Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel
The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Teacher education and special education 2012-05, Vol.35 (2), p.101-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 113 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Teacher education and special education |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Smith, Deborah Deutsch Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth |
description | The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, & Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0888406412444455 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030905236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ963202</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0888406412444455</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1030905236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1335-54b8a2d7332aaa7d6acd04e111f0cbcf00c02a54eb14306cf7a74756c28edf5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHjwUvHiJzn4nR6nxi4KCeg6TyaakpN262xz8790S8SA4l4H5vfdgHmPnHK45t_YG8jxXYBQXKo3WB2zCC6UyVUh-yCZ7nO35MTuJcQUACrSZsMu3raMO-1nZDIS7zm9md552PqTTa_DLgOt4yo5a7KM7-9lT9nFfvs8fs8XLw9P8dpERl1JnWtU5isZKKRDRNgapAeU45y1QTS0AgUCtXM2VBEOtRausNiRy17Qa5ZRdjbnb4D8HF3fVuovk-h43zg-x4iChAC2kSVIYpRR8jMG11TZ0awxfSVTt-6j-9pEsF6PFhY5-5eVzYaQAkXA24ohLV638EDbp1__jvgEahmb8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030905236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Smith, Deborah Deutsch ; Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Deborah Deutsch ; Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, & Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4064</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-4931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0888406412444455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Change Strategies ; College Outcomes Assessment ; Comparative Analysis ; Doctoral postgraduate education ; Doctoral Programs ; Educational Change ; Educational Supply ; Institutional Characteristics ; Instructional Leadership ; Leadership ; Leadership Training ; Mail Surveys ; Needs Assessment ; Professors ; Program Attitudes ; Questionnaires ; Shortages ; Special Education ; Special Education Teachers ; Supply and demand ; Teacher Shortage ; Teacher Supply and Demand</subject><ispartof>Teacher education and special education, 2012-05, Vol.35 (2), p.101-113</ispartof><rights>2012 Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1335-54b8a2d7332aaa7d6acd04e111f0cbcf00c02a54eb14306cf7a74756c28edf5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0888406412444455$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0888406412444455$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,31000,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ963202$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel</title><title>Teacher education and special education</title><description>The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, & Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.</description><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>College Outcomes Assessment</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Doctoral postgraduate education</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Supply</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Instructional Leadership</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Leadership Training</subject><subject>Mail Surveys</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Professors</subject><subject>Program Attitudes</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Special Education Teachers</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><subject>Teacher Shortage</subject><subject>Teacher Supply and Demand</subject><issn>0888-4064</issn><issn>1944-4931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHjwUvHiJzn4nR6nxi4KCeg6TyaakpN262xz8790S8SA4l4H5vfdgHmPnHK45t_YG8jxXYBQXKo3WB2zCC6UyVUh-yCZ7nO35MTuJcQUACrSZsMu3raMO-1nZDIS7zm9md552PqTTa_DLgOt4yo5a7KM7-9lT9nFfvs8fs8XLw9P8dpERl1JnWtU5isZKKRDRNgapAeU45y1QTS0AgUCtXM2VBEOtRausNiRy17Qa5ZRdjbnb4D8HF3fVuovk-h43zg-x4iChAC2kSVIYpRR8jMG11TZ0awxfSVTt-6j-9pEsF6PFhY5-5eVzYaQAkXA24ohLV638EDbp1__jvgEahmb8</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</creator><creator>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Special Education Doctoral Programs</title><author>Smith, Deborah Deutsch ; Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1335-54b8a2d7332aaa7d6acd04e111f0cbcf00c02a54eb14306cf7a74756c28edf5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>College Outcomes Assessment</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Doctoral postgraduate education</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Supply</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Instructional Leadership</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Leadership Training</topic><topic>Mail Surveys</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Professors</topic><topic>Program Attitudes</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Special Education Teachers</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><topic>Teacher Shortage</topic><topic>Teacher Supply and Demand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Teacher education and special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</au><au>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ963202</ericid><atitle>Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel</atitle><jtitle>Teacher education and special education</jtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>101-113</pages><issn>0888-4064</issn><eissn>1944-4931</eissn><abstract>The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, & Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0888406412444455</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-4064 |
ispartof | Teacher education and special education, 2012-05, Vol.35 (2), p.101-113 |
issn | 0888-4064 1944-4931 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030905236 |
source | Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Change Strategies College Outcomes Assessment Comparative Analysis Doctoral postgraduate education Doctoral Programs Educational Change Educational Supply Institutional Characteristics Instructional Leadership Leadership Leadership Training Mail Surveys Needs Assessment Professors Program Attitudes Questionnaires Shortages Special Education Special Education Teachers Supply and demand Teacher Shortage Teacher Supply and Demand |
title | Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Education%20Doctoral%20Programs:%20A%2010-Year%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Suppliers%20of%20Leadership%20Personnel&rft.jtitle=Teacher%20education%20and%20special%20education&rft.au=Smith,%20Deborah%20Deutsch&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=101-113&rft.issn=0888-4064&rft.eissn=1944-4931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0888406412444455&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1030905236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030905236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ963202&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0888406412444455&rfr_iscdi=true |