Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management
PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%). METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cornea 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1000-1008 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1008 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1000 |
container_title | Cornea |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Sullivan, Benjamin D Crews, Leslie A Sönmez, Barş de la Paz, Maria F Comert, Ebru Charoenrook, Victor de Araujo, Aline L Pepose, Jay S Berg, Michael S Kosheleff, Valerie P Lemp, Michael A |
description | PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%).
METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months.
RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P < 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P < 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033456180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1033456180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-800fa27c3a2a4582ab386c298c1057fbaa978a3d93600395803c9ee21c2fd8ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFOGzEQhi1EVULoG1TIRy5Lx_bu2sutSqBEosol9LqadWbB1Lub2htQXqFPXUNSKvU08vj__tHMz9hnAZcCKv1lMVteQgNCkRJG5rJdl3DEJqJQZZbryhyzCUitM6VzOGGnMT4BgNal_MhOpMx1UeZiwn7PvOudRc_vR-fduONDy5fNE9nRPRNfURwjb4fA52HHr3fE5y4SRrriPzA4bPbM8pkCX7mOOPZrvug2PlmObuj37PuMVUJ8fBMdfPh37PGBOurHM_ahTb_06VCn7P7mejW7ze6W3xazr3eZVSB0ZgBalNoqlJgXRmKjTGllZayAQrcNYqUNqnWlSgBVFQaUrYiksOlEhqyasou97yYMv7Zpwbpz0ZL32NOwjbUApfKiFAmcsnwvtWGIMVBbb4LrMOySqH5NoU4p1P-nkLDzw4Rt09H6Hfp79n--L4MfKcSffvtCoX4k9ONjnXICJWWZSRASqvTKXlta_QGxbJQB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033456180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sullivan, Benjamin D ; Crews, Leslie A ; Sönmez, Barş ; de la Paz, Maria F ; Comert, Ebru ; Charoenrook, Victor ; de Araujo, Aline L ; Pepose, Jay S ; Berg, Michael S ; Kosheleff, Valerie P ; Lemp, Michael A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Benjamin D ; Crews, Leslie A ; Sönmez, Barş ; de la Paz, Maria F ; Comert, Ebru ; Charoenrook, Victor ; de Araujo, Aline L ; Pepose, Jay S ; Berg, Michael S ; Kosheleff, Valerie P ; Lemp, Michael A</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%).
METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months.
RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P < 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P < 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-3740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4798</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22475641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cyclosporine - therapeutic use ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological ; Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis ; Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osmolar Concentration ; Prospective Studies ; Tears - chemistry ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cornea, 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1000-1008</ispartof><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-800fa27c3a2a4582ab386c298c1057fbaa978a3d93600395803c9ee21c2fd8ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22475641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crews, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sönmez, Barş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Paz, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comert, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charoenrook, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, Aline L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepose, Jay S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosheleff, Valerie P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemp, Michael A</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</title><title>Cornea</title><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><description>PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%).
METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months.
RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P < 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P < 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osmolar Concentration</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Tears - chemistry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0277-3740</issn><issn>1536-4798</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFOGzEQhi1EVULoG1TIRy5Lx_bu2sutSqBEosol9LqadWbB1Lub2htQXqFPXUNSKvU08vj__tHMz9hnAZcCKv1lMVteQgNCkRJG5rJdl3DEJqJQZZbryhyzCUitM6VzOGGnMT4BgNal_MhOpMx1UeZiwn7PvOudRc_vR-fduONDy5fNE9nRPRNfURwjb4fA52HHr3fE5y4SRrriPzA4bPbM8pkCX7mOOPZrvug2PlmObuj37PuMVUJ8fBMdfPh37PGBOurHM_ahTb_06VCn7P7mejW7ze6W3xazr3eZVSB0ZgBalNoqlJgXRmKjTGllZayAQrcNYqUNqnWlSgBVFQaUrYiksOlEhqyasou97yYMv7Zpwbpz0ZL32NOwjbUApfKiFAmcsnwvtWGIMVBbb4LrMOySqH5NoU4p1P-nkLDzw4Rt09H6Hfp79n--L4MfKcSffvtCoX4k9ONjnXICJWWZSRASqvTKXlta_QGxbJQB</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Sullivan, Benjamin D</creator><creator>Crews, Leslie A</creator><creator>Sönmez, Barş</creator><creator>de la Paz, Maria F</creator><creator>Comert, Ebru</creator><creator>Charoenrook, Victor</creator><creator>de Araujo, Aline L</creator><creator>Pepose, Jay S</creator><creator>Berg, Michael S</creator><creator>Kosheleff, Valerie P</creator><creator>Lemp, Michael A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</title><author>Sullivan, Benjamin D ; Crews, Leslie A ; Sönmez, Barş ; de la Paz, Maria F ; Comert, Ebru ; Charoenrook, Victor ; de Araujo, Aline L ; Pepose, Jay S ; Berg, Michael S ; Kosheleff, Valerie P ; Lemp, Michael A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3017-800fa27c3a2a4582ab386c298c1057fbaa978a3d93600395803c9ee21c2fd8ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cyclosporine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osmolar Concentration</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Tears - chemistry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Benjamin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crews, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sönmez, Barş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Paz, Maria F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comert, Ebru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charoenrook, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, Aline L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepose, Jay S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosheleff, Valerie P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemp, Michael A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sullivan, Benjamin D</au><au>Crews, Leslie A</au><au>Sönmez, Barş</au><au>de la Paz, Maria F</au><au>Comert, Ebru</au><au>Charoenrook, Victor</au><au>de Araujo, Aline L</au><au>Pepose, Jay S</au><au>Berg, Michael S</au><au>Kosheleff, Valerie P</au><au>Lemp, Michael A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management</atitle><jtitle>Cornea</jtitle><addtitle>Cornea</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1000</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>1000-1008</pages><issn>0277-3740</issn><eissn>1536-4798</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of commonly used biomarkers in dry eye disease management in a longitudinal observational case series study followed by an interventional study in a subset of subjects treated with cyclosporine A (0.05%).
METHODS:Bilateral tear osmolarity, Schirmer, tear film breakup time (TBUT), staining, meibomian grading, and Ocular Surface Disease Index were measured for a period of 3 consecutive months in participants recruited from a clinic-based population at 2 study sites. Fifty-two subjects completed the study (n = 16 mild/moderate, n = 36 severe; age, 47.1 ± 16.1 years). After the 3-month observation period, severe dry eye patients were prescribed topical cyclosporine A and evaluated for an additional 3 months.
RESULTS:Tear osmolarity (8.7 ± 6.3%) exhibited significantly less variability over a 3-month period than corneal staining (12.2 ± 8.8%, P = 0.040), conjunctival staining (14.8 ± 8.9%, P = 0.002), and meibomian grading (14.3 ± 8.8%, P < 0.0001) across the entire patient population. Osmolarity also demonstrated less variation than TBUT (11.7 ± 9.0%, P = 0.059), Schirmer tests (10.7 ± 9.2%, P = 0.67), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (9.3 ± 7.8%, P = 0.94), although the differences were not significant. Variation in osmolarity was less for mild dry eye patients (5.9 ± 3.1%) than severe dry eye patients (10.0 ± 6.9%, P = 0.038). After treatment, average osmolarity and variability were lowered from 341 ± 18 mOsm/L to 307 ± 8 mOsm/L (P < 0.0001, n = 10). A downward trend in symptoms followed changes in osmolarity, declining from 44 ± 17 mOsm/L to 38 ± 18 mOsm/L (P = 0.35). None of the other signs demonstrated a change after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:Over a 3-month period, tear film osmolarity was found to have the lowest variability among commonly used signs of dry eye disease. Reductions in osmolarity preceded changes in symptoms during therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22475641</pmid><doi>10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-3740 |
ispartof | Cornea, 2012-09, Vol.31 (9), p.1000-1008 |
issn | 0277-3740 1536-4798 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033456180 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biomarkers Clinical Trials as Topic Cyclosporine - therapeutic use Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis Dry Eye Syndromes - drug therapy Female Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use Male Middle Aged Osmolar Concentration Prospective Studies Tears - chemistry Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Clinical Utility of Objective Tests for Dry Eye Disease: Variability Over Time and Implications for Clinical Trials and Disease Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A58%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Utility%20of%20Objective%20Tests%20for%20Dry%20Eye%20Disease:%20Variability%20Over%20Time%20and%20Implications%20for%20Clinical%20Trials%20and%20Disease%20Management&rft.jtitle=Cornea&rft.au=Sullivan,%20Benjamin%20D&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1000&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=1000-1008&rft.issn=0277-3740&rft.eissn=1536-4798&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318242fd60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1033456180%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033456180&rft_id=info:pmid/22475641&rfr_iscdi=true |