of an autoclave, and energy consumption was relatively high compared with traditional thermal oven use. Opportunities for improvement exist if investment costs can be reduced and additional work carried out to promote more efficient transfer of energy. Improvement of the carbon fibre production process would be the most effective approach for reducing impacts and costs from carbon fibre components.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.028</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2012-07, Vol.29-30, p.91-102
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034822944
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aeronautics
Composites
Cost modelling
Life-cycle assessment
title Economic and environmental assessment of alternative production methods for composite aircraft components
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A11%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20and%20environmental%20assessment%20of%20alternative%20production%20methods%20for%20composite%20aircraft%20components&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Witik,%20Robert%20A.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=29-30&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=91-102&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1034822944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034822944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959652612001047&rfr_iscdi=true