Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis. In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n=8), ETV (n=...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurosurgery 2012-07, Vol.117 (1), p.141-149
Hauptverfasser: Schroeder, Christiane, Fleck, Steffen, Gaab, Michael R, Schweim, Klaus H, Schroeder, Henry W S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 1
container_start_page 141
container_title Journal of neurosurgery
container_volume 117
creator Schroeder, Christiane
Fleck, Steffen
Gaab, Michael R
Schweim, Klaus H
Schroeder, Henry W S
description The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis. In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n=8), ETV (n=8), and both ETV and EAP (n=6), CSF flow through the restored aqueduct and through the ventriculostomy was investigated using cine cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI. For qualitative evaluation of CSF flow, an in-plane phase-contrast sequence in the midsagittal plane was used. The MR images were displayed in a closed-loop cine format. Quantitative through-plane measurements were performed in the axial plane perpendicular to the aqueduct and/or floor of the third ventricle. Evaluation revealed significantly higher CSF flow through the ventriculostomies compared with flow through the aqueducts. This was true both when comparing the ETV group with the EAP group and when comparing the flow of the ventriculostomy and aqueduct within the ETV and EAP group. There was no difference in aqueductal CSF flow between patients who underwent EAP alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. There was also no difference in ventriculostomy CSF flow between patients who underwent ETV alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. Fifty percent of the restored aqueducts became occluded at a mean of 46 months after surgery (range 18-126 months). In contrast, all ETVs remained patent in the mean follow-up period of 110 months after surgery, although 1 patient required shunt placement after 66 months. Cerebrospinal fluid flow through ventriculostomies is significantly higher than aqueductal CSF flow after EAP. This could be one factor to explain why the reclosure rate of aqueducts after EAP is higher than the reclosure rate of the ventriculostoma after ETV.
doi_str_mv 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111926
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023292747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1023292747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1694-c109a4e190ffc764efd5d11a748b73ad66a14d3b27bad80feccba9ff6d2fd2e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUU1rVTEQDYLYWt27klm6ea_5atK7klKsVopdtOLykZtM-iJ5yTVzb-X-R3-UASsIbs7AOWfOHBjG3gi-VcKKU8mF3Krt5y93QohBmmfsWAxKbbgZ1BF7SfSdc2G0kS_YkZRn1lqtj9mvb_sVQkUCLKGSr1Py4H4sGBY_1yk7mleILmWgCrFhV8qc1_dwUVxeKRHUCB4bjq3SlDoJMS8pdKw_wcUZ27_J8z61AI89oyW_5EpzPazgSvjv5kKpPIBPBWHaO8KNr32pS3BwDwXnHtaQanHFI6TOdfsr9jy6TPj6aZ6wr1cf7i8_bW5uP15fXtxsvDCD7sgHp1EMPEZvjcYYzoIQzurz0SoXjHFCBzVKO7pwziN6P7ohRhNkDBK1OmHv_uROrfbaNO8OiTzm7ArWhXaCSyUHabXt1rdP1mU8YNhNrXdt6-7vB9RvON2PLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1023292747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Schroeder, Christiane ; Fleck, Steffen ; Gaab, Michael R ; Schweim, Klaus H ; Schroeder, Henry W S</creator><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Christiane ; Fleck, Steffen ; Gaab, Michael R ; Schweim, Klaus H ; Schroeder, Henry W S</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis. In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n=8), ETV (n=8), and both ETV and EAP (n=6), CSF flow through the restored aqueduct and through the ventriculostomy was investigated using cine cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI. For qualitative evaluation of CSF flow, an in-plane phase-contrast sequence in the midsagittal plane was used. The MR images were displayed in a closed-loop cine format. Quantitative through-plane measurements were performed in the axial plane perpendicular to the aqueduct and/or floor of the third ventricle. Evaluation revealed significantly higher CSF flow through the ventriculostomies compared with flow through the aqueducts. This was true both when comparing the ETV group with the EAP group and when comparing the flow of the ventriculostomy and aqueduct within the ETV and EAP group. There was no difference in aqueductal CSF flow between patients who underwent EAP alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. There was also no difference in ventriculostomy CSF flow between patients who underwent ETV alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. Fifty percent of the restored aqueducts became occluded at a mean of 46 months after surgery (range 18-126 months). In contrast, all ETVs remained patent in the mean follow-up period of 110 months after surgery, although 1 patient required shunt placement after 66 months. Cerebrospinal fluid flow through ventriculostomies is significantly higher than aqueductal CSF flow after EAP. This could be one factor to explain why the reclosure rate of aqueducts after EAP is higher than the reclosure rate of the ventriculostoma after ETV.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1933-0693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111926</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22577744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Cerebral Aqueduct - pathology ; Cerebral Aqueduct - surgery ; Cerebral Ventricles - surgery ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Endoscopy - adverse effects ; Endoscopy - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hydrocephalus - cerebrospinal fluid ; Hydrocephalus - surgery ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Third Ventricle - surgery ; Treatment Failure ; Ventriculostomy - adverse effects ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurosurgery, 2012-07, Vol.117 (1), p.141-149</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1694-c109a4e190ffc764efd5d11a748b73ad66a14d3b27bad80feccba9ff6d2fd2e43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22577744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleck, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaab, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweim, Klaus H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Henry W S</creatorcontrib><title>Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging</title><title>Journal of neurosurgery</title><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis. In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n=8), ETV (n=8), and both ETV and EAP (n=6), CSF flow through the restored aqueduct and through the ventriculostomy was investigated using cine cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI. For qualitative evaluation of CSF flow, an in-plane phase-contrast sequence in the midsagittal plane was used. The MR images were displayed in a closed-loop cine format. Quantitative through-plane measurements were performed in the axial plane perpendicular to the aqueduct and/or floor of the third ventricle. Evaluation revealed significantly higher CSF flow through the ventriculostomies compared with flow through the aqueducts. This was true both when comparing the ETV group with the EAP group and when comparing the flow of the ventriculostomy and aqueduct within the ETV and EAP group. There was no difference in aqueductal CSF flow between patients who underwent EAP alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. There was also no difference in ventriculostomy CSF flow between patients who underwent ETV alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. Fifty percent of the restored aqueducts became occluded at a mean of 46 months after surgery (range 18-126 months). In contrast, all ETVs remained patent in the mean follow-up period of 110 months after surgery, although 1 patient required shunt placement after 66 months. Cerebrospinal fluid flow through ventriculostomies is significantly higher than aqueductal CSF flow after EAP. This could be one factor to explain why the reclosure rate of aqueducts after EAP is higher than the reclosure rate of the ventriculostoma after ETV.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cerebral Aqueduct - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebral Aqueduct - surgery</subject><subject>Cerebral Ventricles - surgery</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic</subject><subject>Endoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus - cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus - surgery</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Third Ventricle - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Ventriculostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1933-0693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplUU1rVTEQDYLYWt27klm6ea_5atK7klKsVopdtOLykZtM-iJ5yTVzb-X-R3-UASsIbs7AOWfOHBjG3gi-VcKKU8mF3Krt5y93QohBmmfsWAxKbbgZ1BF7SfSdc2G0kS_YkZRn1lqtj9mvb_sVQkUCLKGSr1Py4H4sGBY_1yk7mleILmWgCrFhV8qc1_dwUVxeKRHUCB4bjq3SlDoJMS8pdKw_wcUZ27_J8z61AI89oyW_5EpzPazgSvjv5kKpPIBPBWHaO8KNr32pS3BwDwXnHtaQanHFI6TOdfsr9jy6TPj6aZ6wr1cf7i8_bW5uP15fXtxsvDCD7sgHp1EMPEZvjcYYzoIQzurz0SoXjHFCBzVKO7pwziN6P7ohRhNkDBK1OmHv_uROrfbaNO8OiTzm7ArWhXaCSyUHabXt1rdP1mU8YNhNrXdt6-7vB9RvON2PLw</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Schroeder, Christiane</creator><creator>Fleck, Steffen</creator><creator>Gaab, Michael R</creator><creator>Schweim, Klaus H</creator><creator>Schroeder, Henry W S</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging</title><author>Schroeder, Christiane ; Fleck, Steffen ; Gaab, Michael R ; Schweim, Klaus H ; Schroeder, Henry W S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1694-c109a4e190ffc764efd5d11a748b73ad66a14d3b27bad80feccba9ff6d2fd2e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cerebral Aqueduct - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebral Aqueduct - surgery</topic><topic>Cerebral Ventricles - surgery</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic</topic><topic>Endoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus - cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus - surgery</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Third Ventricle - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Ventriculostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleck, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaab, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweim, Klaus H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Henry W S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schroeder, Christiane</au><au>Fleck, Steffen</au><au>Gaab, Michael R</au><au>Schweim, Klaus H</au><au>Schroeder, Henry W S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>141-149</pages><eissn>1933-0693</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare CSF flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic aqueductoplasty (EAP) in patients presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus caused by aqueductal stenosis. In patients harboring aqueductal stenosis who underwent EAP (n=8), ETV (n=8), and both ETV and EAP (n=6), CSF flow through the restored aqueduct and through the ventriculostomy was investigated using cine cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI. For qualitative evaluation of CSF flow, an in-plane phase-contrast sequence in the midsagittal plane was used. The MR images were displayed in a closed-loop cine format. Quantitative through-plane measurements were performed in the axial plane perpendicular to the aqueduct and/or floor of the third ventricle. Evaluation revealed significantly higher CSF flow through the ventriculostomies compared with flow through the aqueducts. This was true both when comparing the ETV group with the EAP group and when comparing the flow of the ventriculostomy and aqueduct within the ETV and EAP group. There was no difference in aqueductal CSF flow between patients who underwent EAP alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. There was also no difference in ventriculostomy CSF flow between patients who underwent ETV alone and patients who underwent ETV and EAP. Fifty percent of the restored aqueducts became occluded at a mean of 46 months after surgery (range 18-126 months). In contrast, all ETVs remained patent in the mean follow-up period of 110 months after surgery, although 1 patient required shunt placement after 66 months. Cerebrospinal fluid flow through ventriculostomies is significantly higher than aqueductal CSF flow after EAP. This could be one factor to explain why the reclosure rate of aqueducts after EAP is higher than the reclosure rate of the ventriculostoma after ETV.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22577744</pmid><doi>10.3171/2012.3.JNS111926</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1933-0693
ispartof Journal of neurosurgery, 2012-07, Vol.117 (1), p.141-149
issn 1933-0693
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023292747
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Cerebral Aqueduct - pathology
Cerebral Aqueduct - surgery
Cerebral Ventricles - surgery
Constriction, Pathologic
Endoscopy - adverse effects
Endoscopy - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hydrocephalus - cerebrospinal fluid
Hydrocephalus - surgery
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Middle Aged
Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects
Neurosurgical Procedures - methods
Third Ventricle - surgery
Treatment Failure
Ventriculostomy - adverse effects
Young Adult
title Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20does%20endoscopic%20aqueductoplasty%20fail%20so%20frequently?%20Analysis%20of%20cerebrospinal%20fluid%20flow%20after%20endoscopic%20third%20ventriculostomy%20and%20aqueductoplasty%20using%20cine%20phase-contrast%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Schroeder,%20Christiane&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=141-149&rft.eissn=1933-0693&rft_id=info:doi/10.3171/2012.3.JNS111926&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1023292747%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1023292747&rft_id=info:pmid/22577744&rfr_iscdi=true