Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?

We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have publis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2012-07, Vol.423 (3), p.2966-2976
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, R. J., Jeffries, R. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2976
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2966
container_title Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
container_volume 423
creator Jackson, R. J.
Jeffries, R. D.
description We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024662048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1024662048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-2324928be45e41f2ed7c3ada32f3ca3904e39a161a10a1fafc92d332e5a925e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_IeDFS2vyfWm3XBQRp8JUEMVjiG1qW9pmNi1b_73pJh4Uc0lInvfly0MI5Szkfp2XIcc4CkDGcQiMQwj-VoabPTL5edgnE8YwCuYzzg_JkXMlY0wgxBOyeMsHmlrqbG3oYPvmgybWVtR1unXU5XZN3cp2tLZpX-musA1d50VlqO1y4wkfbWx3eUwOMl05c_K9T8nr4ubl-i5YPt3eX18tg0QAkwEgCAnzdyMiI3gGJp0lqFONkGGiUTJhUGoec82Z5pnOEgkpIphIS4gMwyk52_WuWvvZG9epunCJqSrdGNs7xRmIOAYm5h49_YWWtm8bP91IccaRS-Gpix219p8a1Kotat0OnlCjXVWqUaIaJarRrtraVRv18Pi8PfoC3BXYfvVPPPgTxy9ZsH3H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021013194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Jackson, R. J. ; Jeffries, R. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, R. J. ; Jeffries, R. D.</creatorcontrib><description>We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 &lt; M/M⊙ &lt; 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516 ; Stars &amp; galaxies ; stars: low‐mass ; stars: magnetic field ; stars: rotation</subject><ispartof>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012-07, Vol.423 (3), p.2966-2976</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS 2012</rights><rights>2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-2324928be45e41f2ed7c3ada32f3ca3904e39a161a10a1fafc92d332e5a925e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2012.21119.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2012.21119.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffries, R. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</title><title>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</title><addtitle>Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</addtitle><description>We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 &lt; M/M⊙ &lt; 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516</subject><subject>Stars &amp; galaxies</subject><subject>stars: low‐mass</subject><subject>stars: magnetic field</subject><subject>stars: rotation</subject><issn>0035-8711</issn><issn>1365-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_IeDFS2vyfWm3XBQRp8JUEMVjiG1qW9pmNi1b_73pJh4Uc0lInvfly0MI5Szkfp2XIcc4CkDGcQiMQwj-VoabPTL5edgnE8YwCuYzzg_JkXMlY0wgxBOyeMsHmlrqbG3oYPvmgybWVtR1unXU5XZN3cp2tLZpX-musA1d50VlqO1y4wkfbWx3eUwOMl05c_K9T8nr4ubl-i5YPt3eX18tg0QAkwEgCAnzdyMiI3gGJp0lqFONkGGiUTJhUGoec82Z5pnOEgkpIphIS4gMwyk52_WuWvvZG9epunCJqSrdGNs7xRmIOAYm5h49_YWWtm8bP91IccaRS-Gpix219p8a1Kotat0OnlCjXVWqUaIaJarRrtraVRv18Pi8PfoC3BXYfvVPPPgTxy9ZsH3H</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Jackson, R. J.</creator><creator>Jeffries, R. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</title><author>Jackson, R. J. ; Jeffries, R. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-2324928be45e41f2ed7c3ada32f3ca3904e39a161a10a1fafc92d332e5a925e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516</topic><topic>Stars &amp; galaxies</topic><topic>stars: low‐mass</topic><topic>stars: magnetic field</topic><topic>stars: rotation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffries, R. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, R. J.</au><au>Jeffries, R. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</atitle><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle><stitle>Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</stitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>423</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2966</spage><epage>2976</epage><pages>2966-2976</pages><issn>0035-8711</issn><eissn>1365-2966</eissn><abstract>We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 &lt; M/M⊙ &lt; 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8711
ispartof Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012-07, Vol.423 (3), p.2966-2976
issn 0035-8711
1365-2966
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024662048
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Astrophysics
open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516
Stars & galaxies
stars: low‐mass
stars: magnetic field
stars: rotation
title Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A07%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20some%20young%20cool%20stars%20show%20spot%20modulation%20while%20others%20do%20not?&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20notices%20of%20the%20Royal%20Astronomical%20Society&rft.au=Jackson,%20R.%20J.&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=423&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2966&rft.epage=2976&rft.pages=2966-2976&rft.issn=0035-8711&rft.eissn=1365-2966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1024662048%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021013194&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x&rfr_iscdi=true