Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past y...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in rheumatology 2012-09, Vol.24 (5), p.561-566
Hauptverfasser: Cheung, Angela M, Giangregorio, Lora
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 566
container_issue 5
container_start_page 561
container_title Current opinion in rheumatology
container_volume 24
creator Cheung, Angela M
Giangregorio, Lora
description PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health. RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women. SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032888946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1032888946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwh5ySbFj9hx2CBa8ZKKKiFYR7YzUQJOUuKEir_HKIUFC1Yzi3PvaA5Cp5TMKUmTi8X6aU4MoRw4U1wkhHG1h6ZUcBrJVPL9sJOYRCqhdIKOvH8lhLKUskM0YSHBFJNTlD6CLXVTWe2w76t6cBXWTY5N2wAuQbu-vMTbUve48rgvAcNHlUNj4eoYHRTaeTjZzRl6ub15Xt5Hq_Xdw_J6FVkupIqkEZKnNGZGKEYYs4YkOsmZZVqYhAooZCEtFUQUKuHappZxU-RF-JFYEws-Q-dj76Zr3wfwfVZX3oJzuoF28Bkl4RWl0lgGNB5R27Xed1Bkm66qdfcZoOxbWhakZX-lhdjZ7sJgash_Qz-WAqBGYNu6Hjr_5oYtdNmo5__uLzjEd-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032888946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cheung, Angela M ; Giangregorio, Lora</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Angela M ; Giangregorio, Lora</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health. RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women. SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22832826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone and Bones - physiology ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Exercise ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control ; Genetic Markers - physiology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy ; Stress, Mechanical ; Vibration - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in rheumatology, 2012-09, Vol.24 (5), p.561-566</ispartof><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22832826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giangregorio, Lora</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</title><title>Current opinion in rheumatology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health. RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women. SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Genetic Markers - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Vibration - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1040-8711</issn><issn>1531-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwh5ySbFj9hx2CBa8ZKKKiFYR7YzUQJOUuKEir_HKIUFC1Yzi3PvaA5Cp5TMKUmTi8X6aU4MoRw4U1wkhHG1h6ZUcBrJVPL9sJOYRCqhdIKOvH8lhLKUskM0YSHBFJNTlD6CLXVTWe2w76t6cBXWTY5N2wAuQbu-vMTbUve48rgvAcNHlUNj4eoYHRTaeTjZzRl6ub15Xt5Hq_Xdw_J6FVkupIqkEZKnNGZGKEYYs4YkOsmZZVqYhAooZCEtFUQUKuHappZxU-RF-JFYEws-Q-dj76Zr3wfwfVZX3oJzuoF28Bkl4RWl0lgGNB5R27Xed1Bkm66qdfcZoOxbWhakZX-lhdjZ7sJgash_Qz-WAqBGYNu6Hjr_5oYtdNmo5__uLzjEd-U</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Cheung, Angela M</creator><creator>Giangregorio, Lora</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</title><author>Cheung, Angela M ; Giangregorio, Lora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Genetic Markers - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Vibration - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giangregorio, Lora</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheung, Angela M</au><au>Giangregorio, Lora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>561-566</pages><issn>1040-8711</issn><eissn>1531-6963</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health. RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women. SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22832826</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-8711
ispartof Current opinion in rheumatology, 2012-09, Vol.24 (5), p.561-566
issn 1040-8711
1531-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032888946
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Bone and Bones - physiology
Bone Density - physiology
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology
Evidence-Based Medicine
Exercise
Female
Fractures, Bone - prevention & control
Genetic Markers - physiology
Humans
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy
Stress, Mechanical
Vibration - therapeutic use
title Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A42%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20stimuli%20and%20bone%20health:%20what%20is%20the%20evidence?&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20rheumatology&rft.au=Cheung,%20Angela%20M&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=561-566&rft.issn=1040-8711&rft.eissn=1531-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1032888946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032888946&rft_id=info:pmid/22832826&rfr_iscdi=true