Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer

Surgical excision of colorectal cancer can reduce immune function during the postoperative period, which may affect long-term survival. There is evidence that regional analgesia may attenuate the immunosuppressive effect of surgery. Opioid analgesia also suppresses cell-mediated immunity, notably na...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2012-08, Vol.109 (2), p.185-190
Hauptverfasser: Day, A., Smith, R., Jourdan, I., Fawcett, W., Scott, M., Rockall, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 185
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 109
creator Day, A.
Smith, R.
Jourdan, I.
Fawcett, W.
Scott, M.
Rockall, T.
description Surgical excision of colorectal cancer can reduce immune function during the postoperative period, which may affect long-term survival. There is evidence that regional analgesia may attenuate the immunosuppressive effect of surgery. Opioid analgesia also suppresses cell-mediated immunity, notably natural killer cell activity. Therefore, using either epidural or spinal analgesia rather than systemic opioids during the postoperative period could affect long-term survival and disease recurrence. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for adenocarcinoma between October 2003 and December 2010 was performed. Patients received either an epidural, spinal block, or a morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for their primary postoperative analgesia. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analysed. A total of 457 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed during the period analysed; 424 cases were suitable for analysis (epidural=107, spinal=144, and PCA=173). There was no significant difference between the groups for age, gender, conversion rate, operation performed, TNM stage, tumour differentiation, extramural venous, or lymphovascular invasion. The epidural group had significantly more ASA category III patients (P=0.006). The median length of stay was significantly longer in the epidural group at 5 days compared with 3 days for spinal and PCA (P
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bja/aes106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024642700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/bja/aes106</oup_id><els_id>S0007091217328878</els_id><sourcerecordid>1024642700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-2fdc6dcb75a8a25e5642c5595c818d1d9b5ec47a78a137fa53847f19582b0a823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcGKFDEQhoMo7uzqxQeQXAQR2k0ySaf7KMvqCguC6LmpTlc0S0-nTXUP7CP41tYw4-pBJIcQ6qu_qC9CvNDqrVbt9rK_g0tA0qp-JDbael3V3uvHYqOU8pVqtTkT50R3SmlvWvdUnBnj-DR2I35-xqVkmjEsaY8SJhjvKZHMUS7fUWKMXDm85kxLnrHAA_cNKYHMk6S17NMeRpkmOXMdp4UkxAWLHGEGjg95TkEWpMMY7uC8kMdc-MltAaaA5Zl4EmEkfH66L8TX99dfrm6q208fPl69u62Cbe1SmTiEegi9d9CAcehqa4JzrQuNbgY9tL3DYD34BvTWR3DbxvqoW9eYXkFjthfi9TF3LvnHirR0u0QBxxEmzCt1WhnLmV4pRt8c0cA7UMHYzSXtoNwz1B3Ud6y-O6pn-OUpd-13ODygv10z8OoEAAUYY-G1E_3hav6d5m8ur_P_B9ojh2xrn7B0FNh9wCEdxHZDTv9q-wWqFa7S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024642700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Day, A. ; Smith, R. ; Jourdan, I. ; Fawcett, W. ; Scott, M. ; Rockall, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Day, A. ; Smith, R. ; Jourdan, I. ; Fawcett, W. ; Scott, M. ; Rockall, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical excision of colorectal cancer can reduce immune function during the postoperative period, which may affect long-term survival. There is evidence that regional analgesia may attenuate the immunosuppressive effect of surgery. Opioid analgesia also suppresses cell-mediated immunity, notably natural killer cell activity. Therefore, using either epidural or spinal analgesia rather than systemic opioids during the postoperative period could affect long-term survival and disease recurrence. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for adenocarcinoma between October 2003 and December 2010 was performed. Patients received either an epidural, spinal block, or a morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for their primary postoperative analgesia. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analysed. A total of 457 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed during the period analysed; 424 cases were suitable for analysis (epidural=107, spinal=144, and PCA=173). There was no significant difference between the groups for age, gender, conversion rate, operation performed, TNM stage, tumour differentiation, extramural venous, or lymphovascular invasion. The epidural group had significantly more ASA category III patients (P=0.006). The median length of stay was significantly longer in the epidural group at 5 days compared with 3 days for spinal and PCA (P&lt;0.0005). There was no significant difference in overall survival (P=0.622) or disease-free survival (P=0.490) at 5 yr between the groups. In this study, there appears to be no significant advantage to be gained in overall or disease-free survival with the use of regional analgesia compared with opioid analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22525284</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJANAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Aged ; analgesia ; Analgesia - adverse effects ; Analgesia - methods ; Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects ; Analgesia, Epidural - methods ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects ; Anesthesia, Spinal - methods ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colectomy - methods ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; survival ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2012-08, Vol.109 (2), p.185-190</ispartof><rights>2012 The Author(s)</rights><rights>The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-2fdc6dcb75a8a25e5642c5595c818d1d9b5ec47a78a137fa53847f19582b0a823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-2fdc6dcb75a8a25e5642c5595c818d1d9b5ec47a78a137fa53847f19582b0a823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26172884$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22525284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Day, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawcett, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockall, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Surgical excision of colorectal cancer can reduce immune function during the postoperative period, which may affect long-term survival. There is evidence that regional analgesia may attenuate the immunosuppressive effect of surgery. Opioid analgesia also suppresses cell-mediated immunity, notably natural killer cell activity. Therefore, using either epidural or spinal analgesia rather than systemic opioids during the postoperative period could affect long-term survival and disease recurrence. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for adenocarcinoma between October 2003 and December 2010 was performed. Patients received either an epidural, spinal block, or a morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for their primary postoperative analgesia. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analysed. A total of 457 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed during the period analysed; 424 cases were suitable for analysis (epidural=107, spinal=144, and PCA=173). There was no significant difference between the groups for age, gender, conversion rate, operation performed, TNM stage, tumour differentiation, extramural venous, or lymphovascular invasion. The epidural group had significantly more ASA category III patients (P=0.006). The median length of stay was significantly longer in the epidural group at 5 days compared with 3 days for spinal and PCA (P&lt;0.0005). There was no significant difference in overall survival (P=0.622) or disease-free survival (P=0.490) at 5 yr between the groups. In this study, there appears to be no significant advantage to be gained in overall or disease-free survival with the use of regional analgesia compared with opioid analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesia - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>survival</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcGKFDEQhoMo7uzqxQeQXAQR2k0ySaf7KMvqCguC6LmpTlc0S0-nTXUP7CP41tYw4-pBJIcQ6qu_qC9CvNDqrVbt9rK_g0tA0qp-JDbael3V3uvHYqOU8pVqtTkT50R3SmlvWvdUnBnj-DR2I35-xqVkmjEsaY8SJhjvKZHMUS7fUWKMXDm85kxLnrHAA_cNKYHMk6S17NMeRpkmOXMdp4UkxAWLHGEGjg95TkEWpMMY7uC8kMdc-MltAaaA5Zl4EmEkfH66L8TX99dfrm6q208fPl69u62Cbe1SmTiEegi9d9CAcehqa4JzrQuNbgY9tL3DYD34BvTWR3DbxvqoW9eYXkFjthfi9TF3LvnHirR0u0QBxxEmzCt1WhnLmV4pRt8c0cA7UMHYzSXtoNwz1B3Ud6y-O6pn-OUpd-13ODygv10z8OoEAAUYY-G1E_3hav6d5m8ur_P_B9ojh2xrn7B0FNh9wCEdxHZDTv9q-wWqFa7S</recordid><startdate>20120801</startdate><enddate>20120801</enddate><creator>Day, A.</creator><creator>Smith, R.</creator><creator>Jourdan, I.</creator><creator>Fawcett, W.</creator><creator>Scott, M.</creator><creator>Rockall, T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120801</creationdate><title>Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer</title><author>Day, A. ; Smith, R. ; Jourdan, I. ; Fawcett, W. ; Scott, M. ; Rockall, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-2fdc6dcb75a8a25e5642c5595c818d1d9b5ec47a78a137fa53847f19582b0a823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesia - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Spinal - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>survival</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Day, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jourdan, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawcett, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockall, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Day, A.</au><au>Smith, R.</au><au>Jourdan, I.</au><au>Fawcett, W.</au><au>Scott, M.</au><au>Rockall, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><stitle>Br J Anaesth</stitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2012-08-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>185-190</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><coden>BJANAD</coden><abstract>Surgical excision of colorectal cancer can reduce immune function during the postoperative period, which may affect long-term survival. There is evidence that regional analgesia may attenuate the immunosuppressive effect of surgery. Opioid analgesia also suppresses cell-mediated immunity, notably natural killer cell activity. Therefore, using either epidural or spinal analgesia rather than systemic opioids during the postoperative period could affect long-term survival and disease recurrence. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection for adenocarcinoma between October 2003 and December 2010 was performed. Patients received either an epidural, spinal block, or a morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for their primary postoperative analgesia. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analysed. A total of 457 laparoscopic colorectal resections were performed during the period analysed; 424 cases were suitable for analysis (epidural=107, spinal=144, and PCA=173). There was no significant difference between the groups for age, gender, conversion rate, operation performed, TNM stage, tumour differentiation, extramural venous, or lymphovascular invasion. The epidural group had significantly more ASA category III patients (P=0.006). The median length of stay was significantly longer in the epidural group at 5 days compared with 3 days for spinal and PCA (P&lt;0.0005). There was no significant difference in overall survival (P=0.622) or disease-free survival (P=0.490) at 5 yr between the groups. In this study, there appears to be no significant advantage to be gained in overall or disease-free survival with the use of regional analgesia compared with opioid analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22525284</pmid><doi>10.1093/bja/aes106</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2012-08, Vol.109 (2), p.185-190
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1024642700
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Aged
analgesia
Analgesia - adverse effects
Analgesia - methods
Analgesia, Epidural - adverse effects
Analgesia, Epidural - methods
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - adverse effects
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Spinal - adverse effects
Anesthesia, Spinal - methods
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Colectomy - methods
colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Laparoscopy
Male
Medical sciences
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Postoperative Care - methods
Retrospective Studies
survival
Treatment Outcome
title Retrospective analysis of the effect of postoperative analgesia on survival in patients after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20postoperative%20analgesia%20on%20survival%20in%20patients%20after%20laparoscopic%20resection%20of%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Day,%20A.&rft.date=2012-08-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=185-190&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft.coden=BJANAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bja/aes106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024642700%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024642700&rft_id=info:pmid/22525284&rft_oup_id=10.1093/bja/aes106&rft_els_id=S0007091217328878&rfr_iscdi=true