NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties
This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research 2012-01 (154), p.1-65 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 65 |
---|---|
container_issue | 154 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research |
container_volume | |
creator | Ingram, Deborah D Franco, Sheila J |
description | This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level.
The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level.
Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024932632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024932632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p229t-e38441506ebdff32d68144b72165ba944a3070d0c1265f771a82ba0d572f98733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jz1LBDEUAFMo3nn6F2RLm4XkvWySLeVQTzi0UOvlJZtgZL9MNoX_XsGzmmYYmDO25dxgDbzRG3aZ8yfnErEVF2wDoA0q1FuGz_vDa1WSpalOJdFQuYFyjiE6WuM8Vdl9-NFXYU6Vm8u0Rp-v2HmgIfvrE3fs_eH-bX-ojy-PT_u7Y70AtGvt0UgpGq687UNA6JURUloNQjWWWikJueY9dwJUE7QWZMAS7xsNoTUaccdu_7pLmr-Kz2s3xuz8MNDk55I7wUG2CArhV705qcWOvu-WFEdK393_KP4AzmJMAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024932632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Center for Disease Control Web site</source><creator>Ingram, Deborah D ; Franco, Sheila J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Deborah D ; Franco, Sheila J</creatorcontrib><description>This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level.
The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level.
Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0083-2057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22783637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Accidents, Traffic - mortality ; Age Distribution ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality ; Geography - classification ; Health Status ; Homicide - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data ; Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data ; Mortality ; National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.) ; Residence Characteristics - classification ; Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data ; Rural Population - classification ; Rural Population - statistics & numerical data ; United States - epidemiology ; Urban Population - classification ; Urban Population - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research, 2012-01 (154), p.1-65</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Deborah D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Sheila J</creatorcontrib><title>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</title><title>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research</title><addtitle>Vital Health Stat 2</addtitle><description>This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level.
The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level.
Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic - mortality</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality</subject><subject>Geography - classification</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Homicide - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - classification</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Rural Population - classification</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urban Population - classification</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0083-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jz1LBDEUAFMo3nn6F2RLm4XkvWySLeVQTzi0UOvlJZtgZL9MNoX_XsGzmmYYmDO25dxgDbzRG3aZ8yfnErEVF2wDoA0q1FuGz_vDa1WSpalOJdFQuYFyjiE6WuM8Vdl9-NFXYU6Vm8u0Rp-v2HmgIfvrE3fs_eH-bX-ojy-PT_u7Y70AtGvt0UgpGq687UNA6JURUloNQjWWWikJueY9dwJUE7QWZMAS7xsNoTUaccdu_7pLmr-Kz2s3xuz8MNDk55I7wUG2CArhV705qcWOvu-WFEdK393_KP4AzmJMAw</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Ingram, Deborah D</creator><creator>Franco, Sheila J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</title><author>Ingram, Deborah D ; Franco, Sheila J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p229t-e38441506ebdff32d68144b72165ba944a3070d0c1265f771a82ba0d572f98733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic - mortality</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality</topic><topic>Geography - classification</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Homicide - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - classification</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Rural Population - classification</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urban Population - classification</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Deborah D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Sheila J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingram, Deborah D</au><au>Franco, Sheila J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</atitle><jtitle>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research</jtitle><addtitle>Vital Health Stat 2</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><issue>154</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>1-65</pages><issn>0083-2057</issn><abstract>This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level.
The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level.
Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22783637</pmid><tpages>65</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0083-2057 |
ispartof | Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research, 2012-01 (154), p.1-65 |
issn | 0083-2057 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024932632 |
source | MEDLINE; Center for Disease Control Web site |
subjects | Accidents, Traffic - mortality Age Distribution Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality Geography - classification Health Status Homicide - statistics & numerical data Humans Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data Mortality National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.) Residence Characteristics - classification Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data Rural Population - classification Rural Population - statistics & numerical data United States - epidemiology Urban Population - classification Urban Population - statistics & numerical data |
title | NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NCHS%20urban-rural%20classification%20scheme%20for%20counties&rft.jtitle=Vital%20and%20health%20statistics.%20Series%202.%20Data%20evaluation%20and%20methods%20research&rft.au=Ingram,%20Deborah%20D&rft.date=2012-01&rft.issue=154&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=1-65&rft.issn=0083-2057&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024932632%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024932632&rft_id=info:pmid/22783637&rfr_iscdi=true |