Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team

Interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) is increasingly encouraged and is often a specific requirement for research grants provided by health research funding councils worldwide. There is consensus that research expertise and scholarship from a diverse range of disciplines are necessary to examine...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality in primary care 2012, Vol.20 (3), p.179-189
Hauptverfasser: Clarke, David, Hawkins, Rebecca, Sadler, Euan, Harding, Geoffrey, Forster, Anne, McKevitt, Christopher, Godfrey, Mary, Monaghan, Josie, Farrin, Amanda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 189
container_issue 3
container_start_page 179
container_title Quality in primary care
container_volume 20
creator Clarke, David
Hawkins, Rebecca
Sadler, Euan
Harding, Geoffrey
Forster, Anne
McKevitt, Christopher
Godfrey, Mary
Monaghan, Josie
Farrin, Amanda
description Interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) is increasingly encouraged and is often a specific requirement for research grants provided by health research funding councils worldwide. There is consensus that research expertise and scholarship from a diverse range of disciplines are necessary to examine questions relating to complex health and social concerns for which single disciplinary approaches have been found inadequate. This paper reports on the experiences of an interdisciplinary process evaluation research team working in the field of stroke care. Realising the perceived benefits is less than straightforward; setting up and conducting IDHR can present researchers with a range of challenges at a strategic, practical and individual level. We identify how differences in disciplinary perspectives and skills impacted on our research practice. Whilst initially challenging, our different approaches to the research problem and the methods to address it, expanded conceptual and methodological understanding and proved of benefit for the research team and the study outputs.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028019751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1028019751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-627ddac005d51ca478d4fa2f2c19a128cc175864ff96ac30219cdcc069f4d0893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKBDEURLNQnHH0FyRLNw1JujsPdzL4GBhwo7hsrjc3TEu_TNID_r0Njq5qc6qoqjO2lpVxhRRGrdhlSp9CKK2MvmArpayy2qg1e98NmaJvE7ZT1w4Qv_mBoMsHHikRRDzc8Ylimghze6TEQxx7DnyKI1JKnI7QzZDbcfg38EzQX7HzAF2i65Nu2Nvjw-v2udi_PO229_tikkrnYunjPaAQta8lQmWsrwKooFA6kMoiSlNbXYXgNGAplHToEYV2ofLCunLDbn9zl0JfM6Xc9MsW6joYaJxTI4WyQjpTywW9OaHzR0--mWLbL3ubvzPKH2pFW68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1028019751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Clarke, David ; Hawkins, Rebecca ; Sadler, Euan ; Harding, Geoffrey ; Forster, Anne ; McKevitt, Christopher ; Godfrey, Mary ; Monaghan, Josie ; Farrin, Amanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Clarke, David ; Hawkins, Rebecca ; Sadler, Euan ; Harding, Geoffrey ; Forster, Anne ; McKevitt, Christopher ; Godfrey, Mary ; Monaghan, Josie ; Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><description>Interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) is increasingly encouraged and is often a specific requirement for research grants provided by health research funding councils worldwide. There is consensus that research expertise and scholarship from a diverse range of disciplines are necessary to examine questions relating to complex health and social concerns for which single disciplinary approaches have been found inadequate. This paper reports on the experiences of an interdisciplinary process evaluation research team working in the field of stroke care. Realising the perceived benefits is less than straightforward; setting up and conducting IDHR can present researchers with a range of challenges at a strategic, practical and individual level. We identify how differences in disciplinary perspectives and skills impacted on our research practice. Whilst initially challenging, our different approaches to the research problem and the methods to address it, expanded conceptual and methodological understanding and proved of benefit for the research team and the study outputs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-1072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22828672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Caregivers - education ; Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Program Development - methods ; Stroke - therapy</subject><ispartof>Quality in primary care, 2012, Vol.20 (3), p.179-189</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clarke, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadler, Euan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKevitt, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfrey, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team</title><title>Quality in primary care</title><addtitle>Qual Prim Care</addtitle><description>Interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) is increasingly encouraged and is often a specific requirement for research grants provided by health research funding councils worldwide. There is consensus that research expertise and scholarship from a diverse range of disciplines are necessary to examine questions relating to complex health and social concerns for which single disciplinary approaches have been found inadequate. This paper reports on the experiences of an interdisciplinary process evaluation research team working in the field of stroke care. Realising the perceived benefits is less than straightforward; setting up and conducting IDHR can present researchers with a range of challenges at a strategic, practical and individual level. We identify how differences in disciplinary perspectives and skills impacted on our research practice. Whilst initially challenging, our different approaches to the research problem and the methods to address it, expanded conceptual and methodological understanding and proved of benefit for the research team and the study outputs.</description><subject>Caregivers - education</subject><subject>Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Program Development - methods</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><issn>1479-1072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKBDEURLNQnHH0FyRLNw1JujsPdzL4GBhwo7hsrjc3TEu_TNID_r0Njq5qc6qoqjO2lpVxhRRGrdhlSp9CKK2MvmArpayy2qg1e98NmaJvE7ZT1w4Qv_mBoMsHHikRRDzc8Ylimghze6TEQxx7DnyKI1JKnI7QzZDbcfg38EzQX7HzAF2i65Nu2Nvjw-v2udi_PO229_tikkrnYunjPaAQta8lQmWsrwKooFA6kMoiSlNbXYXgNGAplHToEYV2ofLCunLDbn9zl0JfM6Xc9MsW6joYaJxTI4WyQjpTywW9OaHzR0--mWLbL3ubvzPKH2pFW68</recordid><startdate>2012</startdate><enddate>2012</enddate><creator>Clarke, David</creator><creator>Hawkins, Rebecca</creator><creator>Sadler, Euan</creator><creator>Harding, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Forster, Anne</creator><creator>McKevitt, Christopher</creator><creator>Godfrey, Mary</creator><creator>Monaghan, Josie</creator><creator>Farrin, Amanda</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2012</creationdate><title>Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team</title><author>Clarke, David ; Hawkins, Rebecca ; Sadler, Euan ; Harding, Geoffrey ; Forster, Anne ; McKevitt, Christopher ; Godfrey, Mary ; Monaghan, Josie ; Farrin, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-627ddac005d51ca478d4fa2f2c19a128cc175864ff96ac30219cdcc069f4d0893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Caregivers - education</topic><topic>Health Services Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Program Development - methods</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clarke, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadler, Euan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forster, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKevitt, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godfrey, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality in primary care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clarke, David</au><au>Hawkins, Rebecca</au><au>Sadler, Euan</au><au>Harding, Geoffrey</au><au>Forster, Anne</au><au>McKevitt, Christopher</au><au>Godfrey, Mary</au><au>Monaghan, Josie</au><au>Farrin, Amanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team</atitle><jtitle>Quality in primary care</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Prim Care</addtitle><date>2012</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>179-189</pages><issn>1479-1072</issn><abstract>Interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) is increasingly encouraged and is often a specific requirement for research grants provided by health research funding councils worldwide. There is consensus that research expertise and scholarship from a diverse range of disciplines are necessary to examine questions relating to complex health and social concerns for which single disciplinary approaches have been found inadequate. This paper reports on the experiences of an interdisciplinary process evaluation research team working in the field of stroke care. Realising the perceived benefits is less than straightforward; setting up and conducting IDHR can present researchers with a range of challenges at a strategic, practical and individual level. We identify how differences in disciplinary perspectives and skills impacted on our research practice. Whilst initially challenging, our different approaches to the research problem and the methods to address it, expanded conceptual and methodological understanding and proved of benefit for the research team and the study outputs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>22828672</pmid><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-1072
ispartof Quality in primary care, 2012, Vol.20 (3), p.179-189
issn 1479-1072
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1028019751
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Caregivers - education
Health Services Research - organization & administration
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Program Development - methods
Stroke - therapy
title Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A22%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interdisciplinary%20health%20research:%20perspectives%20from%20a%20process%20evaluation%20research%20team&rft.jtitle=Quality%20in%20primary%20care&rft.au=Clarke,%20David&rft.date=2012&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=179-189&rft.issn=1479-1072&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1028019751%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1028019751&rft_id=info:pmid/22828672&rfr_iscdi=true