Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction

With increasing emphasis in healthcare on patient satisfaction, many patient satisfaction studies have been administered. Most assume that all patients combine their healthcare experiences (such as nursing care, physician care, etc.) in the same way to arrive at their satisfaction; however, no resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of healthcare management 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.276-293
Hauptverfasser: Otani, Koichiro, Waterman, Brian, Dunagan, W Claiborne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 293
container_issue 4
container_start_page 276
container_title Journal of healthcare management
container_volume 57
creator Otani, Koichiro
Waterman, Brian
Dunagan, W Claiborne
description With increasing emphasis in healthcare on patient satisfaction, many patient satisfaction studies have been administered. Most assume that all patients combine their healthcare experiences (such as nursing care, physician care, etc.) in the same way to arrive at their satisfaction; however, no research has been conducted prior to the present study to investigate how patients' health conditions influence the way they combine their healthcare experiences. This study aims to determine how seriously ill patients differ from less seriously ill patients during their combining process. Data were collected from five large hospitals in the St. Louis area by administering a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Multiple linear regression analyses with a scatter term, a severity measure, and interaction effects of the severity measure were conducted while controlling for age, gender, and race. Two models (overall quality of care and willingness to recommend to others) were analyzed, and the severity of illness variable revealed interaction effects with physician care, staff care, food, and scatter term variables in the willingness to recommend model (six attributes were analyzed: admission process, nursing care, physician care, staff care, food, and room). With more seriously ill patients, physician care becomes more important and staff care becomes less important, and seriously ill patients are proportionately more likely to combine their attribute reactions only in the willingness to recommend model. All six attributes are not equally influential. Nursing care and staff care show consistent influence in both models. These findings show that if healthcare managers want to increase their patient satisfaction, they should enhance nursing care and staff care first to experience the most improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00115514-201207000-00009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034656417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A299343690</galeid><sourcerecordid>A299343690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-dd5a093a5f13b6ef97dae29b2218706a330964cb878b467e1f5de668040317883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl2L1DAUhoso7rr6F6TgjYJdT5rmy7tl0FUY2L3Q65Cmp50snWRsUtR_b8aZXa0MEpITkuc9OTm8RVESuCSgxDsAQhgjTVUDqUEAQJUnqEfFOVFNUwmq-OO8B8UrlZGz4lmMd5lgUvKnxVldK2Ac-Hlxe2uSQ5_KmGPsjU0u-PflJnwvd8ebDZoxbUobfOf2t7F0vh9n9BbLtEE3LbTPiye9GSO-OMaL4uvHD19Wn6r1zfXn1dW6soyJVHUdM6CoYT2hLcdeic5grdq6JlIAN5Tm2hvbSiHbhgskPeuQcwkNUCKkpBfF60Pe3RS-zRiT3rpocRyNxzBHTYA2nPGGiIy--ge9C_Pkc3V7qlaCS6L-UIMZUecvhjQZu0-qr2qlaEO5gkxVJ6gBPU5mDB57l48X_OUJPo8Ot86eFLxZCDKT8EcazByjltfr_xVzZG0YRxxQ536vbpb827_4do7OY8xLdMMmxcMTC1wecDuFGCfs9W5yWzP9zG3Tex_qex_qBx_q3z7M0pfHls_tFrsH4b3x6C8uHtL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032976819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Otani, Koichiro ; Waterman, Brian ; Dunagan, W Claiborne</creator><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koichiro ; Waterman, Brian ; Dunagan, W Claiborne</creatorcontrib><description>With increasing emphasis in healthcare on patient satisfaction, many patient satisfaction studies have been administered. Most assume that all patients combine their healthcare experiences (such as nursing care, physician care, etc.) in the same way to arrive at their satisfaction; however, no research has been conducted prior to the present study to investigate how patients' health conditions influence the way they combine their healthcare experiences. This study aims to determine how seriously ill patients differ from less seriously ill patients during their combining process. Data were collected from five large hospitals in the St. Louis area by administering a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Multiple linear regression analyses with a scatter term, a severity measure, and interaction effects of the severity measure were conducted while controlling for age, gender, and race. Two models (overall quality of care and willingness to recommend to others) were analyzed, and the severity of illness variable revealed interaction effects with physician care, staff care, food, and scatter term variables in the willingness to recommend model (six attributes were analyzed: admission process, nursing care, physician care, staff care, food, and room). With more seriously ill patients, physician care becomes more important and staff care becomes less important, and seriously ill patients are proportionately more likely to combine their attribute reactions only in the willingness to recommend model. All six attributes are not equally influential. Nursing care and staff care show consistent influence in both models. These findings show that if healthcare managers want to increase their patient satisfaction, they should enhance nursing care and staff care first to experience the most improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00115514-201207000-00009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22905606</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHMAFB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Company business management ; Customer satisfaction ; Female ; Health administration ; Health Status ; Health Surveys ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Influence ; Male ; Management ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Middle Aged ; Missouri ; Multi-Institutional Systems ; Nursing care ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physicians ; Questionnaires ; Regression analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of healthcare management, 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.276-293</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</rights><rights>Copyright Health Administration Press Jul/Aug 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-dd5a093a5f13b6ef97dae29b2218706a330964cb878b467e1f5de668040317883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-dd5a093a5f13b6ef97dae29b2218706a330964cb878b467e1f5de668040317883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22905606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterman, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunagan, W Claiborne</creatorcontrib><title>Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction</title><title>Journal of healthcare management</title><addtitle>J Healthc Manag</addtitle><description>With increasing emphasis in healthcare on patient satisfaction, many patient satisfaction studies have been administered. Most assume that all patients combine their healthcare experiences (such as nursing care, physician care, etc.) in the same way to arrive at their satisfaction; however, no research has been conducted prior to the present study to investigate how patients' health conditions influence the way they combine their healthcare experiences. This study aims to determine how seriously ill patients differ from less seriously ill patients during their combining process. Data were collected from five large hospitals in the St. Louis area by administering a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Multiple linear regression analyses with a scatter term, a severity measure, and interaction effects of the severity measure were conducted while controlling for age, gender, and race. Two models (overall quality of care and willingness to recommend to others) were analyzed, and the severity of illness variable revealed interaction effects with physician care, staff care, food, and scatter term variables in the willingness to recommend model (six attributes were analyzed: admission process, nursing care, physician care, staff care, food, and room). With more seriously ill patients, physician care becomes more important and staff care becomes less important, and seriously ill patients are proportionately more likely to combine their attribute reactions only in the willingness to recommend model. All six attributes are not equally influential. Nursing care and staff care show consistent influence in both models. These findings show that if healthcare managers want to increase their patient satisfaction, they should enhance nursing care and staff care first to experience the most improvement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>Multi-Institutional Systems</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1096-9012</issn><issn>1944-7396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl2L1DAUhoso7rr6F6TgjYJdT5rmy7tl0FUY2L3Q65Cmp50snWRsUtR_b8aZXa0MEpITkuc9OTm8RVESuCSgxDsAQhgjTVUDqUEAQJUnqEfFOVFNUwmq-OO8B8UrlZGz4lmMd5lgUvKnxVldK2Ac-Hlxe2uSQ5_KmGPsjU0u-PflJnwvd8ebDZoxbUobfOf2t7F0vh9n9BbLtEE3LbTPiye9GSO-OMaL4uvHD19Wn6r1zfXn1dW6soyJVHUdM6CoYT2hLcdeic5grdq6JlIAN5Tm2hvbSiHbhgskPeuQcwkNUCKkpBfF60Pe3RS-zRiT3rpocRyNxzBHTYA2nPGGiIy--ge9C_Pkc3V7qlaCS6L-UIMZUecvhjQZu0-qr2qlaEO5gkxVJ6gBPU5mDB57l48X_OUJPo8Ot86eFLxZCDKT8EcazByjltfr_xVzZG0YRxxQ536vbpb827_4do7OY8xLdMMmxcMTC1wecDuFGCfs9W5yWzP9zG3Tex_qex_qBx_q3z7M0pfHls_tFrsH4b3x6C8uHtL8</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Otani, Koichiro</creator><creator>Waterman, Brian</creator><creator>Dunagan, W Claiborne</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction</title><author>Otani, Koichiro ; Waterman, Brian ; Dunagan, W Claiborne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-dd5a093a5f13b6ef97dae29b2218706a330964cb878b467e1f5de668040317883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>Multi-Institutional Systems</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterman, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunagan, W Claiborne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of healthcare management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Otani, Koichiro</au><au>Waterman, Brian</au><au>Dunagan, W Claiborne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of healthcare management</jtitle><addtitle>J Healthc Manag</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>276-293</pages><issn>1096-9012</issn><eissn>1944-7396</eissn><coden>JHMAFB</coden><abstract>With increasing emphasis in healthcare on patient satisfaction, many patient satisfaction studies have been administered. Most assume that all patients combine their healthcare experiences (such as nursing care, physician care, etc.) in the same way to arrive at their satisfaction; however, no research has been conducted prior to the present study to investigate how patients' health conditions influence the way they combine their healthcare experiences. This study aims to determine how seriously ill patients differ from less seriously ill patients during their combining process. Data were collected from five large hospitals in the St. Louis area by administering a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Multiple linear regression analyses with a scatter term, a severity measure, and interaction effects of the severity measure were conducted while controlling for age, gender, and race. Two models (overall quality of care and willingness to recommend to others) were analyzed, and the severity of illness variable revealed interaction effects with physician care, staff care, food, and scatter term variables in the willingness to recommend model (six attributes were analyzed: admission process, nursing care, physician care, staff care, food, and room). With more seriously ill patients, physician care becomes more important and staff care becomes less important, and seriously ill patients are proportionately more likely to combine their attribute reactions only in the willingness to recommend model. All six attributes are not equally influential. Nursing care and staff care show consistent influence in both models. These findings show that if healthcare managers want to increase their patient satisfaction, they should enhance nursing care and staff care first to experience the most improvement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, WK Health</pub><pmid>22905606</pmid><doi>10.1097/00115514-201207000-00009</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-9012
ispartof Journal of healthcare management, 2012-07, Vol.57 (4), p.276-293
issn 1096-9012
1944-7396
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1034656417
source MEDLINE; Business Source Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Analysis
Company business management
Customer satisfaction
Female
Health administration
Health Status
Health Surveys
Hospitals
Humans
Influence
Male
Management
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Middle Aged
Missouri
Multi-Institutional Systems
Nursing care
Patient Satisfaction
Physicians
Questionnaires
Regression analysis
Studies
title Patient satisfaction: how patient health conditions influence their satisfaction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A16%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20satisfaction:%20how%20patient%20health%20conditions%20influence%20their%20satisfaction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20healthcare%20management&rft.au=Otani,%20Koichiro&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=276-293&rft.issn=1096-9012&rft.eissn=1944-7396&rft.coden=JHMAFB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00115514-201207000-00009&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA299343690%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032976819&rft_id=info:pmid/22905606&rft_galeid=A299343690&rfr_iscdi=true