Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals

Systems for and methods of quality management are increasingly being implemented in public health services. The aim of our study was to analyze the current state of the integrated quality management concept "quality management acute pain therapy" of the TÜV Rheinland® (TÜV) after a 5-year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) Germany), 2012-08, Vol.26 (4), p.425-430
Hauptverfasser: Böhmer, A B, Poels, M, Simanski, C, Trojan, S, Messer, K, Wirtz, M D, Neugebauer, E A M, Wappler, F, Joppich, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 4
container_start_page 425
container_title Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)
container_volume 26
creator Böhmer, A B
Poels, M
Simanski, C
Trojan, S
Messer, K
Wirtz, M D
Neugebauer, E A M
Wappler, F
Joppich, R
description Systems for and methods of quality management are increasingly being implemented in public health services. The aim of our study was to analyze the current state of the integrated quality management concept "quality management acute pain therapy" of the TÜV Rheinland® (TÜV) after a 5-year project period. General characteristics of the participating hospitals, number of departments certified by the TÜV and implementation of structures and processes according to the TÜV guidelines were evaluated by a mail questionnaire. Furthermore, positive and negative aspects concerning the effects of certification were evaluated by the hospitals' representatives of certification. A total of 36 questionnaires were returned. Since 2006 the number of certified hospitals (2011: n = 48) and surgical departments (2011: n = 202) has increased continuously. The number of certified medical departments is low (2011: n = 39); however, in the last 3 years, it has increased by about 200-300% annually. Standard operative procedures for pain therapy and measurement of pain intensity at regular intervals were implemented in all certified clinics (100%). Although 41% take part in the benchmarking project QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Therapy), 24% do not systematically check the quality of the outcome of pain management. Acceptance of the new pain therapy concepts among nursing staff was rated positively (ratio positive:negative 16:1); however, acceptance among physicians was rated negatively (1:15). Certification by the TÜV leads to sustainable implementation of quality management principles. Future efforts should focus on better integration of physicians in acute pain therapy and the development of an integrated tool to measure patients' outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00482-012-1205-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1031155591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1031155591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g166t-fda970d90133c1e7306c899221055d45ba21cbf1e6d81adbb3f0d2a661b727e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLxDAURoMgzjj6A9xIlm6q9yZNH-5k8AUDIqjbkjY3M5W-zEPsv3fAcXW-xeEsPsYuEK4RIL_xAGkhEkCRoACV_ByxJaZSJAJFuWCn3n8CQCaVOmELIQqlJMol-3iNumvDzHs96C31NATeDlw3MRCf9H6GHTk9zbfckY9d8Ny6seea--i-aeaj5Q250NqWDN-NfmqD7vwZO7Z70PmBK_b-cP-2fko2L4_P67tNssUsC4k1uszBlIBSNki5hKwpylIIBKVMqmotsKktUmYK1KaupQUjdJZhnYuclFyxq7_u5MavSD5Ufesb6jo90Bh9hSARlVIl7tXLgxrrnkw1ubbXbq7-v5C_y8Vfpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1031155591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Böhmer, A B ; Poels, M ; Simanski, C ; Trojan, S ; Messer, K ; Wirtz, M D ; Neugebauer, E A M ; Wappler, F ; Joppich, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Böhmer, A B ; Poels, M ; Simanski, C ; Trojan, S ; Messer, K ; Wirtz, M D ; Neugebauer, E A M ; Wappler, F ; Joppich, R</creatorcontrib><description>Systems for and methods of quality management are increasingly being implemented in public health services. The aim of our study was to analyze the current state of the integrated quality management concept "quality management acute pain therapy" of the TÜV Rheinland® (TÜV) after a 5-year project period. General characteristics of the participating hospitals, number of departments certified by the TÜV and implementation of structures and processes according to the TÜV guidelines were evaluated by a mail questionnaire. Furthermore, positive and negative aspects concerning the effects of certification were evaluated by the hospitals' representatives of certification. A total of 36 questionnaires were returned. Since 2006 the number of certified hospitals (2011: n = 48) and surgical departments (2011: n = 202) has increased continuously. The number of certified medical departments is low (2011: n = 39); however, in the last 3 years, it has increased by about 200-300% annually. Standard operative procedures for pain therapy and measurement of pain intensity at regular intervals were implemented in all certified clinics (100%). Although 41% take part in the benchmarking project QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Therapy), 24% do not systematically check the quality of the outcome of pain management. Acceptance of the new pain therapy concepts among nursing staff was rated positively (ratio positive:negative 16:1); however, acceptance among physicians was rated negatively (1:15). Certification by the TÜV leads to sustainable implementation of quality management principles. Future efforts should focus on better integration of physicians in acute pain therapy and the development of an integrated tool to measure patients' outcome.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00482-012-1205-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22855313</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Acute Pain - diagnosis ; Acute Pain - therapy ; Benchmarking - standards ; Cooperative Behavior ; Credentialing ; Germany ; Health Care Surveys ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Nursing Assessment - standards ; Pain Management - standards ; Pain Measurement - standards ; Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis ; Pain, Postoperative - therapy ; Patient Care Team ; Quality Improvement - standards ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Total Quality Management - standards ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2012-08, Vol.26 (4), p.425-430</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22855313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Böhmer, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poels, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simanski, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trojan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neugebauer, E A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wappler, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joppich, R</creatorcontrib><title>Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals</title><title>Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)</title><addtitle>Schmerz</addtitle><description>Systems for and methods of quality management are increasingly being implemented in public health services. The aim of our study was to analyze the current state of the integrated quality management concept "quality management acute pain therapy" of the TÜV Rheinland® (TÜV) after a 5-year project period. General characteristics of the participating hospitals, number of departments certified by the TÜV and implementation of structures and processes according to the TÜV guidelines were evaluated by a mail questionnaire. Furthermore, positive and negative aspects concerning the effects of certification were evaluated by the hospitals' representatives of certification. A total of 36 questionnaires were returned. Since 2006 the number of certified hospitals (2011: n = 48) and surgical departments (2011: n = 202) has increased continuously. The number of certified medical departments is low (2011: n = 39); however, in the last 3 years, it has increased by about 200-300% annually. Standard operative procedures for pain therapy and measurement of pain intensity at regular intervals were implemented in all certified clinics (100%). Although 41% take part in the benchmarking project QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Therapy), 24% do not systematically check the quality of the outcome of pain management. Acceptance of the new pain therapy concepts among nursing staff was rated positively (ratio positive:negative 16:1); however, acceptance among physicians was rated negatively (1:15). Certification by the TÜV leads to sustainable implementation of quality management principles. Future efforts should focus on better integration of physicians in acute pain therapy and the development of an integrated tool to measure patients' outcome.</description><subject>Acute Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Acute Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Benchmarking - standards</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Credentialing</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Nursing Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Pain Management - standards</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - therapy</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Quality Improvement - standards</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Total Quality Management - standards</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1432-2129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtLxDAURoMgzjj6A9xIlm6q9yZNH-5k8AUDIqjbkjY3M5W-zEPsv3fAcXW-xeEsPsYuEK4RIL_xAGkhEkCRoACV_ByxJaZSJAJFuWCn3n8CQCaVOmELIQqlJMol-3iNumvDzHs96C31NATeDlw3MRCf9H6GHTk9zbfckY9d8Ny6seea--i-aeaj5Q250NqWDN-NfmqD7vwZO7Z70PmBK_b-cP-2fko2L4_P67tNssUsC4k1uszBlIBSNki5hKwpylIIBKVMqmotsKktUmYK1KaupQUjdJZhnYuclFyxq7_u5MavSD5Ufesb6jo90Bh9hSARlVIl7tXLgxrrnkw1ubbXbq7-v5C_y8Vfpg</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Böhmer, A B</creator><creator>Poels, M</creator><creator>Simanski, C</creator><creator>Trojan, S</creator><creator>Messer, K</creator><creator>Wirtz, M D</creator><creator>Neugebauer, E A M</creator><creator>Wappler, F</creator><creator>Joppich, R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals</title><author>Böhmer, A B ; Poels, M ; Simanski, C ; Trojan, S ; Messer, K ; Wirtz, M D ; Neugebauer, E A M ; Wappler, F ; Joppich, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g166t-fda970d90133c1e7306c899221055d45ba21cbf1e6d81adbb3f0d2a661b727e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acute Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Acute Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Benchmarking - standards</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Credentialing</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Nursing Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Pain Management - standards</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - therapy</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Quality Improvement - standards</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Total Quality Management - standards</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Böhmer, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poels, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simanski, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trojan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirtz, M D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neugebauer, E A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wappler, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joppich, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Böhmer, A B</au><au>Poels, M</au><au>Simanski, C</au><au>Trojan, S</au><au>Messer, K</au><au>Wirtz, M D</au><au>Neugebauer, E A M</au><au>Wappler, F</au><au>Joppich, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals</atitle><jtitle>Schmerz (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle><addtitle>Schmerz</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>425</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>425-430</pages><eissn>1432-2129</eissn><abstract>Systems for and methods of quality management are increasingly being implemented in public health services. The aim of our study was to analyze the current state of the integrated quality management concept "quality management acute pain therapy" of the TÜV Rheinland® (TÜV) after a 5-year project period. General characteristics of the participating hospitals, number of departments certified by the TÜV and implementation of structures and processes according to the TÜV guidelines were evaluated by a mail questionnaire. Furthermore, positive and negative aspects concerning the effects of certification were evaluated by the hospitals' representatives of certification. A total of 36 questionnaires were returned. Since 2006 the number of certified hospitals (2011: n = 48) and surgical departments (2011: n = 202) has increased continuously. The number of certified medical departments is low (2011: n = 39); however, in the last 3 years, it has increased by about 200-300% annually. Standard operative procedures for pain therapy and measurement of pain intensity at regular intervals were implemented in all certified clinics (100%). Although 41% take part in the benchmarking project QUIPS (Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Therapy), 24% do not systematically check the quality of the outcome of pain management. Acceptance of the new pain therapy concepts among nursing staff was rated positively (ratio positive:negative 16:1); however, acceptance among physicians was rated negatively (1:15). Certification by the TÜV leads to sustainable implementation of quality management principles. Future efforts should focus on better integration of physicians in acute pain therapy and the development of an integrated tool to measure patients' outcome.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>22855313</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00482-012-1205-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1432-2129
ispartof Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2012-08, Vol.26 (4), p.425-430
issn 1432-2129
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1031155591
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acute Pain - diagnosis
Acute Pain - therapy
Benchmarking - standards
Cooperative Behavior
Credentialing
Germany
Health Care Surveys
Hospitals
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Nursing Assessment - standards
Pain Management - standards
Pain Measurement - standards
Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis
Pain, Postoperative - therapy
Patient Care Team
Quality Improvement - standards
Surveys and Questionnaires
Total Quality Management - standards
Treatment Outcome
title Quality management in acute pain therapy: results from a survey of certified hospitals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A39%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20management%20in%20acute%20pain%20therapy:%20results%20from%20a%20survey%20of%20certified%20hospitals&rft.jtitle=Schmerz%20(Berlin,%20Germany)&rft.au=B%C3%B6hmer,%20A%20B&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=425-430&rft.eissn=1432-2129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00482-012-1205-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1031155591%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1031155591&rft_id=info:pmid/22855313&rfr_iscdi=true