Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?
We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have publis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2012-07, Vol.423 (3), p.2966-2976 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2976 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2966 |
container_title | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
container_volume | 423 |
creator | Jackson, R. J. Jeffries, R. D. |
description | We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024662048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1024662048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-2324928be45e41f2ed7c3ada32f3ca3904e39a161a10a1fafc92d332e5a925e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_IeDFS2vyfWm3XBQRp8JUEMVjiG1qW9pmNi1b_73pJh4Uc0lInvfly0MI5Szkfp2XIcc4CkDGcQiMQwj-VoabPTL5edgnE8YwCuYzzg_JkXMlY0wgxBOyeMsHmlrqbG3oYPvmgybWVtR1unXU5XZN3cp2tLZpX-musA1d50VlqO1y4wkfbWx3eUwOMl05c_K9T8nr4ubl-i5YPt3eX18tg0QAkwEgCAnzdyMiI3gGJp0lqFONkGGiUTJhUGoec82Z5pnOEgkpIphIS4gMwyk52_WuWvvZG9epunCJqSrdGNs7xRmIOAYm5h49_YWWtm8bP91IccaRS-Gpix219p8a1Kotat0OnlCjXVWqUaIaJarRrtraVRv18Pi8PfoC3BXYfvVPPPgTxy9ZsH3H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1021013194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Jackson, R. J. ; Jeffries, R. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, R. J. ; Jeffries, R. D.</creatorcontrib><description>We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516 ; Stars & galaxies ; stars: low‐mass ; stars: magnetic field ; stars: rotation</subject><ispartof>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012-07, Vol.423 (3), p.2966-2976</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS 2012</rights><rights>2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-2324928be45e41f2ed7c3ada32f3ca3904e39a161a10a1fafc92d332e5a925e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2012.21119.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2012.21119.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffries, R. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</title><title>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</title><addtitle>Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</addtitle><description>We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516</subject><subject>Stars & galaxies</subject><subject>stars: low‐mass</subject><subject>stars: magnetic field</subject><subject>stars: rotation</subject><issn>0035-8711</issn><issn>1365-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf_IeDFS2vyfWm3XBQRp8JUEMVjiG1qW9pmNi1b_73pJh4Uc0lInvfly0MI5Szkfp2XIcc4CkDGcQiMQwj-VoabPTL5edgnE8YwCuYzzg_JkXMlY0wgxBOyeMsHmlrqbG3oYPvmgybWVtR1unXU5XZN3cp2tLZpX-musA1d50VlqO1y4wkfbWx3eUwOMl05c_K9T8nr4ubl-i5YPt3eX18tg0QAkwEgCAnzdyMiI3gGJp0lqFONkGGiUTJhUGoec82Z5pnOEgkpIphIS4gMwyk52_WuWvvZG9epunCJqSrdGNs7xRmIOAYm5h49_YWWtm8bP91IccaRS-Gpix219p8a1Kotat0OnlCjXVWqUaIaJarRrtraVRv18Pi8PfoC3BXYfvVPPPgTxy9ZsH3H</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Jackson, R. J.</creator><creator>Jeffries, R. D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</title><author>Jackson, R. J. ; Jeffries, R. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4209-2324928be45e41f2ed7c3ada32f3ca3904e39a161a10a1fafc92d332e5a925e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516</topic><topic>Stars & galaxies</topic><topic>stars: low‐mass</topic><topic>stars: magnetic field</topic><topic>stars: rotation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, R. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffries, R. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, R. J.</au><au>Jeffries, R. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not?</atitle><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle><stitle>Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</stitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>423</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2966</spage><epage>2976</epage><pages>2966-2976</pages><issn>0035-8711</issn><eissn>1365-2966</eissn><abstract>We present far-red, intermediate-resolution spectroscopy of 572 photometrically selected, low-mass stars (0.2 < M/M⊙ < 0.7) in the young open cluster NGC 2516, using the FLAMES spectrograph at the Very Large Telescope. Precise radial velocities confirm membership for 210 stars that have published rotation periods from spot-modulated light curves and for another 144 stars in which periodic modulation could not be found. The two subsamples are compared and no significant differences are found between their positions in colour-magnitude diagrams, the distribution of their projected equatorial velocities or their levels of chromospheric activity. We rule out differing observational sensitivity as an explanation and conclude that otherwise similar objects, with equally high levels of chromospheric activity, do not exhibit spot-induced light-curve modulation because their significant spot coverage is highly axisymmetric. We propose that the spot coverage consists of large numbers of small, dark spots with diameters of about 2°. This explains why about half of cluster members do not exhibit rotationally modulated light curves and why the light-curve amplitudes of those that do have mean values of only 0.01-0.02 mag.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8711 |
ispartof | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012-07, Vol.423 (3), p.2966-2976 |
issn | 0035-8711 1365-2966 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024662048 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Astrophysics open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2516 Stars & galaxies stars: low‐mass stars: magnetic field stars: rotation |
title | Why do some young cool stars show spot modulation while others do not? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A07%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20some%20young%20cool%20stars%20show%20spot%20modulation%20while%20others%20do%20not?&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20notices%20of%20the%20Royal%20Astronomical%20Society&rft.au=Jackson,%20R.%20J.&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=423&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2966&rft.epage=2976&rft.pages=2966-2976&rft.issn=0035-8711&rft.eissn=1365-2966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1024662048%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1021013194&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21119.x&rfr_iscdi=true |