Nifedipine versus labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Purpose To assess the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by hypertensive disorders treated with nifedipine versus labetalol. Methods A retrospective study in hypertensive patients treated during pregnancy with nifedipine or labetalol was conducted. After the charts review the patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2012-09, Vol.286 (3), p.637-642
Hauptverfasser: Giannubilo, Stefano R., Bezzeccheri, Valeria, Cecchi, Stefano, Landi, Beatrice, Battistoni, Giovanna I., Vitali, Paola, Cecchi, Lucia, Tranquilli, Andrea L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 642
container_issue 3
container_start_page 637
container_title Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 286
creator Giannubilo, Stefano R.
Bezzeccheri, Valeria
Cecchi, Stefano
Landi, Beatrice
Battistoni, Giovanna I.
Vitali, Paola
Cecchi, Lucia
Tranquilli, Andrea L.
description Purpose To assess the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by hypertensive disorders treated with nifedipine versus labetalol. Methods A retrospective study in hypertensive patients treated during pregnancy with nifedipine or labetalol was conducted. After the charts review the patients were divided in the four groups: gestational hypertension (113 patients); mild preeclampsia (77 patients); severe preeclampsia (31 patients); HELLP syndrome (21 patients). The pregnancy and neonatal records were analyzed by paired and unpaired t test. Results We found that there was an higher rate of intrauterine growth restriction infants among women treated with labetalol compared with those treated with nifedipine (38.8 vs. 15.5 %; p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00404-012-2371-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033534607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261876640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d1e3d3c6f86ab43b6c4171638df36d9ae13611a7b269124f1f452ba9a2c583073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-AC9S8OKlmknSJHsU8QtED-o5pO10t9JNa9KK--_N2lVB8DSBed53wkPIEdAzoFSdB0oFFSkFljKuIP3YIhMQnKVUAWyTCZ2t31SqPbIfwiuNoNZyl-wxlmngWk_I00NdYVl3tcPkHX0YQtLYHHvbtE1Su6RfYNJ7tP0SXZ-0VbJYdeh7dKF-x6SsQ-vLGFtvOo9zZ12xOiA7lW0CHm7mlLxcXz1f3qb3jzd3lxf3acEV69MSkJe8kJWWNhc8l4UABZLrsuKynFkELgGsypmcARMVVCJjuZ1ZVmSaU8Wn5HTs7Xz7NmDozbIOBTaNddgOwQDlPONCfqEnf9DXdvAu_s4wJkErKQWNFIxU4dsQPFam8_XS-lWsMmvjZjRuokizNm4-YuZ40zzkSyx_Et-KI8BGIMSVm6P_Pf1_6yejhIui</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261876640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nifedipine versus labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Giannubilo, Stefano R. ; Bezzeccheri, Valeria ; Cecchi, Stefano ; Landi, Beatrice ; Battistoni, Giovanna I. ; Vitali, Paola ; Cecchi, Lucia ; Tranquilli, Andrea L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giannubilo, Stefano R. ; Bezzeccheri, Valeria ; Cecchi, Stefano ; Landi, Beatrice ; Battistoni, Giovanna I. ; Vitali, Paola ; Cecchi, Lucia ; Tranquilli, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To assess the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by hypertensive disorders treated with nifedipine versus labetalol. Methods A retrospective study in hypertensive patients treated during pregnancy with nifedipine or labetalol was conducted. After the charts review the patients were divided in the four groups: gestational hypertension (113 patients); mild preeclampsia (77 patients); severe preeclampsia (31 patients); HELLP syndrome (21 patients). The pregnancy and neonatal records were analyzed by paired and unpaired t test. Results We found that there was an higher rate of intrauterine growth restriction infants among women treated with labetalol compared with those treated with nifedipine (38.8 vs. 15.5 %; p  &lt; 0.05), but only in the subgroup of women affected by Gestational Hypertension and Mild Preeclampsia. In this group was also higher the rate of fetal worsening assessed by fetal heart rate tracing (33.3 vs. 14.2 %; p  &lt; 0.05). No neonatal malformations and no differences in the rate of adverse side effects were observed. Conclusions Antihypertensive therapy in pregnancy with Labetalol may have the potential to impair fetal behavior in low degrees hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Optimal care must balance the potentially conflicting risks and benefits to mother and fetus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2371-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22581388</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced - drug therapy ; Labetalol - therapeutic use ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nifedipine - therapeutic use ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Preeclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2012-09, Vol.286 (3), p.637-642</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d1e3d3c6f86ab43b6c4171638df36d9ae13611a7b269124f1f452ba9a2c583073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d1e3d3c6f86ab43b6c4171638df36d9ae13611a7b269124f1f452ba9a2c583073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-012-2371-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-012-2371-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22581388$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giannubilo, Stefano R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezzeccheri, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecchi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landi, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battistoni, Giovanna I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitali, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecchi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranquilli, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><title>Nifedipine versus labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose To assess the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by hypertensive disorders treated with nifedipine versus labetalol. Methods A retrospective study in hypertensive patients treated during pregnancy with nifedipine or labetalol was conducted. After the charts review the patients were divided in the four groups: gestational hypertension (113 patients); mild preeclampsia (77 patients); severe preeclampsia (31 patients); HELLP syndrome (21 patients). The pregnancy and neonatal records were analyzed by paired and unpaired t test. Results We found that there was an higher rate of intrauterine growth restriction infants among women treated with labetalol compared with those treated with nifedipine (38.8 vs. 15.5 %; p  &lt; 0.05), but only in the subgroup of women affected by Gestational Hypertension and Mild Preeclampsia. In this group was also higher the rate of fetal worsening assessed by fetal heart rate tracing (33.3 vs. 14.2 %; p  &lt; 0.05). No neonatal malformations and no differences in the rate of adverse side effects were observed. Conclusions Antihypertensive therapy in pregnancy with Labetalol may have the potential to impair fetal behavior in low degrees hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Optimal care must balance the potentially conflicting risks and benefits to mother and fetus.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced - drug therapy</subject><subject>Labetalol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nifedipine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Preeclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-AC9S8OKlmknSJHsU8QtED-o5pO10t9JNa9KK--_N2lVB8DSBed53wkPIEdAzoFSdB0oFFSkFljKuIP3YIhMQnKVUAWyTCZ2t31SqPbIfwiuNoNZyl-wxlmngWk_I00NdYVl3tcPkHX0YQtLYHHvbtE1Su6RfYNJ7tP0SXZ-0VbJYdeh7dKF-x6SsQ-vLGFtvOo9zZ12xOiA7lW0CHm7mlLxcXz1f3qb3jzd3lxf3acEV69MSkJe8kJWWNhc8l4UABZLrsuKynFkELgGsypmcARMVVCJjuZ1ZVmSaU8Wn5HTs7Xz7NmDozbIOBTaNddgOwQDlPONCfqEnf9DXdvAu_s4wJkErKQWNFIxU4dsQPFam8_XS-lWsMmvjZjRuokizNm4-YuZ40zzkSyx_Et-KI8BGIMSVm6P_Pf1_6yejhIui</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Giannubilo, Stefano R.</creator><creator>Bezzeccheri, Valeria</creator><creator>Cecchi, Stefano</creator><creator>Landi, Beatrice</creator><creator>Battistoni, Giovanna I.</creator><creator>Vitali, Paola</creator><creator>Cecchi, Lucia</creator><creator>Tranquilli, Andrea L.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Nifedipine versus labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy</title><author>Giannubilo, Stefano R. ; Bezzeccheri, Valeria ; Cecchi, Stefano ; Landi, Beatrice ; Battistoni, Giovanna I. ; Vitali, Paola ; Cecchi, Lucia ; Tranquilli, Andrea L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d1e3d3c6f86ab43b6c4171638df36d9ae13611a7b269124f1f452ba9a2c583073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced - drug therapy</topic><topic>Labetalol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nifedipine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Preeclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giannubilo, Stefano R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezzeccheri, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecchi, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landi, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battistoni, Giovanna I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitali, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecchi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranquilli, Andrea L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giannubilo, Stefano R.</au><au>Bezzeccheri, Valeria</au><au>Cecchi, Stefano</au><au>Landi, Beatrice</au><au>Battistoni, Giovanna I.</au><au>Vitali, Paola</au><au>Cecchi, Lucia</au><au>Tranquilli, Andrea L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nifedipine versus labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>286</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>637-642</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose To assess the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies affected by hypertensive disorders treated with nifedipine versus labetalol. Methods A retrospective study in hypertensive patients treated during pregnancy with nifedipine or labetalol was conducted. After the charts review the patients were divided in the four groups: gestational hypertension (113 patients); mild preeclampsia (77 patients); severe preeclampsia (31 patients); HELLP syndrome (21 patients). The pregnancy and neonatal records were analyzed by paired and unpaired t test. Results We found that there was an higher rate of intrauterine growth restriction infants among women treated with labetalol compared with those treated with nifedipine (38.8 vs. 15.5 %; p  &lt; 0.05), but only in the subgroup of women affected by Gestational Hypertension and Mild Preeclampsia. In this group was also higher the rate of fetal worsening assessed by fetal heart rate tracing (33.3 vs. 14.2 %; p  &lt; 0.05). No neonatal malformations and no differences in the rate of adverse side effects were observed. Conclusions Antihypertensive therapy in pregnancy with Labetalol may have the potential to impair fetal behavior in low degrees hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. Optimal care must balance the potentially conflicting risks and benefits to mother and fetus.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22581388</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-012-2371-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0932-0067
ispartof Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2012-09, Vol.286 (3), p.637-642
issn 0932-0067
1432-0711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033534607
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use
Calcium Channel Blockers - therapeutic use
Endocrinology
Female
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Humans
Hypertension
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced - drug therapy
Labetalol - therapeutic use
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nifedipine - therapeutic use
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Preeclampsia
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Retrospective Studies
title Nifedipine versus labetalol in the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nifedipine%20versus%20labetalol%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20hypertensive%20disorders%20of%20pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Giannubilo,%20Stefano%20R.&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=286&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=637-642&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-012-2371-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261876640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261876640&rft_id=info:pmid/22581388&rfr_iscdi=true