NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties

This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research 2012-01 (154), p.1-65
Hauptverfasser: Ingram, Deborah D, Franco, Sheila J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 154
container_start_page 1
container_title Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research
container_volume
creator Ingram, Deborah D
Franco, Sheila J
description This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level. Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024932632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024932632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p229t-e38441506ebdff32d68144b72165ba944a3070d0c1265f771a82ba0d572f98733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jz1LBDEUAFMo3nn6F2RLm4XkvWySLeVQTzi0UOvlJZtgZL9MNoX_XsGzmmYYmDO25dxgDbzRG3aZ8yfnErEVF2wDoA0q1FuGz_vDa1WSpalOJdFQuYFyjiE6WuM8Vdl9-NFXYU6Vm8u0Rp-v2HmgIfvrE3fs_eH-bX-ojy-PT_u7Y70AtGvt0UgpGq687UNA6JURUloNQjWWWikJueY9dwJUE7QWZMAS7xsNoTUaccdu_7pLmr-Kz2s3xuz8MNDk55I7wUG2CArhV705qcWOvu-WFEdK393_KP4AzmJMAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024932632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Center for Disease Control Web site</source><creator>Ingram, Deborah D ; Franco, Sheila J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Deborah D ; Franco, Sheila J</creatorcontrib><description>This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level. Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0083-2057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22783637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Accidents, Traffic - mortality ; Age Distribution ; Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality ; Geography - classification ; Health Status ; Homicide - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data ; Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data ; Mortality ; National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.) ; Residence Characteristics - classification ; Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data ; Rural Population - classification ; Rural Population - statistics & numerical data ; United States - epidemiology ; Urban Population - classification ; Urban Population - statistics & numerical data]]></subject><ispartof>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research, 2012-01 (154), p.1-65</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22783637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Deborah D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Sheila J</creatorcontrib><title>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</title><title>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research</title><addtitle>Vital Health Stat 2</addtitle><description>This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level. Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic - mortality</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality</subject><subject>Geography - classification</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Homicide - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - classification</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Rural Population - classification</subject><subject>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urban Population - classification</subject><subject>Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0083-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jz1LBDEUAFMo3nn6F2RLm4XkvWySLeVQTzi0UOvlJZtgZL9MNoX_XsGzmmYYmDO25dxgDbzRG3aZ8yfnErEVF2wDoA0q1FuGz_vDa1WSpalOJdFQuYFyjiE6WuM8Vdl9-NFXYU6Vm8u0Rp-v2HmgIfvrE3fs_eH-bX-ojy-PT_u7Y70AtGvt0UgpGq687UNA6JURUloNQjWWWikJueY9dwJUE7QWZMAS7xsNoTUaccdu_7pLmr-Kz2s3xuz8MNDk55I7wUG2CArhV705qcWOvu-WFEdK393_KP4AzmJMAw</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Ingram, Deborah D</creator><creator>Franco, Sheila J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</title><author>Ingram, Deborah D ; Franco, Sheila J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p229t-e38441506ebdff32d68144b72165ba944a3070d0c1265f771a82ba0d572f98733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic - mortality</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality</topic><topic>Geography - classification</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Homicide - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - classification</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Rural Population - classification</topic><topic>Rural Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urban Population - classification</topic><topic>Urban Population - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Deborah D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franco, Sheila J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ingram, Deborah D</au><au>Franco, Sheila J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties</atitle><jtitle>Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research</jtitle><addtitle>Vital Health Stat 2</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><issue>154</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>1-65</pages><issn>0083-2057</issn><abstract>This report details the National Center for Health Statistics' (NCHS) development of the 2006 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties and provides some examples of how the scheme can be used to describe differences in health measures by urbanization level. The 2006 NCHS urban-rural classification scheme classifies all U.S. counties and county-equivalents into six levels--four for metropolitan counties and two for nonmetropolitan counties. The Office of Management and Budget's delineation of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties forms the foundation of the scheme. The NCHS scheme also uses the cut points of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural-Urban Continuum Codes to subdivide the metropolitan counties based on the population of their metropolitan statistical area (MSA): large, for MSA population of 1 million or more; medium, for MSA population of 250,000-999,999; and small, for MSA population below 250,000. Large metro counties were further separated into large central and large fringe metro categories using classification rules developed by NCHS. Nonmetropolitan counties were assigned to two levels based on the Office of Management and Budget's designated micropolitan or noncore status. The 2006 scheme was applied to data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) to illustrate its ability to capture health differences by urbanization level. Application of the 2006 NCHS scheme to NVSS and NHIS data shows that it identifies important health disparities among communities, most notably those for inner city and suburban communities. The design of the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties makes it particularly well-suited for assessing and monitoring health differences across the full urbanization continuum.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22783637</pmid><tpages>65</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0083-2057
ispartof Vital and health statistics. Series 2. Data evaluation and methods research, 2012-01 (154), p.1-65
issn 0083-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024932632
source MEDLINE; Center for Disease Control Web site
subjects Accidents, Traffic - mortality
Age Distribution
Cerebrovascular Disorders - mortality
Geography - classification
Health Status
Homicide - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Insurance Coverage - statistics & numerical data
Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data
Mortality
National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)
Residence Characteristics - classification
Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data
Rural Population - classification
Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
United States - epidemiology
Urban Population - classification
Urban Population - statistics & numerical data
title NCHS urban-rural classification scheme for counties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NCHS%20urban-rural%20classification%20scheme%20for%20counties&rft.jtitle=Vital%20and%20health%20statistics.%20Series%202.%20Data%20evaluation%20and%20methods%20research&rft.au=Ingram,%20Deborah%20D&rft.date=2012-01&rft.issue=154&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=1-65&rft.issn=0083-2057&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024932632%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024932632&rft_id=info:pmid/22783637&rfr_iscdi=true