comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese
Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied microbiology 2012-07, Vol.113 (1), p.96-105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 96 |
container_title | Journal of applied microbiology |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Quigley, L O’Sullivan, O Beresford, T.P Paul Ross, R Fitzgerald, G.F Cotter, P.D |
description | Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from these foods, and their relative success with respect to the yield and purity of the DNA isolated, and its quality as a template for downstream PCR, was compared. Although all of the methods were successful with respect to the extraction of DNA naturally present in cheese, they varied in their relative ability to extract DNA from milk. However, when milk was spiked with a representative Gram‐positive (Listeria monocytogenes EGDe) or Gram‐negative (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2) bacterium, it was established that all methods successfully extracted DNA which was suitable for subsequent detection by PCR. Conclusions: Of the seven approaches, the PowerFood™ Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) was found to most consistently extract highly concentrated and pure DNA with a view to its subsequent use for PCR‐based amplification and also facilitated accurate detection by real‐time quantitative PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: Accurately assessing the bacterial composition of milk and cheese is of great importance to the dairy industry. Increasingly, DNA‐based technologies are being employed to provide an accurate assessment of this microbiota. However, these approaches are dependent on our ability to extract DNA of sufficient yield and purity. This study compares a number of different options and highlights the relative success of these approaches. We also highlight the success of one method to extract DNA from different microbial populations as well as DNA which is suitable for real‐time PCR of microbes of interest, a challenge often encountered by the food industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05294.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028025870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3070034371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-2d96afb2df6c6b176ee63ce7f8db8d59d18996be8cdd677bb080d19f2fcf6f3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAQgCMEoqXwF8ASqtRLgh-xnRw4rEopVNsFCVZIXEaOHzTbZL3Yibr99zjdZStxwofxWPPNSPbnLEMEFyStd6uCMMFzKiQtKCa0wJzWZbF9kh0fCk8f8jLnWNKj7EWMK4wJw1w8z44oLTktBT7Oltr3GxXa6NfIO9Tb4cabiMZoDRo8stshKD2gJgUbWtWhD4sZcsH3KKg71LfdLVJr83jQN9ZG-zJ75lQX7av9fpItP158P_-Uz79cfj6fzXPNKStzamqhXEONE1o0RAprBdNWuso0leG1IVVdi8ZW2hghZdPgChtSO-q0E44pdpKd7eZugv892jhA30Ztu06trR8jEEwrTHkl8f-guGKMlzShb_9BV34M63QRICUjdSUEk4l6vafGprcGNqHtVbiHv2-bgNM9oKJWnQtqrdv4yAlMMC9Z4t7vuLu2s_eHOsEwuYYVTEphUgqTa3hwDVu4ml1PWerPd_1tHOz20K_CLQjJJIcfi0u4Woiv1-RnDfPEv9nxTnlQv5J7WH5Lk8vpf8g6hT-557L9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431986637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Quigley, L ; O’Sullivan, O ; Beresford, T.P ; Paul Ross, R ; Fitzgerald, G.F ; Cotter, P.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Quigley, L ; O’Sullivan, O ; Beresford, T.P ; Paul Ross, R ; Fitzgerald, G.F ; Cotter, P.D</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from these foods, and their relative success with respect to the yield and purity of the DNA isolated, and its quality as a template for downstream PCR, was compared. Although all of the methods were successful with respect to the extraction of DNA naturally present in cheese, they varied in their relative ability to extract DNA from milk. However, when milk was spiked with a representative Gram‐positive (Listeria monocytogenes EGDe) or Gram‐negative (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2) bacterium, it was established that all methods successfully extracted DNA which was suitable for subsequent detection by PCR. Conclusions: Of the seven approaches, the PowerFood™ Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) was found to most consistently extract highly concentrated and pure DNA with a view to its subsequent use for PCR‐based amplification and also facilitated accurate detection by real‐time quantitative PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: Accurately assessing the bacterial composition of milk and cheese is of great importance to the dairy industry. Increasingly, DNA‐based technologies are being employed to provide an accurate assessment of this microbiota. However, these approaches are dependent on our ability to extract DNA of sufficient yield and purity. This study compares a number of different options and highlights the relative success of these approaches. We also highlight the success of one method to extract DNA from different microbial populations as well as DNA which is suitable for real‐time PCR of microbes of interest, a challenge often encountered by the food industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-5072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2672</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05294.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22452460</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMIFK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>analytical kits ; Animals ; Bacteria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cheese ; Cheese - microbiology ; cheese milk ; cheeses ; dairy industry ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA extraction ; DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification ; extraction ; food industry ; Food Microbiology - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Liquid-Liquid Extraction - methods ; Listeria monocytogenes ; microbial communities ; Microbiology ; Milk ; Milk - microbiology ; milk composition ; molecular microbiology ; PCR ; Polymerase chain reaction ; population ; purification methods ; quantitative polymerase chain reaction ; raw milk ; raw milk cheese ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Salmonella ; Salmonella enterica ; Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium ; Solid Phase Extraction - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied microbiology, 2012-07, Vol.113 (1), p.96-105</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-2d96afb2df6c6b176ee63ce7f8db8d59d18996be8cdd677bb080d19f2fcf6f3a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2672.2012.05294.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2672.2012.05294.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26010543$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22452460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quigley, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beresford, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul Ross, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, G.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotter, P.D</creatorcontrib><title>comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese</title><title>Journal of applied microbiology</title><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from these foods, and their relative success with respect to the yield and purity of the DNA isolated, and its quality as a template for downstream PCR, was compared. Although all of the methods were successful with respect to the extraction of DNA naturally present in cheese, they varied in their relative ability to extract DNA from milk. However, when milk was spiked with a representative Gram‐positive (Listeria monocytogenes EGDe) or Gram‐negative (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2) bacterium, it was established that all methods successfully extracted DNA which was suitable for subsequent detection by PCR. Conclusions: Of the seven approaches, the PowerFood™ Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) was found to most consistently extract highly concentrated and pure DNA with a view to its subsequent use for PCR‐based amplification and also facilitated accurate detection by real‐time quantitative PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: Accurately assessing the bacterial composition of milk and cheese is of great importance to the dairy industry. Increasingly, DNA‐based technologies are being employed to provide an accurate assessment of this microbiota. However, these approaches are dependent on our ability to extract DNA of sufficient yield and purity. This study compares a number of different options and highlights the relative success of these approaches. We also highlight the success of one method to extract DNA from different microbial populations as well as DNA which is suitable for real‐time PCR of microbes of interest, a challenge often encountered by the food industry.</description><subject>analytical kits</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cheese</subject><subject>Cheese - microbiology</subject><subject>cheese milk</subject><subject>cheeses</subject><subject>dairy industry</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA extraction</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</subject><subject>extraction</subject><subject>food industry</subject><subject>Food Microbiology - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Liquid-Liquid Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Listeria monocytogenes</subject><subject>microbial communities</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk - microbiology</subject><subject>milk composition</subject><subject>molecular microbiology</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>purification methods</subject><subject>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>raw milk</subject><subject>raw milk cheese</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium</subject><subject>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</subject><issn>1364-5072</issn><issn>1365-2672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAQgCMEoqXwF8ASqtRLgh-xnRw4rEopVNsFCVZIXEaOHzTbZL3Yibr99zjdZStxwofxWPPNSPbnLEMEFyStd6uCMMFzKiQtKCa0wJzWZbF9kh0fCk8f8jLnWNKj7EWMK4wJw1w8z44oLTktBT7Oltr3GxXa6NfIO9Tb4cabiMZoDRo8stshKD2gJgUbWtWhD4sZcsH3KKg71LfdLVJr83jQN9ZG-zJ75lQX7av9fpItP158P_-Uz79cfj6fzXPNKStzamqhXEONE1o0RAprBdNWuso0leG1IVVdi8ZW2hghZdPgChtSO-q0E44pdpKd7eZugv892jhA30Ztu06trR8jEEwrTHkl8f-guGKMlzShb_9BV34M63QRICUjdSUEk4l6vafGprcGNqHtVbiHv2-bgNM9oKJWnQtqrdv4yAlMMC9Z4t7vuLu2s_eHOsEwuYYVTEphUgqTa3hwDVu4ml1PWerPd_1tHOz20K_CLQjJJIcfi0u4Woiv1-RnDfPEv9nxTnlQv5J7WH5Lk8vpf8g6hT-557L9</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Quigley, L</creator><creator>O’Sullivan, O</creator><creator>Beresford, T.P</creator><creator>Paul Ross, R</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, G.F</creator><creator>Cotter, P.D</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese</title><author>Quigley, L ; O’Sullivan, O ; Beresford, T.P ; Paul Ross, R ; Fitzgerald, G.F ; Cotter, P.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-2d96afb2df6c6b176ee63ce7f8db8d59d18996be8cdd677bb080d19f2fcf6f3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>analytical kits</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cheese</topic><topic>Cheese - microbiology</topic><topic>cheese milk</topic><topic>cheeses</topic><topic>dairy industry</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA extraction</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification</topic><topic>extraction</topic><topic>food industry</topic><topic>Food Microbiology - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Liquid-Liquid Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Listeria monocytogenes</topic><topic>microbial communities</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk - microbiology</topic><topic>milk composition</topic><topic>molecular microbiology</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>purification methods</topic><topic>quantitative polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>raw milk</topic><topic>raw milk cheese</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium</topic><topic>Solid Phase Extraction - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quigley, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beresford, T.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul Ross, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, G.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotter, P.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quigley, L</au><au>O’Sullivan, O</au><au>Beresford, T.P</au><au>Paul Ross, R</au><au>Fitzgerald, G.F</au><au>Cotter, P.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>96-105</pages><issn>1364-5072</issn><eissn>1365-2672</eissn><coden>JAMIFK</coden><abstract>Aims: In this study, we compare seven different methods which have been designed or modified to extract total DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese with a view to its subsequent use for the PCR of bacterial DNA. Materials and Results: Seven extraction methods were employed to extract total DNA from these foods, and their relative success with respect to the yield and purity of the DNA isolated, and its quality as a template for downstream PCR, was compared. Although all of the methods were successful with respect to the extraction of DNA naturally present in cheese, they varied in their relative ability to extract DNA from milk. However, when milk was spiked with a representative Gram‐positive (Listeria monocytogenes EGDe) or Gram‐negative (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2) bacterium, it was established that all methods successfully extracted DNA which was suitable for subsequent detection by PCR. Conclusions: Of the seven approaches, the PowerFood™ Microbial DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc.) was found to most consistently extract highly concentrated and pure DNA with a view to its subsequent use for PCR‐based amplification and also facilitated accurate detection by real‐time quantitative PCR. Significance and Impact of the Study: Accurately assessing the bacterial composition of milk and cheese is of great importance to the dairy industry. Increasingly, DNA‐based technologies are being employed to provide an accurate assessment of this microbiota. However, these approaches are dependent on our ability to extract DNA of sufficient yield and purity. This study compares a number of different options and highlights the relative success of these approaches. We also highlight the success of one method to extract DNA from different microbial populations as well as DNA which is suitable for real‐time PCR of microbes of interest, a challenge often encountered by the food industry.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22452460</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05294.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-5072 |
ispartof | Journal of applied microbiology, 2012-07, Vol.113 (1), p.96-105 |
issn | 1364-5072 1365-2672 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028025870 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | analytical kits Animals Bacteria Biological and medical sciences Cheese Cheese - microbiology cheese milk cheeses dairy industry Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA extraction DNA, Bacterial - isolation & purification extraction food industry Food Microbiology - methods Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Liquid-Liquid Extraction - methods Listeria monocytogenes microbial communities Microbiology Milk Milk - microbiology milk composition molecular microbiology PCR Polymerase chain reaction population purification methods quantitative polymerase chain reaction raw milk raw milk cheese Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Salmonella Salmonella enterica Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium Solid Phase Extraction - methods |
title | comparison of methods used to extract bacterial DNA from raw milk and raw milk cheese |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=comparison%20of%20methods%20used%20to%20extract%20bacterial%20DNA%20from%20raw%20milk%20and%20raw%20milk%20cheese&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Quigley,%20L&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=96-105&rft.issn=1364-5072&rft.eissn=1365-2672&rft.coden=JAMIFK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05294.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3070034371%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431986637&rft_id=info:pmid/22452460&rfr_iscdi=true |