Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients

Objective In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of renal nutrition 2012-07, Vol.22 (4), p.409-415.e2
Hauptverfasser: Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD, Sala, Priscila Campos, RD, Horie, Lilian Mika, MD, Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD, Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD, Romão, João Egídio, MD, Cecconello, Ivan, PhD, Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 415.e2
container_issue 4
container_start_page 409
container_title Journal of renal nutrition
container_volume 22
creator Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD
Sala, Priscila Campos, RD
Horie, Lilian Mika, MD
Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD
Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD
Romão, João Egídio, MD
Cecconello, Ivan, PhD
Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD
description Objective In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to planning and monitoring of nutritional treatment. We evaluated the performance of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the skinfold thickness sum (SKF) to assess fat mass (FM) in chronic renal failure patients before (BHD) and after (AHD) HD, using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the standard method. Design This single-center cross-sectional trial involved comparing the FM of 60 HD patients estimated BHD and AHD by BIA (multifrequential; 29 women, 31 men) and by SKF with those estimated by the reference method, ADP. Body fat-free mass (FFM) was also obtained by subtracting the total body fat from the individual total weight. Results Mean estimated FM (kg [%]) observed by ADP BHD was 17.95 ± 0.99 kg (30.11% ± 1.30%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 16.00 to 19.90 (27.56 to 32.66); mean estimated FM observed AHD was 17.92 ± 1.11 kg (30.04% ± 1.40%), with a 95% CI of 15.74 to 20.10 (27.28 to 32.79). Neither study period showed a difference in FM and FFM (for both kg and %) estimates by the SKF method when compared with ADP; however, the BIA underestimated the FM and overestimated the FFM (for both kg and %) when compared with ADP. Conclusion The SKF, but not the BIA, method showed results similar to ADP and can be considered adequate for FM evaluation in HD patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.jrn.2012.01.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022260827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1051227612000477</els_id><sourcerecordid>1022260827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ebbbb19b4cc512566cf07706239ac9cd1d67f5b51514aa21c945ff53c52ade7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwA7ggH7kktSdxvBES0rZQWqkIxJaz5bUn4Gxib-0Eaf89jnbhwAFf7JHfe9J8j5DXnJWcieqyL_voS2AcSsZLBvUTcs5FBcVKsOppfjPBCwDZnJEXKfWMcS5W8JycAdRN3YI8J49XLuCAZorO6IHejXu02huka6-HQ3KJam_pZud8FwZLH346s_OYEt3MI3WerlPKk_M_6FWwB3qjJ_pZ5-_Q0W-YI-gHd8r5qieHfkovybNODwlfne4L8v3m48P1bXH_5dPd9fq-MDVbTQVu8-HttjZGcBBNYzomJWugarVpjeW2kZ3YCi54rTVw09ai60RlBGiL0lYX5O0xdx_D44xpUqNLBodBewxzUpwBQMNWILOUH6UmhpQidmof3ajjIYvUQlr1KpNWC2nFuMqks-fNKX7ejmj_Ov6gzYJ3RwHmJX85jCqZDMCgdTHzVja4_8a__8dtBueXjnZ4wNSHOWa6eQuVskdtlqqXpjkwxmopq9_Mw6Pq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022260827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD ; Sala, Priscila Campos, RD ; Horie, Lilian Mika, MD ; Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD ; Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD ; Romão, João Egídio, MD ; Cecconello, Ivan, PhD ; Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD ; Sala, Priscila Campos, RD ; Horie, Lilian Mika, MD ; Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD ; Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD ; Romão, João Egídio, MD ; Cecconello, Ivan, PhD ; Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to planning and monitoring of nutritional treatment. We evaluated the performance of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the skinfold thickness sum (SKF) to assess fat mass (FM) in chronic renal failure patients before (BHD) and after (AHD) HD, using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the standard method. Design This single-center cross-sectional trial involved comparing the FM of 60 HD patients estimated BHD and AHD by BIA (multifrequential; 29 women, 31 men) and by SKF with those estimated by the reference method, ADP. Body fat-free mass (FFM) was also obtained by subtracting the total body fat from the individual total weight. Results Mean estimated FM (kg [%]) observed by ADP BHD was 17.95 ± 0.99 kg (30.11% ± 1.30%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 16.00 to 19.90 (27.56 to 32.66); mean estimated FM observed AHD was 17.92 ± 1.11 kg (30.04% ± 1.40%), with a 95% CI of 15.74 to 20.10 (27.28 to 32.79). Neither study period showed a difference in FM and FFM (for both kg and %) estimates by the SKF method when compared with ADP; however, the BIA underestimated the FM and overestimated the FFM (for both kg and %) when compared with ADP. Conclusion The SKF, but not the BIA, method showed results similar to ADP and can be considered adequate for FM evaluation in HD patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-2276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8503</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2012.01.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22464927</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism ; Adult ; Body Composition ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Electric Impedance ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology ; Plethysmography - methods ; Renal Dialysis ; Skinfold Thickness</subject><ispartof>Journal of renal nutrition, 2012-07, Vol.22 (4), p.409-415.e2</ispartof><rights>National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ebbbb19b4cc512566cf07706239ac9cd1d67f5b51514aa21c945ff53c52ade7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ebbbb19b4cc512566cf07706239ac9cd1d67f5b51514aa21c945ff53c52ade7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1051227612000477$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22464927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, Priscila Campos, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horie, Lilian Mika, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romão, João Egídio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecconello, Ivan, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients</title><title>Journal of renal nutrition</title><addtitle>J Ren Nutr</addtitle><description>Objective In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to planning and monitoring of nutritional treatment. We evaluated the performance of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the skinfold thickness sum (SKF) to assess fat mass (FM) in chronic renal failure patients before (BHD) and after (AHD) HD, using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the standard method. Design This single-center cross-sectional trial involved comparing the FM of 60 HD patients estimated BHD and AHD by BIA (multifrequential; 29 women, 31 men) and by SKF with those estimated by the reference method, ADP. Body fat-free mass (FFM) was also obtained by subtracting the total body fat from the individual total weight. Results Mean estimated FM (kg [%]) observed by ADP BHD was 17.95 ± 0.99 kg (30.11% ± 1.30%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 16.00 to 19.90 (27.56 to 32.66); mean estimated FM observed AHD was 17.92 ± 1.11 kg (30.04% ± 1.40%), with a 95% CI of 15.74 to 20.10 (27.28 to 32.79). Neither study period showed a difference in FM and FFM (for both kg and %) estimates by the SKF method when compared with ADP; however, the BIA underestimated the FM and overestimated the FFM (for both kg and %) when compared with ADP. Conclusion The SKF, but not the BIA, method showed results similar to ADP and can be considered adequate for FM evaluation in HD patients.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Plethysmography - methods</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><issn>1051-2276</issn><issn>1532-8503</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwA7ggH7kktSdxvBES0rZQWqkIxJaz5bUn4Gxib-0Eaf89jnbhwAFf7JHfe9J8j5DXnJWcieqyL_voS2AcSsZLBvUTcs5FBcVKsOppfjPBCwDZnJEXKfWMcS5W8JycAdRN3YI8J49XLuCAZorO6IHejXu02huka6-HQ3KJam_pZud8FwZLH346s_OYEt3MI3WerlPKk_M_6FWwB3qjJ_pZ5-_Q0W-YI-gHd8r5qieHfkovybNODwlfne4L8v3m48P1bXH_5dPd9fq-MDVbTQVu8-HttjZGcBBNYzomJWugarVpjeW2kZ3YCi54rTVw09ai60RlBGiL0lYX5O0xdx_D44xpUqNLBodBewxzUpwBQMNWILOUH6UmhpQidmof3ajjIYvUQlr1KpNWC2nFuMqks-fNKX7ejmj_Ov6gzYJ3RwHmJX85jCqZDMCgdTHzVja4_8a__8dtBueXjnZ4wNSHOWa6eQuVskdtlqqXpjkwxmopq9_Mw6Pq</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD</creator><creator>Sala, Priscila Campos, RD</creator><creator>Horie, Lilian Mika, MD</creator><creator>Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD</creator><creator>Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD</creator><creator>Romão, João Egídio, MD</creator><creator>Cecconello, Ivan, PhD</creator><creator>Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients</title><author>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD ; Sala, Priscila Campos, RD ; Horie, Lilian Mika, MD ; Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD ; Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD ; Romão, João Egídio, MD ; Cecconello, Ivan, PhD ; Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ebbbb19b4cc512566cf07706239ac9cd1d67f5b51514aa21c945ff53c52ade7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Plethysmography - methods</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala, Priscila Campos, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horie, Lilian Mika, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romão, João Egídio, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecconello, Ivan, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of renal nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodrigues, Natália Cristina Lima, RD</au><au>Sala, Priscila Campos, RD</au><au>Horie, Lilian Mika, MD</au><au>Dias, Maria Carolina Gonçalves, MD</au><au>Torrinhas, Raquel Susana Matos de Miranda, MD</au><au>Romão, João Egídio, MD</au><au>Cecconello, Ivan, PhD</au><au>Waitzberg, Dan Linetzky, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of renal nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Ren Nutr</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>415.e2</epage><pages>409-415.e2</pages><issn>1051-2276</issn><eissn>1532-8503</eissn><abstract>Objective In chronic renal failure patients under hemodialysis (HD) treatment, the availability of simple, safe, and effective tools to assess body composition enables evaluation of body composition accurately, in spite of changes in body fluids that occur in dialysis therapy, thus contributing to planning and monitoring of nutritional treatment. We evaluated the performance of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the skinfold thickness sum (SKF) to assess fat mass (FM) in chronic renal failure patients before (BHD) and after (AHD) HD, using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) as the standard method. Design This single-center cross-sectional trial involved comparing the FM of 60 HD patients estimated BHD and AHD by BIA (multifrequential; 29 women, 31 men) and by SKF with those estimated by the reference method, ADP. Body fat-free mass (FFM) was also obtained by subtracting the total body fat from the individual total weight. Results Mean estimated FM (kg [%]) observed by ADP BHD was 17.95 ± 0.99 kg (30.11% ± 1.30%), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 16.00 to 19.90 (27.56 to 32.66); mean estimated FM observed AHD was 17.92 ± 1.11 kg (30.04% ± 1.40%), with a 95% CI of 15.74 to 20.10 (27.28 to 32.79). Neither study period showed a difference in FM and FFM (for both kg and %) estimates by the SKF method when compared with ADP; however, the BIA underestimated the FM and overestimated the FFM (for both kg and %) when compared with ADP. Conclusion The SKF, but not the BIA, method showed results similar to ADP and can be considered adequate for FM evaluation in HD patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22464927</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jrn.2012.01.024</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-2276
ispartof Journal of renal nutrition, 2012-07, Vol.22 (4), p.409-415.e2
issn 1051-2276
1532-8503
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1022260827
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adipose Tissue - metabolism
Adult
Body Composition
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electric Impedance
Female
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrology
Plethysmography - methods
Renal Dialysis
Skinfold Thickness
title Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Skinfold Thickness Sum in Assessing Body Fat Mass of Renal Dialysis Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A28%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioelectrical%20Impedance%20Analysis%20and%20Skinfold%20Thickness%20Sum%20in%20Assessing%20Body%20Fat%20Mass%20of%20Renal%20Dialysis%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20renal%20nutrition&rft.au=Rodrigues,%20Nat%C3%A1lia%20Cristina%20Lima,%20RD&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=415.e2&rft.pages=409-415.e2&rft.issn=1051-2276&rft.eissn=1532-8503&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jrn.2012.01.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1022260827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022260827&rft_id=info:pmid/22464927&rft_els_id=S1051227612000477&rfr_iscdi=true