Reduction of Delia radicum attack in field brassicas using a vertical barrier

Insecticide options for controlling Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in brassica crops are now limited, and alternatives are needed. Vertical mesh barriers impede females reaching, and ovipositing in, small‐scale crops. We tested this pest management technique in a commercial crop to deter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 2012-08, Vol.144 (2), p.145-156
Hauptverfasser: Blackshaw, Rod P., Vernon, Robert S., Prasad, Renee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue 2
container_start_page 145
container_title Entomologia experimentalis et applicata
container_volume 144
creator Blackshaw, Rod P.
Vernon, Robert S.
Prasad, Renee
description Insecticide options for controlling Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in brassica crops are now limited, and alternatives are needed. Vertical mesh barriers impede females reaching, and ovipositing in, small‐scale crops. We tested this pest management technique in a commercial crop to determine whether such barriers would also reduce dispersal of females at larger scales, and whether there was any detectable pattern to the spatial distributions of female D. radicum, eggs, and damage in a rutabaga crop [Brassica napabrassicae (L.) Mill (Brassicaceae)]. A mesh fence of 1.3 m high with an externally facing 30‐cm overhang was erected around the perimeter of a 2.7‐ha field. Yellow sticky traps were positioned at 12 points outside and at 104 locations along transects inside the barrier to capture adult flies. Eggs were sampled from soil around 10 plants at 62 locations and damage was assessed at harvest using a subset of 38 of these locations. There was a substantial reduction (up to 96%) in the number of female flies caught per trap inside the fence compared with outside and a change in the male:female sex ratio from 0.36 outside to 0.92 inside. Female numbers inside and outside were related and sampling date, trap location, and trap face explained significant proportions of the variance in both data sets. There was no relationship between the size of the population and the distance flies penetrated into the field or the proportion of flies recovered in the outer 10 m. Female, egg, and damage counts were largely restricted to the perimeter of the field. Although eggs and damage were related, trap counts did not reflect their spatial distributions. Damage was related to oviposition in the later weeks leading up to harvest. We conclude that yellow sticky traps are an ineffective monitoring tool compared with egg sampling, exclusion barriers can reduce numbers of females reaching a crop, and the system has the potential to deliver reductions in damage and pest control costs at a commercial scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01271.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028039094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3371884321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-5ce546aa6994e53c78bf796f147af17582c90369a910b9e06cdff6b780f29f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PwyAYh4nRxDn9DiRevLRCCwUOHsyc02T-W5Z4JJSBYetahVa3by91ZgdPkrzhzcvveUMeACBGKY7ncpliylDCCOVphnCWxmI43RyAwf7hEAwQwnnCGcqPwUkIS4QQYwIPwMPMLDrduqaGjYU3pnIKerVwultD1bZKr6CroXWmWsDSqxCcVgF2wdVvUMFP49s4qGCpvHfGn4Ijq6pgzn7vIZjfjueju2T6NLkfXU8TTXCGE6oNJYVShRDE0FwzXlomCosJUxYzyjMtUF4IJTAqhUGFXlhblIwjmwlb5ENwsVv77puPzoRWrl3QpqpUbZouSIwyjnKBBInR8z_RZdP5On5OYkoIF5RxHlN8l9K-CcEbK9-9Wyu_jatkr1kuZW9T9jZlr1n-aJabiF7t0C9Xme2_OTkeX_dd5JMd70JrNnte-ZUsWM6ofH2cSD6jz3NBRvIl_wa6JJDJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1544895788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduction of Delia radicum attack in field brassicas using a vertical barrier</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Blackshaw, Rod P. ; Vernon, Robert S. ; Prasad, Renee</creator><creatorcontrib>Blackshaw, Rod P. ; Vernon, Robert S. ; Prasad, Renee</creatorcontrib><description>Insecticide options for controlling Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in brassica crops are now limited, and alternatives are needed. Vertical mesh barriers impede females reaching, and ovipositing in, small‐scale crops. We tested this pest management technique in a commercial crop to determine whether such barriers would also reduce dispersal of females at larger scales, and whether there was any detectable pattern to the spatial distributions of female D. radicum, eggs, and damage in a rutabaga crop [Brassica napabrassicae (L.) Mill (Brassicaceae)]. A mesh fence of 1.3 m high with an externally facing 30‐cm overhang was erected around the perimeter of a 2.7‐ha field. Yellow sticky traps were positioned at 12 points outside and at 104 locations along transects inside the barrier to capture adult flies. Eggs were sampled from soil around 10 plants at 62 locations and damage was assessed at harvest using a subset of 38 of these locations. There was a substantial reduction (up to 96%) in the number of female flies caught per trap inside the fence compared with outside and a change in the male:female sex ratio from 0.36 outside to 0.92 inside. Female numbers inside and outside were related and sampling date, trap location, and trap face explained significant proportions of the variance in both data sets. There was no relationship between the size of the population and the distance flies penetrated into the field or the proportion of flies recovered in the outer 10 m. Female, egg, and damage counts were largely restricted to the perimeter of the field. Although eggs and damage were related, trap counts did not reflect their spatial distributions. Damage was related to oviposition in the later weeks leading up to harvest. We conclude that yellow sticky traps are an ineffective monitoring tool compared with egg sampling, exclusion barriers can reduce numbers of females reaching a crop, and the system has the potential to deliver reductions in damage and pest control costs at a commercial scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-8703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-7458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01271.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETEAAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anthomyiidae ; Brassica ; Brassicaceae ; cabbage maggot ; cabbage root fly ; Crops ; Data processing ; Delia radicum ; Diptera ; Dispersal ; Eggs ; fence ; flight ; Insecticides ; integrated pest management ; invasion ; Oviposition ; Pest control ; physical control ; rutabaga ; Sampling ; Sex ratio ; Soil ; Spatial distribution ; Traps</subject><ispartof>Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 2012-08, Vol.144 (2), p.145-156</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata © 2012 The Netherlands Entomological Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The Netherlands Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-5ce546aa6994e53c78bf796f147af17582c90369a910b9e06cdff6b780f29f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-5ce546aa6994e53c78bf796f147af17582c90369a910b9e06cdff6b780f29f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1570-7458.2012.01271.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1570-7458.2012.01271.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blackshaw, Rod P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Renee</creatorcontrib><title>Reduction of Delia radicum attack in field brassicas using a vertical barrier</title><title>Entomologia experimentalis et applicata</title><addtitle>Entomol Exp Appl</addtitle><description>Insecticide options for controlling Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in brassica crops are now limited, and alternatives are needed. Vertical mesh barriers impede females reaching, and ovipositing in, small‐scale crops. We tested this pest management technique in a commercial crop to determine whether such barriers would also reduce dispersal of females at larger scales, and whether there was any detectable pattern to the spatial distributions of female D. radicum, eggs, and damage in a rutabaga crop [Brassica napabrassicae (L.) Mill (Brassicaceae)]. A mesh fence of 1.3 m high with an externally facing 30‐cm overhang was erected around the perimeter of a 2.7‐ha field. Yellow sticky traps were positioned at 12 points outside and at 104 locations along transects inside the barrier to capture adult flies. Eggs were sampled from soil around 10 plants at 62 locations and damage was assessed at harvest using a subset of 38 of these locations. There was a substantial reduction (up to 96%) in the number of female flies caught per trap inside the fence compared with outside and a change in the male:female sex ratio from 0.36 outside to 0.92 inside. Female numbers inside and outside were related and sampling date, trap location, and trap face explained significant proportions of the variance in both data sets. There was no relationship between the size of the population and the distance flies penetrated into the field or the proportion of flies recovered in the outer 10 m. Female, egg, and damage counts were largely restricted to the perimeter of the field. Although eggs and damage were related, trap counts did not reflect their spatial distributions. Damage was related to oviposition in the later weeks leading up to harvest. We conclude that yellow sticky traps are an ineffective monitoring tool compared with egg sampling, exclusion barriers can reduce numbers of females reaching a crop, and the system has the potential to deliver reductions in damage and pest control costs at a commercial scale.</description><subject>Anthomyiidae</subject><subject>Brassica</subject><subject>Brassicaceae</subject><subject>cabbage maggot</subject><subject>cabbage root fly</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Delia radicum</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>fence</subject><subject>flight</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>invasion</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>physical control</subject><subject>rutabaga</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Traps</subject><issn>0013-8703</issn><issn>1570-7458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9PwyAYh4nRxDn9DiRevLRCCwUOHsyc02T-W5Z4JJSBYetahVa3by91ZgdPkrzhzcvveUMeACBGKY7ncpliylDCCOVphnCWxmI43RyAwf7hEAwQwnnCGcqPwUkIS4QQYwIPwMPMLDrduqaGjYU3pnIKerVwultD1bZKr6CroXWmWsDSqxCcVgF2wdVvUMFP49s4qGCpvHfGn4Ijq6pgzn7vIZjfjueju2T6NLkfXU8TTXCGE6oNJYVShRDE0FwzXlomCosJUxYzyjMtUF4IJTAqhUGFXlhblIwjmwlb5ENwsVv77puPzoRWrl3QpqpUbZouSIwyjnKBBInR8z_RZdP5On5OYkoIF5RxHlN8l9K-CcEbK9-9Wyu_jatkr1kuZW9T9jZlr1n-aJabiF7t0C9Xme2_OTkeX_dd5JMd70JrNnte-ZUsWM6ofH2cSD6jz3NBRvIl_wa6JJDJ</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Blackshaw, Rod P.</creator><creator>Vernon, Robert S.</creator><creator>Prasad, Renee</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>Reduction of Delia radicum attack in field brassicas using a vertical barrier</title><author>Blackshaw, Rod P. ; Vernon, Robert S. ; Prasad, Renee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-5ce546aa6994e53c78bf796f147af17582c90369a910b9e06cdff6b780f29f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anthomyiidae</topic><topic>Brassica</topic><topic>Brassicaceae</topic><topic>cabbage maggot</topic><topic>cabbage root fly</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Delia radicum</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>fence</topic><topic>flight</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>invasion</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>physical control</topic><topic>rutabaga</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Traps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blackshaw, Rod P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Robert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Renee</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Entomologia experimentalis et applicata</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blackshaw, Rod P.</au><au>Vernon, Robert S.</au><au>Prasad, Renee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduction of Delia radicum attack in field brassicas using a vertical barrier</atitle><jtitle>Entomologia experimentalis et applicata</jtitle><addtitle>Entomol Exp Appl</addtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>145-156</pages><issn>0013-8703</issn><eissn>1570-7458</eissn><coden>ETEAAT</coden><abstract>Insecticide options for controlling Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in brassica crops are now limited, and alternatives are needed. Vertical mesh barriers impede females reaching, and ovipositing in, small‐scale crops. We tested this pest management technique in a commercial crop to determine whether such barriers would also reduce dispersal of females at larger scales, and whether there was any detectable pattern to the spatial distributions of female D. radicum, eggs, and damage in a rutabaga crop [Brassica napabrassicae (L.) Mill (Brassicaceae)]. A mesh fence of 1.3 m high with an externally facing 30‐cm overhang was erected around the perimeter of a 2.7‐ha field. Yellow sticky traps were positioned at 12 points outside and at 104 locations along transects inside the barrier to capture adult flies. Eggs were sampled from soil around 10 plants at 62 locations and damage was assessed at harvest using a subset of 38 of these locations. There was a substantial reduction (up to 96%) in the number of female flies caught per trap inside the fence compared with outside and a change in the male:female sex ratio from 0.36 outside to 0.92 inside. Female numbers inside and outside were related and sampling date, trap location, and trap face explained significant proportions of the variance in both data sets. There was no relationship between the size of the population and the distance flies penetrated into the field or the proportion of flies recovered in the outer 10 m. Female, egg, and damage counts were largely restricted to the perimeter of the field. Although eggs and damage were related, trap counts did not reflect their spatial distributions. Damage was related to oviposition in the later weeks leading up to harvest. We conclude that yellow sticky traps are an ineffective monitoring tool compared with egg sampling, exclusion barriers can reduce numbers of females reaching a crop, and the system has the potential to deliver reductions in damage and pest control costs at a commercial scale.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01271.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-8703
ispartof Entomologia experimentalis et applicata, 2012-08, Vol.144 (2), p.145-156
issn 0013-8703
1570-7458
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028039094
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Anthomyiidae
Brassica
Brassicaceae
cabbage maggot
cabbage root fly
Crops
Data processing
Delia radicum
Diptera
Dispersal
Eggs
fence
flight
Insecticides
integrated pest management
invasion
Oviposition
Pest control
physical control
rutabaga
Sampling
Sex ratio
Soil
Spatial distribution
Traps
title Reduction of Delia radicum attack in field brassicas using a vertical barrier
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T00%3A41%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduction%20of%20Delia%20radicum%20attack%20in%20field%20brassicas%20using%20a%20vertical%20barrier&rft.jtitle=Entomologia%20experimentalis%20et%20applicata&rft.au=Blackshaw,%20Rod%20P.&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=145-156&rft.issn=0013-8703&rft.eissn=1570-7458&rft.coden=ETEAAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2012.01271.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3371884321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1544895788&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true