Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)

Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology—animal welfare—has not been approached through systematic assessment and st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transgenic research 2012-08, Vol.21 (4), p.773-784
Hauptverfasser: Huber, Reinhard C, Remuge, Liliana, Carlisle, Ailsa, Lillico, Simon, Sandøe, Peter, Sørensen, Dorte B, Whitelaw, C. Bruce A, Olsson, I. Anna S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 4
container_start_page 773
container_title Transgenic research
container_volume 21
creator Huber, Reinhard C
Remuge, Liliana
Carlisle, Ailsa
Lillico, Simon
Sandøe, Peter
Sørensen, Dorte B
Whitelaw, C. Bruce A
Olsson, I. Anna S
description Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology—animal welfare—has not been approached through systematic assessment and statements regarding the welfare of transgenic pigs have been based on anecdotal observations during early stages of transgenic programs. The main aim of the present study was therefore to perform an extensive welfare assessment comparing heterozygous transgenic animals expressing GFP with wildtype animals along various stages of post natal development. The protocol used covered reproductory performance and behaviour in GFP and wildtype sows and general health and development, social behaviour, exploratory behaviour and emotionality in GFP and wildtype littermates from birth until an age of roughly 4 months. The absence of significant differences between GFP and wildtype animals in the parameters observed suggests that the transgenic animals in question are unlikely to suffer from deleterious effects of transgene expression on their welfare and thus support existing anecdotal observations of pigs expressing GFP as healthy. Although the results are not surprising in the light of previous experience, they give a more solid fundament to the evaluation of GFP expression as being relatively non-invasive in pigs. The present study may furthermore serve as starting point for researchers aiming at a systematic characterization of welfare relevant effects in the line of transgenic pigs they are working with.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028034301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2707758821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dcf2232552d212374bdfa5f53dd114b2c3df467c90a75b73e10e610c5264fa483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN9L3TAUx8NQ5tXtD9jLLIyBPnTLyc_2UWTqQFBwsseQm56USm96TVrQ_34pvboh7CmQ8_me8-VDyCeg34BS_T0BMFGVFKCspYYS3pEVSM3Lmqtqj6xorVhZVVAfkMOUHijNqYq_JweMgea14Cty-xt7byMWNiVMaYNhLLpQjNGG1GLoXLHt2lTg0zbmcRfaoo2IofD9NOQfN_PbOIyYQyeXF7enH8i-t33Cj7v3iNxf_Ph1flVe31z-PD-7Lp2Q9Vg2zjPGmZSsYcC4FuvGW-klbxoAsWaON14o7WpqtVxrjkBRAXWSKeGtqPgROVn25uuPE6bRbLpcp-9twGFKBiirKBecQka_vEEfhimG3G6mhGBcqZmChXJxSCmiN9vYbWx8zpCZdZtFt8m6zazbzJnPu83TeoPNa-LFbwa-7gCbnO191uq69JdToKWodebYwqU8Ci3Gfyv-__rxEvJ2MLaNefH9HaMgKKVKS6j4H8vWnxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024423661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Huber, Reinhard C ; Remuge, Liliana ; Carlisle, Ailsa ; Lillico, Simon ; Sandøe, Peter ; Sørensen, Dorte B ; Whitelaw, C. Bruce A ; Olsson, I. Anna S</creator><creatorcontrib>Huber, Reinhard C ; Remuge, Liliana ; Carlisle, Ailsa ; Lillico, Simon ; Sandøe, Peter ; Sørensen, Dorte B ; Whitelaw, C. Bruce A ; Olsson, I. Anna S</creatorcontrib><description>Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology—animal welfare—has not been approached through systematic assessment and statements regarding the welfare of transgenic pigs have been based on anecdotal observations during early stages of transgenic programs. The main aim of the present study was therefore to perform an extensive welfare assessment comparing heterozygous transgenic animals expressing GFP with wildtype animals along various stages of post natal development. The protocol used covered reproductory performance and behaviour in GFP and wildtype sows and general health and development, social behaviour, exploratory behaviour and emotionality in GFP and wildtype littermates from birth until an age of roughly 4 months. The absence of significant differences between GFP and wildtype animals in the parameters observed suggests that the transgenic animals in question are unlikely to suffer from deleterious effects of transgene expression on their welfare and thus support existing anecdotal observations of pigs expressing GFP as healthy. Although the results are not surprising in the light of previous experience, they give a more solid fundament to the evaluation of GFP expression as being relatively non-invasive in pigs. The present study may furthermore serve as starting point for researchers aiming at a systematic characterization of welfare relevant effects in the line of transgenic pigs they are working with.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22173943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Animals, Genetically Modified - growth &amp; development ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology ; Biotechnology ; Birth ; Emotional behavior ; Exploratory behavior ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gene Expression ; Gene Transfer Techniques - adverse effects ; Genetic Engineering ; Genetic technics ; Green fluorescent protein ; Green Fluorescent Proteins - adverse effects ; Green Fluorescent Proteins - genetics ; Green Fluorescent Proteins - metabolism ; Life Sciences ; Methods. Procedures. Technologies ; Molecular Medicine ; Original Paper ; parturition ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Social behavior ; sows ; Sus scrofa - growth &amp; development ; Transgenes ; Transgenic animals ; Transgenic animals and transgenic plants ; Transgenics</subject><ispartof>Transgenic research, 2012-08, Vol.21 (4), p.773-784</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dcf2232552d212374bdfa5f53dd114b2c3df467c90a75b73e10e610c5264fa483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dcf2232552d212374bdfa5f53dd114b2c3df467c90a75b73e10e610c5264fa483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26175497$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22173943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huber, Reinhard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remuge, Liliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, Ailsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillico, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandøe, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Dorte B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitelaw, C. Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, I. Anna S</creatorcontrib><title>Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)</title><title>Transgenic research</title><addtitle>Transgenic Res</addtitle><addtitle>Transgenic Res</addtitle><description>Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology—animal welfare—has not been approached through systematic assessment and statements regarding the welfare of transgenic pigs have been based on anecdotal observations during early stages of transgenic programs. The main aim of the present study was therefore to perform an extensive welfare assessment comparing heterozygous transgenic animals expressing GFP with wildtype animals along various stages of post natal development. The protocol used covered reproductory performance and behaviour in GFP and wildtype sows and general health and development, social behaviour, exploratory behaviour and emotionality in GFP and wildtype littermates from birth until an age of roughly 4 months. The absence of significant differences between GFP and wildtype animals in the parameters observed suggests that the transgenic animals in question are unlikely to suffer from deleterious effects of transgene expression on their welfare and thus support existing anecdotal observations of pigs expressing GFP as healthy. Although the results are not surprising in the light of previous experience, they give a more solid fundament to the evaluation of GFP expression as being relatively non-invasive in pigs. The present study may furthermore serve as starting point for researchers aiming at a systematic characterization of welfare relevant effects in the line of transgenic pigs they are working with.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Genetically Modified - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Emotional behavior</subject><subject>Exploratory behavior</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Gene Transfer Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Genetic Engineering</subject><subject>Genetic technics</subject><subject>Green fluorescent protein</subject><subject>Green Fluorescent Proteins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Green Fluorescent Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Green Fluorescent Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</subject><subject>Molecular Medicine</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>parturition</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Social behavior</subject><subject>sows</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Transgenes</subject><subject>Transgenic animals</subject><subject>Transgenic animals and transgenic plants</subject><subject>Transgenics</subject><issn>0962-8819</issn><issn>1573-9368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN9L3TAUx8NQ5tXtD9jLLIyBPnTLyc_2UWTqQFBwsseQm56USm96TVrQ_34pvboh7CmQ8_me8-VDyCeg34BS_T0BMFGVFKCspYYS3pEVSM3Lmqtqj6xorVhZVVAfkMOUHijNqYq_JweMgea14Cty-xt7byMWNiVMaYNhLLpQjNGG1GLoXLHt2lTg0zbmcRfaoo2IofD9NOQfN_PbOIyYQyeXF7enH8i-t33Cj7v3iNxf_Ph1flVe31z-PD-7Lp2Q9Vg2zjPGmZSsYcC4FuvGW-klbxoAsWaON14o7WpqtVxrjkBRAXWSKeGtqPgROVn25uuPE6bRbLpcp-9twGFKBiirKBecQka_vEEfhimG3G6mhGBcqZmChXJxSCmiN9vYbWx8zpCZdZtFt8m6zazbzJnPu83TeoPNa-LFbwa-7gCbnO191uq69JdToKWodebYwqU8Ci3Gfyv-__rxEvJ2MLaNefH9HaMgKKVKS6j4H8vWnxA</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Huber, Reinhard C</creator><creator>Remuge, Liliana</creator><creator>Carlisle, Ailsa</creator><creator>Lillico, Simon</creator><creator>Sandøe, Peter</creator><creator>Sørensen, Dorte B</creator><creator>Whitelaw, C. Bruce A</creator><creator>Olsson, I. Anna S</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)</title><author>Huber, Reinhard C ; Remuge, Liliana ; Carlisle, Ailsa ; Lillico, Simon ; Sandøe, Peter ; Sørensen, Dorte B ; Whitelaw, C. Bruce A ; Olsson, I. Anna S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-dcf2232552d212374bdfa5f53dd114b2c3df467c90a75b73e10e610c5264fa483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Genetically Modified - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Emotional behavior</topic><topic>Exploratory behavior</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Gene Transfer Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Genetic Engineering</topic><topic>Genetic technics</topic><topic>Green fluorescent protein</topic><topic>Green Fluorescent Proteins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Green Fluorescent Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Green Fluorescent Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Methods. Procedures. Technologies</topic><topic>Molecular Medicine</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>parturition</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Social behavior</topic><topic>sows</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Transgenes</topic><topic>Transgenic animals</topic><topic>Transgenic animals and transgenic plants</topic><topic>Transgenics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huber, Reinhard C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remuge, Liliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, Ailsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lillico, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandøe, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Dorte B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitelaw, C. Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsson, I. Anna S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transgenic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huber, Reinhard C</au><au>Remuge, Liliana</au><au>Carlisle, Ailsa</au><au>Lillico, Simon</au><au>Sandøe, Peter</au><au>Sørensen, Dorte B</au><au>Whitelaw, C. Bruce A</au><au>Olsson, I. Anna S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)</atitle><jtitle>Transgenic research</jtitle><stitle>Transgenic Res</stitle><addtitle>Transgenic Res</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>773</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>773-784</pages><issn>0962-8819</issn><eissn>1573-9368</eissn><abstract>Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology—animal welfare—has not been approached through systematic assessment and statements regarding the welfare of transgenic pigs have been based on anecdotal observations during early stages of transgenic programs. The main aim of the present study was therefore to perform an extensive welfare assessment comparing heterozygous transgenic animals expressing GFP with wildtype animals along various stages of post natal development. The protocol used covered reproductory performance and behaviour in GFP and wildtype sows and general health and development, social behaviour, exploratory behaviour and emotionality in GFP and wildtype littermates from birth until an age of roughly 4 months. The absence of significant differences between GFP and wildtype animals in the parameters observed suggests that the transgenic animals in question are unlikely to suffer from deleterious effects of transgene expression on their welfare and thus support existing anecdotal observations of pigs expressing GFP as healthy. Although the results are not surprising in the light of previous experience, they give a more solid fundament to the evaluation of GFP expression as being relatively non-invasive in pigs. The present study may furthermore serve as starting point for researchers aiming at a systematic characterization of welfare relevant effects in the line of transgenic pigs they are working with.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22173943</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8819
ispartof Transgenic research, 2012-08, Vol.21 (4), p.773-784
issn 0962-8819
1573-9368
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028034301
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Age
Animal Genetics and Genomics
Animal Welfare
Animals
Animals, Genetically Modified - growth & development
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering/Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Birth
Emotional behavior
Exploratory behavior
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gene Expression
Gene Transfer Techniques - adverse effects
Genetic Engineering
Genetic technics
Green fluorescent protein
Green Fluorescent Proteins - adverse effects
Green Fluorescent Proteins - genetics
Green Fluorescent Proteins - metabolism
Life Sciences
Methods. Procedures. Technologies
Molecular Medicine
Original Paper
parturition
Plant Genetics and Genomics
Social behavior
sows
Sus scrofa - growth & development
Transgenes
Transgenic animals
Transgenic animals and transgenic plants
Transgenics
title Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Welfare%20assessment%20in%20transgenic%20pigs%20expressing%20green%20fluorescent%20protein%20(GFP)&rft.jtitle=Transgenic%20research&rft.au=Huber,%20Reinhard%20C&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=773&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=773-784&rft.issn=0962-8819&rft.eissn=1573-9368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11248-011-9571-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2707758821%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024423661&rft_id=info:pmid/22173943&rfr_iscdi=true