Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data
The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Field methods 2011-11, Vol.23 (4), p.420-438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 438 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 420 |
container_title | Field methods |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Ridolfo, Heather Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú |
description | The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1525822X11414835 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030869602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X11414835</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1920151067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9LwzAUx4soOKd3jwEvXqpJm7TNcdRfg4mCDryVJHvdMrp0Julk_gf-16abBxE8vQfv8z6PxzeKzgm-IiTPrwlLWJEkb4RQQouUHUQDwlgSpzzjh32fsLifH0cnzi0xxkWe0UH0NTKi2X5qM0dlOzfa6w2gsfFgNxo-0I3wAk1dP_YLCIhxXhgfmtVaWLGjH8Ev2hlqa7RzOe2Qb9HUzMD28AyVtnUuLrvGd1Y06Fn4oDcOaYNeOruB7e7MaXRUi8bB2U8dRtO729fyIZ483Y_L0SRWKU18nOaUU6xIIWsCUlJZSK4ySaRKgUrFMsqIYiA4JwWtqZB5CgpUkUnGeZ2zdBhd7r1r27534Hy10k5B0wgDbecqglNcZDzDSUAv_qDLtrPhyUDxBBNGcJYHCu8p1f9poa7WVq-E3QZV1WdT_c0mrMT7FSfm8Ev6H_8N8ziQVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920151067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ridolfo, Heather ; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creator><contributor>Willis, Gordon B ; Miller, Kristen ; Willis, Gordon B.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ridolfo, Heather ; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú ; Willis, Gordon B ; Miller, Kristen ; Willis, Gordon B.</creatorcontrib><description>The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X11414835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Cognitive interviews ; Crosscultural Differences ; Cultural differences ; Data ; Federal Government ; Interviews ; Qualitative research ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2011-11, Vol.23 (4), p.420-438</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X11414835$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X11414835$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Willis, Gordon B</contributor><contributor>Miller, Kristen</contributor><contributor>Willis, Gordon B.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ridolfo, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</title><title>Field methods</title><description>The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9LwzAUx4soOKd3jwEvXqpJm7TNcdRfg4mCDryVJHvdMrp0Julk_gf-16abBxE8vQfv8z6PxzeKzgm-IiTPrwlLWJEkb4RQQouUHUQDwlgSpzzjh32fsLifH0cnzi0xxkWe0UH0NTKi2X5qM0dlOzfa6w2gsfFgNxo-0I3wAk1dP_YLCIhxXhgfmtVaWLGjH8Ev2hlqa7RzOe2Qb9HUzMD28AyVtnUuLrvGd1Y06Fn4oDcOaYNeOruB7e7MaXRUi8bB2U8dRtO729fyIZ483Y_L0SRWKU18nOaUU6xIIWsCUlJZSK4ySaRKgUrFMsqIYiA4JwWtqZB5CgpUkUnGeZ2zdBhd7r1r27534Hy10k5B0wgDbecqglNcZDzDSUAv_qDLtrPhyUDxBBNGcJYHCu8p1f9poa7WVq-E3QZV1WdT_c0mrMT7FSfm8Ev6H_8N8ziQVw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Ridolfo, Heather</creator><creator>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</title><author>Ridolfo, Heather ; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ridolfo, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ridolfo, Heather</au><au>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</au><au>Willis, Gordon B</au><au>Miller, Kristen</au><au>Willis, Gordon B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>420</spage><epage>438</epage><pages>420-438</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X11414835</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-822X |
ispartof | Field methods, 2011-11, Vol.23 (4), p.420-438 |
issn | 1525-822X 1552-3969 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030869602 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cognition Cognitive interviews Crosscultural Differences Cultural differences Data Federal Government Interviews Qualitative research Surveys |
title | Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Cognitive%20Interview%20Data%20Using%20the%20Constant%20Comparative%20Method%20of%20Analysis%20to%20Understand%20Cross-Cultural%20Patterns%20in%20Survey%20Data&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=Ridolfo,%20Heather&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=420&rft.epage=438&rft.pages=420-438&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X11414835&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920151067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920151067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X11414835&rfr_iscdi=true |