Provider Diversity in the English NHS: A Study of Recent Developments in Four Local Health Economies

Objectives To assess the impact of provider diversity on quality and innovation in the English NHS by mapping the extent of diverse provider activity and identifying the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises, and incumbent organizations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of health services research & policy 2012-01, Vol.17 (1_suppl), p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: Allen, Pauline, Turner, Simon, Bartlett, Will, Perotin, Virginie, Matchaya, Greenwell, Zamora, Bernarda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1_suppl
container_start_page 23
container_title Journal of health services research & policy
container_volume 17
creator Allen, Pauline
Turner, Simon
Bartlett, Will
Perotin, Virginie
Matchaya, Greenwell
Zamora, Bernarda
description Objectives To assess the impact of provider diversity on quality and innovation in the English NHS by mapping the extent of diverse provider activity and identifying the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises, and incumbent organizations within the NHS, and the factors that affect the entry and growth of new providers. Methods Case studies of four local health economies. Data included: semi-structured interviews with 48 managerial and clinical staff from NHS organizations and providers from the private and third sector; some documentary evidence; a focus group with service users; and routine data from the Care Quality Commission and Companies House. Data collection was mainly between November 2008 and November 2009. Results Involvement of diverse providers in the NHS is limited. Commissioners' local strategies influence degrees of diversity. Barriers to entry for TSOs include lack of economies of scale in the bidding process. Private providers have greater concern to improve patient pathways and patient experience, whereas TSOs deliver quality improvements by using a more holistic approach and a greater degree of community involvement. Entry of new providers drives NHS trusts to respond by making improvements. Information sharing diminishes as competition intensifies. Conclusions There is scope to increase the participation of diverse providers in the NHS but care must be taken not to damage public accountability, overall productivity, equity and NHS providers (especially acute hospitals, which are likely to remain in the NHS) in the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023090527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1258_jhsrp.2011.011015</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1858569410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-563936ed351205be0bac7330e80711ded0b138a2c7d5d7441a78d2a31f4bd5a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r20AQxZeS0KRuP0AvYSGXXOTOaLXSKjfjP3XAJKFpz2KlHccyktbZlQz-9l3XaQmFHIaZw--9GeYx9hVhjLFU37Yb73bjGBDHoQDlB3aJmVQRQgpnYRZSRgrz9IJ98n4LgCJF9ZFdxKhySJW4ZObR2X1tyPFZvSfn6_7A6473G-Lz7rmp_YbfL59u-YQ_9YM5cLvmP6iirucz2lNjd22Y_VGysIPjK1vphi9JN_2Gzyvb2bYm_5mdr3Xj6ctrH7Ffi_nP6TJaPXy_m05WUZUkoo9kKnKRkhESY5AlQamrTAggBRmiIQMlCqXjKjPSZEmCOlMm1gLXSWmkzsWI3Zx8d86-DOT7oq19RU2jO7KDLxBiATnIOAvo9X_oNtzfhesKVFLJNE8QAoUnqnLWe0frYufqVrtDsCqOERR_IiiOERSnCILm6tV5KFsy_xR_fx6A8Qnw-pnerH3X8TfI4I-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858569410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Provider Diversity in the English NHS: A Study of Recent Developments in Four Local Health Economies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Allen, Pauline ; Turner, Simon ; Bartlett, Will ; Perotin, Virginie ; Matchaya, Greenwell ; Zamora, Bernarda</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pauline ; Turner, Simon ; Bartlett, Will ; Perotin, Virginie ; Matchaya, Greenwell ; Zamora, Bernarda</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To assess the impact of provider diversity on quality and innovation in the English NHS by mapping the extent of diverse provider activity and identifying the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises, and incumbent organizations within the NHS, and the factors that affect the entry and growth of new providers. Methods Case studies of four local health economies. Data included: semi-structured interviews with 48 managerial and clinical staff from NHS organizations and providers from the private and third sector; some documentary evidence; a focus group with service users; and routine data from the Care Quality Commission and Companies House. Data collection was mainly between November 2008 and November 2009. Results Involvement of diverse providers in the NHS is limited. Commissioners' local strategies influence degrees of diversity. Barriers to entry for TSOs include lack of economies of scale in the bidding process. Private providers have greater concern to improve patient pathways and patient experience, whereas TSOs deliver quality improvements by using a more holistic approach and a greater degree of community involvement. Entry of new providers drives NHS trusts to respond by making improvements. Information sharing diminishes as competition intensifies. Conclusions There is scope to increase the participation of diverse providers in the NHS but care must be taken not to damage public accountability, overall productivity, equity and NHS providers (especially acute hospitals, which are likely to remain in the NHS) in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-8196</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21890683</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHRPFD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Accountability ; Community Health Services - economics ; Community Health Services - organization & administration ; Community Health Services - standards ; Community involvement ; Community participation ; Companies ; Diversity ; Documentary evidence ; Economies of scale ; England ; Health ; Health services ; Health Services Research ; Holistic approach ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration ; Hospitals, Voluntary - standards ; Houses ; Humans ; Information sharing ; Innovations ; Mapping ; Medical Staff ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; National health services ; Organizational Innovation ; Private sector ; Private Sector - organization & administration ; Private Sector - standards ; Productivity ; Public Sector - organization & administration ; Public Sector - standards ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care ; State Medicine - economics ; State Medicine - organization & administration ; State Medicine - standards ; Trusts]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of health services research &amp; policy, 2012-01, Vol.17 (1_suppl), p.23-30</ispartof><rights>The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-563936ed351205be0bac7330e80711ded0b138a2c7d5d7441a78d2a31f4bd5a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-563936ed351205be0bac7330e80711ded0b138a2c7d5d7441a78d2a31f4bd5a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,30990,30991</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21890683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotin, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matchaya, Greenwell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, Bernarda</creatorcontrib><title>Provider Diversity in the English NHS: A Study of Recent Developments in Four Local Health Economies</title><title>Journal of health services research &amp; policy</title><addtitle>J Health Serv Res Policy</addtitle><description>Objectives To assess the impact of provider diversity on quality and innovation in the English NHS by mapping the extent of diverse provider activity and identifying the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises, and incumbent organizations within the NHS, and the factors that affect the entry and growth of new providers. Methods Case studies of four local health economies. Data included: semi-structured interviews with 48 managerial and clinical staff from NHS organizations and providers from the private and third sector; some documentary evidence; a focus group with service users; and routine data from the Care Quality Commission and Companies House. Data collection was mainly between November 2008 and November 2009. Results Involvement of diverse providers in the NHS is limited. Commissioners' local strategies influence degrees of diversity. Barriers to entry for TSOs include lack of economies of scale in the bidding process. Private providers have greater concern to improve patient pathways and patient experience, whereas TSOs deliver quality improvements by using a more holistic approach and a greater degree of community involvement. Entry of new providers drives NHS trusts to respond by making improvements. Information sharing diminishes as competition intensifies. Conclusions There is scope to increase the participation of diverse providers in the NHS but care must be taken not to damage public accountability, overall productivity, equity and NHS providers (especially acute hospitals, which are likely to remain in the NHS) in the process.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Community Health Services - economics</subject><subject>Community Health Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Community Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community participation</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Diversity</subject><subject>Documentary evidence</subject><subject>Economies of scale</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Holistic approach</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Voluntary - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Hospitals, Voluntary - standards</subject><subject>Houses</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Medical Staff</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>National health services</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Private Sector - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Private Sector - standards</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Public Sector - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Public Sector - standards</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>State Medicine - economics</subject><subject>State Medicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>State Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Trusts</subject><issn>1355-8196</issn><issn>1758-1060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9r20AQxZeS0KRuP0AvYSGXXOTOaLXSKjfjP3XAJKFpz2KlHccyktbZlQz-9l3XaQmFHIaZw--9GeYx9hVhjLFU37Yb73bjGBDHoQDlB3aJmVQRQgpnYRZSRgrz9IJ98n4LgCJF9ZFdxKhySJW4ZObR2X1tyPFZvSfn6_7A6473G-Lz7rmp_YbfL59u-YQ_9YM5cLvmP6iirucz2lNjd22Y_VGysIPjK1vphi9JN_2Gzyvb2bYm_5mdr3Xj6ctrH7Ffi_nP6TJaPXy_m05WUZUkoo9kKnKRkhESY5AlQamrTAggBRmiIQMlCqXjKjPSZEmCOlMm1gLXSWmkzsWI3Zx8d86-DOT7oq19RU2jO7KDLxBiATnIOAvo9X_oNtzfhesKVFLJNE8QAoUnqnLWe0frYufqVrtDsCqOERR_IiiOERSnCILm6tV5KFsy_xR_fx6A8Qnw-pnerH3X8TfI4I-c</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Allen, Pauline</creator><creator>Turner, Simon</creator><creator>Bartlett, Will</creator><creator>Perotin, Virginie</creator><creator>Matchaya, Greenwell</creator><creator>Zamora, Bernarda</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Provider Diversity in the English NHS: A Study of Recent Developments in Four Local Health Economies</title><author>Allen, Pauline ; Turner, Simon ; Bartlett, Will ; Perotin, Virginie ; Matchaya, Greenwell ; Zamora, Bernarda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-563936ed351205be0bac7330e80711ded0b138a2c7d5d7441a78d2a31f4bd5a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Community Health Services - economics</topic><topic>Community Health Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Community Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community participation</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Diversity</topic><topic>Documentary evidence</topic><topic>Economies of scale</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Holistic approach</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Voluntary - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Hospitals, Voluntary - standards</topic><topic>Houses</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Medical Staff</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>National health services</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Private Sector - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Private Sector - standards</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Public Sector - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Public Sector - standards</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>State Medicine - economics</topic><topic>State Medicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>State Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Trusts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perotin, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matchaya, Greenwell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, Bernarda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of health services research &amp; policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Pauline</au><au>Turner, Simon</au><au>Bartlett, Will</au><au>Perotin, Virginie</au><au>Matchaya, Greenwell</au><au>Zamora, Bernarda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Provider Diversity in the English NHS: A Study of Recent Developments in Four Local Health Economies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health services research &amp; policy</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Serv Res Policy</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1_suppl</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>1355-8196</issn><eissn>1758-1060</eissn><coden>JHRPFD</coden><abstract>Objectives To assess the impact of provider diversity on quality and innovation in the English NHS by mapping the extent of diverse provider activity and identifying the differences in performance between Third Sector Organisations (TSOs), for-profit private enterprises, and incumbent organizations within the NHS, and the factors that affect the entry and growth of new providers. Methods Case studies of four local health economies. Data included: semi-structured interviews with 48 managerial and clinical staff from NHS organizations and providers from the private and third sector; some documentary evidence; a focus group with service users; and routine data from the Care Quality Commission and Companies House. Data collection was mainly between November 2008 and November 2009. Results Involvement of diverse providers in the NHS is limited. Commissioners' local strategies influence degrees of diversity. Barriers to entry for TSOs include lack of economies of scale in the bidding process. Private providers have greater concern to improve patient pathways and patient experience, whereas TSOs deliver quality improvements by using a more holistic approach and a greater degree of community involvement. Entry of new providers drives NHS trusts to respond by making improvements. Information sharing diminishes as competition intensifies. Conclusions There is scope to increase the participation of diverse providers in the NHS but care must be taken not to damage public accountability, overall productivity, equity and NHS providers (especially acute hospitals, which are likely to remain in the NHS) in the process.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21890683</pmid><doi>10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011015</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-8196
ispartof Journal of health services research & policy, 2012-01, Vol.17 (1_suppl), p.23-30
issn 1355-8196
1758-1060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023090527
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Accountability
Community Health Services - economics
Community Health Services - organization & administration
Community Health Services - standards
Community involvement
Community participation
Companies
Diversity
Documentary evidence
Economies of scale
England
Health
Health services
Health Services Research
Holistic approach
Hospitals
Hospitals, Voluntary - organization & administration
Hospitals, Voluntary - standards
Houses
Humans
Information sharing
Innovations
Mapping
Medical Staff
Multiculturalism & pluralism
National health services
Organizational Innovation
Private sector
Private Sector - organization & administration
Private Sector - standards
Productivity
Public Sector - organization & administration
Public Sector - standards
Quality of care
Quality of Health Care
State Medicine - economics
State Medicine - organization & administration
State Medicine - standards
Trusts
title Provider Diversity in the English NHS: A Study of Recent Developments in Four Local Health Economies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Provider%20Diversity%20in%20the%20English%20NHS:%20A%20Study%20of%20Recent%20Developments%20in%20Four%20Local%20Health%20Economies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20services%20research%20&%20policy&rft.au=Allen,%20Pauline&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1_suppl&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=1355-8196&rft.eissn=1758-1060&rft.coden=JHRPFD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1858569410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858569410&rft_id=info:pmid/21890683&rft_sage_id=10.1258_jhsrp.2011.011015&rfr_iscdi=true