Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)

This study examines the associations between the speaking proficiency of 181 adult learners of Dutch as a second language and their linguistic competences. Performance in eight speaking tasks was rated on a scale of communicative adequacy. After extrapolation of these ratings to the Overall Oral Pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Language testing 2012-04, Vol.29 (2), p.203-221
Hauptverfasser: Hulstijn, Jan H, Schoonen, Rob, Jong, Nivja H. de, Steinel, Margarita P, Florijn, Arjen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 2
container_start_page 203
container_title Language testing
container_volume 29
creator Hulstijn, Jan H
Schoonen, Rob
Jong, Nivja H. de
Steinel, Margarita P
Florijn, Arjen
description This study examines the associations between the speaking proficiency of 181 adult learners of Dutch as a second language and their linguistic competences. Performance in eight speaking tasks was rated on a scale of communicative adequacy. After extrapolation of these ratings to the Overall Oral Production scale of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) (Council of Europe, 2001), 80 and 30 participants (on average per speaking task) were found to be, respectively, at the B1 and B2 levels of this scale. The following linguistic competences were tapped with non-communicative tasks: productive vocabulary knowledge, productive knowledge of grammar, speed of lexical retrieval, speed of articulation, speed of sentence building, and pronunciation skills. Discriminant analyses showed that all linguistic competences, except speed of articulation, discriminated participants at the two levels of oral production. Subsequent comparisons showed that the distance between B1ers and B2ers was smaller in knowledge of high-frequency words than in knowledge of medium- and low-frequency words. Extrapolation from scores on the vocabulary test yielded estimations of productive vocabularies of, on average, 4000 and 7000 words for B1ers and B2ers, respectively. The grammar test assessed grammatical knowledge in 10 domains. B2ers were found to outperform B1ers on all parts of the test. Thus, the differences in lexical and grammatical knowledge of B1ers and B2ers appear to be a matter of degree, rather than a matter of category or domain. The paper ends with a research agenda for a linguistic underpinning of the CEFR. (Verlag).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0265532211419826
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023037370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ971381</ericid><sourcerecordid>1023037370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-6b90e3c88e46159d0d52faa3d9a77f165083e46a3e6133a181867217f20bfcae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS3USmxp76ji4CM9hHrsjR0fYdmFVitVQuUcGWcMLkkc7ISK38UfxGERlXqa0bzvPY81hBwCOwFQ6jvjsiwF5wBL0BWXe2QBS6UKppfyA1nMcjHr--RTSn8YYxqEXJDnre9vJ59Gb6kN3YAj9hYTDY62aGKP8bU_n0Z7R02ihia0oW9oa7LP3CI1Ix3vkJ4BNXl8xrPvEdtXVxrQ3Od8OsTgvPU5-mmez_wqdF3o6XqKIVM93UTT4d8Q72fgCh3GeRHqQqTbt6cSPV6tN1ffPpOPzrQJv7zVA3K9Wf9eXRbbXxc_VqfbwgqhZSFvNENhqwqXEkrdsKbkzhjRaKOUA1mySmTJCJQghIEKKqk4KMfZjbMGxQE53uXm9R8mTGPd-WSxzV_HMKUaGBdMKKFYRtkOtTGkFNHVQ_SdiU8Zquf71P_fJ1uOdhaM3r7j659agaggy193cuOHf2lalUyV4gX1epSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1023037370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Hulstijn, Jan H ; Schoonen, Rob ; Jong, Nivja H. de ; Steinel, Margarita P ; Florijn, Arjen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hulstijn, Jan H ; Schoonen, Rob ; Jong, Nivja H. de ; Steinel, Margarita P ; Florijn, Arjen</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the associations between the speaking proficiency of 181 adult learners of Dutch as a second language and their linguistic competences. Performance in eight speaking tasks was rated on a scale of communicative adequacy. After extrapolation of these ratings to the Overall Oral Production scale of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) (Council of Europe, 2001), 80 and 30 participants (on average per speaking task) were found to be, respectively, at the B1 and B2 levels of this scale. The following linguistic competences were tapped with non-communicative tasks: productive vocabulary knowledge, productive knowledge of grammar, speed of lexical retrieval, speed of articulation, speed of sentence building, and pronunciation skills. Discriminant analyses showed that all linguistic competences, except speed of articulation, discriminated participants at the two levels of oral production. Subsequent comparisons showed that the distance between B1ers and B2ers was smaller in knowledge of high-frequency words than in knowledge of medium- and low-frequency words. Extrapolation from scores on the vocabulary test yielded estimations of productive vocabularies of, on average, 4000 and 7000 words for B1ers and B2ers, respectively. The grammar test assessed grammatical knowledge in 10 domains. B2ers were found to outperform B1ers on all parts of the test. Thus, the differences in lexical and grammatical knowledge of B1ers and B2ers appear to be a matter of degree, rather than a matter of category or domain. The paper ends with a research agenda for a linguistic underpinning of the CEFR. (Verlag).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-5322</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-0946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0265532211419826</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LATEEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult Learning ; Adult Students ; Articulation (Speech) ; Correlation ; Empirische Forschung ; Foreign Countries ; Grammar ; Grammatik ; Guidelines ; Indo European Languages ; Language Proficiency ; Language Tests ; Linguistic Competence ; Measures (Individuals) ; Niederländisch ; Oral Language ; Pronunciation ; Quantitative Forschung ; Scores ; Second Language Learning ; Speech Communication ; Sprachkompetenz ; Task Analysis ; Vocabulary ; Wortschatz ; Zweitsprache</subject><ispartof>Language testing, 2012-04, Vol.29 (2), p.203-221</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-6b90e3c88e46159d0d52faa3d9a77f165083e46a3e6133a181867217f20bfcae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-6b90e3c88e46159d0d52faa3d9a77f165083e46a3e6133a181867217f20bfcae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=975075$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ971381$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hulstijn, Jan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoonen, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jong, Nivja H. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinel, Margarita P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florijn, Arjen</creatorcontrib><title>Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)</title><title>Language testing</title><description>This study examines the associations between the speaking proficiency of 181 adult learners of Dutch as a second language and their linguistic competences. Performance in eight speaking tasks was rated on a scale of communicative adequacy. After extrapolation of these ratings to the Overall Oral Production scale of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) (Council of Europe, 2001), 80 and 30 participants (on average per speaking task) were found to be, respectively, at the B1 and B2 levels of this scale. The following linguistic competences were tapped with non-communicative tasks: productive vocabulary knowledge, productive knowledge of grammar, speed of lexical retrieval, speed of articulation, speed of sentence building, and pronunciation skills. Discriminant analyses showed that all linguistic competences, except speed of articulation, discriminated participants at the two levels of oral production. Subsequent comparisons showed that the distance between B1ers and B2ers was smaller in knowledge of high-frequency words than in knowledge of medium- and low-frequency words. Extrapolation from scores on the vocabulary test yielded estimations of productive vocabularies of, on average, 4000 and 7000 words for B1ers and B2ers, respectively. The grammar test assessed grammatical knowledge in 10 domains. B2ers were found to outperform B1ers on all parts of the test. Thus, the differences in lexical and grammatical knowledge of B1ers and B2ers appear to be a matter of degree, rather than a matter of category or domain. The paper ends with a research agenda for a linguistic underpinning of the CEFR. (Verlag).</description><subject>Adult Learning</subject><subject>Adult Students</subject><subject>Articulation (Speech)</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Empirische Forschung</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatik</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Indo European Languages</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Linguistic Competence</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Niederländisch</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Quantitative Forschung</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Sprachkompetenz</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Wortschatz</subject><subject>Zweitsprache</subject><issn>0265-5322</issn><issn>1477-0946</issn><issn>1477-0946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQhS3USmxp76ji4CM9hHrsjR0fYdmFVitVQuUcGWcMLkkc7ISK38UfxGERlXqa0bzvPY81hBwCOwFQ6jvjsiwF5wBL0BWXe2QBS6UKppfyA1nMcjHr--RTSn8YYxqEXJDnre9vJ59Gb6kN3YAj9hYTDY62aGKP8bU_n0Z7R02ihia0oW9oa7LP3CI1Ix3vkJ4BNXl8xrPvEdtXVxrQ3Od8OsTgvPU5-mmez_wqdF3o6XqKIVM93UTT4d8Q72fgCh3GeRHqQqTbt6cSPV6tN1ffPpOPzrQJv7zVA3K9Wf9eXRbbXxc_VqfbwgqhZSFvNENhqwqXEkrdsKbkzhjRaKOUA1mySmTJCJQghIEKKqk4KMfZjbMGxQE53uXm9R8mTGPd-WSxzV_HMKUaGBdMKKFYRtkOtTGkFNHVQ_SdiU8Zquf71P_fJ1uOdhaM3r7j659agaggy193cuOHf2lalUyV4gX1epSg</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>Hulstijn, Jan H</creator><creator>Schoonen, Rob</creator><creator>Jong, Nivja H. de</creator><creator>Steinel, Margarita P</creator><creator>Florijn, Arjen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)</title><author>Hulstijn, Jan H ; Schoonen, Rob ; Jong, Nivja H. de ; Steinel, Margarita P ; Florijn, Arjen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3396-6b90e3c88e46159d0d52faa3d9a77f165083e46a3e6133a181867217f20bfcae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult Learning</topic><topic>Adult Students</topic><topic>Articulation (Speech)</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Empirische Forschung</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatik</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Indo European Languages</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Linguistic Competence</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Niederländisch</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Quantitative Forschung</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Sprachkompetenz</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Wortschatz</topic><topic>Zweitsprache</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hulstijn, Jan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoonen, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jong, Nivja H. de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinel, Margarita P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florijn, Arjen</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hulstijn, Jan H</au><au>Schoonen, Rob</au><au>Jong, Nivja H. de</au><au>Steinel, Margarita P</au><au>Florijn, Arjen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ971381</ericid><atitle>Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)</atitle><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>203-221</pages><issn>0265-5322</issn><issn>1477-0946</issn><eissn>1477-0946</eissn><coden>LATEEU</coden><abstract>This study examines the associations between the speaking proficiency of 181 adult learners of Dutch as a second language and their linguistic competences. Performance in eight speaking tasks was rated on a scale of communicative adequacy. After extrapolation of these ratings to the Overall Oral Production scale of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) (Council of Europe, 2001), 80 and 30 participants (on average per speaking task) were found to be, respectively, at the B1 and B2 levels of this scale. The following linguistic competences were tapped with non-communicative tasks: productive vocabulary knowledge, productive knowledge of grammar, speed of lexical retrieval, speed of articulation, speed of sentence building, and pronunciation skills. Discriminant analyses showed that all linguistic competences, except speed of articulation, discriminated participants at the two levels of oral production. Subsequent comparisons showed that the distance between B1ers and B2ers was smaller in knowledge of high-frequency words than in knowledge of medium- and low-frequency words. Extrapolation from scores on the vocabulary test yielded estimations of productive vocabularies of, on average, 4000 and 7000 words for B1ers and B2ers, respectively. The grammar test assessed grammatical knowledge in 10 domains. B2ers were found to outperform B1ers on all parts of the test. Thus, the differences in lexical and grammatical knowledge of B1ers and B2ers appear to be a matter of degree, rather than a matter of category or domain. The paper ends with a research agenda for a linguistic underpinning of the CEFR. (Verlag).</abstract><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0265532211419826</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-5322
ispartof Language testing, 2012-04, Vol.29 (2), p.203-221
issn 0265-5322
1477-0946
1477-0946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023037370
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult Learning
Adult Students
Articulation (Speech)
Correlation
Empirische Forschung
Foreign Countries
Grammar
Grammatik
Guidelines
Indo European Languages
Language Proficiency
Language Tests
Linguistic Competence
Measures (Individuals)
Niederländisch
Oral Language
Pronunciation
Quantitative Forschung
Scores
Second Language Learning
Speech Communication
Sprachkompetenz
Task Analysis
Vocabulary
Wortschatz
Zweitsprache
title Linguistic competences of learners of Dutch as a second language at the B1 and B2 levels of speaking proficiency of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A35%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linguistic%20competences%20of%20learners%20of%20Dutch%20as%20a%20second%20language%20at%20the%20B1%20and%20B2%20levels%20of%20speaking%20proficiency%20of%20the%20Common%20European%20Framework%20of%20Reference%20for%20Languages%20(CEFR)&rft.jtitle=Language%20testing&rft.au=Hulstijn,%20Jan%20H&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=203-221&rft.issn=0265-5322&rft.eissn=1477-0946&rft.coden=LATEEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0265532211419826&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023037370%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1023037370&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ971381&rfr_iscdi=true