What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?

Abstract Objective To identify the most frequently used outcome measurement instruments reported in clinical studies on TBI and to provide a content comparison in the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Patients and methods A systematic literatu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2012-07, Vol.114 (6), p.645-650
Hauptverfasser: Laxe, Sara, Tschiesner, Uta, Zasler, Nathan, López-Blazquez, Raquel, Tormos, Jose M, Bernabeu, Montserrat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 650
container_issue 6
container_start_page 645
container_title Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
container_volume 114
creator Laxe, Sara
Tschiesner, Uta
Zasler, Nathan
López-Blazquez, Raquel
Tormos, Jose M
Bernabeu, Montserrat
description Abstract Objective To identify the most frequently used outcome measurement instruments reported in clinical studies on TBI and to provide a content comparison in the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Patients and methods A systematic literature review of clinical studies in TBI was performed using Medline, EMBASE and PsychINFO. The items of the measurement instruments present in more than 20% of the studies were linked to the ICF language. Results 193 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The frequency analysis identified six instruments: Functional Independence Measure (50%), Glasgow Outcome Scale (34%), Disability Rating Scale (32%), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (29%), Trail Making Test (26%) and Community Integration Questionnaire (22%). The analysed instruments focus on different aspects of body functions (especially DRS, WAIS and TMT) and aspects of activities and participation in life (especially CIQ and FIM). Inter-researcher agreement for the ICF linking process was 0.83. Conclusions Translating the items of different measurement instruments into the ICF language provides a practical tool to facilitate content comparisons among different outcome measures. The comparison can assist clinical researchers to integrate information acquired from different studies and different tools.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034817393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0303846711004471</els_id><sourcerecordid>2747504091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-5269c79e2fee399c638f7e134d0512f7c081b1774e0c3455708dd2b2540e3a623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL1SWEBIHsvgjcZwLH1oorVSJAyCOluNMWC-OXWynUv4ZPw9nd0ulXuDk0fiZd8bjtyjOCF4TTPjr3Vpb42AKfk0xIWtC15iJB8WKiIaWvOXiYbHCDLNSVLw5KZ7EuMMYM8bF4-KEUlrVVdWsit_ftyqh3o_KuIj8gNIW0KVLEJxKxjtl0caqGM1g9D6xMOeT00ts3I9X6IOJqjPWpBkp16MLUDZtkQqAtL-BAD3q5r3q6GPKuXH0zs5oivlmBBWnACO4hHL_FKYljDlGKahpzB016kKeLad2U5hRgAgq6O3bp8WjQdkIz47nafHt_OPXzUV59fnT5eb9ValrgVNZU97qpgU6ALC21ZyJoQHCqh7XhA6NxoJ0pGkqwJpVdd1g0fe0o3WFgSlO2Wnx8qB7HfyvCWKSo4karFUO_BQlwawSpGEt-w-UYlyJluKMPr-H7vyUV273gpyzFvM2U_xA6eBjDDDI62BGFeYMycUGcidvbSAXG0hCZbZBLjw7yk_dCP3fstt_z8CLI6CiVnYIymkT7zierUMEydy7Awd5xTcGgozagNPQmwA6yd6bf8_y5p7EgmU32Z8wQ7x7t4y5QH5ZTLt4lpC8rKoh7A_Ml-sz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036639069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Laxe, Sara ; Tschiesner, Uta ; Zasler, Nathan ; López-Blazquez, Raquel ; Tormos, Jose M ; Bernabeu, Montserrat</creator><creatorcontrib>Laxe, Sara ; Tschiesner, Uta ; Zasler, Nathan ; López-Blazquez, Raquel ; Tormos, Jose M ; Bernabeu, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To identify the most frequently used outcome measurement instruments reported in clinical studies on TBI and to provide a content comparison in the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Patients and methods A systematic literature review of clinical studies in TBI was performed using Medline, EMBASE and PsychINFO. The items of the measurement instruments present in more than 20% of the studies were linked to the ICF language. Results 193 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The frequency analysis identified six instruments: Functional Independence Measure (50%), Glasgow Outcome Scale (34%), Disability Rating Scale (32%), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (29%), Trail Making Test (26%) and Community Integration Questionnaire (22%). The analysed instruments focus on different aspects of body functions (especially DRS, WAIS and TMT) and aspects of activities and participation in life (especially CIQ and FIM). Inter-researcher agreement for the ICF linking process was 0.83. Conclusions Translating the items of different measurement instruments into the ICF language provides a practical tool to facilitate content comparisons among different outcome measures. The comparison can assist clinical researchers to integrate information acquired from different studies and different tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22245447</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CNNSBV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Injuries - classification ; Brain Injuries - rehabilitation ; Classification ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Disability and health ; Disability Evaluation ; Glasgow Outcome Scale ; Humans ; ICF Core Set ; Independent Living ; Information processing ; Integration ; Intelligence ; International Classification of Diseases ; International classification of functioning ; Inventories ; Language ; Linking ; Literature reviews ; Medical sciences ; Neurologic Examination ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neurorehabilitation ; Neurosurgery ; Observer Variation ; Outcome measures ; Social Behavior ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Terminology as Topic ; Traumatic brain injury ; Treatment Outcome ; World Health Organization</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2012-07, Vol.114 (6), p.645-650</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-5269c79e2fee399c638f7e134d0512f7c081b1774e0c3455708dd2b2540e3a623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-5269c79e2fee399c638f7e134d0512f7c081b1774e0c3455708dd2b2540e3a623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1036639069?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26030181$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22245447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laxe, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschiesner, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zasler, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Blazquez, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tormos, Jose M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernabeu, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><title>What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?</title><title>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To identify the most frequently used outcome measurement instruments reported in clinical studies on TBI and to provide a content comparison in the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Patients and methods A systematic literature review of clinical studies in TBI was performed using Medline, EMBASE and PsychINFO. The items of the measurement instruments present in more than 20% of the studies were linked to the ICF language. Results 193 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The frequency analysis identified six instruments: Functional Independence Measure (50%), Glasgow Outcome Scale (34%), Disability Rating Scale (32%), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (29%), Trail Making Test (26%) and Community Integration Questionnaire (22%). The analysed instruments focus on different aspects of body functions (especially DRS, WAIS and TMT) and aspects of activities and participation in life (especially CIQ and FIM). Inter-researcher agreement for the ICF linking process was 0.83. Conclusions Translating the items of different measurement instruments into the ICF language provides a practical tool to facilitate content comparisons among different outcome measures. The comparison can assist clinical researchers to integrate information acquired from different studies and different tools.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Disability and health</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Glasgow Outcome Scale</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICF Core Set</subject><subject>Independent Living</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>International Classification of Diseases</subject><subject>International classification of functioning</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linking</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neurologic Examination</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neurorehabilitation</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Outcome measures</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><issn>0303-8467</issn><issn>1872-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL1SWEBIHsvgjcZwLH1oorVSJAyCOluNMWC-OXWynUv4ZPw9nd0ulXuDk0fiZd8bjtyjOCF4TTPjr3Vpb42AKfk0xIWtC15iJB8WKiIaWvOXiYbHCDLNSVLw5KZ7EuMMYM8bF4-KEUlrVVdWsit_ftyqh3o_KuIj8gNIW0KVLEJxKxjtl0caqGM1g9D6xMOeT00ts3I9X6IOJqjPWpBkp16MLUDZtkQqAtL-BAD3q5r3q6GPKuXH0zs5oivlmBBWnACO4hHL_FKYljDlGKahpzB016kKeLad2U5hRgAgq6O3bp8WjQdkIz47nafHt_OPXzUV59fnT5eb9ValrgVNZU97qpgU6ALC21ZyJoQHCqh7XhA6NxoJ0pGkqwJpVdd1g0fe0o3WFgSlO2Wnx8qB7HfyvCWKSo4karFUO_BQlwawSpGEt-w-UYlyJluKMPr-H7vyUV273gpyzFvM2U_xA6eBjDDDI62BGFeYMycUGcidvbSAXG0hCZbZBLjw7yk_dCP3fstt_z8CLI6CiVnYIymkT7zierUMEydy7Awd5xTcGgozagNPQmwA6yd6bf8_y5p7EgmU32Z8wQ7x7t4y5QH5ZTLt4lpC8rKoh7A_Ml-sz</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Laxe, Sara</creator><creator>Tschiesner, Uta</creator><creator>Zasler, Nathan</creator><creator>López-Blazquez, Raquel</creator><creator>Tormos, Jose M</creator><creator>Bernabeu, Montserrat</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?</title><author>Laxe, Sara ; Tschiesner, Uta ; Zasler, Nathan ; López-Blazquez, Raquel ; Tormos, Jose M ; Bernabeu, Montserrat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-5269c79e2fee399c638f7e134d0512f7c081b1774e0c3455708dd2b2540e3a623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Disability and health</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Glasgow Outcome Scale</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICF Core Set</topic><topic>Independent Living</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>International Classification of Diseases</topic><topic>International classification of functioning</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linking</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neurologic Examination</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neurorehabilitation</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Outcome measures</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laxe, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tschiesner, Uta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zasler, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Blazquez, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tormos, Jose M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernabeu, Montserrat</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laxe, Sara</au><au>Tschiesner, Uta</au><au>Zasler, Nathan</au><au>López-Blazquez, Raquel</au><au>Tormos, Jose M</au><au>Bernabeu, Montserrat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>650</epage><pages>645-650</pages><issn>0303-8467</issn><eissn>1872-6968</eissn><coden>CNNSBV</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective To identify the most frequently used outcome measurement instruments reported in clinical studies on TBI and to provide a content comparison in the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Patients and methods A systematic literature review of clinical studies in TBI was performed using Medline, EMBASE and PsychINFO. The items of the measurement instruments present in more than 20% of the studies were linked to the ICF language. Results 193 papers fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The frequency analysis identified six instruments: Functional Independence Measure (50%), Glasgow Outcome Scale (34%), Disability Rating Scale (32%), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (29%), Trail Making Test (26%) and Community Integration Questionnaire (22%). The analysed instruments focus on different aspects of body functions (especially DRS, WAIS and TMT) and aspects of activities and participation in life (especially CIQ and FIM). Inter-researcher agreement for the ICF linking process was 0.83. Conclusions Translating the items of different measurement instruments into the ICF language provides a practical tool to facilitate content comparisons among different outcome measures. The comparison can assist clinical researchers to integrate information acquired from different studies and different tools.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22245447</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.038</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-8467
ispartof Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2012-07, Vol.114 (6), p.645-650
issn 0303-8467
1872-6968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034817393
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain Injuries - classification
Brain Injuries - rehabilitation
Classification
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Disability and health
Disability Evaluation
Glasgow Outcome Scale
Humans
ICF Core Set
Independent Living
Information processing
Integration
Intelligence
International Classification of Diseases
International classification of functioning
Inventories
Language
Linking
Literature reviews
Medical sciences
Neurologic Examination
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests
Neurorehabilitation
Neurosurgery
Observer Variation
Outcome measures
Social Behavior
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surveys and Questionnaires
Systematic review
Terminology as Topic
Traumatic brain injury
Treatment Outcome
World Health Organization
title What domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20domains%20of%20the%20International%20Classification%20of%20Functioning,%20Disability%20and%20Health%20are%20covered%20by%20the%20most%20commonly%20used%20measurement%20instruments%20in%20traumatic%20brain%20injury%20research?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurology%20and%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Laxe,%20Sara&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=650&rft.pages=645-650&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft.coden=CNNSBV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.12.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2747504091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036639069&rft_id=info:pmid/22245447&rft_els_id=S0303846711004471&rfr_iscdi=true