A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement

‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical child psychology and psychiatry 2012-04, Vol.17 (2), p.246-265
Hauptverfasser: Dexter, Gemma, Larkin, Michael, Newnes, Craig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 265
container_issue 2
container_start_page 246
container_title Clinical child psychology and psychiatry
container_volume 17
creator Dexter, Gemma
Larkin, Michael
Newnes, Craig
description ‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1359104511400970
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023092496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1359104511400970</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1023092496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1OxDAQhC0E4r-nQilpAruxE-MSnfiTkKCAlshJNndGPvuwkxPX8Rq8Hk9CTndQICFR7Uj7zRQzjB0hnCJKeYY8VwgiRxQASsIG20VRYCohw81BD-90-d9hezG-AIDMEbbZToaSc8WzXfZ8kbz22ppOd2ZOCb3NrA-D9i7xbTKaGNskI2ucqbVNHuKinnjrxyZ28fP9I-ldQyF22jXGjZeGPlJIjJt7O6cpue6AbbXaRjpc3332dHX5OLpJ7-6vb0cXd2nNJXSpAEGaF6KouGgrbCFTtayrTAtRnysAanNdkCioybggghwJC12oSotzalXD99nJKncW_GtPsSunJtZkrXbk-1giZBxUJlTxDxQUchByicIKrYOPMVBbzoKZ6rAYoHI5QPl7gMFyvE7vqyk1P4bvxgcgXQFRj6l88X1wQzF_B34BAESOuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009130476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Dexter, Gemma ; Larkin, Michael ; Newnes, Craig</creator><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Gemma ; Larkin, Michael ; Newnes, Craig</creatorcontrib><description>‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-1045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1359104511400970</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21733932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Children ; Clinical psychologists ; Disempowerment ; Family - psychology ; Humans ; Mental health services ; Parents ; Patient Participation ; Power (Psychology) ; Psychology, Child - methods ; Qualitative Research ; User involvement</subject><ispartof>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2012-04, Vol.17 (2), p.246-265</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1359104511400970$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1359104511400970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30977,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21733932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newnes, Craig</creatorcontrib><title>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</title><title>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry</title><addtitle>Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical psychologists</subject><subject>Disempowerment</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Power (Psychology)</subject><subject>Psychology, Child - methods</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>User involvement</subject><issn>1359-1045</issn><issn>1461-7021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1OxDAQhC0E4r-nQilpAruxE-MSnfiTkKCAlshJNndGPvuwkxPX8Rq8Hk9CTndQICFR7Uj7zRQzjB0hnCJKeYY8VwgiRxQASsIG20VRYCohw81BD-90-d9hezG-AIDMEbbZToaSc8WzXfZ8kbz22ppOd2ZOCb3NrA-D9i7xbTKaGNskI2ucqbVNHuKinnjrxyZ28fP9I-ldQyF22jXGjZeGPlJIjJt7O6cpue6AbbXaRjpc3332dHX5OLpJ7-6vb0cXd2nNJXSpAEGaF6KouGgrbCFTtayrTAtRnysAanNdkCioybggghwJC12oSotzalXD99nJKncW_GtPsSunJtZkrXbk-1giZBxUJlTxDxQUchByicIKrYOPMVBbzoKZ6rAYoHI5QPl7gMFyvE7vqyk1P4bvxgcgXQFRj6l88X1wQzF_B34BAESOuQ</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Dexter, Gemma</creator><creator>Larkin, Michael</creator><creator>Newnes, Craig</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</title><author>Dexter, Gemma ; Larkin, Michael ; Newnes, Craig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-404ea3646b34fb1f029c7cb2a44c8900ef5a6e46ed234ee051e16a69ba48ef9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical psychologists</topic><topic>Disempowerment</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Power (Psychology)</topic><topic>Psychology, Child - methods</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>User involvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dexter, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newnes, Craig</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dexter, Gemma</au><au>Larkin, Michael</au><au>Newnes, Craig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement</atitle><jtitle>Clinical child psychology and psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>265</epage><pages>246-265</pages><issn>1359-1045</issn><eissn>1461-7021</eissn><abstract>‘Service User Involvement’ is a key directive for mental health services. This is thought to be especially complex in child services—despite evidence that it can be achieved—because of the need to use developmentally-appropriate tools. Children are in a multi-faceted position of disempowerment when they enter mental health services; attempts to involve them in these services are entangled with intricate power issues. To explore these issues, eight Clinical Psychologists who work with children were interviewed about their views and experiences of User Involvement. Their accounts were analysed by drawing on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. The resulting account demonstrates how children are consistently positioned as both vulnerable and powerless (in contrast to parents and professionals). This has the effect of rendering them as less-than-ideal candidates for involvement in service evaluation and planning, in a context where parents may seem to offer a more straightforward option to professionals, and where those professionals see themselves as having to operate within certain constraints.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21733932</pmid><doi>10.1177/1359104511400970</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-1045
ispartof Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2012-04, Vol.17 (2), p.246-265
issn 1359-1045
1461-7021
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023092496
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Children
Clinical psychologists
Disempowerment
Family - psychology
Humans
Mental health services
Parents
Patient Participation
Power (Psychology)
Psychology, Child - methods
Qualitative Research
User involvement
title A qualitative exploration of Child Clinical Psychologists’ understanding of user involvement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T17%3A04%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20qualitative%20exploration%20of%20Child%20Clinical%20Psychologists%E2%80%99%20understanding%20of%20user%20involvement&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20child%20psychology%20and%20psychiatry&rft.au=Dexter,%20Gemma&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=265&rft.pages=246-265&rft.issn=1359-1045&rft.eissn=1461-7021&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1359104511400970&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023092496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009130476&rft_id=info:pmid/21733932&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1359104511400970&rfr_iscdi=true