Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates

Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1018-1023
Hauptverfasser: Puchwein, Paul, MD, Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD, Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD, Heidari, Nima, MD, Windisch, Gunter, MD, Pichler, Wolfgang, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1023
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1018
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 21
creator Puchwein, Paul, MD
Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD
Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD
Heidari, Nima, MD
Windisch, Gunter, MD
Pichler, Wolfgang, MD
description Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1026701640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274611003004</els_id><sourcerecordid>1026701640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6AdxINoKb1ps_bVoFQQZHhQEXjuuQJre81DapSSu-b2_Ke47gwlXCzTmHe3-5RfGcQkWBNq_HakxYMaC0AlkBiAfFJa05K5sa4GG-Q92WTIrmoniS0ggAnQD2uLhg2SMayi-L7e4QEUvrZvTJBa8nMoe4HMKMazySMJD1gGSJ4Zeb89s2ef2GaGLCvOjoUvBkDcRsMaJfpyPZElqivV7D7IyecmWJmA56yeXdS5ZJr5ieFo8GPSV8dj6vim83H-6uP5W3Xz5-vn5_WxrB27XUbW1YZ03fDRwGO1hgUNe1MH0rse-wFpJJzntrRGMkFa2WwnDZMSZ1LS3nV8WrU24e4MeGaVWzSwanSXsMW1IUWCMzSQFZSk9SE0NKEQe1xDxyPGaR2mmrUWXaaqetQKpMO3tenOO3fkZ77_iDNwtengU6ZRxD1N649FfXMOCi24PennSYYfx0GFUyDr1B6yKaVdng_tvGu3_cZnJ-5_8dj5jGsMX8r3lalZgC9XVfi30rKAXge8BvGJizPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1026701640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Puchwein, Paul, MD ; Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD ; Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD ; Heidari, Nima, MD ; Windisch, Gunter, MD ; Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Puchwein, Paul, MD ; Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD ; Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD ; Heidari, Nima, MD ; Windisch, Gunter, MD ; Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22014613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Plates ; Cadaver ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monteggia fracture ; Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging ; Monteggia's Fracture - surgery ; morphometry of proximal ulna ; Observer Variation ; Olecranon Process - anatomy &amp; histology ; Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging ; Orthopedics ; Preshaped ulna plates ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sampling Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Ulna - anatomy &amp; histology ; Ulna - diagnostic imaging ; Ulna - surgery ; Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Ulna Fractures - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1018-1023</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274611003004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26203494$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puchwein, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Nima, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windisch, Gunter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monteggia fracture</subject><subject>Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Monteggia's Fracture - surgery</subject><subject>morphometry of proximal ulna</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Olecranon Process - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Preshaped ulna plates</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sampling Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Ulna - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Ulna - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ulna - surgery</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk-L1TAUxYsozjj6AdxINoKb1ps_bVoFQQZHhQEXjuuQJre81DapSSu-b2_Ke47gwlXCzTmHe3-5RfGcQkWBNq_HakxYMaC0AlkBiAfFJa05K5sa4GG-Q92WTIrmoniS0ggAnQD2uLhg2SMayi-L7e4QEUvrZvTJBa8nMoe4HMKMazySMJD1gGSJ4Zeb89s2ef2GaGLCvOjoUvBkDcRsMaJfpyPZElqivV7D7IyecmWJmA56yeXdS5ZJr5ieFo8GPSV8dj6vim83H-6uP5W3Xz5-vn5_WxrB27XUbW1YZ03fDRwGO1hgUNe1MH0rse-wFpJJzntrRGMkFa2WwnDZMSZ1LS3nV8WrU24e4MeGaVWzSwanSXsMW1IUWCMzSQFZSk9SE0NKEQe1xDxyPGaR2mmrUWXaaqetQKpMO3tenOO3fkZ77_iDNwtengU6ZRxD1N649FfXMOCi24PennSYYfx0GFUyDr1B6yKaVdng_tvGu3_cZnJ-5_8dj5jGsMX8r3lalZgC9XVfi30rKAXge8BvGJizPw</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Puchwein, Paul, MD</creator><creator>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</creator><creator>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</creator><creator>Heidari, Nima, MD</creator><creator>Windisch, Gunter, MD</creator><creator>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</title><author>Puchwein, Paul, MD ; Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD ; Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD ; Heidari, Nima, MD ; Windisch, Gunter, MD ; Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-a85c29dcb9f30fdfd0205554cb87eb9e5472733bdc46c7148a74c379227a57d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monteggia fracture</topic><topic>Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Monteggia's Fracture - surgery</topic><topic>morphometry of proximal ulna</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Olecranon Process - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Preshaped ulna plates</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sampling Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Ulna - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Ulna - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ulna - surgery</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puchwein, Paul, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidari, Nima, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windisch, Gunter, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puchwein, Paul, MD</au><au>Schildhauer, Thomas Armin, MD</au><au>Schöffmann, Sylvia, MD</au><au>Heidari, Nima, MD</au><au>Windisch, Gunter, MD</au><au>Pichler, Wolfgang, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1018</spage><epage>1023</epage><pages>1018-1023</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background Anatomically preshaped plates are increasingly used for stabilization of comminuted olecranon and Monteggia fractures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the morphology of the proximal ulna and to compare morphologic findings with geometry of 4 preshaped ulna plates. Materials and methods Forty human elbows (mean age, 68 years; range, 21-98 years) were measured by 2 independent observers using 64-slice computed tomography scans and 3-dimensional measuring software. Results Measurements showed a mean dorsal hook angle of 95.3° ± 9.0° (range, 74.7°-110.8°) with gender-specific differences (mean, 92.2° ± 8.1° in men and 98.3° ± 8.9° in women; P = .029); a mean distance from the tip of the olecranon to the proximal edge of the ulna of 24.7 ± 2.7 mm (range, 20-30.5 mm) with gender-specific differences ( P = .00068); a mean varus angulation of 14.3° ± 3.6° (range, 5.8°-21.2°); and a mean anterior angulation (proximal ulna dorsal angulation) of 6.2° ± 2.7° (range, 1.0°-11.2°). The investigated plates offered a tolerable (± standard deviation) hook angle in 25% to 68%, an appropriate varus angulation in 0% to 20%, and an adequate anterior angulation in 23% to 88%. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.74 and 0.91. Conclusion The proximal ulna has a gender-specific and variable morphology. Some currently used anatomically preshaped proximal ulna plates differ significantly from these morphologic findings. In cases where reduction is not exactly possible, application of an “anatomically preshaped” plate may result in poor reduction. Especially in case of Monteggia fractures with instability of the radiocapitellar joint, surgeons could be misguided by plates that do not incorporate anterior angulation, resulting in subluxation of the radial head on the capitellum.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22014613</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-08, Vol.21 (8), p.1018-1023
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1026701640
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Plates
Cadaver
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Monteggia fracture
Monteggia's Fracture - diagnostic imaging
Monteggia's Fracture - surgery
morphometry of proximal ulna
Observer Variation
Olecranon Process - anatomy & histology
Olecranon Process - diagnostic imaging
Orthopedics
Preshaped ulna plates
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Reproducibility of Results
Sampling Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Ulna - anatomy & histology
Ulna - diagnostic imaging
Ulna - surgery
Ulna Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Ulna Fractures - surgery
Young Adult
title Three-dimensional morphometry of the proximal ulna: a comparison to currently used anatomically preshaped ulna plates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A45%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20morphometry%20of%20the%20proximal%20ulna:%20a%20comparison%20to%20currently%20used%20anatomically%20preshaped%20ulna%20plates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Puchwein,%20Paul,%20MD&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1018&rft.epage=1023&rft.pages=1018-1023&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1026701640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1026701640&rft_id=info:pmid/22014613&rft_els_id=S1058274611003004&rfr_iscdi=true