Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?
PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past y...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current opinion in rheumatology 2012-09, Vol.24 (5), p.561-566 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 566 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 561 |
container_title | Current opinion in rheumatology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Cheung, Angela M Giangregorio, Lora |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health.
RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women.
SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032888946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1032888946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwh5ySbFj9hx2CBa8ZKKKiFYR7YzUQJOUuKEir_HKIUFC1Yzi3PvaA5Cp5TMKUmTi8X6aU4MoRw4U1wkhHG1h6ZUcBrJVPL9sJOYRCqhdIKOvH8lhLKUskM0YSHBFJNTlD6CLXVTWe2w76t6cBXWTY5N2wAuQbu-vMTbUve48rgvAcNHlUNj4eoYHRTaeTjZzRl6ub15Xt5Hq_Xdw_J6FVkupIqkEZKnNGZGKEYYs4YkOsmZZVqYhAooZCEtFUQUKuHappZxU-RF-JFYEws-Q-dj76Zr3wfwfVZX3oJzuoF28Bkl4RWl0lgGNB5R27Xed1Bkm66qdfcZoOxbWhakZX-lhdjZ7sJgash_Qz-WAqBGYNu6Hjr_5oYtdNmo5__uLzjEd-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1032888946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cheung, Angela M ; Giangregorio, Lora</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Angela M ; Giangregorio, Lora</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health.
RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women.
SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22832826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone and Bones - physiology ; Bone Density - physiology ; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Exercise ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - prevention & control ; Genetic Markers - physiology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy ; Stress, Mechanical ; Vibration - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in rheumatology, 2012-09, Vol.24 (5), p.561-566</ispartof><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22832826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giangregorio, Lora</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</title><title>Current opinion in rheumatology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health.
RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women.
SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention & control</subject><subject>Genetic Markers - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Vibration - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1040-8711</issn><issn>1531-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwh5ySbFj9hx2CBa8ZKKKiFYR7YzUQJOUuKEir_HKIUFC1Yzi3PvaA5Cp5TMKUmTi8X6aU4MoRw4U1wkhHG1h6ZUcBrJVPL9sJOYRCqhdIKOvH8lhLKUskM0YSHBFJNTlD6CLXVTWe2w76t6cBXWTY5N2wAuQbu-vMTbUve48rgvAcNHlUNj4eoYHRTaeTjZzRl6ub15Xt5Hq_Xdw_J6FVkupIqkEZKnNGZGKEYYs4YkOsmZZVqYhAooZCEtFUQUKuHappZxU-RF-JFYEws-Q-dj76Zr3wfwfVZX3oJzuoF28Bkl4RWl0lgGNB5R27Xed1Bkm66qdfcZoOxbWhakZX-lhdjZ7sJgash_Qz-WAqBGYNu6Hjr_5oYtdNmo5__uLzjEd-U</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Cheung, Angela M</creator><creator>Giangregorio, Lora</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</title><author>Cheung, Angela M ; Giangregorio, Lora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-6b5639142b582022cb07a7d2c2a5b715ef6f6c1505f873ac9c23bfdf1090cb453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention & control</topic><topic>Genetic Markers - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Vibration - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Angela M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giangregorio, Lora</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheung, Angela M</au><au>Giangregorio, Lora</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence?</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>566</epage><pages>561-566</pages><issn>1040-8711</issn><eissn>1531-6963</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE OF REVIEWWith the recent emergence of associations of bisphosphonate therapy with atypical fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw, there is renewed interest among clinicians and patients for nonpharmacological approaches to bone health. Here, we review the new studies published in the past year or two that advance our knowledge of the effect of mechanical stimuli on bone health.
RECENT FINDINGSPhysical activity is associated with serum sclerostin levels; the most physically active individuals have the lowest serum sclerostin levels. Observational trials suggest that physical activity participation results in higher bone mass, but clinical trials suggest that the effects of exercise on areal bone mineral density are small, and vary with the site measured and the type of exercise. Based on current data, it may be best to combine progressive resistance training with interventions such as walking or aerobic dancing if the desire is to improve both spine and hip in postmenopausal women. Low-magnitude high-frequency whole body vibration does not improve bone mineral density and bone structure in postmenopausal women.
SUMMARYPhysical activity and exercise are important for the maintenance of musculoskeletal health as we age. Future studies need to investigate the effects of exercise in older populations with rheumatological diseases and those with a history of fragility fractures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22832826</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-8711 |
ispartof | Current opinion in rheumatology, 2012-09, Vol.24 (5), p.561-566 |
issn | 1040-8711 1531-6963 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1032888946 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Bone and Bones - physiology Bone Density - physiology Bone Morphogenetic Proteins - physiology Evidence-Based Medicine Exercise Female Fractures, Bone - prevention & control Genetic Markers - physiology Humans Middle Aged Motor Activity Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - physiopathology Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - therapy Stress, Mechanical Vibration - therapeutic use |
title | Mechanical stimuli and bone health: what is the evidence? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A42%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20stimuli%20and%20bone%20health:%20what%20is%20the%20evidence?&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20rheumatology&rft.au=Cheung,%20Angela%20M&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=566&rft.pages=561-566&rft.issn=1040-8711&rft.eissn=1531-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283570238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1032888946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1032888946&rft_id=info:pmid/22832826&rfr_iscdi=true |