Estimating Forest Duiker (Cephalophinae) Density in Korup National Park: A Case Study on the Performance of Three Line Transect Methods
Forest duikers (Cephalophinae) are important targets of the bushmeat trade but a reliable and efficient assessment of these shy animals is often regarded as problematic. Using a power analysis approach, we assessed the performance of three established methods (diurnal, nocturnal and indirect dung su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | South African journal of wildlife research 2012-04, Vol.42 (1), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | South African journal of wildlife research |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton Bobo, Kadiri Serge Müller, Mareike Kiffner, Christian Waltert, Matthias |
description | Forest duikers (Cephalophinae) are important targets of the bushmeat trade but a reliable and efficient assessment of these shy animals is often regarded as problematic. Using a power analysis approach, we assessed the performance of three established methods (diurnal, nocturnal and indirect dung surveys) in producing density estimates for the blue and the Ogilby's duiker (Cephalophus monticola, Cephalophus ogilbyi ogilbyi) in a 16 km2 section of primary forest, systematically sampled using line transects. Direct survey methods (diurnal and nocturnal) yielded density estimates between 8.3 and 6.8 (blue duiker) and 6.5 and 4.3 animals/ km2 (Ogilby's). The coefficients of variation of density estimates implied a resolution of 44% density change detectable in diurnal surveys but only of 140% in nocturnal surveys. Density estimates derived from the dung survey were lower than those of direct surveys (1.5 animals/ km2 and 1.4 animals/ km2, respectively). Associated coefficients of variation imply a resolution of change in density estimates detectable for changes far larger than 100%. However, dung pile density was susceptible to variation in key parameters (decay and production rates) and difficulties in data acquisition lead us to reject the dung survey as a suitable method in our particular setting. Our results suggest that diurnal direct surveying from line transects can be reliable and effective even for shy forest ungulates under (some) hunting pressure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3957/056.042.0110 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028032978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1028032978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b303t-6e54e02d0d06d8c708afc8674221171e2c6b1ec9daa40059274f953a4078cc643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEs8dHzBLQLRMnIcTdqg8RYFKlHXkOhNiSO1gO4t-Ab-Nq7JgxWpmpDNXuieKjmMcJ2XGLzDLx5iyMcYxbkV7mPBylCZ5uf1n3432nftARJ6zdC_6vnFeLYVX-h1ujSXn4XpQn2ThZEJ9KzrTt0oLOoVr0k75FSgNj8YOPTyHL6NFBzNhPy_hCibCEbz6oV6B0eBbghnZxtil0JLANDBvLRFMlSaYW6EdSQ9P5FtTu8NopxGdo6PfeRC93d7MJ_ej6cvdw-RqOlokmPhRTllKyGqsMa8LybEQjSxynjIWxzwmJvNFTLKshUgRs5LxtCmzJBy8kDJPk4PoZJPbW_M1hLrVUjlJXSc0mcFVMbICE1byIqDnG1Ra45ylpuptUGVXAarWvqvguwq-q7XvgJ9t8IUyRtP_8A95QH77</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1028032978</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating Forest Duiker (Cephalophinae) Density in Korup National Park: A Case Study on the Performance of Three Line Transect Methods</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton ; Bobo, Kadiri Serge ; Müller, Mareike ; Kiffner, Christian ; Waltert, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton ; Bobo, Kadiri Serge ; Müller, Mareike ; Kiffner, Christian ; Waltert, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>Forest duikers (Cephalophinae) are important targets of the bushmeat trade but a reliable and efficient assessment of these shy animals is often regarded as problematic. Using a power analysis approach, we assessed the performance of three established methods (diurnal, nocturnal and indirect dung surveys) in producing density estimates for the blue and the Ogilby's duiker (Cephalophus monticola, Cephalophus ogilbyi ogilbyi) in a 16 km2 section of primary forest, systematically sampled using line transects. Direct survey methods (diurnal and nocturnal) yielded density estimates between 8.3 and 6.8 (blue duiker) and 6.5 and 4.3 animals/ km2 (Ogilby's). The coefficients of variation of density estimates implied a resolution of 44% density change detectable in diurnal surveys but only of 140% in nocturnal surveys. Density estimates derived from the dung survey were lower than those of direct surveys (1.5 animals/ km2 and 1.4 animals/ km2, respectively). Associated coefficients of variation imply a resolution of change in density estimates detectable for changes far larger than 100%. However, dung pile density was susceptible to variation in key parameters (decay and production rates) and difficulties in data acquisition lead us to reject the dung survey as a suitable method in our particular setting. Our results suggest that diurnal direct surveying from line transects can be reliable and effective even for shy forest ungulates under (some) hunting pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0379-4369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0379-4369</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3957/056.042.0110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>South African Wildlife Management Association</publisher><subject>Cephalophus ; Cephalophus monticola ; diurnal survey ; dung survey ; nocturnal survey ; power analysis ; resolution</subject><ispartof>South African journal of wildlife research, 2012-04, Vol.42 (1), p.1-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b303t-6e54e02d0d06d8c708afc8674221171e2c6b1ec9daa40059274f953a4078cc643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b303t-6e54e02d0d06d8c708afc8674221171e2c6b1ec9daa40059274f953a4078cc643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobo, Kadiri Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Mareike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiffner, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltert, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating Forest Duiker (Cephalophinae) Density in Korup National Park: A Case Study on the Performance of Three Line Transect Methods</title><title>South African journal of wildlife research</title><description>Forest duikers (Cephalophinae) are important targets of the bushmeat trade but a reliable and efficient assessment of these shy animals is often regarded as problematic. Using a power analysis approach, we assessed the performance of three established methods (diurnal, nocturnal and indirect dung surveys) in producing density estimates for the blue and the Ogilby's duiker (Cephalophus monticola, Cephalophus ogilbyi ogilbyi) in a 16 km2 section of primary forest, systematically sampled using line transects. Direct survey methods (diurnal and nocturnal) yielded density estimates between 8.3 and 6.8 (blue duiker) and 6.5 and 4.3 animals/ km2 (Ogilby's). The coefficients of variation of density estimates implied a resolution of 44% density change detectable in diurnal surveys but only of 140% in nocturnal surveys. Density estimates derived from the dung survey were lower than those of direct surveys (1.5 animals/ km2 and 1.4 animals/ km2, respectively). Associated coefficients of variation imply a resolution of change in density estimates detectable for changes far larger than 100%. However, dung pile density was susceptible to variation in key parameters (decay and production rates) and difficulties in data acquisition lead us to reject the dung survey as a suitable method in our particular setting. Our results suggest that diurnal direct surveying from line transects can be reliable and effective even for shy forest ungulates under (some) hunting pressure.</description><subject>Cephalophus</subject><subject>Cephalophus monticola</subject><subject>diurnal survey</subject><subject>dung survey</subject><subject>nocturnal survey</subject><subject>power analysis</subject><subject>resolution</subject><issn>0379-4369</issn><issn>0379-4369</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEs8dHzBLQLRMnIcTdqg8RYFKlHXkOhNiSO1gO4t-Ab-Nq7JgxWpmpDNXuieKjmMcJ2XGLzDLx5iyMcYxbkV7mPBylCZ5uf1n3432nftARJ6zdC_6vnFeLYVX-h1ujSXn4XpQn2ThZEJ9KzrTt0oLOoVr0k75FSgNj8YOPTyHL6NFBzNhPy_hCibCEbz6oV6B0eBbghnZxtil0JLANDBvLRFMlSaYW6EdSQ9P5FtTu8NopxGdo6PfeRC93d7MJ_ej6cvdw-RqOlokmPhRTllKyGqsMa8LybEQjSxynjIWxzwmJvNFTLKshUgRs5LxtCmzJBy8kDJPk4PoZJPbW_M1hLrVUjlJXSc0mcFVMbICE1byIqDnG1Ra45ylpuptUGVXAarWvqvguwq-q7XvgJ9t8IUyRtP_8A95QH77</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton</creator><creator>Bobo, Kadiri Serge</creator><creator>Müller, Mareike</creator><creator>Kiffner, Christian</creator><creator>Waltert, Matthias</creator><general>South African Wildlife Management Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Estimating Forest Duiker (Cephalophinae) Density in Korup National Park: A Case Study on the Performance of Three Line Transect Methods</title><author>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton ; Bobo, Kadiri Serge ; Müller, Mareike ; Kiffner, Christian ; Waltert, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b303t-6e54e02d0d06d8c708afc8674221171e2c6b1ec9daa40059274f953a4078cc643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cephalophus</topic><topic>Cephalophus monticola</topic><topic>diurnal survey</topic><topic>dung survey</topic><topic>nocturnal survey</topic><topic>power analysis</topic><topic>resolution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobo, Kadiri Serge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Mareike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiffner, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waltert, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>South African journal of wildlife research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Viquerat, Sacha Marc Anton</au><au>Bobo, Kadiri Serge</au><au>Müller, Mareike</au><au>Kiffner, Christian</au><au>Waltert, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating Forest Duiker (Cephalophinae) Density in Korup National Park: A Case Study on the Performance of Three Line Transect Methods</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of wildlife research</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0379-4369</issn><eissn>0379-4369</eissn><abstract>Forest duikers (Cephalophinae) are important targets of the bushmeat trade but a reliable and efficient assessment of these shy animals is often regarded as problematic. Using a power analysis approach, we assessed the performance of three established methods (diurnal, nocturnal and indirect dung surveys) in producing density estimates for the blue and the Ogilby's duiker (Cephalophus monticola, Cephalophus ogilbyi ogilbyi) in a 16 km2 section of primary forest, systematically sampled using line transects. Direct survey methods (diurnal and nocturnal) yielded density estimates between 8.3 and 6.8 (blue duiker) and 6.5 and 4.3 animals/ km2 (Ogilby's). The coefficients of variation of density estimates implied a resolution of 44% density change detectable in diurnal surveys but only of 140% in nocturnal surveys. Density estimates derived from the dung survey were lower than those of direct surveys (1.5 animals/ km2 and 1.4 animals/ km2, respectively). Associated coefficients of variation imply a resolution of change in density estimates detectable for changes far larger than 100%. However, dung pile density was susceptible to variation in key parameters (decay and production rates) and difficulties in data acquisition lead us to reject the dung survey as a suitable method in our particular setting. Our results suggest that diurnal direct surveying from line transects can be reliable and effective even for shy forest ungulates under (some) hunting pressure.</abstract><pub>South African Wildlife Management Association</pub><doi>10.3957/056.042.0110</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0379-4369 |
ispartof | South African journal of wildlife research, 2012-04, Vol.42 (1), p.1-10 |
issn | 0379-4369 0379-4369 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028032978 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cephalophus Cephalophus monticola diurnal survey dung survey nocturnal survey power analysis resolution |
title | Estimating Forest Duiker (Cephalophinae) Density in Korup National Park: A Case Study on the Performance of Three Line Transect Methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A23%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20Forest%20Duiker%20(Cephalophinae)%20Density%20in%20Korup%20National%20Park:%20A%20Case%20Study%20on%20the%20Performance%20of%20Three%20Line%20Transect%20Methods&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20wildlife%20research&rft.au=Viquerat,%20Sacha%20Marc%20Anton&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0379-4369&rft.eissn=0379-4369&rft_id=info:doi/10.3957/056.042.0110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1028032978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1028032978&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |