Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters

Objective: To identify the characteristics of bone tissue microarchitecture by microCT at dental implant bone sites, describing them in terms of clinical parameters. Material and methods: Forty‐six bone implant sites of the maxilla and mandible from 32 volunteers were evaluated by conventional radio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2012-08, Vol.23 (8), p.981-986
Hauptverfasser: Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido, Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues, Lindh, Christina, Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 986
container_issue 8
container_start_page 981
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 23
creator Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido
Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues
Lindh, Christina
Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria
description Objective: To identify the characteristics of bone tissue microarchitecture by microCT at dental implant bone sites, describing them in terms of clinical parameters. Material and methods: Forty‐six bone implant sites of the maxilla and mandible from 32 volunteers were evaluated by conventional radiographs and CT scans. During the installation of each implant, bone biopsies were removed using a trephine bur at the first drilling to prepare the socket implant. Each sample was evaluated by microCT and dimensional parameters measured. Results: Factor analysis summarized the microparameters into four components, which accounted for 92.8% of the total variance. The identified factors were (1) architecture – variables affecting 3D trabecular bone configuration and organization, (2) density – variables relating to surface/volume ratios and volume/volume ratios, (3) bulk – variables relating to the amount of bone and (4) spacing – variable related to the distance between trabeculae and the quantity and organization of marrow spaces. Conclusion: These four summarized factors correspond to clinical and radiographically recognizable parameters used for routine bone quality evaluation for implant treatment planning, which can potentially influence the primary stability of dental implants. The understanding of factors related to bone microarchitecture might reveal important aspects of its mechanical properties, essential for implant success. To cite this article:
De Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiro‐Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical related parameters.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 981–986
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02243.x
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02243.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028033529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024936053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4573-79e4751439eb390e568d78534a5aa57cc400f953bb5d2099c2d12163855ab8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtvGyEUhVHVqHHT_oWKZTczvcAAQ6UuGqtxEllJVfWxRAyDFdx5OMCoziL_PUydel02gM53jnTvQQgTKEk-H7YlEQAFcCAlBUJKoLRi5f4FWhyFl2gBCnghiSCn6HWMWwAQqlav0CklklKixAI9no-Dw8nHODncextGE-ydT86mKZgO2zsTjE0u-Ji8jdgk3LohZcX3u84MCccMxxJ_NSFh8hFfzbLfeGuSHwc8brDt_JC_XRFcZ5Jr8S5H9i5nxjfoZGO66N4-32fox8WX78vLYn27ulp-Xhe24pIVUrlKclIx5RqmwHFRt7LmrDLcGC6trQA2irOm4S0FpSxtCSWC1ZybpiY1O0PvD7m7MN5PLibd-2hdlwdw4xQ1AVoDY5yq_0ErxQRwltF3z-jU9K7Vu-B7Ex70v-1m4NMB-OM793DUCei5Rb3Vc1l6LkvPLeq_Leq9Xq6_za_sLw7-vHy3P_pN-K2FZJLrXzcrvap_imt-fqGv2RP_h579</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024936053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido ; Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues ; Lindh, Christina ; Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</creator><creatorcontrib>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido ; Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues ; Lindh, Christina ; Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To identify the characteristics of bone tissue microarchitecture by microCT at dental implant bone sites, describing them in terms of clinical parameters. Material and methods: Forty‐six bone implant sites of the maxilla and mandible from 32 volunteers were evaluated by conventional radiographs and CT scans. During the installation of each implant, bone biopsies were removed using a trephine bur at the first drilling to prepare the socket implant. Each sample was evaluated by microCT and dimensional parameters measured. Results: Factor analysis summarized the microparameters into four components, which accounted for 92.8% of the total variance. The identified factors were (1) architecture – variables affecting 3D trabecular bone configuration and organization, (2) density – variables relating to surface/volume ratios and volume/volume ratios, (3) bulk – variables relating to the amount of bone and (4) spacing – variable related to the distance between trabeculae and the quantity and organization of marrow spaces. Conclusion: These four summarized factors correspond to clinical and radiographically recognizable parameters used for routine bone quality evaluation for implant treatment planning, which can potentially influence the primary stability of dental implants. The understanding of factors related to bone microarchitecture might reveal important aspects of its mechanical properties, essential for implant success. To cite this article:
De Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiro‐Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical related parameters.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 981–986
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02243.x</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02243.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21722196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Bone Density ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; dental implants ; Dentistry ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - diagnostic imaging ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery ; Male ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - surgery ; Mandible - ultrastructure ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Maxilla - surgery ; Maxilla - ultrastructure ; microcomputed tomography ; Middle Aged ; X-Ray Microtomography - methods</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2012-08, Vol.23 (8), p.981-986</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4573-79e4751439eb390e568d78534a5aa57cc400f953bb5d2099c2d12163855ab8183</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2011.02243.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2011.02243.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21722196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindh, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</creatorcontrib><title>Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objective: To identify the characteristics of bone tissue microarchitecture by microCT at dental implant bone sites, describing them in terms of clinical parameters. Material and methods: Forty‐six bone implant sites of the maxilla and mandible from 32 volunteers were evaluated by conventional radiographs and CT scans. During the installation of each implant, bone biopsies were removed using a trephine bur at the first drilling to prepare the socket implant. Each sample was evaluated by microCT and dimensional parameters measured. Results: Factor analysis summarized the microparameters into four components, which accounted for 92.8% of the total variance. The identified factors were (1) architecture – variables affecting 3D trabecular bone configuration and organization, (2) density – variables relating to surface/volume ratios and volume/volume ratios, (3) bulk – variables relating to the amount of bone and (4) spacing – variable related to the distance between trabeculae and the quantity and organization of marrow spaces. Conclusion: These four summarized factors correspond to clinical and radiographically recognizable parameters used for routine bone quality evaluation for implant treatment planning, which can potentially influence the primary stability of dental implants. The understanding of factors related to bone microarchitecture might reveal important aspects of its mechanical properties, essential for implant success. To cite this article:
De Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiro‐Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical related parameters.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 981–986
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02243.x</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mandible - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Maxilla - ultrastructure</subject><subject>microcomputed tomography</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography - methods</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtvGyEUhVHVqHHT_oWKZTczvcAAQ6UuGqtxEllJVfWxRAyDFdx5OMCoziL_PUydel02gM53jnTvQQgTKEk-H7YlEQAFcCAlBUJKoLRi5f4FWhyFl2gBCnghiSCn6HWMWwAQqlav0CklklKixAI9no-Dw8nHODncextGE-ydT86mKZgO2zsTjE0u-Ji8jdgk3LohZcX3u84MCccMxxJ_NSFh8hFfzbLfeGuSHwc8brDt_JC_XRFcZ5Jr8S5H9i5nxjfoZGO66N4-32fox8WX78vLYn27ulp-Xhe24pIVUrlKclIx5RqmwHFRt7LmrDLcGC6trQA2irOm4S0FpSxtCSWC1ZybpiY1O0PvD7m7MN5PLibd-2hdlwdw4xQ1AVoDY5yq_0ErxQRwltF3z-jU9K7Vu-B7Ex70v-1m4NMB-OM793DUCei5Rb3Vc1l6LkvPLeq_Leq9Xq6_za_sLw7-vHy3P_pN-K2FZJLrXzcrvap_imt-fqGv2RP_h579</recordid><startdate>201208</startdate><enddate>201208</enddate><creator>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido</creator><creator>Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues</creator><creator>Lindh, Christina</creator><creator>Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201208</creationdate><title>Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters</title><author>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido ; Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues ; Lindh, Christina ; Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4573-79e4751439eb390e568d78534a5aa57cc400f953bb5d2099c2d12163855ab8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mandible - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Maxilla - ultrastructure</topic><topic>microcomputed tomography</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindh, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gomes de Oliveira, Rubelisa Cândido</au><au>Leles, Cláudio Rodrigues</au><au>Lindh, Christina</au><au>Ribeiro-Rotta, Rejane Faria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2012-08</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>986</epage><pages>981-986</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objective: To identify the characteristics of bone tissue microarchitecture by microCT at dental implant bone sites, describing them in terms of clinical parameters. Material and methods: Forty‐six bone implant sites of the maxilla and mandible from 32 volunteers were evaluated by conventional radiographs and CT scans. During the installation of each implant, bone biopsies were removed using a trephine bur at the first drilling to prepare the socket implant. Each sample was evaluated by microCT and dimensional parameters measured. Results: Factor analysis summarized the microparameters into four components, which accounted for 92.8% of the total variance. The identified factors were (1) architecture – variables affecting 3D trabecular bone configuration and organization, (2) density – variables relating to surface/volume ratios and volume/volume ratios, (3) bulk – variables relating to the amount of bone and (4) spacing – variable related to the distance between trabeculae and the quantity and organization of marrow spaces. Conclusion: These four summarized factors correspond to clinical and radiographically recognizable parameters used for routine bone quality evaluation for implant treatment planning, which can potentially influence the primary stability of dental implants. The understanding of factors related to bone microarchitecture might reveal important aspects of its mechanical properties, essential for implant success. To cite this article:
De Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiro‐Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical related parameters.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23, 2012; 981–986
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02243.x</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21722196</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02243.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2012-08, Vol.23 (8), p.981-986
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028033529
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biopsy
Bone Density
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
dental implants
Dentistry
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - diagnostic imaging
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery
Male
Mandible - diagnostic imaging
Mandible - surgery
Mandible - ultrastructure
Maxilla - diagnostic imaging
Maxilla - surgery
Maxilla - ultrastructure
microcomputed tomography
Middle Aged
X-Ray Microtomography - methods
title Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinical-related parameters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A05%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20tissue%20microarchitectural%20characteristics%20at%20dental%20implant%20sites.%20Part%201:%20Identification%20of%20clinical-related%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Gomes%20de%20Oliveira,%20Rubelisa%20C%C3%A2ndido&rft.date=2012-08&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=986&rft.pages=981-986&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02243.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024936053%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024936053&rft_id=info:pmid/21722196&rfr_iscdi=true