Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management

PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%). METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cornea 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1000-1008
Hauptverfasser: Sullivan, Benjamin D, Crews, Leslie A, Sönmez, Barş, de la Paz, Maria F, Comert, Ebru, Charoenrook, Victor, de Araujo, Aline L, Pepose, Jay S, Berg, Michael S, Kosheleff, Valerie P, Lemp, Michael A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1008
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1000
container_title Cornea
container_volume 31
creator Sullivan, Benjamin D
Crews, Leslie A
Sönmez, Barş
de la Paz, Maria F
Comert, Ebru
Charoenrook, Victor
de Araujo, Aline L
Pepose, Jay S
Berg, Michael S
Kosheleff, Valerie P
Lemp, Michael A
description PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%). METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months. RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P < 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P < 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033456180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1033456180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-800fa27c3a2a4582ab386c298c1057fbaa978a3d93600395803c9ee21c2fd8ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFOGzEQhi1EVULoG1TIRy5Lx_bu2sutSqBEosol9LqadWbB1Lub2htQXqFPXUNSKvU08vj__tHMz9hnAZcCKv1lMVteQgNCkRJG5rJdl3DEJqJQZZbryhyzCUitM6VzOGGnMT4BgNal_MhOpMx1UeZiwn7PvOudRc_vR-fduONDy5fNE9nRPRNfURwjb4fA52HHr3fE5y4SRrriPzA4bPbM8pkCX7mOOPZrvug2PlmObuj37PuMVUJ8fBMdfPh37PGBOurHM_ahTb_06VCn7P7mejW7ze6W3xazr3eZVSB0ZgBalNoqlJgXRmKjTGllZayAQrcNYqUNqnWlSgBVFQaUrYiksOlEhqyasou97yYMv7Zpwbpz0ZL32NOwjbUApfKiFAmcsnwvtWGIMVBbb4LrMOySqH5NoU4p1P-nkLDzw4Rt09H6Hfp79n--L4MfKcSffvtCoX4k9ONjnXICJWWZSRASqvTKXlta_QGxbJQB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033456180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sullivan, Benjamin D ; Crews, Leslie A ; Sönmez, Barş ; de la Paz, Maria F ; Comert, Ebru ; Charoenrook, Victor ; de Araujo, Aline L ; Pepose, Jay S ; Berg, Michael S ; Kosheleff, Valerie P ; Lemp, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Benjamin D ; Crews, Leslie A ; Sönmez, Barş ; de la Paz, Maria F ; Comert, Ebru ; Charoenrook, Victor ; de Araujo, Aline L ; Pepose, Jay S ; Berg, Michael S ; Kosheleff, Valerie P ; Lemp, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%). METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months. RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P &lt; 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P &lt; 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22475641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological ; Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis ; Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osmolar Concentration ; Prospective Studies ; Tears - chemistry ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cornea, 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1000-1008</ispartof><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-800fa27c3a2a4582ab386c298c1057fbaa978a3d93600395803c9ee21c2fd8ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22475641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crews, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sönmez, Barş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Paz, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comert, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charoenrook, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, Aline L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepose, Jay S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosheleff, Valerie P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemp, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</title><title>Cornea</title><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><description>PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%). METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months. RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P &lt; 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P &lt; 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osmolar Concentration</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tears - chemistry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0277-3740</issn><issn>1536-4798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFOGzEQhi1EVULoG1TIRy5Lx_bu2sutSqBEosol9LqadWbB1Lub2htQXqFPXUNSKvU08vj__tHMz9hnAZcCKv1lMVteQgNCkRJG5rJdl3DEJqJQZZbryhyzCUitM6VzOGGnMT4BgNal_MhOpMx1UeZiwn7PvOudRc_vR-fduONDy5fNE9nRPRNfURwjb4fA52HHr3fE5y4SRrriPzA4bPbM8pkCX7mOOPZrvug2PlmObuj37PuMVUJ8fBMdfPh37PGBOurHM_ahTb_06VCn7P7mejW7ze6W3xazr3eZVSB0ZgBalNoqlJgXRmKjTGllZayAQrcNYqUNqnWlSgBVFQaUrYiksOlEhqyasou97yYMv7Zpwbpz0ZL32NOwjbUApfKiFAmcsnwvtWGIMVBbb4LrMOySqH5NoU4p1P-nkLDzw4Rt09H6Hfp79n--L4MfKcSffvtCoX4k9ONjnXICJWWZSRASqvTKXlta_QGxbJQB</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Sullivan, Benjamin D</creator><creator>Crews, Leslie A</creator><creator>Sönmez, Barş</creator><creator>de la Paz, Maria F</creator><creator>Comert, Ebru</creator><creator>Charoenrook, Victor</creator><creator>de Araujo, Aline L</creator><creator>Pepose, Jay S</creator><creator>Berg, Michael S</creator><creator>Kosheleff, Valerie P</creator><creator>Lemp, Michael A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</title><author>Sullivan, Benjamin D ; Crews, Leslie A ; Sönmez, Barş ; de la Paz, Maria F ; Comert, Ebru ; Charoenrook, Victor ; de Araujo, Aline L ; Pepose, Jay S ; Berg, Michael S ; Kosheleff, Valerie P ; Lemp, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-800fa27c3a2a4582ab386c298c1057fbaa978a3d93600395803c9ee21c2fd8ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osmolar Concentration</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tears - chemistry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crews, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sönmez, Barş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Paz, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comert, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charoenrook, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, Aline L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepose, Jay S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosheleff, Valerie P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemp, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sullivan, Benjamin D</au><au>Crews, Leslie A</au><au>Sönmez, Barş</au><au>de la Paz, Maria F</au><au>Comert, Ebru</au><au>Charoenrook, Victor</au><au>de Araujo, Aline L</au><au>Pepose, Jay S</au><au>Berg, Michael S</au><au>Kosheleff, Valerie P</au><au>Lemp, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</atitle><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1000</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>1000-1008</pages><issn>0277-3740</issn><eissn>1536-4798</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%). METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months. RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P &lt; 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P &lt; 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment. CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22475641</pmid><doi>10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-3740
ispartof Cornea, 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1000-1008
issn 0277-3740
1536-4798
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033456180
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers
Clinical Trials as Topic
Cyclosporine - therapeutic use
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis
Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy
Female
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Osmolar Concentration
Prospective Studies
Tears - chemistry
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A58%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Utility%20of%20Objective%20Tests%20for%20Dry%20Eye%20Disease:%20Variability%20Over%20Time%20and%20Implications%20for%20Clinical%20Trials%20and%20Disease%20Management&rft.jtitle=Cornea&rft.au=Sullivan,%20Benjamin%20D&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1000&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=1000-1008&rft.issn=0277-3740&rft.eissn=1536-4798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1033456180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033456180&rft_id=info:pmid/22475641&rfr_iscdi=true