Feasibility and reliability of physical fitness tests in older adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study
Abstract Background Physical fitness is relevant for wellbeing and health, but knowledge on the feasibility and reliability of instruments to measure physical fitness for older adults with intellectual disability is lacking. Methods Feasibility and test-retest reliability of a physical fitness test...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual & developmental disability 2012-06, Vol.37 (2), p.158-162 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 162 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 158 |
| container_title | Journal of intellectual & developmental disability |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M. van Wijck, Ruud Evenhuis, Heleen M. |
| description | Abstract
Background Physical fitness is relevant for wellbeing and health, but knowledge on the feasibility and reliability of instruments to measure physical fitness for older adults with intellectual disability is lacking.
Methods Feasibility and test-retest reliability of a physical fitness test battery (Box and Block Test, Response Time Test, walking speed, grip strength, 30-s chair stand, 10-m Incremental Shuttle Walking Test and the Extended Modified Back-Saver Sit-and-Reach Test) were investigated in older adults with ID in a convenience sample of 36 older adults (mean 65.9, range 50-89 years), with differing levels of intellectual disability and mobility.
Results and conclusion All tests to measure physical fitness in older adults with ID had moderate to excellent feasibility and had sufficient test-retest reliability (ICCs .63-.96). No statistically significant learning effects were found. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3109/13668250.2012.681773 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023091916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ964999</ericid><sourcerecordid>1011843131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-42e7c86d6c1f7d869947e30f8f8e70fecdf85abb6df8fa1cb5259ebc4f25b5543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9rFTEUxYMotj79BkUCbtzMM_9n4kIopa1KwY2uh0xyw0vJm3lNMsj79maY1yIuimRxc3N_93DCQeiCki2nRH-iXKmOSbJlhLKt6mjb8hfonAqlGy05e1nvFWkW5gy9yfmeECI4ka_RGWNSSM27c_RwAyaHIcRQjtiMDieIwZz6yePD7piDNRH7UEbIGRfIJeMw4ik6SNi4Odb-dyi7-lggRrBlrrwL-STzGV_iQ4hTwbnM7vgWvfImZnh3qhv06-b659XX5u7H7bery7vGCiFKIxi0tlNOWepb1ymtRQuc-M530BIP1vlOmmFQtXpD7SCZ1DBY4ZkcpBR8gz6uuoc0PczVdb8P2VaDZoRpzj0ljBNNNVX_gVLaCU7r2aAP_6D305zG-pGFaqXQC7lBYqVsmnJO4PtDCnuTjhXql_T6x_T6Jb1-Ta-uvT-Jz8Me3NPSY1wVuFgBSME-ja-_ayW01nX8ZR2H0U9pb3ZgYtlZk-Bvl88Y-AOeprL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1017549184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and reliability of physical fitness tests in older adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M. ; van Wijck, Ruud ; Evenhuis, Heleen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M. ; van Wijck, Ruud ; Evenhuis, Heleen M.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background Physical fitness is relevant for wellbeing and health, but knowledge on the feasibility and reliability of instruments to measure physical fitness for older adults with intellectual disability is lacking.
Methods Feasibility and test-retest reliability of a physical fitness test battery (Box and Block Test, Response Time Test, walking speed, grip strength, 30-s chair stand, 10-m Incremental Shuttle Walking Test and the Extended Modified Back-Saver Sit-and-Reach Test) were investigated in older adults with ID in a convenience sample of 36 older adults (mean 65.9, range 50-89 years), with differing levels of intellectual disability and mobility.
Results and conclusion All tests to measure physical fitness in older adults with ID had moderate to excellent feasibility and had sufficient test-retest reliability (ICCs .63-.96). No statistically significant learning effects were found.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-8250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9532</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2012.681773</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22545938</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDDFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa Healthcare</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Disabled older people ; Exercise Test - instrumentation ; Exercise Test - methods ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Intellectual Disability ; Knowledge ; Learning disabilities ; Learning disabled people ; Male ; Measurement Objectives ; Measurement Techniques ; Measures (Individuals) ; Mental health ; Mental Retardation ; Middle Aged ; Older Adults ; Physical Activities ; Physical Activity Level ; Physical Characteristics ; Physical Endurance ; Physical Fitness ; Pilot Projects ; Postural Balance ; Pretests Posttests ; Psychometrics - methods ; Reaction Time ; Reliability ; Replication (Evaluation) ; Reproducibility of Results ; Response time ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Test Reliability ; Test-Retest reliability ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual & developmental disability, 2012-06, Vol.37 (2), p.158-162</ispartof><rights>2012 Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability, Inc. 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Jun 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-42e7c86d6c1f7d869947e30f8f8e70fecdf85abb6df8fa1cb5259ebc4f25b5543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-42e7c86d6c1f7d869947e30f8f8e70fecdf85abb6df8fa1cb5259ebc4f25b5543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,30979</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ964999$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22545938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijck, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evenhuis, Heleen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and reliability of physical fitness tests in older adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study</title><title>Journal of intellectual & developmental disability</title><addtitle>J Intellect Dev Disabil</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background Physical fitness is relevant for wellbeing and health, but knowledge on the feasibility and reliability of instruments to measure physical fitness for older adults with intellectual disability is lacking.
Methods Feasibility and test-retest reliability of a physical fitness test battery (Box and Block Test, Response Time Test, walking speed, grip strength, 30-s chair stand, 10-m Incremental Shuttle Walking Test and the Extended Modified Back-Saver Sit-and-Reach Test) were investigated in older adults with ID in a convenience sample of 36 older adults (mean 65.9, range 50-89 years), with differing levels of intellectual disability and mobility.
Results and conclusion All tests to measure physical fitness in older adults with ID had moderate to excellent feasibility and had sufficient test-retest reliability (ICCs .63-.96). No statistically significant learning effects were found.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Disabled older people</subject><subject>Exercise Test - instrumentation</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning disabilities</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement Objectives</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Physical Activities</subject><subject>Physical Activity Level</subject><subject>Physical Characteristics</subject><subject>Physical Endurance</subject><subject>Physical Fitness</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Replication (Evaluation)</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1366-8250</issn><issn>1469-9532</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9rFTEUxYMotj79BkUCbtzMM_9n4kIopa1KwY2uh0xyw0vJm3lNMsj79maY1yIuimRxc3N_93DCQeiCki2nRH-iXKmOSbJlhLKt6mjb8hfonAqlGy05e1nvFWkW5gy9yfmeECI4ka_RGWNSSM27c_RwAyaHIcRQjtiMDieIwZz6yePD7piDNRH7UEbIGRfIJeMw4ik6SNi4Odb-dyi7-lggRrBlrrwL-STzGV_iQ4hTwbnM7vgWvfImZnh3qhv06-b659XX5u7H7bery7vGCiFKIxi0tlNOWepb1ymtRQuc-M530BIP1vlOmmFQtXpD7SCZ1DBY4ZkcpBR8gz6uuoc0PczVdb8P2VaDZoRpzj0ljBNNNVX_gVLaCU7r2aAP_6D305zG-pGFaqXQC7lBYqVsmnJO4PtDCnuTjhXql_T6x_T6Jb1-Ta-uvT-Jz8Me3NPSY1wVuFgBSME-ja-_ayW01nX8ZR2H0U9pb3ZgYtlZk-Bvl88Y-AOeprL8</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M.</creator><creator>van Wijck, Ruud</creator><creator>Evenhuis, Heleen M.</creator><general>Informa Healthcare</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Feasibility and reliability of physical fitness tests in older adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study</title><author>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M. ; van Wijck, Ruud ; Evenhuis, Heleen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-42e7c86d6c1f7d869947e30f8f8e70fecdf85abb6df8fa1cb5259ebc4f25b5543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Disabled older people</topic><topic>Exercise Test - instrumentation</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning disabilities</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement Objectives</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Physical Activities</topic><topic>Physical Activity Level</topic><topic>Physical Characteristics</topic><topic>Physical Endurance</topic><topic>Physical Fitness</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Replication (Evaluation)</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijck, Ruud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evenhuis, Heleen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual & developmental disability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M.</au><au>van Wijck, Ruud</au><au>Evenhuis, Heleen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ964999</ericid><atitle>Feasibility and reliability of physical fitness tests in older adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual & developmental disability</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Dev Disabil</addtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>158-162</pages><issn>1366-8250</issn><eissn>1469-9532</eissn><coden>JIDDFG</coden><abstract>Abstract
Background Physical fitness is relevant for wellbeing and health, but knowledge on the feasibility and reliability of instruments to measure physical fitness for older adults with intellectual disability is lacking.
Methods Feasibility and test-retest reliability of a physical fitness test battery (Box and Block Test, Response Time Test, walking speed, grip strength, 30-s chair stand, 10-m Incremental Shuttle Walking Test and the Extended Modified Back-Saver Sit-and-Reach Test) were investigated in older adults with ID in a convenience sample of 36 older adults (mean 65.9, range 50-89 years), with differing levels of intellectual disability and mobility.
Results and conclusion All tests to measure physical fitness in older adults with ID had moderate to excellent feasibility and had sufficient test-retest reliability (ICCs .63-.96). No statistically significant learning effects were found.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa Healthcare</pub><pmid>22545938</pmid><doi>10.3109/13668250.2012.681773</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1366-8250 |
| ispartof | Journal of intellectual & developmental disability, 2012-06, Vol.37 (2), p.158-162 |
| issn | 1366-8250 1469-9532 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023091916 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Aged Aged, 80 and over Disabled older people Exercise Test - instrumentation Exercise Test - methods Feasibility Feasibility Studies Female Humans Intellectual Disability Knowledge Learning disabilities Learning disabled people Male Measurement Objectives Measurement Techniques Measures (Individuals) Mental health Mental Retardation Middle Aged Older Adults Physical Activities Physical Activity Level Physical Characteristics Physical Endurance Physical Fitness Pilot Projects Postural Balance Pretests Posttests Psychometrics - methods Reaction Time Reliability Replication (Evaluation) Reproducibility of Results Response time Surveys and Questionnaires Test Reliability Test-Retest reliability Walking |
| title | Feasibility and reliability of physical fitness tests in older adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A44%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20reliability%20of%20physical%20fitness%20tests%20in%20older%20adults%20with%20intellectual%20disability:%20A%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20&%20developmental%20disability&rft.au=Hilgenkamp,%20Thessa%20I.%20M.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=158-162&rft.issn=1366-8250&rft.eissn=1469-9532&rft.coden=JIDDFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/13668250.2012.681773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011843131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1017549184&rft_id=info:pmid/22545938&rft_ericid=EJ964999&rfr_iscdi=true |