A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement
‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical child psychology and psychiatry 2012-04, Vol.17 (2), p.246-265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 265 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Clinical child psychology and psychiatry |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Dexter, Gemma Larkin, Michael Newnes, Craig |
description | ‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1359104511400970 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023092496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1359104511400970</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1023092496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1OxDAQhC0E4r-nQilpAruxE-MSnfiTkKCAlshJNndGPvuwkxPX8Rq8Hk9CTndQICFR7Uj7zRQzjB0hnCJKeYY8VwgiRxQASsIG20VRYCohw81BD-90-d9hezG-AIDMEbbZToaSc8WzXfZ8kbz22ppOd2ZOCb3NrA-D9i7xbTKaGNskI2ucqbVNHuKinnjrxyZ28fP9I-ldQyF22jXGjZeGPlJIjJt7O6cpue6AbbXaRjpc3332dHX5OLpJ7-6vb0cXd2nNJXSpAEGaF6KouGgrbCFTtayrTAtRnysAanNdkCioybggghwJC12oSotzalXD99nJKncW_GtPsSunJtZkrXbk-1giZBxUJlTxDxQUchByicIKrYOPMVBbzoKZ6rAYoHI5QPl7gMFyvE7vqyk1P4bvxgcgXQFRj6l88X1wQzF_B34BAESOuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009130476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Dexter, Gemma ; Larkin, Michael ; Newnes, Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Gemma ; Larkin, Michael ; Newnes, Craig</creatorcontrib><description>‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-1045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1359104511400970</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21733932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Children ; Clinical psychologists ; Disempowerment ; Family - psychology ; Humans ; Mental health services ; Parents ; Patient Participation ; Power (Psychology) ; Psychology, Child - methods ; Qualitative Research ; User involvement</subject><ispartof>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2012-04, Vol.17 (2), p.246-265</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1359104511400970$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1359104511400970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21733932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newnes, Craig</creatorcontrib><title>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</title><title>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry</title><addtitle>Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical psychologists</subject><subject>Disempowerment</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Power (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychology, Child - methods</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>User involvement</subject><issn>1359-1045</issn><issn>1461-7021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1OxDAQhC0E4r-nQilpAruxE-MSnfiTkKCAlshJNndGPvuwkxPX8Rq8Hk9CTndQICFR7Uj7zRQzjB0hnCJKeYY8VwgiRxQASsIG20VRYCohw81BD-90-d9hezG-AIDMEbbZToaSc8WzXfZ8kbz22ppOd2ZOCb3NrA-D9i7xbTKaGNskI2ucqbVNHuKinnjrxyZ28fP9I-ldQyF22jXGjZeGPlJIjJt7O6cpue6AbbXaRjpc3332dHX5OLpJ7-6vb0cXd2nNJXSpAEGaF6KouGgrbCFTtayrTAtRnysAanNdkCioybggghwJC12oSotzalXD99nJKncW_GtPsSunJtZkrXbk-1giZBxUJlTxDxQUchByicIKrYOPMVBbzoKZ6rAYoHI5QPl7gMFyvE7vqyk1P4bvxgcgXQFRj6l88X1wQzF_B34BAESOuQ</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Dexter, Gemma</creator><creator>Larkin, Michael</creator><creator>Newnes, Craig</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</title><author>Dexter, Gemma ; Larkin, Michael ; Newnes, Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical psychologists</topic><topic>Disempowerment</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Power (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychology, Child - methods</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>User involvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newnes, Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dexter, Gemma</au><au>Larkin, Michael</au><au>Newnes, Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</atitle><jtitle>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>246-265</pages><issn>1359-1045</issn><eissn>1461-7021</eissn><abstract>‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21733932</pmid><doi>10.1177/1359104511400970</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1359-1045 |
ispartof | Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2012-04, Vol.17 (2), p.246-265 |
issn | 1359-1045 1461-7021 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023092496 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Children Clinical psychologists Disempowerment Family - psychology Humans Mental health services Parents Patient Participation Power (Psychology) Psychology, Child - methods Qualitative Research User involvement |
title | A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A04%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20qualitative%20exploration%20of%20Child%20Clinical%20Psychologists%E2%80%99%20understanding%20of%20user%20involvement&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20child%20psychology%20and%20psychiatry&rft.au=Dexter,%20Gemma&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=246-265&rft.issn=1359-1045&rft.eissn=1461-7021&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1359104511400970&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023092496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009130476&rft_id=info:pmid/21733932&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1359104511400970&rfr_iscdi=true |