Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation

Summary The sperm DNA quality as determined by chromatin integrity has been reported to be associated with in vivo and in vitro fertility. However, previous studies have evaluated preparation procedures to select motile, morphologically normal and mature spermatozoa, but not the spermatozoa with int...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Andrologia 2012-05, Vol.44 (s1), p.248-251
Hauptverfasser: Sauer, R., Coulam, C. B., Jeyendran, R. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 251
container_issue s1
container_start_page 248
container_title Andrologia
container_volume 44
creator Sauer, R.
Coulam, C. B.
Jeyendran, R. S.
description Summary The sperm DNA quality as determined by chromatin integrity has been reported to be associated with in vivo and in vitro fertility. However, previous studies have evaluated preparation procedures to select motile, morphologically normal and mature spermatozoa, but not the spermatozoa with intact sperm chromatin. To determine which technique yields a population of spermatozoa with improved DNA quality, split ejaculate was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC) procedure and glass wool column filtration (GWF) procedure. The processed samples were analysed for sperm DNA quality using the acridine orange staining method on flow cytometry. The GWF procedure decreases the percentage of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation resulting in more intact chromatin in the processed sample. There is a need to design a clinical study with GWF for assisted reproductive technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01171.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024657252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024657252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-b2d3f37d6deed3b75717884184d5112836c1e2d61fc7c37326f31befaaa6cb7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEoqvSV0A-cknI2I6dHDhUW1qKlnIBwc1yHCfx4sSLnbC7T8Br1-mWPTPS2KOZ_x9L_pIEQZ5BjPfbDCip0hxznOEcIIvJITu8SFbnwctklZOcpLRg1UVyFcI2j0ELzil9nVxgYGUFpFglf9e9d4OczIjMOEk1oX4e5IjCTvsBea3cH-2PyATUm67XHrXOWrc3Y4c6K0NAe-csUs7Ow4haYycfd7kRyRCbw0563aC9mXrU6DGY6Yg6LxujxwmpeHjTzt2T4U3yqpU26Kvn-zL5fvvx2_pTuvl6d7--3qSKUoC0xg1pCW9Yo3VDal5w4GVJoaRNAYBLwhRo3DBoFVeEE8xaArVupZRM1bF1mbw77d1593vWYRKDCUpbK0ft5iAgx5QVHBf4P6QQ3wNWkSh9-yyd60E3YufNIP1R_PvnKPhwEuyN1cfzHHKxIBVbsZATCzmxIBVPSMVBXD_cLFX0pye_CZM-nP3S_xKME16IHw93gm_K6vbm5xfxmTwCurul7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1018361693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Sauer, R. ; Coulam, C. B. ; Jeyendran, R. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauer, R. ; Coulam, C. B. ; Jeyendran, R. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary The sperm DNA quality as determined by chromatin integrity has been reported to be associated with in vivo and in vitro fertility. However, previous studies have evaluated preparation procedures to select motile, morphologically normal and mature spermatozoa, but not the spermatozoa with intact sperm chromatin. To determine which technique yields a population of spermatozoa with improved DNA quality, split ejaculate was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC) procedure and glass wool column filtration (GWF) procedure. The processed samples were analysed for sperm DNA quality using the acridine orange staining method on flow cytometry. The GWF procedure decreases the percentage of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation resulting in more intact chromatin in the processed sample. There is a need to design a clinical study with GWF for assisted reproductive technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-4569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0272</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01171.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21689135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acridine orange ; Centrifugation ; Centrifugation - methods ; Chromatin ; Chromatin - metabolism ; density gradient centrifugation ; Density gradients ; DNA - metabolism ; DNA fragmentation ; Fertility ; Filtration ; Filtration - instrumentation ; Flow Cytometry ; Glass wool ; glass wool column filtration ; Humans ; Male ; Reproduction ; Sperm ; spermatozoa ; Spermatozoa - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Andrologia, 2012-05, Vol.44 (s1), p.248-251</ispartof><rights>2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-b2d3f37d6deed3b75717884184d5112836c1e2d61fc7c37326f31befaaa6cb7c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0272.2011.01171.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0272.2011.01171.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21689135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulam, C. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeyendran, R. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation</title><title>Andrologia</title><addtitle>Andrologia</addtitle><description>Summary The sperm DNA quality as determined by chromatin integrity has been reported to be associated with in vivo and in vitro fertility. However, previous studies have evaluated preparation procedures to select motile, morphologically normal and mature spermatozoa, but not the spermatozoa with intact sperm chromatin. To determine which technique yields a population of spermatozoa with improved DNA quality, split ejaculate was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC) procedure and glass wool column filtration (GWF) procedure. The processed samples were analysed for sperm DNA quality using the acridine orange staining method on flow cytometry. The GWF procedure decreases the percentage of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation resulting in more intact chromatin in the processed sample. There is a need to design a clinical study with GWF for assisted reproductive technology.</description><subject>Acridine orange</subject><subject>Centrifugation</subject><subject>Centrifugation - methods</subject><subject>Chromatin</subject><subject>Chromatin - metabolism</subject><subject>density gradient centrifugation</subject><subject>Density gradients</subject><subject>DNA - metabolism</subject><subject>DNA fragmentation</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Filtration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Glass wool</subject><subject>glass wool column filtration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>spermatozoa</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - metabolism</subject><issn>0303-4569</issn><issn>1439-0272</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAQhiMEoqvSV0A-cknI2I6dHDhUW1qKlnIBwc1yHCfx4sSLnbC7T8Br1-mWPTPS2KOZ_x9L_pIEQZ5BjPfbDCip0hxznOEcIIvJITu8SFbnwctklZOcpLRg1UVyFcI2j0ELzil9nVxgYGUFpFglf9e9d4OczIjMOEk1oX4e5IjCTvsBea3cH-2PyATUm67XHrXOWrc3Y4c6K0NAe-csUs7Ow4haYycfd7kRyRCbw0563aC9mXrU6DGY6Yg6LxujxwmpeHjTzt2T4U3yqpU26Kvn-zL5fvvx2_pTuvl6d7--3qSKUoC0xg1pCW9Yo3VDal5w4GVJoaRNAYBLwhRo3DBoFVeEE8xaArVupZRM1bF1mbw77d1593vWYRKDCUpbK0ft5iAgx5QVHBf4P6QQ3wNWkSh9-yyd60E3YufNIP1R_PvnKPhwEuyN1cfzHHKxIBVbsZATCzmxIBVPSMVBXD_cLFX0pye_CZM-nP3S_xKME16IHw93gm_K6vbm5xfxmTwCurul7g</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Sauer, R.</creator><creator>Coulam, C. B.</creator><creator>Jeyendran, R. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation</title><author>Sauer, R. ; Coulam, C. B. ; Jeyendran, R. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4411-b2d3f37d6deed3b75717884184d5112836c1e2d61fc7c37326f31befaaa6cb7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acridine orange</topic><topic>Centrifugation</topic><topic>Centrifugation - methods</topic><topic>Chromatin</topic><topic>Chromatin - metabolism</topic><topic>density gradient centrifugation</topic><topic>Density gradients</topic><topic>DNA - metabolism</topic><topic>DNA fragmentation</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Filtration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Glass wool</topic><topic>glass wool column filtration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>spermatozoa</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulam, C. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeyendran, R. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Andrologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauer, R.</au><au>Coulam, C. B.</au><au>Jeyendran, R. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation</atitle><jtitle>Andrologia</jtitle><addtitle>Andrologia</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>248</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>248-251</pages><issn>0303-4569</issn><eissn>1439-0272</eissn><abstract>Summary The sperm DNA quality as determined by chromatin integrity has been reported to be associated with in vivo and in vitro fertility. However, previous studies have evaluated preparation procedures to select motile, morphologically normal and mature spermatozoa, but not the spermatozoa with intact sperm chromatin. To determine which technique yields a population of spermatozoa with improved DNA quality, split ejaculate was processed with density gradient centrifugation (DGC) procedure and glass wool column filtration (GWF) procedure. The processed samples were analysed for sperm DNA quality using the acridine orange staining method on flow cytometry. The GWF procedure decreases the percentage of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation resulting in more intact chromatin in the processed sample. There is a need to design a clinical study with GWF for assisted reproductive technology.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21689135</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01171.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-4569
ispartof Andrologia, 2012-05, Vol.44 (s1), p.248-251
issn 0303-4569
1439-0272
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024657252
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Acridine orange
Centrifugation
Centrifugation - methods
Chromatin
Chromatin - metabolism
density gradient centrifugation
Density gradients
DNA - metabolism
DNA fragmentation
Fertility
Filtration
Filtration - instrumentation
Flow Cytometry
Glass wool
glass wool column filtration
Humans
Male
Reproduction
Sperm
spermatozoa
Spermatozoa - metabolism
title Chromatin intact human sperm recovery is higher following glass wool column filtration as compared with density gradient centrifugation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A09%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chromatin%20intact%20human%20sperm%20recovery%20is%20higher%20following%20glass%20wool%20column%20filtration%20as%20compared%20with%20density%20gradient%20centrifugation&rft.jtitle=Andrologia&rft.au=Sauer,%20R.&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=248-251&rft.issn=0303-4569&rft.eissn=1439-0272&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01171.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1024657252%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1018361693&rft_id=info:pmid/21689135&rfr_iscdi=true