Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard

Mountain ungulates around the world have been threatened by illegal hunting, habitat modification, increased livestock grazing, disease and development. Mountain ungulates play an important functional role in grasslands as primary consumers and as prey for wild carnivores, and monitoring of their po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oecologia 2012-07, Vol.169 (3), p.581-590
Hauptverfasser: Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R., Bhatnagar, Yash Veer, Mishra, Charudutt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 590
container_issue 3
container_start_page 581
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 169
creator Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R.
Bhatnagar, Yash Veer
Mishra, Charudutt
description Mountain ungulates around the world have been threatened by illegal hunting, habitat modification, increased livestock grazing, disease and development. Mountain ungulates play an important functional role in grasslands as primary consumers and as prey for wild carnivores, and monitoring of their populations is important for conservation purposes. However, most of the several currently available methods of estimating wild ungulate abundance are either difficult to implement or too expensive for mountainous terrain. A rigorous method of sampling ungulate abundance in mountainous areas that can allow for some measure of sampling error is therefore much needed. To this end, we used a combination of field data and computer simulations to test the critical assumptions associated with double-observer technique based on capture—recapture theory. The technique was modified and adapted to estimate the populations of bharal (Pseudois nayaur) and ibex (Capra sibirica) at five different sites. Conducting the two double-observer surveys simultaneously led to underestimation of the population by 15%. We therefore recommend separating the surveys in space or time. The overall detection probability for the two observers was 0.74 and 0.79. Our surveys estimated mountain ungulate populations (±95% confidence interval) of 735 (±44), 580 (±46), 509 (±53), 184 (±40) and 30 (±14) individuals at the five sites, respectively. A detection probability of 0.75 was found to be sufficient to detect a change of 20% in populations of >420 individuals. Based on these results, we believe that this method is sufficiently precise for scientific and conservation purposes and therefore recommend the use of the double-observer approach (with the two surveys separated in time or space) for the estimation and monitoring of mountain ungulate populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00442-011-2237-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024652173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A356808776</galeid><jstor_id>23259716</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A356808776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-3ffd22ed625dcf8592a60295006e31bad6d3bda60ed9ab896185441035bffbc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt1r1jAYxYso7nX6B3ihBLzRi858t70cw4_BQHB6HdLmSdeXNnlN0un21y9dp_MVBclFIPmdk-eQUxTPCT4iGFdvI8ac0xITUlLKqhI_KDaEM1qShjUPiw3GtClrwZuD4kmMW4wJJ0I8Lg5oxgmr2KZI50k7o4MZrgfXo3QByPi5HaH0bYRwCQHFOW9XaIJ04Q2yPiCIaZh0WgSTn13Sg0Oz6-dRJ0C7kGFvb60gW7seAhgUnf-ORvC7_NbT4pHVY4Rnd_th8fX9uy8nH8uzTx9OT47Pyk40PJXMWkMpGEmF6WwtGqplTiQwlsBIq400rDX5DEyj27qRJGflBDPRWtt2kh0Wr1ffXfDf5jy1mobYwThqB36OimDKpaCkYv-D4ppxyeqMvvoD3fo5uBzkliI151jcU70eQQ3O-hR0t5iqYyZkjeuqWiY8-guVl4Fp6LwDO-TzPcGbPUFmEvxIvZ5jVKfnn_dZsrJd8DEGsGoX8r-FqzynWgqk1gKpXCC1FEjhrHl5F25uJzC_FD8bkwG6AjFfLX_7e_p_u75YRduYfLg3ZVQ0FZHsBjyl2Hc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1020184405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R. ; Bhatnagar, Yash Veer ; Mishra, Charudutt</creator><creatorcontrib>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R. ; Bhatnagar, Yash Veer ; Mishra, Charudutt</creatorcontrib><description>Mountain ungulates around the world have been threatened by illegal hunting, habitat modification, increased livestock grazing, disease and development. Mountain ungulates play an important functional role in grasslands as primary consumers and as prey for wild carnivores, and monitoring of their populations is important for conservation purposes. However, most of the several currently available methods of estimating wild ungulate abundance are either difficult to implement or too expensive for mountainous terrain. A rigorous method of sampling ungulate abundance in mountainous areas that can allow for some measure of sampling error is therefore much needed. To this end, we used a combination of field data and computer simulations to test the critical assumptions associated with double-observer technique based on capture—recapture theory. The technique was modified and adapted to estimate the populations of bharal (Pseudois nayaur) and ibex (Capra sibirica) at five different sites. Conducting the two double-observer surveys simultaneously led to underestimation of the population by 15%. We therefore recommend separating the surveys in space or time. The overall detection probability for the two observers was 0.74 and 0.79. Our surveys estimated mountain ungulate populations (±95% confidence interval) of 735 (±44), 580 (±46), 509 (±53), 184 (±40) and 30 (±14) individuals at the five sites, respectively. A detection probability of 0.75 was found to be sufficient to detect a change of 20% in populations of &gt;420 individuals. Based on these results, we believe that this method is sufficiently precise for scientific and conservation purposes and therefore recommend the use of the double-observer approach (with the two surveys separated in time or space) for the estimation and monitoring of mountain ungulate populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2237-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22231373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animal diseases ; Animals ; Antelopes ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Capra ; Carnivores ; Computer simulation ; Computer-generated environments ; Conservation ; Consumers ; Data processing ; Density estimation ; Ecology ; Ecology - methods ; Estimation methods ; Felidae ; Food Chain ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; Habitat ; Hunting ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; India ; Interval estimators ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Mathematical models ; METHODS ; Mountain regions ; Mountains ; Plant Sciences ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population Density ; Population dynamics ; Population estimates ; Population size ; Predatory Behavior ; Prey ; Sampling ; Simulation ; Snow ; Space based observatories ; Ungulates ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2012-07, Vol.169 (3), p.581-590</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-3ffd22ed625dcf8592a60295006e31bad6d3bda60ed9ab896185441035bffbc63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-3ffd22ed625dcf8592a60295006e31bad6d3bda60ed9ab896185441035bffbc63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23259716$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23259716$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22231373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Yash Veer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Charudutt</creatorcontrib><title>Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>Mountain ungulates around the world have been threatened by illegal hunting, habitat modification, increased livestock grazing, disease and development. Mountain ungulates play an important functional role in grasslands as primary consumers and as prey for wild carnivores, and monitoring of their populations is important for conservation purposes. However, most of the several currently available methods of estimating wild ungulate abundance are either difficult to implement or too expensive for mountainous terrain. A rigorous method of sampling ungulate abundance in mountainous areas that can allow for some measure of sampling error is therefore much needed. To this end, we used a combination of field data and computer simulations to test the critical assumptions associated with double-observer technique based on capture—recapture theory. The technique was modified and adapted to estimate the populations of bharal (Pseudois nayaur) and ibex (Capra sibirica) at five different sites. Conducting the two double-observer surveys simultaneously led to underestimation of the population by 15%. We therefore recommend separating the surveys in space or time. The overall detection probability for the two observers was 0.74 and 0.79. Our surveys estimated mountain ungulate populations (±95% confidence interval) of 735 (±44), 580 (±46), 509 (±53), 184 (±40) and 30 (±14) individuals at the five sites, respectively. A detection probability of 0.75 was found to be sufficient to detect a change of 20% in populations of &gt;420 individuals. Based on these results, we believe that this method is sufficiently precise for scientific and conservation purposes and therefore recommend the use of the double-observer approach (with the two surveys separated in time or space) for the estimation and monitoring of mountain ungulate populations.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antelopes</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Capra</subject><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computer-generated environments</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Density estimation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology - methods</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Felidae</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Habitat</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Interval estimators</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>METHODS</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Space based observatories</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt1r1jAYxYso7nX6B3ihBLzRi858t70cw4_BQHB6HdLmSdeXNnlN0un21y9dp_MVBclFIPmdk-eQUxTPCT4iGFdvI8ac0xITUlLKqhI_KDaEM1qShjUPiw3GtClrwZuD4kmMW4wJJ0I8Lg5oxgmr2KZI50k7o4MZrgfXo3QByPi5HaH0bYRwCQHFOW9XaIJ04Q2yPiCIaZh0WgSTn13Sg0Oz6-dRJ0C7kGFvb60gW7seAhgUnf-ORvC7_NbT4pHVY4Rnd_th8fX9uy8nH8uzTx9OT47Pyk40PJXMWkMpGEmF6WwtGqplTiQwlsBIq400rDX5DEyj27qRJGflBDPRWtt2kh0Wr1ffXfDf5jy1mobYwThqB36OimDKpaCkYv-D4ppxyeqMvvoD3fo5uBzkliI151jcU70eQQ3O-hR0t5iqYyZkjeuqWiY8-guVl4Fp6LwDO-TzPcGbPUFmEvxIvZ5jVKfnn_dZsrJd8DEGsGoX8r-FqzynWgqk1gKpXCC1FEjhrHl5F25uJzC_FD8bkwG6AjFfLX_7e_p_u75YRduYfLg3ZVQ0FZHsBjyl2Hc</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R.</creator><creator>Bhatnagar, Yash Veer</creator><creator>Mishra, Charudutt</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard</title><author>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R. ; Bhatnagar, Yash Veer ; Mishra, Charudutt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c594t-3ffd22ed625dcf8592a60295006e31bad6d3bda60ed9ab896185441035bffbc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antelopes</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Capra</topic><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computer-generated environments</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Density estimation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology - methods</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Felidae</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Habitat</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Interval estimators</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>METHODS</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Space based observatories</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatnagar, Yash Veer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, Charudutt</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suryawanshi, Kulbhushansingh R.</au><au>Bhatnagar, Yash Veer</au><au>Mishra, Charudutt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><stitle>Oecologia</stitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>581-590</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><abstract>Mountain ungulates around the world have been threatened by illegal hunting, habitat modification, increased livestock grazing, disease and development. Mountain ungulates play an important functional role in grasslands as primary consumers and as prey for wild carnivores, and monitoring of their populations is important for conservation purposes. However, most of the several currently available methods of estimating wild ungulate abundance are either difficult to implement or too expensive for mountainous terrain. A rigorous method of sampling ungulate abundance in mountainous areas that can allow for some measure of sampling error is therefore much needed. To this end, we used a combination of field data and computer simulations to test the critical assumptions associated with double-observer technique based on capture—recapture theory. The technique was modified and adapted to estimate the populations of bharal (Pseudois nayaur) and ibex (Capra sibirica) at five different sites. Conducting the two double-observer surveys simultaneously led to underestimation of the population by 15%. We therefore recommend separating the surveys in space or time. The overall detection probability for the two observers was 0.74 and 0.79. Our surveys estimated mountain ungulate populations (±95% confidence interval) of 735 (±44), 580 (±46), 509 (±53), 184 (±40) and 30 (±14) individuals at the five sites, respectively. A detection probability of 0.75 was found to be sufficient to detect a change of 20% in populations of &gt;420 individuals. Based on these results, we believe that this method is sufficiently precise for scientific and conservation purposes and therefore recommend the use of the double-observer approach (with the two surveys separated in time or space) for the estimation and monitoring of mountain ungulate populations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>22231373</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00442-011-2237-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 2012-07, Vol.169 (3), p.581-590
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024652173
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abundance
Animal diseases
Animals
Antelopes
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Capra
Carnivores
Computer simulation
Computer-generated environments
Conservation
Consumers
Data processing
Density estimation
Ecology
Ecology - methods
Estimation methods
Felidae
Food Chain
Grasslands
Grazing
Habitat
Hunting
Hydrology/Water Resources
India
Interval estimators
Life Sciences
Livestock
Mathematical models
METHODS
Mountain regions
Mountains
Plant Sciences
Polls & surveys
Population Density
Population dynamics
Population estimates
Population size
Predatory Behavior
Prey
Sampling
Simulation
Snow
Space based observatories
Ungulates
Wildlife conservation
title Standardizing the double-observer survey method for estimating mountain ungulate prey of the endangered snow leopard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standardizing%20the%20double-observer%20survey%20method%20for%20estimating%20mountain%20ungulate%20prey%20of%20the%20endangered%20snow%20leopard&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Suryawanshi,%20Kulbhushansingh%20R.&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=581-590&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00442-011-2237-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA356808776%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1020184405&rft_id=info:pmid/22231373&rft_galeid=A356808776&rft_jstor_id=23259716&rfr_iscdi=true