Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae)
‘Ecogeographic isolation’ describes the combined role of ecology and geography as a reproductive barrier, and an important component in speciation. Evidence increasingly shows that this form of isolation is important for maintaining the genetic integrity of populations and species. Further, ecogeogr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolutionary ecology 2012-07, Vol.26 (4), p.909-926 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 926 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 909 |
container_title | Evolutionary ecology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Glennon, K. L. Rissler, L. J. Church, S. A. |
description | ‘Ecogeographic isolation’ describes the combined role of ecology and geography as a reproductive barrier, and an important component in speciation. Evidence increasingly shows that this form of isolation is important for maintaining the genetic integrity of populations and species. Further, ecogeographic isolation can be a reproductive barrier between polyploid individuals and their diploid progenitors. New ecoinformatic methods, which includes niche modeling and associated statistical assessments of these models with spatially explicit environmental data, allow us to test if ecogeographic isolation is a contributing isolating barrier between species and between cytotypes within a species. We tested the hypothesis that ecogeographic isolation contributes to isolation of species and cytotypes within species of the plant genus
Houstonia
. We found that species in this group occupied significantly different niches, which suggests ecogeographic isolation is a contributing reproductive barrier. We also found that diploid and tetraploid forms of
H. longifolia
show some level of ecogeographic isolation, but
H. purpurea
diploids and tetraploids did not. Our results suggest that ecogeographic isolation plays a role in reproductive isolation between
Houstonia
species and between cytotypes of
H. longifolia
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10682-011-9539-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028024576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714117026</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714117026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c173141d966340e1feab813e0416f6237dafb3f4910ee830d089dda94682bbbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhUVpodu0P6A3QS7JwcnIsiW5txDSJBAIlPYsZHm8VfBKjiQ32X9fLQ6lBIIOgsf3hjfzCPnK4IwByPPEQKi6AsaqruVd9fyObFgreaUaKd-TDdSiq6Ro-UfyKaUHAOANFxvir2zYYthGM_92lroUJpNd8N-ooRHnGIbFZvcHaW9idBhpj_kJ0dM0o3WYqPHDP83uc8j7uajO05uwpBy8M_Tkx9I7Y9Hg6WfyYTRTwi8v_xH59f3q5-VNdXd_fXt5cVdZrlSuLJOcNWzohOANIBvR9IpxhIaJUdRcDmbs-dh0DBAVhwFUNwyma8oN-r5HfkRO1rllg8cFU9Y7lyxOk_FYcmkGtYK6aaUo6PEr9CEs0Zd0hWJKtSDEgTpbqa2ZUDs_hhyNLW_AnbPB4-iKfiFLaibLsYuBrQYbQ0oRRz1HtzNxX6bqQ2V6rUyXyvShMv1cPPXqSYX1W4z_R3nL9BdpgppB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018850666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae)</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Glennon, K. L. ; Rissler, L. J. ; Church, S. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glennon, K. L. ; Rissler, L. J. ; Church, S. A.</creatorcontrib><description>‘Ecogeographic isolation’ describes the combined role of ecology and geography as a reproductive barrier, and an important component in speciation. Evidence increasingly shows that this form of isolation is important for maintaining the genetic integrity of populations and species. Further, ecogeographic isolation can be a reproductive barrier between polyploid individuals and their diploid progenitors. New ecoinformatic methods, which includes niche modeling and associated statistical assessments of these models with spatially explicit environmental data, allow us to test if ecogeographic isolation is a contributing isolating barrier between species and between cytotypes within a species. We tested the hypothesis that ecogeographic isolation contributes to isolation of species and cytotypes within species of the plant genus
Houstonia
. We found that species in this group occupied significantly different niches, which suggests ecogeographic isolation is a contributing reproductive barrier. We also found that diploid and tetraploid forms of
H. longifolia
show some level of ecogeographic isolation, but
H. purpurea
diploids and tetraploids did not. Our results suggest that ecogeographic isolation plays a role in reproductive isolation between
Houstonia
species and between cytotypes of
H. longifolia
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7653</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10682-011-9539-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecology ; Evolutionary Biology ; Geography ; Habitats ; Houstonia ; Life Sciences ; Niches ; Original Paper ; Plant ecology ; Plant populations ; Plant reproduction ; Plant Sciences ; Rubiaceae ; Speciation</subject><ispartof>Evolutionary ecology, 2012-07, Vol.26 (4), p.909-926</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c173141d966340e1feab813e0416f6237dafb3f4910ee830d089dda94682bbbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c173141d966340e1feab813e0416f6237dafb3f4910ee830d089dda94682bbbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10682-011-9539-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10682-011-9539-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glennon, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rissler, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, S. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae)</title><title>Evolutionary ecology</title><addtitle>Evol Ecol</addtitle><description>‘Ecogeographic isolation’ describes the combined role of ecology and geography as a reproductive barrier, and an important component in speciation. Evidence increasingly shows that this form of isolation is important for maintaining the genetic integrity of populations and species. Further, ecogeographic isolation can be a reproductive barrier between polyploid individuals and their diploid progenitors. New ecoinformatic methods, which includes niche modeling and associated statistical assessments of these models with spatially explicit environmental data, allow us to test if ecogeographic isolation is a contributing isolating barrier between species and between cytotypes within a species. We tested the hypothesis that ecogeographic isolation contributes to isolation of species and cytotypes within species of the plant genus
Houstonia
. We found that species in this group occupied significantly different niches, which suggests ecogeographic isolation is a contributing reproductive barrier. We also found that diploid and tetraploid forms of
H. longifolia
show some level of ecogeographic isolation, but
H. purpurea
diploids and tetraploids did not. Our results suggest that ecogeographic isolation plays a role in reproductive isolation between
Houstonia
species and between cytotypes of
H. longifolia
.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Houstonia</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Rubiaceae</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><issn>0269-7653</issn><issn>1573-8477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFr3DAQhUVpodu0P6A3QS7JwcnIsiW5txDSJBAIlPYsZHm8VfBKjiQ32X9fLQ6lBIIOgsf3hjfzCPnK4IwByPPEQKi6AsaqruVd9fyObFgreaUaKd-TDdSiq6Ro-UfyKaUHAOANFxvir2zYYthGM_92lroUJpNd8N-ooRHnGIbFZvcHaW9idBhpj_kJ0dM0o3WYqPHDP83uc8j7uajO05uwpBy8M_Tkx9I7Y9Hg6WfyYTRTwi8v_xH59f3q5-VNdXd_fXt5cVdZrlSuLJOcNWzohOANIBvR9IpxhIaJUdRcDmbs-dh0DBAVhwFUNwyma8oN-r5HfkRO1rllg8cFU9Y7lyxOk_FYcmkGtYK6aaUo6PEr9CEs0Zd0hWJKtSDEgTpbqa2ZUDs_hhyNLW_AnbPB4-iKfiFLaibLsYuBrQYbQ0oRRz1HtzNxX6bqQ2V6rUyXyvShMv1cPPXqSYX1W4z_R3nL9BdpgppB</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Glennon, K. L.</creator><creator>Rissler, L. J.</creator><creator>Church, S. A.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae)</title><author>Glennon, K. L. ; Rissler, L. J. ; Church, S. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-c173141d966340e1feab813e0416f6237dafb3f4910ee830d089dda94682bbbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Houstonia</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Rubiaceae</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glennon, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rissler, L. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, S. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glennon, K. L.</au><au>Rissler, L. J.</au><au>Church, S. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae)</atitle><jtitle>Evolutionary ecology</jtitle><stitle>Evol Ecol</stitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>926</epage><pages>909-926</pages><issn>0269-7653</issn><eissn>1573-8477</eissn><abstract>‘Ecogeographic isolation’ describes the combined role of ecology and geography as a reproductive barrier, and an important component in speciation. Evidence increasingly shows that this form of isolation is important for maintaining the genetic integrity of populations and species. Further, ecogeographic isolation can be a reproductive barrier between polyploid individuals and their diploid progenitors. New ecoinformatic methods, which includes niche modeling and associated statistical assessments of these models with spatially explicit environmental data, allow us to test if ecogeographic isolation is a contributing isolating barrier between species and between cytotypes within a species. We tested the hypothesis that ecogeographic isolation contributes to isolation of species and cytotypes within species of the plant genus
Houstonia
. We found that species in this group occupied significantly different niches, which suggests ecogeographic isolation is a contributing reproductive barrier. We also found that diploid and tetraploid forms of
H. longifolia
show some level of ecogeographic isolation, but
H. purpurea
diploids and tetraploids did not. Our results suggest that ecogeographic isolation plays a role in reproductive isolation between
Houstonia
species and between cytotypes of
H. longifolia
.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10682-011-9539-x</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-7653 |
ispartof | Evolutionary ecology, 2012-07, Vol.26 (4), p.909-926 |
issn | 0269-7653 1573-8477 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028024576 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal Ecology Biomedical and Life Sciences Ecology Evolutionary Biology Geography Habitats Houstonia Life Sciences Niches Original Paper Plant ecology Plant populations Plant reproduction Plant Sciences Rubiaceae Speciation |
title | Ecogeographic isolation: a reproductive barrier between species and between cytotypes in Houstonia (Rubiaceae) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecogeographic%20isolation:%20a%20reproductive%20barrier%20between%20species%20and%20between%20cytotypes%20in%20Houstonia%20(Rubiaceae)&rft.jtitle=Evolutionary%20ecology&rft.au=Glennon,%20K.%20L.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=926&rft.pages=909-926&rft.issn=0269-7653&rft.eissn=1573-8477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10682-011-9539-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714117026%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018850666&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A714117026&rfr_iscdi=true |