What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability
► The concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated in sustainability transitions. ► Our analysis identifies three properties of protection: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. ► Empowerment is the least developed; a distinction is made between fit-and-confirm and stretch-and-tran...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research policy 2012-07, Vol.41 (6), p.1025-1036 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1036 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1025 |
container_title | Research policy |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Smith, Adrian Raven, Rob |
description | ► The concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated in sustainability transitions. ► Our analysis identifies three properties of protection: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. ► Empowerment is the least developed; a distinction is made between fit-and-confirm and stretch-and-transform empowerment. ► It is proposed to analyse the politics involved in empowerment with the notion of narratives. ► Future research is proposed to focus on the empirical reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework and the analyses of the diverse political narratives across time and space.
The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032895044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048733312000601</els_id><sourcerecordid>1015466279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-bfc258c6c348d59c988198385a521a4f8146232fb7c0b90349824204aacefc743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMoWKvfwEPAi5ddM0l2N7koUvwHhYIoHkM2m7Up2901SQv99qbUkwfxNDDzm8ebeQhdAsmBQHmzyr0N49DllADkQHMC9AhNQFQsq0paHKMJIVxkFWPsFJ2FsCKEACdyghYfSx2xC3j0Q7Qmuq3FYdTG3uFXa4Y-uMZ613_i3pmlDdj1OHqd2tGlIY4DDpsQtet17ToXd-fopNVdsBc_dYreHx_eZs_ZfPH0MrufZ6aQZczq1tBCmNIwLppCGikESMFEoQsKmrcCeEkZbevKkFoSxqWgnBKuk7PWVJxN0fVBN_n-2tgQ1doFY7tO93bYBAWEUSELwv-DQsHLklYyoVe_0NWw8X06ZE8BI1RWkCh-oIwfQvC2VaN3a-13CdpzpVqpQyBqH4gCqlIgae32sGbTX7bOehWMs72xjfPp86oZ3N8C32rllNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011302971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Smith, Adrian ; Raven, Rob</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Adrian ; Raven, Rob</creatorcontrib><description>► The concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated in sustainability transitions. ► Our analysis identifies three properties of protection: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. ► Empowerment is the least developed; a distinction is made between fit-and-confirm and stretch-and-transform empowerment. ► It is proposed to analyse the politics involved in empowerment with the notion of narratives. ► Future research is proposed to focus on the empirical reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework and the analyses of the diverse political narratives across time and space.
The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REPYBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Competitiveness ; Constructivism ; Development ; Empowerment ; Innovations ; Narratives ; Niche ; Organization development ; Protective space ; Social change ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Transitions</subject><ispartof>Research policy, 2012-07, Vol.41 (6), p.1025-1036</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-bfc258c6c348d59c988198385a521a4f8146232fb7c0b90349824204aacefc743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-bfc258c6c348d59c988198385a521a4f8146232fb7c0b90349824204aacefc743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raven, Rob</creatorcontrib><title>What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability</title><title>Research policy</title><description>► The concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated in sustainability transitions. ► Our analysis identifies three properties of protection: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. ► Empowerment is the least developed; a distinction is made between fit-and-confirm and stretch-and-transform empowerment. ► It is proposed to analyse the politics involved in empowerment with the notion of narratives. ► Future research is proposed to focus on the empirical reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework and the analyses of the diverse political narratives across time and space.
The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.</description><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Constructivism</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Niche</subject><subject>Organization development</subject><subject>Protective space</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><issn>0048-7333</issn><issn>1873-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMoWKvfwEPAi5ddM0l2N7koUvwHhYIoHkM2m7Up2901SQv99qbUkwfxNDDzm8ebeQhdAsmBQHmzyr0N49DllADkQHMC9AhNQFQsq0paHKMJIVxkFWPsFJ2FsCKEACdyghYfSx2xC3j0Q7Qmuq3FYdTG3uFXa4Y-uMZ613_i3pmlDdj1OHqd2tGlIY4DDpsQtet17ToXd-fopNVdsBc_dYreHx_eZs_ZfPH0MrufZ6aQZczq1tBCmNIwLppCGikESMFEoQsKmrcCeEkZbevKkFoSxqWgnBKuk7PWVJxN0fVBN_n-2tgQ1doFY7tO93bYBAWEUSELwv-DQsHLklYyoVe_0NWw8X06ZE8BI1RWkCh-oIwfQvC2VaN3a-13CdpzpVqpQyBqH4gCqlIgae32sGbTX7bOehWMs72xjfPp86oZ3N8C32rllNQ</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Smith, Adrian</creator><creator>Raven, Rob</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability</title><author>Smith, Adrian ; Raven, Rob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-bfc258c6c348d59c988198385a521a4f8146232fb7c0b90349824204aacefc743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Constructivism</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Niche</topic><topic>Organization development</topic><topic>Protective space</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raven, Rob</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Adrian</au><au>Raven, Rob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1025</spage><epage>1036</epage><pages>1025-1036</pages><issn>0048-7333</issn><eissn>1873-7625</eissn><coden>REPYBP</coden><abstract>► The concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated in sustainability transitions. ► Our analysis identifies three properties of protection: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. ► Empowerment is the least developed; a distinction is made between fit-and-confirm and stretch-and-transform empowerment. ► It is proposed to analyse the politics involved in empowerment with the notion of narratives. ► Future research is proposed to focus on the empirical reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework and the analyses of the diverse political narratives across time and space.
The transitions literature emphasises the role of niches, defined as a protective space for path-breaking innovations. Surprisingly, the concept of protection has not been systematically interrogated. Our analysis identifies effective protection as having three properties in wider transition processes: shielding, nurturing and empowerment. Empowerment is considered the least developed in current niche literature. It can be understood as either processes that make niche innovations competitive within unchanged selection environments (fit-and-conform) or as processes that contribute to changes in mainstream selection environments in ways favourable to a path-breaking niche innovation (stretch-and-transform). Adopting a more constructivist perspective, we subsequently argue that analysis of these properties needs to be complemented with particular attention for the politics involved in their construction. Attention to empowerment confirms the view that niche actors need to link to wider processes of social change, and suggests how this arises. The paper ends with an outlook upon two promising research avenues: (1) the reconstruction of niche development in light of the present framework; (2) analyses of the diverse (political) narratives seeking to empower niches across time and space.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-7333 |
ispartof | Research policy, 2012-07, Vol.41 (6), p.1025-1036 |
issn | 0048-7333 1873-7625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032895044 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Competitiveness Constructivism Development Empowerment Innovations Narratives Niche Organization development Protective space Social change Studies Sustainability Transitions |
title | What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A45%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20protective%20space?%20Reconsidering%20niches%20in%20transitions%20to%20sustainability&rft.jtitle=Research%20policy&rft.au=Smith,%20Adrian&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1025&rft.epage=1036&rft.pages=1025-1036&rft.issn=0048-7333&rft.eissn=1873-7625&rft.coden=REPYBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1015466279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011302971&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048733312000601&rfr_iscdi=true |