Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data

The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Field methods 2011-11, Vol.23 (4), p.420-438
Hauptverfasser: Ridolfo, Heather, Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 438
container_issue 4
container_start_page 420
container_title Field methods
container_volume 23
creator Ridolfo, Heather
Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú
description The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1525822X11414835
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030869602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1525822X11414835</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1920151067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9LwzAUx4soOKd3jwEvXqpJm7TNcdRfg4mCDryVJHvdMrp0Julk_gf-16abBxE8vQfv8z6PxzeKzgm-IiTPrwlLWJEkb4RQQouUHUQDwlgSpzzjh32fsLifH0cnzi0xxkWe0UH0NTKi2X5qM0dlOzfa6w2gsfFgNxo-0I3wAk1dP_YLCIhxXhgfmtVaWLGjH8Ev2hlqa7RzOe2Qb9HUzMD28AyVtnUuLrvGd1Y06Fn4oDcOaYNeOruB7e7MaXRUi8bB2U8dRtO729fyIZ483Y_L0SRWKU18nOaUU6xIIWsCUlJZSK4ySaRKgUrFMsqIYiA4JwWtqZB5CgpUkUnGeZ2zdBhd7r1r27534Hy10k5B0wgDbecqglNcZDzDSUAv_qDLtrPhyUDxBBNGcJYHCu8p1f9poa7WVq-E3QZV1WdT_c0mrMT7FSfm8Ev6H_8N8ziQVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920151067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ridolfo, Heather ; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creator><contributor>Willis, Gordon B ; Miller, Kristen ; Willis, Gordon B.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ridolfo, Heather ; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú ; Willis, Gordon B ; Miller, Kristen ; Willis, Gordon B.</creatorcontrib><description>The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1525822X11414835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognition ; Cognitive interviews ; Crosscultural Differences ; Cultural differences ; Data ; Federal Government ; Interviews ; Qualitative research ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>Field methods, 2011-11, Vol.23 (4), p.420-438</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1525822X11414835$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X11414835$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Willis, Gordon B</contributor><contributor>Miller, Kristen</contributor><contributor>Willis, Gordon B.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ridolfo, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</title><title>Field methods</title><description>The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.</description><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Crosscultural Differences</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Federal Government</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>1525-822X</issn><issn>1552-3969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9LwzAUx4soOKd3jwEvXqpJm7TNcdRfg4mCDryVJHvdMrp0Julk_gf-16abBxE8vQfv8z6PxzeKzgm-IiTPrwlLWJEkb4RQQouUHUQDwlgSpzzjh32fsLifH0cnzi0xxkWe0UH0NTKi2X5qM0dlOzfa6w2gsfFgNxo-0I3wAk1dP_YLCIhxXhgfmtVaWLGjH8Ev2hlqa7RzOe2Qb9HUzMD28AyVtnUuLrvGd1Y06Fn4oDcOaYNeOruB7e7MaXRUi8bB2U8dRtO729fyIZ483Y_L0SRWKU18nOaUU6xIIWsCUlJZSK4ySaRKgUrFMsqIYiA4JwWtqZB5CgpUkUnGeZ2zdBhd7r1r27534Hy10k5B0wgDbecqglNcZDzDSUAv_qDLtrPhyUDxBBNGcJYHCu8p1f9poa7WVq-E3QZV1WdT_c0mrMT7FSfm8Ev6H_8N8ziQVw</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Ridolfo, Heather</creator><creator>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</title><author>Ridolfo, Heather ; Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-374940c18bf1ebb4b8b9c6b1bc3e4bc56451c5ea99184f4ab73ecec86b599f753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Crosscultural Differences</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Federal Government</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ridolfo, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ridolfo, Heather</au><au>Schoua-Glusberg, Alisú</au><au>Willis, Gordon B</au><au>Miller, Kristen</au><au>Willis, Gordon B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data</atitle><jtitle>Field methods</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>420</spage><epage>438</epage><pages>420-438</pages><issn>1525-822X</issn><eissn>1552-3969</eissn><abstract>The rise in multilingual surveys within the U.S. federal government and around the world has led to an increased need for assurance of comparable survey questions and resulting data. Cognitive interviewing (CI) is one method that allows us to examine how different language versions are interpreted and thus detects ways in which translated questions are not comparable. However, despite being a well-established question evaluation methodology, CI findings have been limited due to a lack of standards for analyzing interview data. The authors contend that cognitive interview findings can be strengthened by using existing qualitative analysis methods. In this article, the authors demonstrate how to conduct analysis of CI data using the constant comparative method and present the resulting findings.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1525822X11414835</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-822X
ispartof Field methods, 2011-11, Vol.23 (4), p.420-438
issn 1525-822X
1552-3969
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1030869602
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cognition
Cognitive interviews
Crosscultural Differences
Cultural differences
Data
Federal Government
Interviews
Qualitative research
Surveys
title Analyzing Cognitive Interview Data Using the Constant Comparative Method of Analysis to Understand Cross-Cultural Patterns in Survey Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20Cognitive%20Interview%20Data%20Using%20the%20Constant%20Comparative%20Method%20of%20Analysis%20to%20Understand%20Cross-Cultural%20Patterns%20in%20Survey%20Data&rft.jtitle=Field%20methods&rft.au=Ridolfo,%20Heather&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=420&rft.epage=438&rft.pages=420-438&rft.issn=1525-822X&rft.eissn=1552-3969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1525822X11414835&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1920151067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920151067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1525822X11414835&rfr_iscdi=true