Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care

Purpose Patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) plays an increasing role in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care but their use in EOL care and research remains varied and inconsistent. We aimed to facilitate pan-European collaboration to improve PROMs in palliative and EOL care and research. Me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2012-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1573-1578
Hauptverfasser: Simon, Steffen T., Higginson, Irene J., Harding, Richard, Daveson, Barbara A., Gysels, Marjolein, Deliens, Luc, Echteld, Michael A., Radbruch, Lukas, Toscani, Franco, Krzyzanowski, Dominik M., Costantini, Massimo, Downing, Julia, Ferreira, Pedro L., Benalia, Abdelhamid, Bausewein, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1578
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1573
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 20
creator Simon, Steffen T.
Higginson, Irene J.
Harding, Richard
Daveson, Barbara A.
Gysels, Marjolein
Deliens, Luc
Echteld, Michael A.
Radbruch, Lukas
Toscani, Franco
Krzyzanowski, Dominik M.
Costantini, Massimo
Downing, Julia
Ferreira, Pedro L.
Benalia, Abdelhamid
Bausewein, Claudia
description Purpose Patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) plays an increasing role in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care but their use in EOL care and research remains varied and inconsistent. We aimed to facilitate pan-European collaboration to improve PROMs in palliative and EOL care and research. Methods The study includes a workshop with experts experienced in using PROMs in clinical care and research from Europe, North America, and Africa. Information from presentations, and plenary and group discussions was analysed using content analysis for extracting the main themes. Results Thirty-two professionals from 15 countries and eight different professional backgrounds participated in the workshop. The discussion identified: 1) the need for standardisation with improvement of existing PROMs, e.g., with a modular system and an optional item pool; 2) the aspects of further development with a multi-professional approach taking into account cultural sensitivity especially for translated versions; and 3) the need for guidance, training, and resources. An international network for sharing concepts, experiences, and solutions could enhance these steps of further development. Conclusion PROMs must be based on rigorous scientific methods and respond to patient complexity. Coordinated pan-European collaboration including researchers and clinicians is required to develop and attain quality care and systematic research in outcome measurement in palliative and EOL care.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-012-1436-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1026863760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A357760032</galeid><sourcerecordid>A357760032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-aec0a6eba022f97c2823c32adf310be5a4c03ee4d913381675a175572629672b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqB_BiSLx4YS2ggenjZrO6Jpt40TNh6GKWSTe00G3it5dx1vVPNBwg1O-9qsoj5CWHCw5g3lYAJYABF4x3UjP1iGzaQzIjZf-YbKDvOOukUmfkWa0HAG6MEk_JmRCy56pXG3K4Tncu-Zj2dHZLxLSwgnMuCw40r4vPE9IJXV0LTq1IY6IFK7ri76hLA52L80v0SHNoBuMYm8lX_FHCNLAc2BgDUu8KPidPghsrvri_z8nnd9efrm7Y7cf3H64ub5nvZL8whx6cxp0DIUJvvNgK6aVwQ5Acdqhc50EidkPPpdxybZTjRikjtOi1ETt5Tt6cfOeSv6xYFzvF6nEcXcK8VstB6K2WRkNDX_-FHvJaUpuuUVx3Cray-0Xt3Yg2ppCXtvXR1F5KZZoRSNGoi39Q7Qw4RZ8Thtj-_xDwk8CXXGvBYOcSJ1e-td72mK895WtbvvaYr1VN8-p-4HU34fCg-BloA8QJqK2U9lh-3-h_rt8B8t2t5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1016450834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Simon, Steffen T. ; Higginson, Irene J. ; Harding, Richard ; Daveson, Barbara A. ; Gysels, Marjolein ; Deliens, Luc ; Echteld, Michael A. ; Radbruch, Lukas ; Toscani, Franco ; Krzyzanowski, Dominik M. ; Costantini, Massimo ; Downing, Julia ; Ferreira, Pedro L. ; Benalia, Abdelhamid ; Bausewein, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Steffen T. ; Higginson, Irene J. ; Harding, Richard ; Daveson, Barbara A. ; Gysels, Marjolein ; Deliens, Luc ; Echteld, Michael A. ; Radbruch, Lukas ; Toscani, Franco ; Krzyzanowski, Dominik M. ; Costantini, Massimo ; Downing, Julia ; Ferreira, Pedro L. ; Benalia, Abdelhamid ; Bausewein, Claudia ; PRISMA ; on behalf of PRISMA</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) plays an increasing role in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care but their use in EOL care and research remains varied and inconsistent. We aimed to facilitate pan-European collaboration to improve PROMs in palliative and EOL care and research. Methods The study includes a workshop with experts experienced in using PROMs in clinical care and research from Europe, North America, and Africa. Information from presentations, and plenary and group discussions was analysed using content analysis for extracting the main themes. Results Thirty-two professionals from 15 countries and eight different professional backgrounds participated in the workshop. The discussion identified: 1) the need for standardisation with improvement of existing PROMs, e.g., with a modular system and an optional item pool; 2) the aspects of further development with a multi-professional approach taking into account cultural sensitivity especially for translated versions; and 3) the need for guidance, training, and resources. An international network for sharing concepts, experiences, and solutions could enhance these steps of further development. Conclusion PROMs must be based on rigorous scientific methods and respond to patient complexity. Coordinated pan-European collaboration including researchers and clinicians is required to develop and attain quality care and systematic research in outcome measurement in palliative and EOL care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1436-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22391595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical Research - methods ; Content analysis ; Cooperative Behavior ; Europe ; Humans ; International Cooperation ; Measurement ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Palliative Care - methods ; Palliative treatment ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Short Communication ; Terminal Care - methods ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2012-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1573-1578</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-aec0a6eba022f97c2823c32adf310be5a4c03ee4d913381675a175572629672b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-aec0a6eba022f97c2823c32adf310be5a4c03ee4d913381675a175572629672b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-012-1436-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-012-1436-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22391595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Steffen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daveson, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gysels, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deliens, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echteld, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radbruch, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toscani, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzyzanowski, Dominik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Pedro L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benalia, Abdelhamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bausewein, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRISMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of PRISMA</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose Patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) plays an increasing role in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care but their use in EOL care and research remains varied and inconsistent. We aimed to facilitate pan-European collaboration to improve PROMs in palliative and EOL care and research. Methods The study includes a workshop with experts experienced in using PROMs in clinical care and research from Europe, North America, and Africa. Information from presentations, and plenary and group discussions was analysed using content analysis for extracting the main themes. Results Thirty-two professionals from 15 countries and eight different professional backgrounds participated in the workshop. The discussion identified: 1) the need for standardisation with improvement of existing PROMs, e.g., with a modular system and an optional item pool; 2) the aspects of further development with a multi-professional approach taking into account cultural sensitivity especially for translated versions; and 3) the need for guidance, training, and resources. An international network for sharing concepts, experiences, and solutions could enhance these steps of further development. Conclusion PROMs must be based on rigorous scientific methods and respond to patient complexity. Coordinated pan-European collaboration including researchers and clinicians is required to develop and attain quality care and systematic research in outcome measurement in palliative and EOL care.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Palliative treatment</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><subject>Terminal Care - methods</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU-PFCEQxYnRuOPqB_BiSLx4YS2ggenjZrO6Jpt40TNh6GKWSTe00G3it5dx1vVPNBwg1O-9qsoj5CWHCw5g3lYAJYABF4x3UjP1iGzaQzIjZf-YbKDvOOukUmfkWa0HAG6MEk_JmRCy56pXG3K4Tncu-Zj2dHZLxLSwgnMuCw40r4vPE9IJXV0LTq1IY6IFK7ri76hLA52L80v0SHNoBuMYm8lX_FHCNLAc2BgDUu8KPidPghsrvri_z8nnd9efrm7Y7cf3H64ub5nvZL8whx6cxp0DIUJvvNgK6aVwQ5Acdqhc50EidkPPpdxybZTjRikjtOi1ETt5Tt6cfOeSv6xYFzvF6nEcXcK8VstB6K2WRkNDX_-FHvJaUpuuUVx3Cray-0Xt3Yg2ppCXtvXR1F5KZZoRSNGoi39Q7Qw4RZ8Thtj-_xDwk8CXXGvBYOcSJ1e-td72mK895WtbvvaYr1VN8-p-4HU34fCg-BloA8QJqK2U9lh-3-h_rt8B8t2t5Q</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Simon, Steffen T.</creator><creator>Higginson, Irene J.</creator><creator>Harding, Richard</creator><creator>Daveson, Barbara A.</creator><creator>Gysels, Marjolein</creator><creator>Deliens, Luc</creator><creator>Echteld, Michael A.</creator><creator>Radbruch, Lukas</creator><creator>Toscani, Franco</creator><creator>Krzyzanowski, Dominik M.</creator><creator>Costantini, Massimo</creator><creator>Downing, Julia</creator><creator>Ferreira, Pedro L.</creator><creator>Benalia, Abdelhamid</creator><creator>Bausewein, Claudia</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care</title><author>Simon, Steffen T. ; Higginson, Irene J. ; Harding, Richard ; Daveson, Barbara A. ; Gysels, Marjolein ; Deliens, Luc ; Echteld, Michael A. ; Radbruch, Lukas ; Toscani, Franco ; Krzyzanowski, Dominik M. ; Costantini, Massimo ; Downing, Julia ; Ferreira, Pedro L. ; Benalia, Abdelhamid ; Bausewein, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-aec0a6eba022f97c2823c32adf310be5a4c03ee4d913381675a175572629672b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Palliative treatment</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><topic>Terminal Care - methods</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Steffen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harding, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daveson, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gysels, Marjolein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deliens, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echteld, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radbruch, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toscani, Franco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzyzanowski, Dominik M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Downing, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Pedro L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benalia, Abdelhamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bausewein, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRISMA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of PRISMA</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Steffen T.</au><au>Higginson, Irene J.</au><au>Harding, Richard</au><au>Daveson, Barbara A.</au><au>Gysels, Marjolein</au><au>Deliens, Luc</au><au>Echteld, Michael A.</au><au>Radbruch, Lukas</au><au>Toscani, Franco</au><au>Krzyzanowski, Dominik M.</au><au>Costantini, Massimo</au><au>Downing, Julia</au><au>Ferreira, Pedro L.</au><au>Benalia, Abdelhamid</au><au>Bausewein, Claudia</au><aucorp>PRISMA</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of PRISMA</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1573</spage><epage>1578</epage><pages>1573-1578</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose Patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) plays an increasing role in palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care but their use in EOL care and research remains varied and inconsistent. We aimed to facilitate pan-European collaboration to improve PROMs in palliative and EOL care and research. Methods The study includes a workshop with experts experienced in using PROMs in clinical care and research from Europe, North America, and Africa. Information from presentations, and plenary and group discussions was analysed using content analysis for extracting the main themes. Results Thirty-two professionals from 15 countries and eight different professional backgrounds participated in the workshop. The discussion identified: 1) the need for standardisation with improvement of existing PROMs, e.g., with a modular system and an optional item pool; 2) the aspects of further development with a multi-professional approach taking into account cultural sensitivity especially for translated versions; and 3) the need for guidance, training, and resources. An international network for sharing concepts, experiences, and solutions could enhance these steps of further development. Conclusion PROMs must be based on rigorous scientific methods and respond to patient complexity. Coordinated pan-European collaboration including researchers and clinicians is required to develop and attain quality care and systematic research in outcome measurement in palliative and EOL care.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22391595</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-012-1436-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2012-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1573-1578
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1026863760
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Analysis
Biomedical Research - methods
Content analysis
Cooperative Behavior
Europe
Humans
International Cooperation
Measurement
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Experimental
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Pain Medicine
Palliative care
Palliative Care - methods
Palliative treatment
Quality Assurance, Health Care
Rehabilitation Medicine
Short Communication
Terminal Care - methods
Workshops
title Enhancing patient-reported outcome measurement in research and practice of palliative and end-of-life care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A22%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20patient-reported%20outcome%20measurement%20in%20research%20and%20practice%20of%20palliative%20and%20end-of-life%20care&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Simon,%20Steffen%20T.&rft.aucorp=PRISMA&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1573&rft.epage=1578&rft.pages=1573-1578&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-012-1436-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA357760032%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1016450834&rft_id=info:pmid/22391595&rft_galeid=A357760032&rfr_iscdi=true