Are firms' voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms
In this paper, to clarify whether a firm's voluntary approach to environmental protection is beneficial for both the environment and business, we analyze whether a firm's voluntary implementation of an environmental management system (EMS) simultaneously reduces its environmental impacts a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 2012-08, Vol.105, p.121-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Nishitani, Kimitaka Kaneko, Shinji Fujii, Hidemichi Komatsu, Satoru |
description | In this paper, to clarify whether a firm's voluntary approach to environmental protection is beneficial for both the environment and business, we analyze whether a firm's voluntary implementation of an environmental management system (EMS) simultaneously reduces its environmental impacts and improves its productivity. Using data on Japanese manufacturing firms for 2002–2008, we find empirical support for the view that the implementation of an EMS simultaneously reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity, and that a reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. However, in the context of this relationship, the direct effect of implementing an EMS on productivity is conditional. If various other activities designed to improve productivity implemented in response to market discipline are also taken into account, the effect of implementing an EMS is hidden by the effects of these activities. This implies that voluntary environmental management activities are merely a minor component of these activities. Therefore, the relationship between the implementation of an EMS and productivity improvement is not strong, although implementing an EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.
► EMS implementation reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity. ► A reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. ► However, the direct effect of EMS on productivity is conditional. ► EMS is a minor component of activities designed to improve productivity. ► EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1027674210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030147971200179X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1015245859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-348dc68a1a4707d301e0ba591dfb63c4314b69e96d50c4baf2099a5315ac03db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksuO1DAQRSMEYpqBTwBZQiPYdCi_kng1ao14aiQ2sLYcuzI4SpzGTlqaz-FPcaabh9gwK6vkc29VqW5RPKdQUqDVm77sMRxGE0oGlJXAS5DiQbGhoOS2qTg8LDbAgW5Freqz4klKPQBwRuvHxRljUjDVwKb4sYtIOh_H9IocpmEJs4m3JDv7OIURczmQ3MTc4FoQY2d_8LPHRFoM2HnrM9BNkczf8G8ZMcGRdkk-YEqXZBcIjnsfvc14mhd3m0V2_b4hUyCfzN5kENdWS5ebLHH9uZvrafGoM0PCZ6f3vPj67u2Xqw_b68_vP17trrdWSjlvuWicrRpDjaihdnlzhNZIRV3XVtwKTkVbKVSVk2BFazoGShnJqTQWuGv5efH66LuP0_cF06xHnywOQ55sWpKmwOqqFozCfVBoREWVvAdKJROykSqjL_9B-2mJIe-8UlXNgEmWKXmkbJxSitjpffRjPlqG7jjd61My9JoMDVznZGTdi5P70o7ofqt-RSEDFyfApHylLppgffrDSSVZTVejyyOH-RgHj1En6zFYdD6inbWb_H9G-Qkpgdur</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1016720252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are firms' voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nishitani, Kimitaka ; Kaneko, Shinji ; Fujii, Hidemichi ; Komatsu, Satoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishitani, Kimitaka ; Kaneko, Shinji ; Fujii, Hidemichi ; Komatsu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, to clarify whether a firm's voluntary approach to environmental protection is beneficial for both the environment and business, we analyze whether a firm's voluntary implementation of an environmental management system (EMS) simultaneously reduces its environmental impacts and improves its productivity. Using data on Japanese manufacturing firms for 2002–2008, we find empirical support for the view that the implementation of an EMS simultaneously reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity, and that a reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. However, in the context of this relationship, the direct effect of implementing an EMS on productivity is conditional. If various other activities designed to improve productivity implemented in response to market discipline are also taken into account, the effect of implementing an EMS is hidden by the effects of these activities. This implies that voluntary environmental management activities are merely a minor component of these activities. Therefore, the relationship between the implementation of an EMS and productivity improvement is not strong, although implementing an EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.
► EMS implementation reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity. ► A reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. ► However, the direct effect of EMS on productivity is conditional. ► EMS is a minor component of activities designed to improve productivity. ► EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22542980</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Business management ; Business practices ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Environmental effects ; Environmental impact ; Environmental management ; Environmental Pollutants ; Environmental protection ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Industrial enterprises ; Industrial Waste - prevention & control ; ISO 14001 ; Japan ; Manufacturing ; Market analysis ; Metallurgy ; Productivity ; Productivity improvement ; Reduction of environmental impacts ; Voluntary environmental activities</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2012-08, Vol.105, p.121-130</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Aug 30, 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-348dc68a1a4707d301e0ba591dfb63c4314b69e96d50c4baf2099a5315ac03db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-348dc68a1a4707d301e0ba591dfb63c4314b69e96d50c4baf2099a5315ac03db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25952714$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishitani, Kimitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Hidemichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatsu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><title>Are firms' voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>In this paper, to clarify whether a firm's voluntary approach to environmental protection is beneficial for both the environment and business, we analyze whether a firm's voluntary implementation of an environmental management system (EMS) simultaneously reduces its environmental impacts and improves its productivity. Using data on Japanese manufacturing firms for 2002–2008, we find empirical support for the view that the implementation of an EMS simultaneously reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity, and that a reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. However, in the context of this relationship, the direct effect of implementing an EMS on productivity is conditional. If various other activities designed to improve productivity implemented in response to market discipline are also taken into account, the effect of implementing an EMS is hidden by the effects of these activities. This implies that voluntary environmental management activities are merely a minor component of these activities. Therefore, the relationship between the implementation of an EMS and productivity improvement is not strong, although implementing an EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.
► EMS implementation reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity. ► A reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. ► However, the direct effect of EMS on productivity is conditional. ► EMS is a minor component of activities designed to improve productivity. ► EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>Business practices</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Industrial enterprises</subject><subject>Industrial Waste - prevention & control</subject><subject>ISO 14001</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Market analysis</subject><subject>Metallurgy</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Productivity improvement</subject><subject>Reduction of environmental impacts</subject><subject>Voluntary environmental activities</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksuO1DAQRSMEYpqBTwBZQiPYdCi_kng1ao14aiQ2sLYcuzI4SpzGTlqaz-FPcaabh9gwK6vkc29VqW5RPKdQUqDVm77sMRxGE0oGlJXAS5DiQbGhoOS2qTg8LDbAgW5Freqz4klKPQBwRuvHxRljUjDVwKb4sYtIOh_H9IocpmEJs4m3JDv7OIURczmQ3MTc4FoQY2d_8LPHRFoM2HnrM9BNkczf8G8ZMcGRdkk-YEqXZBcIjnsfvc14mhd3m0V2_b4hUyCfzN5kENdWS5ebLHH9uZvrafGoM0PCZ6f3vPj67u2Xqw_b68_vP17trrdWSjlvuWicrRpDjaihdnlzhNZIRV3XVtwKTkVbKVSVk2BFazoGShnJqTQWuGv5efH66LuP0_cF06xHnywOQ55sWpKmwOqqFozCfVBoREWVvAdKJROykSqjL_9B-2mJIe-8UlXNgEmWKXmkbJxSitjpffRjPlqG7jjd61My9JoMDVznZGTdi5P70o7ofqt-RSEDFyfApHylLppgffrDSSVZTVejyyOH-RgHj1En6zFYdD6inbWb_H9G-Qkpgdur</recordid><startdate>20120830</startdate><enddate>20120830</enddate><creator>Nishitani, Kimitaka</creator><creator>Kaneko, Shinji</creator><creator>Fujii, Hidemichi</creator><creator>Komatsu, Satoru</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120830</creationdate><title>Are firms' voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms</title><author>Nishitani, Kimitaka ; Kaneko, Shinji ; Fujii, Hidemichi ; Komatsu, Satoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-348dc68a1a4707d301e0ba591dfb63c4314b69e96d50c4baf2099a5315ac03db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>Business practices</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Industrial enterprises</topic><topic>Industrial Waste - prevention & control</topic><topic>ISO 14001</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Market analysis</topic><topic>Metallurgy</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Productivity improvement</topic><topic>Reduction of environmental impacts</topic><topic>Voluntary environmental activities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishitani, Kimitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Hidemichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatsu, Satoru</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishitani, Kimitaka</au><au>Kaneko, Shinji</au><au>Fujii, Hidemichi</au><au>Komatsu, Satoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are firms' voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2012-08-30</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>105</volume><spage>121</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>121-130</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>In this paper, to clarify whether a firm's voluntary approach to environmental protection is beneficial for both the environment and business, we analyze whether a firm's voluntary implementation of an environmental management system (EMS) simultaneously reduces its environmental impacts and improves its productivity. Using data on Japanese manufacturing firms for 2002–2008, we find empirical support for the view that the implementation of an EMS simultaneously reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity, and that a reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. However, in the context of this relationship, the direct effect of implementing an EMS on productivity is conditional. If various other activities designed to improve productivity implemented in response to market discipline are also taken into account, the effect of implementing an EMS is hidden by the effects of these activities. This implies that voluntary environmental management activities are merely a minor component of these activities. Therefore, the relationship between the implementation of an EMS and productivity improvement is not strong, although implementing an EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.
► EMS implementation reduces environmental impacts and improves productivity. ► A reduction in environmental impacts also improves productivity. ► However, the direct effect of EMS on productivity is conditional. ► EMS is a minor component of activities designed to improve productivity. ► EMS indirectly improves productivity by reducing environmental impacts.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22542980</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.054</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2012-08, Vol.105, p.121-130 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1027674210 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Business management Business practices Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Environmental effects Environmental impact Environmental management Environmental Pollutants Environmental protection Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Industrial enterprises Industrial Waste - prevention & control ISO 14001 Japan Manufacturing Market analysis Metallurgy Productivity Productivity improvement Reduction of environmental impacts Voluntary environmental activities |
title | Are firms' voluntary environmental management activities beneficial for the environment and business? An empirical study focusing on Japanese manufacturing firms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A36%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20firms'%20voluntary%20environmental%20management%20activities%20beneficial%20for%20the%20environment%20and%20business?%20An%20empirical%20study%20focusing%20on%20Japanese%20manufacturing%20firms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Nishitani,%20Kimitaka&rft.date=2012-08-30&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=121-130&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1015245859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1016720252&rft_id=info:pmid/22542980&rft_els_id=S030147971200179X&rfr_iscdi=true |