A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment

The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Punishment & society 2012-04, Vol.14 (2), p.147-165
Hauptverfasser: Indermaur, David, Roberts, Lynne, Spiranovic, Caroline, Mackenzie, Geraldine, Gelb, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 147
container_title Punishment & society
container_volume 14
creator Indermaur, David
Roberts, Lynne
Spiranovic, Caroline
Mackenzie, Geraldine
Gelb, Karen
description The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent variables). The study involved a pre-test, post-test experimental design. Participants were randomly allocated to either an intervention group or a control condition. Statistically significant changes in the dependent variables were observed immediately following the intervention but these changes were not sustained when measured at follow-up nine months later. Further, at the time of the follow-up the differences between the control group scores and the intervention group scores were not significantly different. The observed changes immediately following the intervention are seen to be a function of the changed relationship of the respondent to the task. The implications of the results for integrating public perspectives into policy are discussed. It is argued that rather than a focus on public education, a more productive direction is to focus on the way the public is engaged on matters concerning punishment.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1462474511434430
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023030825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1462474511434430</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2645374891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-6c5632588d3e20e0d8f4d368ffbea8f93d0c3d928d3783c9a5f3bc0b65f7db1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHhe8eInuZ7LxVopfUPBSz2GzO9tuSZO6mxz8790QD1IQCgMzvPebB8MgdEvJA6VF8UhFzkQhJKWCC8HJGZrRQtCMk1KepznZ2ehfoqsYd4RQRQo5Q2aB97rvIeDO4d1gN7CHtn_C6y1gcA5MPxq-dV1InO9arFuLLTS-hjAJqQ5D3XiDU5DvBwsR913SWh-3Y9o1unC6iXDz2-fo8-V5vXzLVh-v78vFKjOipH2WG5lzJpWyHBgBYpUTlufKuRq0ciW3xHBbsuQXiptSS8drQ-pcusLWFPgc3U-5h9B9DRD7au-jgabRLXRDrChhnHCimDwNZZJIdQJKqZKUizyhd0forhtCm25OFCmVoiXjiSITZUIXYwBXHYLf6_CdoGr8ZXX8y7SSTStRb-Bv6D_8D-1enQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009881923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Indermaur, David ; Roberts, Lynne ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Mackenzie, Geraldine ; Gelb, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Indermaur, David ; Roberts, Lynne ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Mackenzie, Geraldine ; Gelb, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent variables). The study involved a pre-test, post-test experimental design. Participants were randomly allocated to either an intervention group or a control condition. Statistically significant changes in the dependent variables were observed immediately following the intervention but these changes were not sustained when measured at follow-up nine months later. Further, at the time of the follow-up the differences between the control group scores and the intervention group scores were not significantly different. The observed changes immediately following the intervention are seen to be a function of the changed relationship of the respondent to the task. The implications of the results for integrating public perspectives into policy are discussed. It is argued that rather than a focus on public education, a more productive direction is to focus on the way the public is engaged on matters concerning punishment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-4745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1462474511434430</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behavior ; Courts ; Criminal justice ; Criminal sentencing ; Impact analysis ; Imprisonment ; Information ; Intervention ; Judgement ; Justice ; Litigation ; Public Opinion ; Punishment ; Research Design ; Respondents ; Sentences ; Studies ; Trust ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Punishment &amp; society, 2012-04, Vol.14 (2), p.147-165</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Apr 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-6c5632588d3e20e0d8f4d368ffbea8f93d0c3d928d3783c9a5f3bc0b65f7db1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-6c5632588d3e20e0d8f4d368ffbea8f93d0c3d928d3783c9a5f3bc0b65f7db1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1462474511434430$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1462474511434430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Indermaur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiranovic, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelb, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment</title><title>Punishment &amp; society</title><description>The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent variables). The study involved a pre-test, post-test experimental design. Participants were randomly allocated to either an intervention group or a control condition. Statistically significant changes in the dependent variables were observed immediately following the intervention but these changes were not sustained when measured at follow-up nine months later. Further, at the time of the follow-up the differences between the control group scores and the intervention group scores were not significantly different. The observed changes immediately following the intervention are seen to be a function of the changed relationship of the respondent to the task. The implications of the results for integrating public perspectives into policy are discussed. It is argued that rather than a focus on public education, a more productive direction is to focus on the way the public is engaged on matters concerning punishment.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal sentencing</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Judgement</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Punishment</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1462-4745</issn><issn>1741-3095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHhe8eInuZ7LxVopfUPBSz2GzO9tuSZO6mxz8790QD1IQCgMzvPebB8MgdEvJA6VF8UhFzkQhJKWCC8HJGZrRQtCMk1KepznZ2ehfoqsYd4RQRQo5Q2aB97rvIeDO4d1gN7CHtn_C6y1gcA5MPxq-dV1InO9arFuLLTS-hjAJqQ5D3XiDU5DvBwsR913SWh-3Y9o1unC6iXDz2-fo8-V5vXzLVh-v78vFKjOipH2WG5lzJpWyHBgBYpUTlufKuRq0ciW3xHBbsuQXiptSS8drQ-pcusLWFPgc3U-5h9B9DRD7au-jgabRLXRDrChhnHCimDwNZZJIdQJKqZKUizyhd0forhtCm25OFCmVoiXjiSITZUIXYwBXHYLf6_CdoGr8ZXX8y7SSTStRb-Bv6D_8D-1enQA</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Indermaur, David</creator><creator>Roberts, Lynne</creator><creator>Spiranovic, Caroline</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Geraldine</creator><creator>Gelb, Karen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment</title><author>Indermaur, David ; Roberts, Lynne ; Spiranovic, Caroline ; Mackenzie, Geraldine ; Gelb, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-6c5632588d3e20e0d8f4d368ffbea8f93d0c3d928d3783c9a5f3bc0b65f7db1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal sentencing</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Judgement</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Punishment</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Indermaur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiranovic, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelb, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Punishment &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Indermaur, David</au><au>Roberts, Lynne</au><au>Spiranovic, Caroline</au><au>Mackenzie, Geraldine</au><au>Gelb, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment</atitle><jtitle>Punishment &amp; society</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>147-165</pages><issn>1462-4745</issn><eissn>1741-3095</eissn><abstract>The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent variables). The study involved a pre-test, post-test experimental design. Participants were randomly allocated to either an intervention group or a control condition. Statistically significant changes in the dependent variables were observed immediately following the intervention but these changes were not sustained when measured at follow-up nine months later. Further, at the time of the follow-up the differences between the control group scores and the intervention group scores were not significantly different. The observed changes immediately following the intervention are seen to be a function of the changed relationship of the respondent to the task. The implications of the results for integrating public perspectives into policy are discussed. It is argued that rather than a focus on public education, a more productive direction is to focus on the way the public is engaged on matters concerning punishment.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1462474511434430</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-4745
ispartof Punishment & society, 2012-04, Vol.14 (2), p.147-165
issn 1462-4745
1741-3095
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1023030825
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Attitudes
Behavior
Courts
Criminal justice
Criminal sentencing
Impact analysis
Imprisonment
Information
Intervention
Judgement
Justice
Litigation
Public Opinion
Punishment
Research Design
Respondents
Sentences
Studies
Trust
Variables
title A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T14%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20matter%20of%20judgement:%20The%20effect%20of%20information%20and%20deliberation%20on%20public%20attitudes%20to%20punishment&rft.jtitle=Punishment%20&%20society&rft.au=Indermaur,%20David&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=147-165&rft.issn=1462-4745&rft.eissn=1741-3095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1462474511434430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2645374891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009881923&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1462474511434430&rfr_iscdi=true