Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands

It is widely recognized that healthy ecosystems can provide considerable benefits to people, including food, timber, freshwater, protection from floods and much of what we call quality of life. A global review of these ecosystem services carried out as part of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (ME...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological sciences journal 2011-12, Vol.56 (8), p.1543-1565
Hauptverfasser: Acreman, M. C, Harding, R. J, Lloyd, C, McNamara, N. P, Mountford, J. O, Mould, D. J, Purse, B. V, Heard, M. S, Stratford, C. J, Dury, S. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1565
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1543
container_title Hydrological sciences journal
container_volume 56
creator Acreman, M. C
Harding, R. J
Lloyd, C
McNamara, N. P
Mountford, J. O
Mould, D. J
Purse, B. V
Heard, M. S
Stratford, C. J
Dury, S. J
description It is widely recognized that healthy ecosystems can provide considerable benefits to people, including food, timber, freshwater, protection from floods and much of what we call quality of life. A global review of these ecosystem services carried out as part of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) provided a framework for national and local studies. Using the MEA approach, this paper reviews the ecosystem services provided by the Somerset Levels and Moors wetland system in southwest England. This wetland provides a series of important services that are beneficial locally, regionally and globally, including grazing for cattle, carbon sequestration, flood water storage, recreation and archaeology. Some services are synergistic and reinforcing; for example, maintaining wet conditions supports wetland bird life that maintains biological diversity, attracts tourists, protects archaeological artefacts and reduces CO₂ emissions; raising water levels to or above the ground leads to net greenhouse gas uptake by the wetland. Other services are potentially conflicting, for example raising water levels may reduce potential flood water storage and increase methane emissions. Comparison of the services of the wetland with those of drier habitats reveals for example that carbon sequestration, bird habitat provision and hay production is greater in wetlands, whilst grazing quality may decline and plant diversity may be reduced in the short term and distributions of disease vectors may be altered by wetland restoration through raising water levels. Management decisions affecting wetlands may necessitate a trade-off of ecosystem services.Editor Z.W. KundzewiczCitation Acreman, M.C., Harding, R.J., Lloyd, C., McNamara, N.P., Mountford, J.O., Mould, D.J., Purse, B. V., Heard, M.S., Stratford, C.J. and Dury, S.J., 2011. Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (8), 1543–1565.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02626667.2011.629783
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_fao_a</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034814402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1034814402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f48ef3f10f00300f606b9810894bf206c85fcf586d7da29f643ea4addabc67723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9rFEEQxQdRMMZ8g4ANXrzMWv1nenpOIiFqYEMOSc5Nb0-VTpiZjl2zCfvt7WUUxIunqoLfe7x6VXUuYSPBwUdQVllr240CKTdWda3TL6oTJRuotdHNy7_219Ub5gcAbTqrT6qruxx6rBORGGaBMfGBF5wEY34aIrJIJJYfKG7ThJlxEVt8wpFFmHtxnVJm8YzLWC5-W72iMDKe_Z6n1f2Xy7uLb_X25uvVxedtHbV1S03GIWmSQCUDAFmwu86VNzqzIwU2uoYiNc72bR9UR9ZoDCb0fdhF27ZKn1YfVt_HnH7ukRc_DRxxLCEw7dnL8pqTxsARff8P-pD2eS7pCqVaUA0YVyizUjEn5ozkH_MwhXwokD_26__064_9-rXfIvu0yoaZUp7Cc8pj75dwGFOmHOY4sNf_cXi3OlBIPnzPRXB_WwADIDsNSupfXc2JMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027025048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Acreman, M. C ; Harding, R. J ; Lloyd, C ; McNamara, N. P ; Mountford, J. O ; Mould, D. J ; Purse, B. V ; Heard, M. S ; Stratford, C. J ; Dury, S. J</creator><creatorcontrib>Acreman, M. C ; Harding, R. J ; Lloyd, C ; McNamara, N. P ; Mountford, J. O ; Mould, D. J ; Purse, B. V ; Heard, M. S ; Stratford, C. J ; Dury, S. J</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely recognized that healthy ecosystems can provide considerable benefits to people, including food, timber, freshwater, protection from floods and much of what we call quality of life. A global review of these ecosystem services carried out as part of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) provided a framework for national and local studies. Using the MEA approach, this paper reviews the ecosystem services provided by the Somerset Levels and Moors wetland system in southwest England. This wetland provides a series of important services that are beneficial locally, regionally and globally, including grazing for cattle, carbon sequestration, flood water storage, recreation and archaeology. Some services are synergistic and reinforcing; for example, maintaining wet conditions supports wetland bird life that maintains biological diversity, attracts tourists, protects archaeological artefacts and reduces CO₂ emissions; raising water levels to or above the ground leads to net greenhouse gas uptake by the wetland. Other services are potentially conflicting, for example raising water levels may reduce potential flood water storage and increase methane emissions. Comparison of the services of the wetland with those of drier habitats reveals for example that carbon sequestration, bird habitat provision and hay production is greater in wetlands, whilst grazing quality may decline and plant diversity may be reduced in the short term and distributions of disease vectors may be altered by wetland restoration through raising water levels. Management decisions affecting wetlands may necessitate a trade-off of ecosystem services.Editor Z.W. KundzewiczCitation Acreman, M.C., Harding, R.J., Lloyd, C., McNamara, N.P., Mountford, J.O., Mould, D.J., Purse, B. V., Heard, M.S., Stratford, C.J. and Dury, S.J., 2011. Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (8), 1543–1565.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-3435</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0262-6667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-3435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.629783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; birds ; carbon dioxide ; carbon sequestration ; cattle ; disease vectors ; ecosystem function ; ecosystem services ; ecosystems ; emissions ; floods ; floods; water resources ; fonction de l'écosystème ; freshwater ; grazing ; greenhouse gases ; habitats ; hay ; inondations ; methane production ; quality of life ; recreation ; ressources en eau ; services écosystémiques ; Somerset Levels and Moors ; séquestration du carbone ; tourism; archaeology ; tourisme, archéologie ; tourists ; wetlands ; zones humides</subject><ispartof>Hydrological sciences journal, 2011-12, Vol.56 (8), p.1543-1565</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 IAHS Press 2011</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Dec 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f48ef3f10f00300f606b9810894bf206c85fcf586d7da29f643ea4addabc67723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f48ef3f10f00300f606b9810894bf206c85fcf586d7da29f643ea4addabc67723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02626667.2011.629783$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2011.629783$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Acreman, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, N. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountford, J. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mould, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purse, B. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratford, C. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dury, S. J</creatorcontrib><title>Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands</title><title>Hydrological sciences journal</title><description>It is widely recognized that healthy ecosystems can provide considerable benefits to people, including food, timber, freshwater, protection from floods and much of what we call quality of life. A global review of these ecosystem services carried out as part of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) provided a framework for national and local studies. Using the MEA approach, this paper reviews the ecosystem services provided by the Somerset Levels and Moors wetland system in southwest England. This wetland provides a series of important services that are beneficial locally, regionally and globally, including grazing for cattle, carbon sequestration, flood water storage, recreation and archaeology. Some services are synergistic and reinforcing; for example, maintaining wet conditions supports wetland bird life that maintains biological diversity, attracts tourists, protects archaeological artefacts and reduces CO₂ emissions; raising water levels to or above the ground leads to net greenhouse gas uptake by the wetland. Other services are potentially conflicting, for example raising water levels may reduce potential flood water storage and increase methane emissions. Comparison of the services of the wetland with those of drier habitats reveals for example that carbon sequestration, bird habitat provision and hay production is greater in wetlands, whilst grazing quality may decline and plant diversity may be reduced in the short term and distributions of disease vectors may be altered by wetland restoration through raising water levels. Management decisions affecting wetlands may necessitate a trade-off of ecosystem services.Editor Z.W. KundzewiczCitation Acreman, M.C., Harding, R.J., Lloyd, C., McNamara, N.P., Mountford, J.O., Mould, D.J., Purse, B. V., Heard, M.S., Stratford, C.J. and Dury, S.J., 2011. Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (8), 1543–1565.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>birds</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>cattle</subject><subject>disease vectors</subject><subject>ecosystem function</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>emissions</subject><subject>floods</subject><subject>floods; water resources</subject><subject>fonction de l'écosystème</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>habitats</subject><subject>hay</subject><subject>inondations</subject><subject>methane production</subject><subject>quality of life</subject><subject>recreation</subject><subject>ressources en eau</subject><subject>services écosystémiques</subject><subject>Somerset Levels and Moors</subject><subject>séquestration du carbone</subject><subject>tourism; archaeology</subject><subject>tourisme, archéologie</subject><subject>tourists</subject><subject>wetlands</subject><subject>zones humides</subject><issn>2150-3435</issn><issn>0262-6667</issn><issn>2150-3435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9rFEEQxQdRMMZ8g4ANXrzMWv1nenpOIiFqYEMOSc5Nb0-VTpiZjl2zCfvt7WUUxIunqoLfe7x6VXUuYSPBwUdQVllr240CKTdWda3TL6oTJRuotdHNy7_219Ub5gcAbTqrT6qruxx6rBORGGaBMfGBF5wEY34aIrJIJJYfKG7ThJlxEVt8wpFFmHtxnVJm8YzLWC5-W72iMDKe_Z6n1f2Xy7uLb_X25uvVxedtHbV1S03GIWmSQCUDAFmwu86VNzqzIwU2uoYiNc72bR9UR9ZoDCb0fdhF27ZKn1YfVt_HnH7ukRc_DRxxLCEw7dnL8pqTxsARff8P-pD2eS7pCqVaUA0YVyizUjEn5ozkH_MwhXwokD_26__064_9-rXfIvu0yoaZUp7Cc8pj75dwGFOmHOY4sNf_cXi3OlBIPnzPRXB_WwADIDsNSupfXc2JMg</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Acreman, M. C</creator><creator>Harding, R. J</creator><creator>Lloyd, C</creator><creator>McNamara, N. P</creator><creator>Mountford, J. O</creator><creator>Mould, D. J</creator><creator>Purse, B. V</creator><creator>Heard, M. S</creator><creator>Stratford, C. J</creator><creator>Dury, S. J</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands</title><author>Acreman, M. C ; Harding, R. J ; Lloyd, C ; McNamara, N. P ; Mountford, J. O ; Mould, D. J ; Purse, B. V ; Heard, M. S ; Stratford, C. J ; Dury, S. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f48ef3f10f00300f606b9810894bf206c85fcf586d7da29f643ea4addabc67723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>birds</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>cattle</topic><topic>disease vectors</topic><topic>ecosystem function</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>emissions</topic><topic>floods</topic><topic>floods; water resources</topic><topic>fonction de l'écosystème</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>habitats</topic><topic>hay</topic><topic>inondations</topic><topic>methane production</topic><topic>quality of life</topic><topic>recreation</topic><topic>ressources en eau</topic><topic>services écosystémiques</topic><topic>Somerset Levels and Moors</topic><topic>séquestration du carbone</topic><topic>tourism; archaeology</topic><topic>tourisme, archéologie</topic><topic>tourists</topic><topic>wetlands</topic><topic>zones humides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Acreman, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, N. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mountford, J. O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mould, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purse, B. V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratford, C. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dury, S. J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Acreman, M. C</au><au>Harding, R. J</au><au>Lloyd, C</au><au>McNamara, N. P</au><au>Mountford, J. O</au><au>Mould, D. J</au><au>Purse, B. V</au><au>Heard, M. S</au><au>Stratford, C. J</au><au>Dury, S. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological sciences journal</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1543</spage><epage>1565</epage><pages>1543-1565</pages><issn>2150-3435</issn><issn>0262-6667</issn><eissn>2150-3435</eissn><abstract>It is widely recognized that healthy ecosystems can provide considerable benefits to people, including food, timber, freshwater, protection from floods and much of what we call quality of life. A global review of these ecosystem services carried out as part of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) provided a framework for national and local studies. Using the MEA approach, this paper reviews the ecosystem services provided by the Somerset Levels and Moors wetland system in southwest England. This wetland provides a series of important services that are beneficial locally, regionally and globally, including grazing for cattle, carbon sequestration, flood water storage, recreation and archaeology. Some services are synergistic and reinforcing; for example, maintaining wet conditions supports wetland bird life that maintains biological diversity, attracts tourists, protects archaeological artefacts and reduces CO₂ emissions; raising water levels to or above the ground leads to net greenhouse gas uptake by the wetland. Other services are potentially conflicting, for example raising water levels may reduce potential flood water storage and increase methane emissions. Comparison of the services of the wetland with those of drier habitats reveals for example that carbon sequestration, bird habitat provision and hay production is greater in wetlands, whilst grazing quality may decline and plant diversity may be reduced in the short term and distributions of disease vectors may be altered by wetland restoration through raising water levels. Management decisions affecting wetlands may necessitate a trade-off of ecosystem services.Editor Z.W. KundzewiczCitation Acreman, M.C., Harding, R.J., Lloyd, C., McNamara, N.P., Mountford, J.O., Mould, D.J., Purse, B. V., Heard, M.S., Stratford, C.J. and Dury, S.J., 2011. Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56 (8), 1543–1565.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/02626667.2011.629783</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2150-3435
ispartof Hydrological sciences journal, 2011-12, Vol.56 (8), p.1543-1565
issn 2150-3435
0262-6667
2150-3435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034814402
source Taylor & Francis Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects biodiversity
birds
carbon dioxide
carbon sequestration
cattle
disease vectors
ecosystem function
ecosystem services
ecosystems
emissions
floods
floods
water resources
fonction de l'écosystème
freshwater
grazing
greenhouse gases
habitats
hay
inondations
methane production
quality of life
recreation
ressources en eau
services écosystémiques
Somerset Levels and Moors
séquestration du carbone
tourism
archaeology
tourisme, archéologie
tourists
wetlands
zones humides
title Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A46%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_fao_a&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trade-off%20in%20ecosystem%20services%20of%20the%20Somerset%20Levels%20and%20Moors%20wetlands&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20sciences%20journal&rft.au=Acreman,%20M.%20C&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1543&rft.epage=1565&rft.pages=1543-1565&rft.issn=2150-3435&rft.eissn=2150-3435&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02626667.2011.629783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_fao_a%3E1034814402%3C/proquest_fao_a%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027025048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true