Use of Colour Duplex Ultrasound as a First Line Surveillance Tool Following EVAR is Associated with a Reduction in Cost Without Compromising Accuracy

Abstract Introduction CT scanning remains the postoperative surveillance imaging modality of choice following EVAR. Concerns regarding cost, exposure to ionising radiation and intravenous contrast have led to a search for a less expensive, equally efficacious and safer method of monitoring EVAR pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2012-08, Vol.44 (2), p.145-150
Hauptverfasser: Gray, C, Goodman, P, Herron, C.C, Lawler, L.P, O'Malley, M.K, O'Donohoe, M.K, McDonnell, C.O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 2
container_start_page 145
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 44
creator Gray, C
Goodman, P
Herron, C.C
Lawler, L.P
O'Malley, M.K
O'Donohoe, M.K
McDonnell, C.O
description Abstract Introduction CT scanning remains the postoperative surveillance imaging modality of choice following EVAR. Concerns regarding cost, exposure to ionising radiation and intravenous contrast have led to a search for a less expensive, equally efficacious and safer method of monitoring EVAR patients after endograft deployment. This study evaluated the cost saving obtained if CDUS was employed as a first line surveillance tool following EVAR, as well as comparing the two entities in terms of efficacy. Patients & methods Postoperative surveillance CTs and CDUS scans in the 145 patients who have undergone EVAR from 1st June 2003 to 1st July 2010 were compared for the detection of endoleak and determination of residual sac size. Results Adopting a protocol where CDUS was employed as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR would result in a reduction in the number of postoperative CTs required in 2010 from 235 to 36. Based on 2010 costings, this would equate to an estimated reduction in expenditure from €117,500 to €34,915 a saving of €82,585. CDUS had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85% in the detection of endoleaks compared to CT. The positive predictive value was 28% and negative predictive value 100%. The Pearson Coefficient correlation of 0.96 indicates a large degree of correlation between CDUS and CT when measuring residual aneurysm size following EVAR. Conclusion CDUS can replace CT as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR. This is associated with a significant reduction in the cost of surveillance without any loss of imaging accuracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033158577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1078588412003309</els_id><sourcerecordid>1033158577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-433d60e3ae0dcc7eefd7fa0100337b8bb1612e7e0dc6fb08112ca69a0632b76b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsGO0zAQjRCIXRZ-gAPykUvC2K7jrISQqrIFpEpIu1s4Wo4zAQc37tpxl34I_4ujLhw4cLKtee955r0pipcUKgq0fjNUOBxixYCyCkQF0DwqzqngrGS0Fo_zHWRTiqZZnBXPYhwAQFAunhZnjEkqawnnxa9tROJ7svLOp0Dep73Dn2TrpqCjT2NHdCSarG2IE9nYEclNCge0zunRILn13pG1d87f2_EbufqyvCY2kmWM3lg9YUfu7fQ9C1xjl8xk_UjsmP_KYl9zwacpP3b74Hc2zgJLY1LQ5vi8eNJrF_HFw3lRbNdXt6uP5ebzh0-r5aY0CyGmcsF5VwNyjdAZIxH7TvYaKADnsm3altaUoZyrdd9CQykzur7UUHPWyrrlF8Xrk25u4S5hnFRuxOA8HfoUFc1CVDRCygxlJ6gJPsaAvdoHu9PhmEFqjkMNao5DzXEoECrHkUmvHvRTu8PuL-WP_xnw9gTAPOXBYlDRWMzWdjagmVTn7f_13_1DN86O1mj3A48YhxzpmP1TVMXMUTfzQsz7QNlsEVzy31VismM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033158577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Colour Duplex Ultrasound as a First Line Surveillance Tool Following EVAR is Associated with a Reduction in Cost Without Compromising Accuracy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Gray, C ; Goodman, P ; Herron, C.C ; Lawler, L.P ; O'Malley, M.K ; O'Donohoe, M.K ; McDonnell, C.O</creator><creatorcontrib>Gray, C ; Goodman, P ; Herron, C.C ; Lawler, L.P ; O'Malley, M.K ; O'Donohoe, M.K ; McDonnell, C.O</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction CT scanning remains the postoperative surveillance imaging modality of choice following EVAR. Concerns regarding cost, exposure to ionising radiation and intravenous contrast have led to a search for a less expensive, equally efficacious and safer method of monitoring EVAR patients after endograft deployment. This study evaluated the cost saving obtained if CDUS was employed as a first line surveillance tool following EVAR, as well as comparing the two entities in terms of efficacy. Patients &amp; methods Postoperative surveillance CTs and CDUS scans in the 145 patients who have undergone EVAR from 1st June 2003 to 1st July 2010 were compared for the detection of endoleak and determination of residual sac size. Results Adopting a protocol where CDUS was employed as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR would result in a reduction in the number of postoperative CTs required in 2010 from 235 to 36. Based on 2010 costings, this would equate to an estimated reduction in expenditure from €117,500 to €34,915 a saving of €82,585. CDUS had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85% in the detection of endoleaks compared to CT. The positive predictive value was 28% and negative predictive value 100%. The Pearson Coefficient correlation of 0.96 indicates a large degree of correlation between CDUS and CT when measuring residual aneurysm size following EVAR. Conclusion CDUS can replace CT as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR. This is associated with a significant reduction in the cost of surveillance without any loss of imaging accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22717670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - economics ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery ; Aortography - economics ; Aortography - methods ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Cost Savings ; Duplex ; Endoleak - diagnosis ; Endoleak - diagnostic imaging ; Endoleak - etiology ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; EVAR ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Health Expenditures ; Humans ; Ireland ; Male ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color - economics</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2012-08, Vol.44 (2), p.145-150</ispartof><rights>European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-433d60e3ae0dcc7eefd7fa0100337b8bb1612e7e0dc6fb08112ca69a0632b76b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-433d60e3ae0dcc7eefd7fa0100337b8bb1612e7e0dc6fb08112ca69a0632b76b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078588412003309$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22717670$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gray, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herron, C.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, L.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donohoe, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, C.O</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Colour Duplex Ultrasound as a First Line Surveillance Tool Following EVAR is Associated with a Reduction in Cost Without Compromising Accuracy</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction CT scanning remains the postoperative surveillance imaging modality of choice following EVAR. Concerns regarding cost, exposure to ionising radiation and intravenous contrast have led to a search for a less expensive, equally efficacious and safer method of monitoring EVAR patients after endograft deployment. This study evaluated the cost saving obtained if CDUS was employed as a first line surveillance tool following EVAR, as well as comparing the two entities in terms of efficacy. Patients &amp; methods Postoperative surveillance CTs and CDUS scans in the 145 patients who have undergone EVAR from 1st June 2003 to 1st July 2010 were compared for the detection of endoleak and determination of residual sac size. Results Adopting a protocol where CDUS was employed as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR would result in a reduction in the number of postoperative CTs required in 2010 from 235 to 36. Based on 2010 costings, this would equate to an estimated reduction in expenditure from €117,500 to €34,915 a saving of €82,585. CDUS had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85% in the detection of endoleaks compared to CT. The positive predictive value was 28% and negative predictive value 100%. The Pearson Coefficient correlation of 0.96 indicates a large degree of correlation between CDUS and CT when measuring residual aneurysm size following EVAR. Conclusion CDUS can replace CT as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR. This is associated with a significant reduction in the cost of surveillance without any loss of imaging accuracy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aneurysm</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - economics</subject><subject>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Aortography - economics</subject><subject>Aortography - methods</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>Duplex</subject><subject>Endoleak - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endoleak - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endoleak - etiology</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>EVAR</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color - economics</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsGO0zAQjRCIXRZ-gAPykUvC2K7jrISQqrIFpEpIu1s4Wo4zAQc37tpxl34I_4ujLhw4cLKtee955r0pipcUKgq0fjNUOBxixYCyCkQF0DwqzqngrGS0Fo_zHWRTiqZZnBXPYhwAQFAunhZnjEkqawnnxa9tROJ7svLOp0Dep73Dn2TrpqCjT2NHdCSarG2IE9nYEclNCge0zunRILn13pG1d87f2_EbufqyvCY2kmWM3lg9YUfu7fQ9C1xjl8xk_UjsmP_KYl9zwacpP3b74Hc2zgJLY1LQ5vi8eNJrF_HFw3lRbNdXt6uP5ebzh0-r5aY0CyGmcsF5VwNyjdAZIxH7TvYaKADnsm3altaUoZyrdd9CQykzur7UUHPWyrrlF8Xrk25u4S5hnFRuxOA8HfoUFc1CVDRCygxlJ6gJPsaAvdoHu9PhmEFqjkMNao5DzXEoECrHkUmvHvRTu8PuL-WP_xnw9gTAPOXBYlDRWMzWdjagmVTn7f_13_1DN86O1mj3A48YhxzpmP1TVMXMUTfzQsz7QNlsEVzy31VismM</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Gray, C</creator><creator>Goodman, P</creator><creator>Herron, C.C</creator><creator>Lawler, L.P</creator><creator>O'Malley, M.K</creator><creator>O'Donohoe, M.K</creator><creator>McDonnell, C.O</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Use of Colour Duplex Ultrasound as a First Line Surveillance Tool Following EVAR is Associated with a Reduction in Cost Without Compromising Accuracy</title><author>Gray, C ; Goodman, P ; Herron, C.C ; Lawler, L.P ; O'Malley, M.K ; O'Donohoe, M.K ; McDonnell, C.O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-433d60e3ae0dcc7eefd7fa0100337b8bb1612e7e0dc6fb08112ca69a0632b76b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aneurysm</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - economics</topic><topic>Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Aortography - economics</topic><topic>Aortography - methods</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>Duplex</topic><topic>Endoleak - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endoleak - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endoleak - etiology</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>EVAR</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color - economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gray, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herron, C.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawler, L.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donohoe, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, C.O</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gray, C</au><au>Goodman, P</au><au>Herron, C.C</au><au>Lawler, L.P</au><au>O'Malley, M.K</au><au>O'Donohoe, M.K</au><au>McDonnell, C.O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Colour Duplex Ultrasound as a First Line Surveillance Tool Following EVAR is Associated with a Reduction in Cost Without Compromising Accuracy</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>145-150</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction CT scanning remains the postoperative surveillance imaging modality of choice following EVAR. Concerns regarding cost, exposure to ionising radiation and intravenous contrast have led to a search for a less expensive, equally efficacious and safer method of monitoring EVAR patients after endograft deployment. This study evaluated the cost saving obtained if CDUS was employed as a first line surveillance tool following EVAR, as well as comparing the two entities in terms of efficacy. Patients &amp; methods Postoperative surveillance CTs and CDUS scans in the 145 patients who have undergone EVAR from 1st June 2003 to 1st July 2010 were compared for the detection of endoleak and determination of residual sac size. Results Adopting a protocol where CDUS was employed as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR would result in a reduction in the number of postoperative CTs required in 2010 from 235 to 36. Based on 2010 costings, this would equate to an estimated reduction in expenditure from €117,500 to €34,915 a saving of €82,585. CDUS had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 85% in the detection of endoleaks compared to CT. The positive predictive value was 28% and negative predictive value 100%. The Pearson Coefficient correlation of 0.96 indicates a large degree of correlation between CDUS and CT when measuring residual aneurysm size following EVAR. Conclusion CDUS can replace CT as the first line surveillance tool following EVAR. This is associated with a significant reduction in the cost of surveillance without any loss of imaging accuracy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22717670</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.008</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2012-08, Vol.44 (2), p.145-150
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1033158577
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aneurysm
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - economics
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal - surgery
Aortography - economics
Aortography - methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Cost Savings
Duplex
Endoleak - diagnosis
Endoleak - diagnostic imaging
Endoleak - etiology
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
EVAR
Female
Health Care Costs
Health Expenditures
Humans
Ireland
Male
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - economics
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color - economics
title Use of Colour Duplex Ultrasound as a First Line Surveillance Tool Following EVAR is Associated with a Reduction in Cost Without Compromising Accuracy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A32%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Colour%20Duplex%20Ultrasound%20as%20a%20First%20Line%20Surveillance%20Tool%20Following%20EVAR%20is%20Associated%20with%20a%20Reduction%20in%20Cost%20Without%20Compromising%20Accuracy&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Gray,%20C&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=145-150&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1033158577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033158577&rft_id=info:pmid/22717670&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1078588412003309&rfr_iscdi=true