Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

Background & Aims The efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown. Methods Four placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 2012-07, Vol.143 (1), p.62-69.e4
Hauptverfasser: Sandborn, William J, Colombel, Jean–Frederic, Sands, Bruce E, Rutgeerts, Paul, Targan, Stephan R, Panaccione, Remo, Bressler, Brian, Geboes, Karl, Schreiber, Stefan, Aranda, Richard, Gujrathi, Sheila, Luo, Allison, Peng, Yun, Salter–Cid, Luisa, Hanauer, Stephen B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 69.e4
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)
container_volume 143
creator Sandborn, William J
Colombel, Jean–Frederic
Sands, Bruce E
Rutgeerts, Paul
Targan, Stephan R
Panaccione, Remo
Bressler, Brian
Geboes, Karl
Schreiber, Stefan
Aranda, Richard
Gujrathi, Sheila
Luo, Allison
Peng, Yun
Salter–Cid, Luisa
Hanauer, Stephen B
description Background & Aims The efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown. Methods Four placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe CD (CD-IP; CD-MP) and UC (UC-IP1; UC-MP). In CD-IP and UC-IP1, 451 patients with CD and 490 patients with UC were randomized to abatacept 30, 10, or 3 mg/kg (according to body weight) or placebo, and dosed at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. In MP, 90 patients with CD and 131 patients with UC who responded to abatacept at week 12 in the induction trials were randomized to abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks through week 52. Results In CD-IP, 17.2%, 10.2%, and 15.5% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at weeks 8 and 12, vs 14.4% receiving placebo ( P = .611, P = .311, and P = .812, respectively). In UC-IP1, 21.4%, 19.0%, and 20.3% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at week 12, vs 29.5% receiving placebo ( P = .124, P = .043, and P = .158, respectively). In CD-MP, 23.8% vs 11.1% of abatacept vs placebo patients were in remission at week 52. In UC-MP, 12.5% vs 14.1% of patients receiving abatacept vs placebo were in remission at week 52. Safety generally was comparable between groups. Conclusions The studies showed that abatacept is not efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00406653 , NCT00410410.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022379916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016508512005252</els_id><sourcerecordid>1022379916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a5ea292d5cbee8f031700f741b083e8192d3229ca037e92175b8fbd222e5033a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EgvLxDxDKBkvC-RyTZEGqyqdUiQGYLce5gEsaFzutxL_HVQsDC9PJ9vPeyc8xdsoh4yDF5Sx702HwLkPgmEGeAYcdNuISyxTi1S4bxXKVSijlATsMYQYAlSj5PjtAlJDHw4jl41oP2tBiSFrnk4l37_15SG5sIB0o0X2TvHaGvB7sipKJ6-xgwzHba3UX6GRbj9jr3e3L5CGdPt0_TsbT1EishlRL0lhhI01NVLYgeAHQFjmvoRRU8vgkECujQRRUIS9kXbZ1g4gkQQgtjtjFpu_Cu88lhUHNbTDUdbontwyKA6IoqopfRTTfoMa7EDy1auHtXPuvCKm1LzVTG19q7UtBrqKvGDvbTljWc2p-Qz-CInC9ASj-c2XJq2As9YYa68kMqnH2vwl_G5jO9tbo7oO-KMzc0vfRoeIqxIx6Xu9svTKOABIlim93FJA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022379916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sandborn, William J ; Colombel, Jean–Frederic ; Sands, Bruce E ; Rutgeerts, Paul ; Targan, Stephan R ; Panaccione, Remo ; Bressler, Brian ; Geboes, Karl ; Schreiber, Stefan ; Aranda, Richard ; Gujrathi, Sheila ; Luo, Allison ; Peng, Yun ; Salter–Cid, Luisa ; Hanauer, Stephen B</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandborn, William J ; Colombel, Jean–Frederic ; Sands, Bruce E ; Rutgeerts, Paul ; Targan, Stephan R ; Panaccione, Remo ; Bressler, Brian ; Geboes, Karl ; Schreiber, Stefan ; Aranda, Richard ; Gujrathi, Sheila ; Luo, Allison ; Peng, Yun ; Salter–Cid, Luisa ; Hanauer, Stephen B</creatorcontrib><description>Background &amp; Aims The efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown. Methods Four placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe CD (CD-IP; CD-MP) and UC (UC-IP1; UC-MP). In CD-IP and UC-IP1, 451 patients with CD and 490 patients with UC were randomized to abatacept 30, 10, or 3 mg/kg (according to body weight) or placebo, and dosed at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. In MP, 90 patients with CD and 131 patients with UC who responded to abatacept at week 12 in the induction trials were randomized to abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks through week 52. Results In CD-IP, 17.2%, 10.2%, and 15.5% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at weeks 8 and 12, vs 14.4% receiving placebo ( P = .611, P = .311, and P = .812, respectively). In UC-IP1, 21.4%, 19.0%, and 20.3% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at week 12, vs 29.5% receiving placebo ( P = .124, P = .043, and P = .158, respectively). In CD-MP, 23.8% vs 11.1% of abatacept vs placebo patients were in remission at week 52. In UC-MP, 12.5% vs 14.1% of patients receiving abatacept vs placebo were in remission at week 52. Safety generally was comparable between groups. Conclusions The studies showed that abatacept is not efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00406653 , NCT00410410.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22504093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abatacept ; Adult ; Clinical Trial ; Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy ; Crohn Disease - drug therapy ; Female ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; IBD ; Immunoconjugates ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; Inflammatory Bowel Disease ; Male ; Middle Aged ; T-Cell Signaling Inhibitor</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2012-07, Vol.143 (1), p.62-69.e4</ispartof><rights>AGA Institute</rights><rights>2012 AGA Institute</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a5ea292d5cbee8f031700f741b083e8192d3229ca037e92175b8fbd222e5033a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a5ea292d5cbee8f031700f741b083e8192d3229ca037e92175b8fbd222e5033a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22504093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandborn, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombel, Jean–Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutgeerts, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targan, Stephan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panaccione, Remo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressler, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geboes, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gujrathi, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter–Cid, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanauer, Stephen B</creatorcontrib><title>Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis</title><title>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</title><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>Background &amp; Aims The efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown. Methods Four placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe CD (CD-IP; CD-MP) and UC (UC-IP1; UC-MP). In CD-IP and UC-IP1, 451 patients with CD and 490 patients with UC were randomized to abatacept 30, 10, or 3 mg/kg (according to body weight) or placebo, and dosed at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. In MP, 90 patients with CD and 131 patients with UC who responded to abatacept at week 12 in the induction trials were randomized to abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks through week 52. Results In CD-IP, 17.2%, 10.2%, and 15.5% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at weeks 8 and 12, vs 14.4% receiving placebo ( P = .611, P = .311, and P = .812, respectively). In UC-IP1, 21.4%, 19.0%, and 20.3% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at week 12, vs 29.5% receiving placebo ( P = .124, P = .043, and P = .158, respectively). In CD-MP, 23.8% vs 11.1% of abatacept vs placebo patients were in remission at week 52. In UC-MP, 12.5% vs 14.1% of patients receiving abatacept vs placebo were in remission at week 52. Safety generally was comparable between groups. Conclusions The studies showed that abatacept is not efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00406653 , NCT00410410.</description><subject>Abatacept</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical Trial</subject><subject>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IBD</subject><subject>Immunoconjugates</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents</subject><subject>Inflammatory Bowel Disease</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>T-Cell Signaling Inhibitor</subject><issn>0016-5085</issn><issn>1528-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT1PwzAQhi0EgvLxDxDKBkvC-RyTZEGqyqdUiQGYLce5gEsaFzutxL_HVQsDC9PJ9vPeyc8xdsoh4yDF5Sx702HwLkPgmEGeAYcdNuISyxTi1S4bxXKVSijlATsMYQYAlSj5PjtAlJDHw4jl41oP2tBiSFrnk4l37_15SG5sIB0o0X2TvHaGvB7sipKJ6-xgwzHba3UX6GRbj9jr3e3L5CGdPt0_TsbT1EishlRL0lhhI01NVLYgeAHQFjmvoRRU8vgkECujQRRUIS9kXbZ1g4gkQQgtjtjFpu_Cu88lhUHNbTDUdbontwyKA6IoqopfRTTfoMa7EDy1auHtXPuvCKm1LzVTG19q7UtBrqKvGDvbTljWc2p-Qz-CInC9ASj-c2XJq2As9YYa68kMqnH2vwl_G5jO9tbo7oO-KMzc0vfRoeIqxIx6Xu9svTKOABIlim93FJA4</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Sandborn, William J</creator><creator>Colombel, Jean–Frederic</creator><creator>Sands, Bruce E</creator><creator>Rutgeerts, Paul</creator><creator>Targan, Stephan R</creator><creator>Panaccione, Remo</creator><creator>Bressler, Brian</creator><creator>Geboes, Karl</creator><creator>Schreiber, Stefan</creator><creator>Aranda, Richard</creator><creator>Gujrathi, Sheila</creator><creator>Luo, Allison</creator><creator>Peng, Yun</creator><creator>Salter–Cid, Luisa</creator><creator>Hanauer, Stephen B</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis</title><author>Sandborn, William J ; Colombel, Jean–Frederic ; Sands, Bruce E ; Rutgeerts, Paul ; Targan, Stephan R ; Panaccione, Remo ; Bressler, Brian ; Geboes, Karl ; Schreiber, Stefan ; Aranda, Richard ; Gujrathi, Sheila ; Luo, Allison ; Peng, Yun ; Salter–Cid, Luisa ; Hanauer, Stephen B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a5ea292d5cbee8f031700f741b083e8192d3229ca037e92175b8fbd222e5033a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abatacept</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical Trial</topic><topic>Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Crohn Disease - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IBD</topic><topic>Immunoconjugates</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents</topic><topic>Inflammatory Bowel Disease</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>T-Cell Signaling Inhibitor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandborn, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombel, Jean–Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, Bruce E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutgeerts, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Targan, Stephan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panaccione, Remo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressler, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geboes, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aranda, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gujrathi, Sheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salter–Cid, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanauer, Stephen B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandborn, William J</au><au>Colombel, Jean–Frederic</au><au>Sands, Bruce E</au><au>Rutgeerts, Paul</au><au>Targan, Stephan R</au><au>Panaccione, Remo</au><au>Bressler, Brian</au><au>Geboes, Karl</au><au>Schreiber, Stefan</au><au>Aranda, Richard</au><au>Gujrathi, Sheila</au><au>Luo, Allison</au><au>Peng, Yun</au><au>Salter–Cid, Luisa</au><au>Hanauer, Stephen B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>69.e4</epage><pages>62-69.e4</pages><issn>0016-5085</issn><eissn>1528-0012</eissn><abstract>Background &amp; Aims The efficacy of abatacept, a selective costimulation modulator, in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown. Methods Four placebo-controlled trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of abatacept as induction (IP) and maintenance (MP) therapy in adults with active, moderate-to-severe CD (CD-IP; CD-MP) and UC (UC-IP1; UC-MP). In CD-IP and UC-IP1, 451 patients with CD and 490 patients with UC were randomized to abatacept 30, 10, or 3 mg/kg (according to body weight) or placebo, and dosed at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. In MP, 90 patients with CD and 131 patients with UC who responded to abatacept at week 12 in the induction trials were randomized to abatacept 10 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks through week 52. Results In CD-IP, 17.2%, 10.2%, and 15.5% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at weeks 8 and 12, vs 14.4% receiving placebo ( P = .611, P = .311, and P = .812, respectively). In UC-IP1, 21.4%, 19.0%, and 20.3% of patients receiving abatacept 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg achieved a clinical response at week 12, vs 29.5% receiving placebo ( P = .124, P = .043, and P = .158, respectively). In CD-MP, 23.8% vs 11.1% of abatacept vs placebo patients were in remission at week 52. In UC-MP, 12.5% vs 14.1% of patients receiving abatacept vs placebo were in remission at week 52. Safety generally was comparable between groups. Conclusions The studies showed that abatacept is not efficacious for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CD or UC. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00406653 , NCT00410410.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22504093</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5085
ispartof Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2012-07, Vol.143 (1), p.62-69.e4
issn 0016-5085
1528-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022379916
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abatacept
Adult
Clinical Trial
Colitis, Ulcerative - drug therapy
Crohn Disease - drug therapy
Female
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
IBD
Immunoconjugates
Immunosuppressive Agents
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Male
Middle Aged
T-Cell Signaling Inhibitor
title Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T06%3A14%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abatacept%20for%20Crohn's%20Disease%20and%20Ulcerative%20Colitis&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201943)&rft.au=Sandborn,%20William%20J&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=69.e4&rft.pages=62-69.e4&rft.issn=0016-5085&rft.eissn=1528-0012&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1022379916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022379916&rft_id=info:pmid/22504093&rft_els_id=S0016508512005252&rfr_iscdi=true