Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat
In habitats where prey is either rare or difficult to predict spatiotemporally, such as open habitats, predators must be adapted to react effectively to variations in prey abundance. Open-habitat foraging bats have a wing morphology adapted for covering long distances, possibly use information trans...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 2012-07, Vol.169 (3), p.673-684 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 684 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 673 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 169 |
creator | Müller, Jörg Mehr, Milenka Bässler, Claus Fenton, M. Brock Hothorn, Torsten Pretzsch, Hans Klemmt, Hans-Joachim Brandl, Roland |
description | In habitats where prey is either rare or difficult to predict spatiotemporally, such as open habitats, predators must be adapted to react effectively to variations in prey abundance. Open-habitat foraging bats have a wing morphology adapted for covering long distances, possibly use information transfer to locate patches of high prey abundance, and would therefore be expected to show an aggregative response at these patches. Here, we examined the effects of prey abundance on foraging activities of open-habitat foragers in comparison to that of edge-habitat foragers and closed-habitat foragers. Bat activity was estimated by counting foraging calls recorded with bat call recorders (38,371 calls). Prey abundance was estimated concurrently at each site using light and pitfall traps. The habitat was characterized by terrestrial laser scanning. Prey abundance increased with vegetation density. As expected, recordings of open-habitat foragers clearly decreased with increasing vegetation density. The foraging activity of edge- and closed-habitat foragers was not significantly affected by the vegetation density, i.e., these guilds were able to forage from open habitats to habitats with dense vegetation. Only open-habitat foragers displayed a significant and proportional aggregative response to increasing prey abundance. Our results suggest that adaptations for effective and low-cost foraging constrains habitat use and excludes the guild of open-habitat foragers from foraging in habitats with high prey abundance, such as dense forest stands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00442-011-2247-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024652339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356808784</galeid><jstor_id>23259724</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A356808784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-84ca5f89ac05830c6c39b25e41a8230d8f1f07ffc538ad01f766513d91d092ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEUhYMoTk_rD3ChFLgZFzXem0dVMq6awcfAgOBjHVKppKymu6pNUoP9701bo2OLgmRxIfnOIYd7CHmCcI4A9csIwDktAbGklNfl_h5ZIGe0RMXUfbIAoKqUgqsTchrjGgA5CvGQnFBKUSrOF-TVquuC60zqb1wRXNyNQ3RFPxSNSfGi2AW3L0wzDa0ZrCtuXIhTLL6Ypk8mPSIPvNlE9_h2LsnnN68_Xb4rr9-_vbpcXZdW1FUqJbdGeKmMBSEZ2Moy1VDhOBpJGbTSo4faeyuYNC2gr6tKIGsVtqCo92xJzmbfXRi_Ti4mve2jdZuNGdw4RY1AeSUoY-p_UJCMsQoy-vwPdD1OYchBflAoOUO8ozqzcbof_JiCsQdTvWKikiDrDC7J-V-ofFq37e04ON_n-yPBiyNBZpL7ljozxaivPn44ZnFmbRhjDM7rXei3JuzzP_WhB3rugc490Ice6H3WPLsNNzVb1_5S_Fx8BugMxPw0dC78nv7frk9n0TqmMdyZMipUTTn7DmaLwoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020184311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Müller, Jörg ; Mehr, Milenka ; Bässler, Claus ; Fenton, M. Brock ; Hothorn, Torsten ; Pretzsch, Hans ; Klemmt, Hans-Joachim ; Brandl, Roland</creator><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg ; Mehr, Milenka ; Bässler, Claus ; Fenton, M. Brock ; Hothorn, Torsten ; Pretzsch, Hans ; Klemmt, Hans-Joachim ; Brandl, Roland</creatorcontrib><description>In habitats where prey is either rare or difficult to predict spatiotemporally, such as open habitats, predators must be adapted to react effectively to variations in prey abundance. Open-habitat foraging bats have a wing morphology adapted for covering long distances, possibly use information transfer to locate patches of high prey abundance, and would therefore be expected to show an aggregative response at these patches. Here, we examined the effects of prey abundance on foraging activities of open-habitat foragers in comparison to that of edge-habitat foragers and closed-habitat foragers. Bat activity was estimated by counting foraging calls recorded with bat call recorders (38,371 calls). Prey abundance was estimated concurrently at each site using light and pitfall traps. The habitat was characterized by terrestrial laser scanning. Prey abundance increased with vegetation density. As expected, recordings of open-habitat foragers clearly decreased with increasing vegetation density. The foraging activity of edge- and closed-habitat foragers was not significantly affected by the vegetation density, i.e., these guilds were able to forage from open habitats to habitats with dense vegetation. Only open-habitat foragers displayed a significant and proportional aggregative response to increasing prey abundance. Our results suggest that adaptations for effective and low-cost foraging constrains habitat use and excludes the guild of open-habitat foragers from foraging in habitats with high prey abundance, such as dense forest stands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2247-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22218944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Adaptability ; Adaptations ; Animal traps ; Animals ; Bats ; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY ; Behavioral ecology - Original research ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chiroptera ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Enumeration ; Feeding Behavior ; Forage ; Foraging ; Foraging behavior ; Forest habitats ; Forest stands ; Forests ; Germany ; Guilds ; Habitat ; Habitat utilization ; Habitats ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Life Sciences ; Montane forests ; Pitfall traps ; Plant Sciences ; Population Density ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior ; Prey ; Vegetation ; Vocalization behavior ; Wildlife habitats ; Wings</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2012-07, Vol.169 (3), p.673-684</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-84ca5f89ac05830c6c39b25e41a8230d8f1f07ffc538ad01f766513d91d092ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-84ca5f89ac05830c6c39b25e41a8230d8f1f07ffc538ad01f766513d91d092ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23259724$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23259724$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22218944$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehr, Milenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bässler, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, M. Brock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hothorn, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretzsch, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemmt, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandl, Roland</creatorcontrib><title>Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>In habitats where prey is either rare or difficult to predict spatiotemporally, such as open habitats, predators must be adapted to react effectively to variations in prey abundance. Open-habitat foraging bats have a wing morphology adapted for covering long distances, possibly use information transfer to locate patches of high prey abundance, and would therefore be expected to show an aggregative response at these patches. Here, we examined the effects of prey abundance on foraging activities of open-habitat foragers in comparison to that of edge-habitat foragers and closed-habitat foragers. Bat activity was estimated by counting foraging calls recorded with bat call recorders (38,371 calls). Prey abundance was estimated concurrently at each site using light and pitfall traps. The habitat was characterized by terrestrial laser scanning. Prey abundance increased with vegetation density. As expected, recordings of open-habitat foragers clearly decreased with increasing vegetation density. The foraging activity of edge- and closed-habitat foragers was not significantly affected by the vegetation density, i.e., these guilds were able to forage from open habitats to habitats with dense vegetation. Only open-habitat foragers displayed a significant and proportional aggregative response to increasing prey abundance. Our results suggest that adaptations for effective and low-cost foraging constrains habitat use and excludes the guild of open-habitat foragers from foraging in habitats with high prey abundance, such as dense forest stands.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Adaptations</subject><subject>Animal traps</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY</subject><subject>Behavioral ecology - Original research</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Enumeration</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forest stands</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Guilds</subject><subject>Habitat</subject><subject>Habitat utilization</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Montane forests</subject><subject>Pitfall traps</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vocalization behavior</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wings</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEUhYMoTk_rD3ChFLgZFzXem0dVMq6awcfAgOBjHVKppKymu6pNUoP9701bo2OLgmRxIfnOIYd7CHmCcI4A9csIwDktAbGklNfl_h5ZIGe0RMXUfbIAoKqUgqsTchrjGgA5CvGQnFBKUSrOF-TVquuC60zqb1wRXNyNQ3RFPxSNSfGi2AW3L0wzDa0ZrCtuXIhTLL6Ypk8mPSIPvNlE9_h2LsnnN68_Xb4rr9-_vbpcXZdW1FUqJbdGeKmMBSEZ2Moy1VDhOBpJGbTSo4faeyuYNC2gr6tKIGsVtqCo92xJzmbfXRi_Ti4mve2jdZuNGdw4RY1AeSUoY-p_UJCMsQoy-vwPdD1OYchBflAoOUO8ozqzcbof_JiCsQdTvWKikiDrDC7J-V-ofFq37e04ON_n-yPBiyNBZpL7ljozxaivPn44ZnFmbRhjDM7rXei3JuzzP_WhB3rugc490Ice6H3WPLsNNzVb1_5S_Fx8BugMxPw0dC78nv7frk9n0TqmMdyZMipUTTn7DmaLwoQ</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Müller, Jörg</creator><creator>Mehr, Milenka</creator><creator>Bässler, Claus</creator><creator>Fenton, M. Brock</creator><creator>Hothorn, Torsten</creator><creator>Pretzsch, Hans</creator><creator>Klemmt, Hans-Joachim</creator><creator>Brandl, Roland</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat</title><author>Müller, Jörg ; Mehr, Milenka ; Bässler, Claus ; Fenton, M. Brock ; Hothorn, Torsten ; Pretzsch, Hans ; Klemmt, Hans-Joachim ; Brandl, Roland</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c576t-84ca5f89ac05830c6c39b25e41a8230d8f1f07ffc538ad01f766513d91d092ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Adaptations</topic><topic>Animal traps</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY</topic><topic>Behavioral ecology - Original research</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Enumeration</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forest stands</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Guilds</topic><topic>Habitat</topic><topic>Habitat utilization</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Montane forests</topic><topic>Pitfall traps</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vocalization behavior</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Müller, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehr, Milenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bässler, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, M. Brock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hothorn, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretzsch, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemmt, Hans-Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandl, Roland</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Müller, Jörg</au><au>Mehr, Milenka</au><au>Bässler, Claus</au><au>Fenton, M. Brock</au><au>Hothorn, Torsten</au><au>Pretzsch, Hans</au><au>Klemmt, Hans-Joachim</au><au>Brandl, Roland</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>684</epage><pages>673-684</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>In habitats where prey is either rare or difficult to predict spatiotemporally, such as open habitats, predators must be adapted to react effectively to variations in prey abundance. Open-habitat foraging bats have a wing morphology adapted for covering long distances, possibly use information transfer to locate patches of high prey abundance, and would therefore be expected to show an aggregative response at these patches. Here, we examined the effects of prey abundance on foraging activities of open-habitat foragers in comparison to that of edge-habitat foragers and closed-habitat foragers. Bat activity was estimated by counting foraging calls recorded with bat call recorders (38,371 calls). Prey abundance was estimated concurrently at each site using light and pitfall traps. The habitat was characterized by terrestrial laser scanning. Prey abundance increased with vegetation density. As expected, recordings of open-habitat foragers clearly decreased with increasing vegetation density. The foraging activity of edge- and closed-habitat foragers was not significantly affected by the vegetation density, i.e., these guilds were able to forage from open habitats to habitats with dense vegetation. Only open-habitat foragers displayed a significant and proportional aggregative response to increasing prey abundance. Our results suggest that adaptations for effective and low-cost foraging constrains habitat use and excludes the guild of open-habitat foragers from foraging in habitats with high prey abundance, such as dense forest stands.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>22218944</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-011-2247-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2012-07, Vol.169 (3), p.673-684 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024652339 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abundance Adaptability Adaptations Animal traps Animals Bats BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY Behavioral ecology - Original research Biomedical and Life Sciences Chiroptera Ecology Ecosystem Enumeration Feeding Behavior Forage Foraging Foraging behavior Forest habitats Forest stands Forests Germany Guilds Habitat Habitat utilization Habitats Hydrology/Water Resources Life Sciences Montane forests Pitfall traps Plant Sciences Population Density Predators Predatory Behavior Prey Vegetation Vocalization behavior Wildlife habitats Wings |
title | Aggregative response in bats: prey abundance versus habitat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A17%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aggregative%20response%20in%20bats:%20prey%20abundance%20versus%20habitat&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=M%C3%BCller,%20J%C3%B6rg&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=684&rft.pages=673-684&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-011-2247-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA356808784%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020184311&rft_id=info:pmid/22218944&rft_galeid=A356808784&rft_jstor_id=23259724&rfr_iscdi=true |