Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel

The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Teacher education and special education 2012-05, Vol.35 (2), p.101-113
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Deborah Deutsch, Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 2
container_start_page 101
container_title Teacher education and special education
container_volume 35
creator Smith, Deborah Deutsch
Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth
description The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, & Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0888406412444455
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030905236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ963202</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0888406412444455</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1030905236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1335-54b8a2d7332aaa7d6acd04e111f0cbcf00c02a54eb14306cf7a74756c28edf5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHjwUvHiJzn4nR6nxi4KCeg6TyaakpN262xz8790S8SA4l4H5vfdgHmPnHK45t_YG8jxXYBQXKo3WB2zCC6UyVUh-yCZ7nO35MTuJcQUACrSZsMu3raMO-1nZDIS7zm9md552PqTTa_DLgOt4yo5a7KM7-9lT9nFfvs8fs8XLw9P8dpERl1JnWtU5isZKKRDRNgapAeU45y1QTS0AgUCtXM2VBEOtRausNiRy17Qa5ZRdjbnb4D8HF3fVuovk-h43zg-x4iChAC2kSVIYpRR8jMG11TZ0awxfSVTt-6j-9pEsF6PFhY5-5eVzYaQAkXA24ohLV638EDbp1__jvgEahmb8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030905236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Smith, Deborah Deutsch ; Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Deborah Deutsch ; Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, &amp; Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4064</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-4931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0888406412444455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Change Strategies ; College Outcomes Assessment ; Comparative Analysis ; Doctoral postgraduate education ; Doctoral Programs ; Educational Change ; Educational Supply ; Institutional Characteristics ; Instructional Leadership ; Leadership ; Leadership Training ; Mail Surveys ; Needs Assessment ; Professors ; Program Attitudes ; Questionnaires ; Shortages ; Special Education ; Special Education Teachers ; Supply and demand ; Teacher Shortage ; Teacher Supply and Demand</subject><ispartof>Teacher education and special education, 2012-05, Vol.35 (2), p.101-113</ispartof><rights>2012 Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1335-54b8a2d7332aaa7d6acd04e111f0cbcf00c02a54eb14306cf7a74756c28edf5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0888406412444455$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0888406412444455$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,31000,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ963202$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel</title><title>Teacher education and special education</title><description>The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, &amp; Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.</description><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>College Outcomes Assessment</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Doctoral postgraduate education</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Supply</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Instructional Leadership</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Leadership Training</subject><subject>Mail Surveys</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Professors</subject><subject>Program Attitudes</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Special Education Teachers</subject><subject>Supply and demand</subject><subject>Teacher Shortage</subject><subject>Teacher Supply and Demand</subject><issn>0888-4064</issn><issn>1944-4931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHjwUvHiJzn4nR6nxi4KCeg6TyaakpN262xz8790S8SA4l4H5vfdgHmPnHK45t_YG8jxXYBQXKo3WB2zCC6UyVUh-yCZ7nO35MTuJcQUACrSZsMu3raMO-1nZDIS7zm9md552PqTTa_DLgOt4yo5a7KM7-9lT9nFfvs8fs8XLw9P8dpERl1JnWtU5isZKKRDRNgapAeU45y1QTS0AgUCtXM2VBEOtRausNiRy17Qa5ZRdjbnb4D8HF3fVuovk-h43zg-x4iChAC2kSVIYpRR8jMG11TZ0awxfSVTt-6j-9pEsF6PFhY5-5eVzYaQAkXA24ohLV638EDbp1__jvgEahmb8</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</creator><creator>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Special Education Doctoral Programs</title><author>Smith, Deborah Deutsch ; Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1335-54b8a2d7332aaa7d6acd04e111f0cbcf00c02a54eb14306cf7a74756c28edf5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>College Outcomes Assessment</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Doctoral postgraduate education</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Supply</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Instructional Leadership</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Leadership Training</topic><topic>Mail Surveys</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Professors</topic><topic>Program Attitudes</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Special Education Teachers</topic><topic>Supply and demand</topic><topic>Teacher Shortage</topic><topic>Teacher Supply and Demand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Teacher education and special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Deborah Deutsch</au><au>Montrosse, Bianca Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ963202</ericid><atitle>Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel</atitle><jtitle>Teacher education and special education</jtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>101-113</pages><issn>0888-4064</issn><eissn>1944-4931</eissn><abstract>The first article in this special issue is about the doctoral programs, the suppliers of new doctoral graduates in special education. It focuses on one component of a larger effort, the Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment (SEFNA) project, which investigated many aspects of the supply of new doctoral graduates as well as the demand for new college and university faculty members. Here, the authors present information about the characteristics of the nation’s doctoral programs and their capacity to produce a sufficient supply of teacher educators, faculty for doctoral-granting universities, school leaders, federal and state officials, policy makers, researchers, and advocates. In the 10-year period since The Faculty Shortage Study (Smith, Pion, Tyler, Sindelar, &amp; Rosenberg, 2001) was completed, substantial improvement in the capacity of doctoral programs (i.e., number and size) and the supply (i.e., number of graduates produced) occurred. Federal and stakeholder actions contributed greatly to progress made in addressing the special education faculty shortage identified in the previous study. These programs are at substantial risk of being understaffed in the upcoming years due to overwhelming attrition due to faculty retirements, which will impact the supply chain across the field of special education.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0888406412444455</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-4064
ispartof Teacher education and special education, 2012-05, Vol.35 (2), p.101-113
issn 0888-4064
1944-4931
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030905236
source Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Change Strategies
College Outcomes Assessment
Comparative Analysis
Doctoral postgraduate education
Doctoral Programs
Educational Change
Educational Supply
Institutional Characteristics
Instructional Leadership
Leadership
Leadership Training
Mail Surveys
Needs Assessment
Professors
Program Attitudes
Questionnaires
Shortages
Special Education
Special Education Teachers
Supply and demand
Teacher Shortage
Teacher Supply and Demand
title Special Education Doctoral Programs: A 10-Year Comparison of the Suppliers of Leadership Personnel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Education%20Doctoral%20Programs:%20A%2010-Year%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Suppliers%20of%20Leadership%20Personnel&rft.jtitle=Teacher%20education%20and%20special%20education&rft.au=Smith,%20Deborah%20Deutsch&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=101-113&rft.issn=0888-4064&rft.eissn=1944-4931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0888406412444455&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1030905236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030905236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ963202&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0888406412444455&rfr_iscdi=true