Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates
Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1018-1023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1023 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1018 |
container_title | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Puchwein, Paul, MD Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD Heidari, Nima, MD Windisch, Gunter, MD Pichler, Wolfgang, MD |
description | Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1026701640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274611003004</els_id><sourcerecordid>1026701640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6AdxINoKb1ps_bVoFQQZHhQEXjuuQJre81DapSSu-b2_Ke47gwlXCzTmHe3-5RfGcQkWBNq_HakxYMaC0AlkBiAfFJa05K5sa4GG-Q92WTIrmoniS0ggAnQD2uLhg2SMayi-L7e4QEUvrZvTJBa8nMoe4HMKMazySMJD1gGSJ4Zeb89s2ef2GaGLCvOjoUvBkDcRsMaJfpyPZElqivV7D7IyecmWJmA56yeXdS5ZJr5ieFo8GPSV8dj6vim83H-6uP5W3Xz5-vn5_WxrB27XUbW1YZ03fDRwGO1hgUNe1MH0rse-wFpJJzntrRGMkFa2WwnDZMSZ1LS3nV8WrU24e4MeGaVWzSwanSXsMW1IUWCMzSQFZSk9SE0NKEQe1xDxyPGaR2mmrUWXaaqetQKpMO3tenOO3fkZ77_iDNwtengU6ZRxD1N649FfXMOCi24PennSYYfx0GFUyDr1B6yKaVdng_tvGu3_cZnJ-5_8dj5jGsMX8r3lalZgC9XVfi30rKAXge8BvGJizPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026701640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Puchwein, Paul, MD ; Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD ; Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD ; Heidari, Nima, MD ; Windisch, Gunter, MD ; Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Puchwein, Paul, MD ; Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD ; Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD ; Heidari, Nima, MD ; Windisch, Gunter, MD ; Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22014613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Plates ; Cadaver ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monteggia fracture ; Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging ; Monteggia's Fracture - surgery ; morphometry of proximal ulna ; Observer Variation ; Olecranon Process - anatomy & histology ; Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging ; Orthopedics ; Preshaped ulna plates ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sampling Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Ulna - anatomy & histology ; Ulna - diagnostic imaging ; Ulna - surgery ; Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Ulna Fractures - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1018-1023</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274611003004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26203494$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puchwein, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Nima, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windisch, Gunter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monteggia fracture</subject><subject>Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Monteggia's Fracture - surgery</subject><subject>morphometry of proximal ulna</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Olecranon Process - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Preshaped ulna plates</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Ulna - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Ulna - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ulna - surgery</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6AdxINoKb1ps_bVoFQQZHhQEXjuuQJre81DapSSu-b2_Ke47gwlXCzTmHe3-5RfGcQkWBNq_HakxYMaC0AlkBiAfFJa05K5sa4GG-Q92WTIrmoniS0ggAnQD2uLhg2SMayi-L7e4QEUvrZvTJBa8nMoe4HMKMazySMJD1gGSJ4Zeb89s2ef2GaGLCvOjoUvBkDcRsMaJfpyPZElqivV7D7IyecmWJmA56yeXdS5ZJr5ieFo8GPSV8dj6vim83H-6uP5W3Xz5-vn5_WxrB27XUbW1YZ03fDRwGO1hgUNe1MH0rse-wFpJJzntrRGMkFa2WwnDZMSZ1LS3nV8WrU24e4MeGaVWzSwanSXsMW1IUWCMzSQFZSk9SE0NKEQe1xDxyPGaR2mmrUWXaaqetQKpMO3tenOO3fkZ77_iDNwtengU6ZRxD1N649FfXMOCi24PennSYYfx0GFUyDr1B6yKaVdng_tvGu3_cZnJ-5_8dj5jGsMX8r3lalZgC9XVfi30rKAXge8BvGJizPw</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Puchwein, Paul, MD</creator><creator>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</creator><creator>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</creator><creator>Heidari, Nima, MD</creator><creator>Windisch, Gunter, MD</creator><creator>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</title><author>Puchwein, Paul, MD ; Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD ; Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD ; Heidari, Nima, MD ; Windisch, Gunter, MD ; Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monteggia fracture</topic><topic>Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Monteggia's Fracture - surgery</topic><topic>morphometry of proximal ulna</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Olecranon Process - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Preshaped ulna plates</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Ulna - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Ulna - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ulna - surgery</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puchwein, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Nima, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windisch, Gunter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puchwein, Paul, MD</au><au>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</au><au>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</au><au>Heidari, Nima, MD</au><au>Windisch, Gunter, MD</au><au>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1018</spage><epage>1023</epage><pages>1018-1023</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22014613</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-2746 |
ispartof | Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1018-1023 |
issn | 1058-2746 1532-6500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1026701640 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Bone Plates Cadaver Diseases of the osteoarticular system Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Monteggia fracture Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging Monteggia's Fracture - surgery morphometry of proximal ulna Observer Variation Olecranon Process - anatomy & histology Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging Orthopedics Preshaped ulna plates Radiographic Image Enhancement Reproducibility of Results Sampling Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Ulna - anatomy & histology Ulna - diagnostic imaging Ulna - surgery Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging Ulna Fractures - surgery Young Adult |
title | Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20morphometry%20of%20the%20proximal%20ulna:%20a%20comparison%20to%20currently%20used%20anatomically%20preshaped%20ulna%20plates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Puchwein,%20Paul,%20MD&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1018&rft.epage=1023&rft.pages=1018-1023&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1026701640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026701640&rft_id=info:pmid/22014613&rft_els_id=S1058274611003004&rfr_iscdi=true |