Reexamination of ionospheric photochemistry
This paper reexamines the chemistry of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ by comparing densities from a photochemical model with data from the Atmosphere Explorer C satellite. These comparisons show that the measurements of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ density are well modeled with up‐to‐date reaction rates, solar EUV...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 2011-08, Vol.116 (A8), p.n/a |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | A8 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics |
| container_volume | 116 |
| creator | Richards, P. G. |
| description | This paper reexamines the chemistry of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ by comparing densities from a photochemical model with data from the Atmosphere Explorer C satellite. These comparisons show that the measurements of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ density are well modeled with up‐to‐date reaction rates, solar EUV irradiances, and photoelectron fluxes. In particular, this study has resolved a long‐standing problem wherein the previous investigations overestimated the measured N2+ density by a factor of 2. A new method of determining the important and controversial O+(2D) + N2 reaction rate from the Atmosphere Explorer C data is presented. This reaction rate determination agrees well with the latest laboratory measured reaction rate.
Key Points
The ionospheric ion densities are well modeled
The ionospheric ion densities are compatible with model solar EUV fluxes
The aeronomically determined reaction rates match laboratory measurements |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2011JA016613 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024647309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424481231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-3af65f389415a1fa5ef0950eb6e8786ee27bf6bd1c8e05b2a0537a4c5471245e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgChbtzgcouhF0NCf3WZZiq6VeKFqXIR3P0KltU5Mptm9vpCIiaDZn8_35k0PIEdALoCy_ZBSg36agFPAd0mAgVcYYZbukQUGYjDKm90kzxilNR0glKDTI2RBx7ebVwtWVX7R82UrDx-UEQ1W0lhNf-2KC8yrWYXNI9ko3i9j8mgfkqXv12LnOBve9m057kBWCSplxVypZcpMLkA5KJ7GkuaQ4Vmi0UYhMj0s1foHCIJVj5qjk2olCCg1MSOQH5HR77zL4txXG2qb-Amczt0C_ijZ9VyihOc0TPf5Fp34VFul11hjOjBCGJ3TyFwItlRRcACR1vlVF8DEGLO0yVHMXNqnvszK3PzecON_y92qGm3-t7feGbQZcyJTKtqm0UFx_p1x4tUpzLe3zXc-OusPu6HZg7AP_ABOYiJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1756543411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reexamination of ionospheric photochemistry</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Richards, P. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richards, P. G.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reexamines the chemistry of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ by comparing densities from a photochemical model with data from the Atmosphere Explorer C satellite. These comparisons show that the measurements of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ density are well modeled with up‐to‐date reaction rates, solar EUV irradiances, and photoelectron fluxes. In particular, this study has resolved a long‐standing problem wherein the previous investigations overestimated the measured N2+ density by a factor of 2. A new method of determining the important and controversial O+(2D) + N2 reaction rate from the Atmosphere Explorer C data is presented. This reaction rate determination agrees well with the latest laboratory measured reaction rate.
Key Points
The ionospheric ion densities are well modeled
The ionospheric ion densities are compatible with model solar EUV fluxes
The aeronomically determined reaction rates match laboratory measurements</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2011JA016613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; Atmospheric chemistry ; Atmospheric sciences ; ionosphere ; Laboratories ; Photochemicals ; Photochemistry</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2011-08, Vol.116 (A8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>Copyright 2011 by American Geophysical Union</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-3af65f389415a1fa5ef0950eb6e8786ee27bf6bd1c8e05b2a0537a4c5471245e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-3af65f389415a1fa5ef0950eb6e8786ee27bf6bd1c8e05b2a0537a4c5471245e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2011JA016613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2011JA016613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46446,46811,46870</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richards, P. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Reexamination of ionospheric photochemistry</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>This paper reexamines the chemistry of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ by comparing densities from a photochemical model with data from the Atmosphere Explorer C satellite. These comparisons show that the measurements of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ density are well modeled with up‐to‐date reaction rates, solar EUV irradiances, and photoelectron fluxes. In particular, this study has resolved a long‐standing problem wherein the previous investigations overestimated the measured N2+ density by a factor of 2. A new method of determining the important and controversial O+(2D) + N2 reaction rate from the Atmosphere Explorer C data is presented. This reaction rate determination agrees well with the latest laboratory measured reaction rate.
Key Points
The ionospheric ion densities are well modeled
The ionospheric ion densities are compatible with model solar EUV fluxes
The aeronomically determined reaction rates match laboratory measurements</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospheric sciences</subject><subject>ionosphere</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Photochemicals</subject><subject>Photochemistry</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgChbtzgcouhF0NCf3WZZiq6VeKFqXIR3P0KltU5Mptm9vpCIiaDZn8_35k0PIEdALoCy_ZBSg36agFPAd0mAgVcYYZbukQUGYjDKm90kzxilNR0glKDTI2RBx7ebVwtWVX7R82UrDx-UEQ1W0lhNf-2KC8yrWYXNI9ko3i9j8mgfkqXv12LnOBve9m057kBWCSplxVypZcpMLkA5KJ7GkuaQ4Vmi0UYhMj0s1foHCIJVj5qjk2olCCg1MSOQH5HR77zL4txXG2qb-Amczt0C_ijZ9VyihOc0TPf5Fp34VFul11hjOjBCGJ3TyFwItlRRcACR1vlVF8DEGLO0yVHMXNqnvszK3PzecON_y92qGm3-t7feGbQZcyJTKtqm0UFx_p1x4tUpzLe3zXc-OusPu6HZg7AP_ABOYiJY</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>Richards, P. G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>Reexamination of ionospheric photochemistry</title><author>Richards, P. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-3af65f389415a1fa5ef0950eb6e8786ee27bf6bd1c8e05b2a0537a4c5471245e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospheric sciences</topic><topic>ionosphere</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Photochemicals</topic><topic>Photochemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richards, P. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richards, P. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reexamination of ionospheric photochemistry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>A8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>This paper reexamines the chemistry of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ by comparing densities from a photochemical model with data from the Atmosphere Explorer C satellite. These comparisons show that the measurements of N2+, NO+, O2+, and N+ density are well modeled with up‐to‐date reaction rates, solar EUV irradiances, and photoelectron fluxes. In particular, this study has resolved a long‐standing problem wherein the previous investigations overestimated the measured N2+ density by a factor of 2. A new method of determining the important and controversial O+(2D) + N2 reaction rate from the Atmosphere Explorer C data is presented. This reaction rate determination agrees well with the latest laboratory measured reaction rate.
Key Points
The ionospheric ion densities are well modeled
The ionospheric ion densities are compatible with model solar EUV fluxes
The aeronomically determined reaction rates match laboratory measurements</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2011JA016613</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
| ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2011-08, Vol.116 (A8), p.n/a |
| issn | 0148-0227 2169-9380 2156-2202 2169-9402 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024647309 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Atmosphere Atmospheric chemistry Atmospheric sciences ionosphere Laboratories Photochemicals Photochemistry |
| title | Reexamination of ionospheric photochemistry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A51%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reexamination%20of%20ionospheric%20photochemistry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Space%20Physics&rft.au=Richards,%20P.%20G.&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=A8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2011JA016613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424481231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1756543411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |