Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: a comparison of models
This study examined the type of growth model that best fit within-year growth in oral reading fluency and between-student differences in growth. Participants were 2,465 students in grades 3–5. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses modeled curriculum-based measurement (CBM) oral reading fluency...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Reading & writing 2012-04, Vol.25 (4), p.887-915 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 915 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 887 |
| container_title | Reading & writing |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Nese, Joseph F. T. Biancarosa, Gina Anderson, Daniel Lai, Cheng-Fei Alonzo, Julie Tindal, Gerald |
| description | This study examined the type of growth model that best fit within-year growth in oral reading fluency and between-student differences in growth. Participants were 2,465 students in grades 3–5. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses modeled curriculum-based measurement (CBM) oral reading fluency benchmark measures in fall, winter, and spring with grade level and student characteristics (including special education and Limited English Proficiency status) as covariates. Results indicated that a discontinuous growth model fit the data better than a linear growth model, with greater growth in the fall than in the spring. Oral reading fluency growth rates also differed by grade and student characteristics. Implications for school practice and research are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030894099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ959100</ericid><sourcerecordid>2608791091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9dc69a9aa29d7332d73c94030bcc699510f7e924bd3377636ab655d381f228043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LwzAchoMoOKcfQPAQPHmJ_pI0TeNtjvmPiRfFY8jSdHa0zUxWZN_ejIqC4CU5vM_7JLwInVK4pADyKlJKM0GAUqI4ZAT20IgKyQkoEPtoBIoxkkkpD9FRjCsAYEXGR2jyVm_e645snQnYB9Pg4ExZd0tcNb3r7BZ_JgBPb56uscHWt2sT6ug77Cvc-tI18RgdVKaJ7uT7HqPX29nL9J7Mn-8eppM5sTxXG6JKmyujjGGqlJyzdFiVAYeFTYESFCrpFMsWJedS5jw3i1yIkhe0YqyAjI_RxeBdB__Ru7jRbR2taxrTOd9HTZOrSEalEnr-B135PnTpd1oxWQjKGE0QHSAbfIzBVXod6taEbTLp3aZ62FSnTfVuUw2pczZ0XKjtDz97VEKlRorZEMcUdUsXft_93_kFljV_lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927851221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: a comparison of models</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Nese, Joseph F. T. ; Biancarosa, Gina ; Anderson, Daniel ; Lai, Cheng-Fei ; Alonzo, Julie ; Tindal, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>Nese, Joseph F. T. ; Biancarosa, Gina ; Anderson, Daniel ; Lai, Cheng-Fei ; Alonzo, Julie ; Tindal, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the type of growth model that best fit within-year growth in oral reading fluency and between-student differences in growth. Participants were 2,465 students in grades 3–5. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses modeled curriculum-based measurement (CBM) oral reading fluency benchmark measures in fall, winter, and spring with grade level and student characteristics (including special education and Limited English Proficiency status) as covariates. Results indicated that a discontinuous growth model fit the data better than a linear growth model, with greater growth in the fall than in the spring. Oral reading fluency growth rates also differed by grade and student characteristics. Implications for school practice and research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REWRE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Comparative Analysis ; Curriculum Based Assessment ; Education ; Educational evaluation ; Elementary education ; Elementary School Students ; English as a second language learning ; Federal Programs ; Fluency ; Grade 3 ; Grade 4 ; Grade 5 ; Growth Models ; Language and Literature ; Limited English proficiency ; Limited English Speaking ; Linguistics ; Literacy ; Neurology ; Oral Reading ; Psycholinguistics ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Fluency ; Reading instruction ; Reading Tests ; Research and Development ; Response to Intervention ; Social Sciences ; Special Education ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Characteristics ; Theory Practice Relationship</subject><ispartof>Reading & writing, 2012-04, Vol.25 (4), p.887-915</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9dc69a9aa29d7332d73c94030bcc699510f7e924bd3377636ab655d381f228043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9dc69a9aa29d7332d73c94030bcc699510f7e924bd3377636ab655d381f228043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ959100$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nese, Joseph F. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biancarosa, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Cheng-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonzo, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tindal, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: a comparison of models</title><title>Reading & writing</title><addtitle>Read Writ</addtitle><description>This study examined the type of growth model that best fit within-year growth in oral reading fluency and between-student differences in growth. Participants were 2,465 students in grades 3–5. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses modeled curriculum-based measurement (CBM) oral reading fluency benchmark measures in fall, winter, and spring with grade level and student characteristics (including special education and Limited English Proficiency status) as covariates. Results indicated that a discontinuous growth model fit the data better than a linear growth model, with greater growth in the fall than in the spring. Oral reading fluency growth rates also differed by grade and student characteristics. Implications for school practice and research are discussed.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Curriculum Based Assessment</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>Federal Programs</subject><subject>Fluency</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Grade 4</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Growth Models</subject><subject>Language and Literature</subject><subject>Limited English proficiency</subject><subject>Limited English Speaking</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Research and Development</subject><subject>Response to Intervention</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LwzAchoMoOKcfQPAQPHmJ_pI0TeNtjvmPiRfFY8jSdHa0zUxWZN_ejIqC4CU5vM_7JLwInVK4pADyKlJKM0GAUqI4ZAT20IgKyQkoEPtoBIoxkkkpD9FRjCsAYEXGR2jyVm_e645snQnYB9Pg4ExZd0tcNb3r7BZ_JgBPb56uscHWt2sT6ug77Cvc-tI18RgdVKaJ7uT7HqPX29nL9J7Mn-8eppM5sTxXG6JKmyujjGGqlJyzdFiVAYeFTYESFCrpFMsWJedS5jw3i1yIkhe0YqyAjI_RxeBdB__Ru7jRbR2taxrTOd9HTZOrSEalEnr-B135PnTpd1oxWQjKGE0QHSAbfIzBVXod6taEbTLp3aZ62FSnTfVuUw2pczZ0XKjtDz97VEKlRorZEMcUdUsXft_93_kFljV_lg</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Nese, Joseph F. T.</creator><creator>Biancarosa, Gina</creator><creator>Anderson, Daniel</creator><creator>Lai, Cheng-Fei</creator><creator>Alonzo, Julie</creator><creator>Tindal, Gerald</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: a comparison of models</title><author>Nese, Joseph F. T. ; Biancarosa, Gina ; Anderson, Daniel ; Lai, Cheng-Fei ; Alonzo, Julie ; Tindal, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-9dc69a9aa29d7332d73c94030bcc699510f7e924bd3377636ab655d381f228043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Curriculum Based Assessment</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>Federal Programs</topic><topic>Fluency</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Grade 4</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Growth Models</topic><topic>Language and Literature</topic><topic>Limited English proficiency</topic><topic>Limited English Speaking</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Research and Development</topic><topic>Response to Intervention</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nese, Joseph F. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biancarosa, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Cheng-Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonzo, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tindal, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nese, Joseph F. T.</au><au>Biancarosa, Gina</au><au>Anderson, Daniel</au><au>Lai, Cheng-Fei</au><au>Alonzo, Julie</au><au>Tindal, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ959100</ericid><atitle>Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: a comparison of models</atitle><jtitle>Reading & writing</jtitle><stitle>Read Writ</stitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>887</spage><epage>915</epage><pages>887-915</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><coden>REWRE8</coden><abstract>This study examined the type of growth model that best fit within-year growth in oral reading fluency and between-student differences in growth. Participants were 2,465 students in grades 3–5. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses modeled curriculum-based measurement (CBM) oral reading fluency benchmark measures in fall, winter, and spring with grade level and student characteristics (including special education and Limited English Proficiency status) as covariates. Results indicated that a discontinuous growth model fit the data better than a linear growth model, with greater growth in the fall than in the spring. Oral reading fluency growth rates also differed by grade and student characteristics. Implications for school practice and research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0922-4777 |
| ispartof | Reading & writing, 2012-04, Vol.25 (4), p.887-915 |
| issn | 0922-4777 1573-0905 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030894099 |
| source | Education Source (EBSCOhost); SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Academic achievement Comparative Analysis Curriculum Based Assessment Education Educational evaluation Elementary education Elementary School Students English as a second language learning Federal Programs Fluency Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Growth Models Language and Literature Limited English proficiency Limited English Speaking Linguistics Literacy Neurology Oral Reading Psycholinguistics Reading Comprehension Reading Fluency Reading instruction Reading Tests Research and Development Response to Intervention Social Sciences Special Education Statistical Analysis Student Characteristics Theory Practice Relationship |
| title | Within-year oral reading fluency with CBM: a comparison of models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Within-year%20oral%20reading%20fluency%20with%20CBM:%20a%20comparison%20of%20models&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=Nese,%20Joseph%20F.%20T.&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=887&rft.epage=915&rft.pages=887-915&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft.coden=REWRE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11145-011-9304-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608791091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927851221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ959100&rfr_iscdi=true |