Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Purpose Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to es...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2012-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1307-1322
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Tao, Zhao, Song, Peng, Xiaochun, Zhang, Xianlong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1322
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1307
container_title Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
container_volume 20
creator Cheng, Tao
Zhao, Song
Peng, Xiaochun
Zhang, Xianlong
description Purpose Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to establish whether computer-assisted surgery leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning than conventional technique in patients with primary TKA. Methods Major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies without language restriction. A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs was performed in a random effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted by type of navigation system to explore the clinical heterogeneity between these trials. The following radiographic parameters were used to compare computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique: (1) mechanical leg axis, (2) femoral component coronal alignment, (3) tibial component coronal alignment, (4) femoral component sagittal alignment, and (5) tibial component sagittal alignment. Results For the mechanical leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components, there are statistically significant reductions in the number of patients with malalignment in the CAS group if the outlier cutoff value is ±3 or 2° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that CT-free navigation systems provide better alignment than conventional techniques in the coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral components within ±3 and 2°. If the outlier cutoff value for the tibial sagittal alignment is ±2°, the outlier percentages are higher in the CT-free navigation group than in the conventional group. However, there was no significant difference in the tibial sagittal alignment at ±3°. Conclusion Computer-assisted surgery does improve mechanical leg axis and component orientation in TKAs. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary to determine whether surgeons could use computer-assisted techniques to achieve a targeted tibial slope in TKA. Level of evidence Therapeutic study (Systematic review of Level I/II studies), Level II.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024662714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024662714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1dc7255be75563e499e96cecda71bd2765470270fcc5b55aecf6f283eb68e4973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-O1SAUxonRONfRB3BjSNy4QYEWaFeTyfg3mcSNrhtKT6-MtFSgmutD-YyepqMxJiau-IAf3zmHj5DHgj8XnJsXmXOhDeNCMKGahjV3yEHUVcVMVZu75MDbWjLJlT4jD3K-4Rxl3d4nZ1KYCs_Ngfx4GSFTF6dlLZCYzdnnAgPNazpCOlE_LSl-BbrEXOICyRaPuwBHaoM_zhPMhdp52LhgUSPni4-zn490jCHEb5sqsdhAP88A1KbyKUWEczld0Es6QbHMzjacsDKNI01oFyf_HZtwcS4JTVCW5G3IFw_JvRFXeHS7npOPr199uHrLrt-_eXd1ec1cbURhYnBGKtWDUUpXULcttNqBG6wR_SCNVrXh0vDROdUrZcGNepRNBb1ukDbVOXm2--L0X1bIpZt8dhBwRohr7gSXtdbS4G__Bypq7IA3iD79C72Ja8LZd0oIqSuJlNgpl2LOCcZuSX6y6YRQt-Xe7bl3mHu35d5tzk9undd-guH3i19BIyB3IOPVjNH-Wfpfrj8BmbW8vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021112632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Cheng, Tao ; Zhao, Song ; Peng, Xiaochun ; Zhang, Xianlong</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Tao ; Zhao, Song ; Peng, Xiaochun ; Zhang, Xianlong</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to establish whether computer-assisted surgery leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning than conventional technique in patients with primary TKA. Methods Major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies without language restriction. A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs was performed in a random effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted by type of navigation system to explore the clinical heterogeneity between these trials. The following radiographic parameters were used to compare computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique: (1) mechanical leg axis, (2) femoral component coronal alignment, (3) tibial component coronal alignment, (4) femoral component sagittal alignment, and (5) tibial component sagittal alignment. Results For the mechanical leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components, there are statistically significant reductions in the number of patients with malalignment in the CAS group if the outlier cutoff value is ±3 or 2° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that CT-free navigation systems provide better alignment than conventional techniques in the coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral components within ±3 and 2°. If the outlier cutoff value for the tibial sagittal alignment is ±2°, the outlier percentages are higher in the CT-free navigation group than in the conventional group. However, there was no significant difference in the tibial sagittal alignment at ±3°. Conclusion Computer-assisted surgery does improve mechanical leg axis and component orientation in TKAs. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary to determine whether surgeons could use computer-assisted techniques to achieve a targeted tibial slope in TKA. Level of evidence Therapeutic study (Systematic review of Level I/II studies), Level II.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21732057</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Bone surgery ; CAS ; Clinical trials ; Computer assisted surgery ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Knee ; Knee Prosthesis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Navigation systems ; Orthopedics ; Prosthesis Fitting ; Radiography, Interventional ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Surgeons ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted ; Systematic review ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2012-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1307-1322</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1dc7255be75563e499e96cecda71bd2765470270fcc5b55aecf6f283eb68e4973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1dc7255be75563e499e96cecda71bd2765470270fcc5b55aecf6f283eb68e4973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21732057$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaochun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xianlong</creatorcontrib><title>Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Purpose Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to establish whether computer-assisted surgery leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning than conventional technique in patients with primary TKA. Methods Major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies without language restriction. A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs was performed in a random effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted by type of navigation system to explore the clinical heterogeneity between these trials. The following radiographic parameters were used to compare computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique: (1) mechanical leg axis, (2) femoral component coronal alignment, (3) tibial component coronal alignment, (4) femoral component sagittal alignment, and (5) tibial component sagittal alignment. Results For the mechanical leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components, there are statistically significant reductions in the number of patients with malalignment in the CAS group if the outlier cutoff value is ±3 or 2° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that CT-free navigation systems provide better alignment than conventional techniques in the coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral components within ±3 and 2°. If the outlier cutoff value for the tibial sagittal alignment is ±2°, the outlier percentages are higher in the CT-free navigation group than in the conventional group. However, there was no significant difference in the tibial sagittal alignment at ±3°. Conclusion Computer-assisted surgery does improve mechanical leg axis and component orientation in TKAs. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary to determine whether surgeons could use computer-assisted techniques to achieve a targeted tibial slope in TKA. Level of evidence Therapeutic study (Systematic review of Level I/II studies), Level II.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>CAS</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Computer assisted surgery</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prosthesis Fitting</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc-O1SAUxonRONfRB3BjSNy4QYEWaFeTyfg3mcSNrhtKT6-MtFSgmutD-YyepqMxJiau-IAf3zmHj5DHgj8XnJsXmXOhDeNCMKGahjV3yEHUVcVMVZu75MDbWjLJlT4jD3K-4Rxl3d4nZ1KYCs_Ngfx4GSFTF6dlLZCYzdnnAgPNazpCOlE_LSl-BbrEXOICyRaPuwBHaoM_zhPMhdp52LhgUSPni4-zn490jCHEb5sqsdhAP88A1KbyKUWEczld0Es6QbHMzjacsDKNI01oFyf_HZtwcS4JTVCW5G3IFw_JvRFXeHS7npOPr199uHrLrt-_eXd1ec1cbURhYnBGKtWDUUpXULcttNqBG6wR_SCNVrXh0vDROdUrZcGNepRNBb1ukDbVOXm2--L0X1bIpZt8dhBwRohr7gSXtdbS4G__Bypq7IA3iD79C72Ja8LZd0oIqSuJlNgpl2LOCcZuSX6y6YRQt-Xe7bl3mHu35d5tzk9undd-guH3i19BIyB3IOPVjNH-Wfpfrj8BmbW8vA</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Cheng, Tao</creator><creator>Zhao, Song</creator><creator>Peng, Xiaochun</creator><creator>Zhang, Xianlong</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?</title><author>Cheng, Tao ; Zhao, Song ; Peng, Xiaochun ; Zhang, Xianlong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-1dc7255be75563e499e96cecda71bd2765470270fcc5b55aecf6f283eb68e4973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>CAS</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Computer assisted surgery</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prosthesis Fitting</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xiaochun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xianlong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Tao</au><au>Zhao, Song</au><au>Peng, Xiaochun</au><au>Zhang, Xianlong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><stitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</stitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1322</epage><pages>1307-1322</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Purpose Computer-assisted surgery has been proposed as a technique to improve implant alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is still a debate over the accuracy of placing the femoral and tibial components using computer-assisted systems in TKA. The aim of this study is to establish whether computer-assisted surgery leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning than conventional technique in patients with primary TKA. Methods Major electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies without language restriction. A meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs was performed in a random effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted by type of navigation system to explore the clinical heterogeneity between these trials. The following radiographic parameters were used to compare computer-assisted surgery with conventional technique: (1) mechanical leg axis, (2) femoral component coronal alignment, (3) tibial component coronal alignment, (4) femoral component sagittal alignment, and (5) tibial component sagittal alignment. Results For the mechanical leg axis and coronal positioning of femoral and tibial components, there are statistically significant reductions in the number of patients with malalignment in the CAS group if the outlier cutoff value is ±3 or 2° in the coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrates that CT-free navigation systems provide better alignment than conventional techniques in the coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral components within ±3 and 2°. If the outlier cutoff value for the tibial sagittal alignment is ±2°, the outlier percentages are higher in the CT-free navigation group than in the conventional group. However, there was no significant difference in the tibial sagittal alignment at ±3°. Conclusion Computer-assisted surgery does improve mechanical leg axis and component orientation in TKAs. However, high-quality RCTs are necessary to determine whether surgeons could use computer-assisted techniques to achieve a targeted tibial slope in TKA. Level of evidence Therapeutic study (Systematic review of Level I/II studies), Level II.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>21732057</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0942-2056
ispartof Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2012-07, Vol.20 (7), p.1307-1322
issn 0942-2056
1433-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024662714
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Accuracy
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Bone surgery
CAS
Clinical trials
Computer assisted surgery
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Hospitals
Humans
Joint replacement surgery
Knee
Knee Prosthesis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Navigation systems
Orthopedics
Prosthesis Fitting
Radiography, Interventional
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Surgeons
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Systematic review
Tibia - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T05%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20computer-assisted%20surgery%20improve%20postoperative%20leg%20alignment%20and%20implant%20positioning%20following%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty?%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials?&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Cheng,%20Tao&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1322&rft.pages=1307-1322&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-011-1588-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024662714%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021112632&rft_id=info:pmid/21732057&rfr_iscdi=true