Postrelease Movements of Captive-Reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)
Postrelease movements can determine the success of wildlife translocations. We monitored movements of 36 captive-reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) released to augment wild populations at two sites on the North Fork of the White River (Missouri, USA). We used radioteleme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Herpetologica 2012-06, Vol.68 (2), p.160-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 173 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | Herpetologica |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Bodinof, Catherine M. Briggler, Jeffrey T. Junge, Randall E. Beringer, Jeff Wanner, Mark D. Schuette, Chawna D. Ettling, Jeff Gitzen, Robert A. Millspaugh, Joshua J. |
description | Postrelease movements can determine the success of wildlife translocations. We monitored movements of 36 captive-reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) released to augment wild populations at two sites on the North Fork of the White River (Missouri, USA). We used radiotelemetry to collect 3610 Hellbender locations from May 2008 to August 2009. We quantified movements at multiple spatio-temporal scales and made comparisons between two seasons of monitoring (1 = release–December 2008; 2 = January 2009–August 2009). At the finest (daily) scale, most Hellbenders (90%–94% per season) were highly sedentary (≥50% of observations indicated no movement). Typical distances between daily locations when Hellbenders moved were 50 m at one site, when it coincided with abandonment of core habitat that was one-third as large as at the other site. At the broadest scale, 68% and 86% of Hellbenders settled in core habitat of respective release sites, and most had settled within 21 d postrelease (range = 0–49 d). Collectively, Hellbender movements indicated a short period of exploration followed by more permanent settlement and high site fidelity typical of wild conspecifics. Captive-reared juvenile Hellbenders may be well suited for translocation; however, the quality of habitat at fine scale (10–30 m2) and the extent of suitable habitat within release sites are important considerations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-11-00033.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032896022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23254553</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23254553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b419t-3bf0493ea49bf0701d2c1894a800b63f40725c26adb9761fa308aeb280e9cb9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvLR0BEcCkHt_4TJza3art0kVptVdqzsbOT1ks2Dp5spfbT420QEtw4zUjzezNPbwj5wNkxr5Q6WS6urxY3q4vV-df5KT2jnFPGmJTH_AWZcSM1VcyYl2TGGNeUaclfkzeImz1UCz4j368ijgk6cAjFZXyALfQjFrEt5m4YwwPQa3AJ1sXqyaUfxRK6zkO_hoTF0Tw9DmP0yfXN_Q4L13Vw5_oAPQYsfMD7OIRPh-RV6zqEt7_rAbn9sriZL-nk-YL6kpuRSt-y0khwpcldzfhaNFyb0mnGfCXbktVCNaJya2_qirdOMu3AC83ANN608oAcTXuHFH_uAEe7Ddhku66HuEPLmRTaVEyIjH78B93EXeqzu0wJWSsjFM_U54lqUkRM0Nohha1Ljxmy-_DtX-HbM8u5fQ7f7sXvJvEGx5j-KIUUqlRK5vn7ad66aN1dCmhvvwnGq_wnpWuz36AnwocYe_if478A0eaeMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1023759251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postrelease Movements of Captive-Reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Bodinof, Catherine M. ; Briggler, Jeffrey T. ; Junge, Randall E. ; Beringer, Jeff ; Wanner, Mark D. ; Schuette, Chawna D. ; Ettling, Jeff ; Gitzen, Robert A. ; Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bodinof, Catherine M. ; Briggler, Jeffrey T. ; Junge, Randall E. ; Beringer, Jeff ; Wanner, Mark D. ; Schuette, Chawna D. ; Ettling, Jeff ; Gitzen, Robert A. ; Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><description>Postrelease movements can determine the success of wildlife translocations. We monitored movements of 36 captive-reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) released to augment wild populations at two sites on the North Fork of the White River (Missouri, USA). We used radiotelemetry to collect 3610 Hellbender locations from May 2008 to August 2009. We quantified movements at multiple spatio-temporal scales and made comparisons between two seasons of monitoring (1 = release–December 2008; 2 = January 2009–August 2009). At the finest (daily) scale, most Hellbenders (90%–94% per season) were highly sedentary (≥50% of observations indicated no movement). Typical distances between daily locations when Hellbenders moved were <5 m in Season 1 (median = 3.08 m, n = 331; range = 0.19–903.00) and <2 m in Season 2 (median = 1.80 m; n = 161; range = 0.21–34.00). During the study Hellbenders rarely (35 of 492 movements) travelled >20 m between daily locations, and virtually all (34 of 35) such movements occurred in Season 1. At a broader scale, home ranges of Hellbenders varied widely in Season 1 (range = 0.66–986.92 m2, n = 26), but in Season 2 averaged only 31.33 m2 (± 11.81 SE, n = 8) and 11.08 m2 (± 3.25 SE, n = 7) at respective sites. Among Hellbenders monitored long enough to exhibit settlement (estimation of a home range) 69% (18 of 26) dispersed ≤50 m from the point of release. We only noted mortality associated with dispersals >50 m at one site, when it coincided with abandonment of core habitat that was one-third as large as at the other site. At the broadest scale, 68% and 86% of Hellbenders settled in core habitat of respective release sites, and most had settled within 21 d postrelease (range = 0–49 d). Collectively, Hellbender movements indicated a short period of exploration followed by more permanent settlement and high site fidelity typical of wild conspecifics. Captive-reared juvenile Hellbenders may be well suited for translocation; however, the quality of habitat at fine scale (10–30 m2) and the extent of suitable habitat within release sites are important considerations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-0831</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-11-00033.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1011 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703: The Herpetologists' League, Inc</publisher><subject>Amphibian ; Amphibians ; Animal behavior ; Aquariums ; Autumn ; Birds ; Boulders ; Captive-reared ; Conservation biology ; Cryptobranchus alleganiensis ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Hellbender ; Herpetology ; Home range ; Hypotheses ; Movement ; Point of View ; Release site fidelity ; Reptiles & amphibians ; Rivers ; Seasons ; Stream habitats ; Translocation ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>Herpetologica, 2012-06, Vol.68 (2), p.160-173</ispartof><rights>The Herpetologists' League, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Herpetologists' League, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b419t-3bf0493ea49bf0701d2c1894a800b63f40725c26adb9761fa308aeb280e9cb9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b419t-3bf0493ea49bf0701d2c1894a800b63f40725c26adb9761fa308aeb280e9cb9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23254553$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23254553$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bodinof, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggler, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junge, Randall E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beringer, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanner, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuette, Chawna D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettling, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitzen, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><title>Postrelease Movements of Captive-Reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)</title><title>Herpetologica</title><description>Postrelease movements can determine the success of wildlife translocations. We monitored movements of 36 captive-reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) released to augment wild populations at two sites on the North Fork of the White River (Missouri, USA). We used radiotelemetry to collect 3610 Hellbender locations from May 2008 to August 2009. We quantified movements at multiple spatio-temporal scales and made comparisons between two seasons of monitoring (1 = release–December 2008; 2 = January 2009–August 2009). At the finest (daily) scale, most Hellbenders (90%–94% per season) were highly sedentary (≥50% of observations indicated no movement). Typical distances between daily locations when Hellbenders moved were <5 m in Season 1 (median = 3.08 m, n = 331; range = 0.19–903.00) and <2 m in Season 2 (median = 1.80 m; n = 161; range = 0.21–34.00). During the study Hellbenders rarely (35 of 492 movements) travelled >20 m between daily locations, and virtually all (34 of 35) such movements occurred in Season 1. At a broader scale, home ranges of Hellbenders varied widely in Season 1 (range = 0.66–986.92 m2, n = 26), but in Season 2 averaged only 31.33 m2 (± 11.81 SE, n = 8) and 11.08 m2 (± 3.25 SE, n = 7) at respective sites. Among Hellbenders monitored long enough to exhibit settlement (estimation of a home range) 69% (18 of 26) dispersed ≤50 m from the point of release. We only noted mortality associated with dispersals >50 m at one site, when it coincided with abandonment of core habitat that was one-third as large as at the other site. At the broadest scale, 68% and 86% of Hellbenders settled in core habitat of respective release sites, and most had settled within 21 d postrelease (range = 0–49 d). Collectively, Hellbender movements indicated a short period of exploration followed by more permanent settlement and high site fidelity typical of wild conspecifics. Captive-reared juvenile Hellbenders may be well suited for translocation; however, the quality of habitat at fine scale (10–30 m2) and the extent of suitable habitat within release sites are important considerations.</description><subject>Amphibian</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Aquariums</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Boulders</subject><subject>Captive-reared</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Cryptobranchus alleganiensis</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hellbender</subject><subject>Herpetology</subject><subject>Home range</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Point of View</subject><subject>Release site fidelity</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Stream habitats</subject><subject>Translocation</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0018-0831</issn><issn>1938-5099</issn><issn>1938-5099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU9v1DAQxS0EEkvLR0BEcCkHt_4TJza3art0kVptVdqzsbOT1ks2Dp5spfbT420QEtw4zUjzezNPbwj5wNkxr5Q6WS6urxY3q4vV-df5KT2jnFPGmJTH_AWZcSM1VcyYl2TGGNeUaclfkzeImz1UCz4j368ijgk6cAjFZXyALfQjFrEt5m4YwwPQa3AJ1sXqyaUfxRK6zkO_hoTF0Tw9DmP0yfXN_Q4L13Vw5_oAPQYsfMD7OIRPh-RV6zqEt7_rAbn9sriZL-nk-YL6kpuRSt-y0khwpcldzfhaNFyb0mnGfCXbktVCNaJya2_qirdOMu3AC83ANN608oAcTXuHFH_uAEe7Ddhku66HuEPLmRTaVEyIjH78B93EXeqzu0wJWSsjFM_U54lqUkRM0Nohha1Ljxmy-_DtX-HbM8u5fQ7f7sXvJvEGx5j-KIUUqlRK5vn7ad66aN1dCmhvvwnGq_wnpWuz36AnwocYe_if478A0eaeMg</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Bodinof, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Briggler, Jeffrey T.</creator><creator>Junge, Randall E.</creator><creator>Beringer, Jeff</creator><creator>Wanner, Mark D.</creator><creator>Schuette, Chawna D.</creator><creator>Ettling, Jeff</creator><creator>Gitzen, Robert A.</creator><creator>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creator><general>The Herpetologists' League, Inc</general><general>Allen Press Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Postrelease Movements of Captive-Reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)</title><author>Bodinof, Catherine M. ; Briggler, Jeffrey T. ; Junge, Randall E. ; Beringer, Jeff ; Wanner, Mark D. ; Schuette, Chawna D. ; Ettling, Jeff ; Gitzen, Robert A. ; Millspaugh, Joshua J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b419t-3bf0493ea49bf0701d2c1894a800b63f40725c26adb9761fa308aeb280e9cb9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Amphibian</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Aquariums</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Boulders</topic><topic>Captive-reared</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Cryptobranchus alleganiensis</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hellbender</topic><topic>Herpetology</topic><topic>Home range</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Point of View</topic><topic>Release site fidelity</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Stream habitats</topic><topic>Translocation</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bodinof, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggler, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junge, Randall E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beringer, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanner, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuette, Chawna D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ettling, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitzen, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Herpetologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bodinof, Catherine M.</au><au>Briggler, Jeffrey T.</au><au>Junge, Randall E.</au><au>Beringer, Jeff</au><au>Wanner, Mark D.</au><au>Schuette, Chawna D.</au><au>Ettling, Jeff</au><au>Gitzen, Robert A.</au><au>Millspaugh, Joshua J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postrelease Movements of Captive-Reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi)</atitle><jtitle>Herpetologica</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>160-173</pages><issn>0018-0831</issn><issn>1938-5099</issn><eissn>1938-5099</eissn><abstract>Postrelease movements can determine the success of wildlife translocations. We monitored movements of 36 captive-reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) released to augment wild populations at two sites on the North Fork of the White River (Missouri, USA). We used radiotelemetry to collect 3610 Hellbender locations from May 2008 to August 2009. We quantified movements at multiple spatio-temporal scales and made comparisons between two seasons of monitoring (1 = release–December 2008; 2 = January 2009–August 2009). At the finest (daily) scale, most Hellbenders (90%–94% per season) were highly sedentary (≥50% of observations indicated no movement). Typical distances between daily locations when Hellbenders moved were <5 m in Season 1 (median = 3.08 m, n = 331; range = 0.19–903.00) and <2 m in Season 2 (median = 1.80 m; n = 161; range = 0.21–34.00). During the study Hellbenders rarely (35 of 492 movements) travelled >20 m between daily locations, and virtually all (34 of 35) such movements occurred in Season 1. At a broader scale, home ranges of Hellbenders varied widely in Season 1 (range = 0.66–986.92 m2, n = 26), but in Season 2 averaged only 31.33 m2 (± 11.81 SE, n = 8) and 11.08 m2 (± 3.25 SE, n = 7) at respective sites. Among Hellbenders monitored long enough to exhibit settlement (estimation of a home range) 69% (18 of 26) dispersed ≤50 m from the point of release. We only noted mortality associated with dispersals >50 m at one site, when it coincided with abandonment of core habitat that was one-third as large as at the other site. At the broadest scale, 68% and 86% of Hellbenders settled in core habitat of respective release sites, and most had settled within 21 d postrelease (range = 0–49 d). Collectively, Hellbender movements indicated a short period of exploration followed by more permanent settlement and high site fidelity typical of wild conspecifics. Captive-reared juvenile Hellbenders may be well suited for translocation; however, the quality of habitat at fine scale (10–30 m2) and the extent of suitable habitat within release sites are important considerations.</abstract><cop>1011 E. Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703</cop><pub>The Herpetologists' League, Inc</pub><doi>10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-11-00033.1</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-0831 |
ispartof | Herpetologica, 2012-06, Vol.68 (2), p.160-173 |
issn | 0018-0831 1938-5099 1938-5099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032896022 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Amphibian Amphibians Animal behavior Aquariums Autumn Birds Boulders Captive-reared Conservation biology Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Habitat conservation Habitats Hellbender Herpetology Home range Hypotheses Movement Point of View Release site fidelity Reptiles & amphibians Rivers Seasons Stream habitats Translocation Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife habitats |
title | Postrelease Movements of Captive-Reared Ozark Hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis bishopi) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A54%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postrelease%20Movements%20of%20Captive-Reared%20Ozark%20Hellbenders%20(Cryptobranchus%20alleganiensis%20bishopi)&rft.jtitle=Herpetologica&rft.au=Bodinof,%20Catherine%20M.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=160-173&rft.issn=0018-0831&rft.eissn=1938-5099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-11-00033.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23254553%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1023759251&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23254553&rfr_iscdi=true |